Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho; Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Idaho

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

[Federal Register: January 16, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 11)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2217-2227]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16ja03-17]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[ID-02-002; FRL-7422-3]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho;
Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Idaho

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve numerous revisions to
the State of Idaho Implementation Plan submitted to EPA by the Director
of the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) on May 17,
1994, May 11, 1995, November 21, 1996, February 28, 1997, December 18,
1997, April 9, 1998, May 5, 1999, December 5, 2000, and May 30, 2002.
The revisions were submitted in accordance with the requirements of
section 110 and part D of the Clean Air Act (hereinafter the Act). EPA
is taking no action in this rulemaking on a number of submitted rule
provisions which are unrelated to the purposes of the implementation
plan, including the Idaho provisions for implementing the title V
operating permit program.
EPA is also taking final action to revoke the total suspended
particulates (TSP) area designations for Idaho and to adjust the PM-10
area designations to conform to the requirements of EPA's prevention of
significant deterioration (PSD) regulations.

DATES: Effective February 18, 2003.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the State's request and other supporting
information used in developing this action are available for inspection
during normal business hours at the following locations: EPA, Office of
Air Quality (OAQ-107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101,
and State of Idaho, Department of Environmental Quality, 1410 North
Hilton, Boise, Idaho 83706-1255. Interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an appointment with the appropriate office
at least 24 hours before the visiting day. A reasonable fee may be
charged for copies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David C. Bray, Senior Air Pollution
Scientist, EPA, Office of Air Quality (OAQ-107), Seattle, Washington
98101, (206) 553-4253.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

On November 15, 1990, Congress amended the Clean Air Act to
require, among other things, revisions to State implementation plans
(SIPs) to attain and maintain the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) in areas which violate those standards (nonattainment
areas), including revisions to title I, part D new source review (NSR).
IDEQ amended its part D NSR rules on April 8, 1994, and submitted them
to EPA on May 17, 1994, as a revision to the Idaho SIP.
Idaho also revised provisions of its SIP to facilitate and improve
the relationship between the Idaho SIP and its regulations implementing
the

[[Page 2218]]

operating permit program under title V of the Act. In addition, since
EPA last approved the Idaho SIP in 1993, Idaho has revised nearly every
section of its air quality rules to some degree. Many of these
amendments have been editorial and are renumberings, changes to
citations for cross-referenced rules or statutes, changes in
terminology, or grammatical corrections. Finally, during the 2000
legislative session, the Idaho Division of Environmental Quality became
a separate department rather than a division of the Idaho Department of
Health and Welfare, which remained a separate department. See Idaho
Code sections 39-102A and 39-104. At the same time, IDEQ was given the
SIP authorities previously held by the Department of Health and
Welfare. See Idaho Code sections 39-108 to 39-118D. As a result, Idaho
has renumbered and recodified all of its air quality regulations in a
new IDAPA Chapter 58. IDEQ submitted these various revisions to its
rules for air pollution sources to EPA on May 17, 1994, May 11, 1995,
November 21, 1996, February 28, 1997, December 18, 1997, April 9, 1998,
May 5, 1999, December 5, 2000, and May 30, 2002, as revisions to the
Idaho SIP.
On August 13, 2002, EPA solicited public comment on a proposal to
approve all of the revisions submitted by IDEQ, except identified
provisions on which EPA proposed to take no action.\1\ EPA also
requested public comment on its proposal to delete the TSP area
designations for Idaho in 40 CFR 81.313 and to adjust the PM-10 area
designations in 40 CFR 81.313. See 67 FR 52666 (August 13, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ Included in the docket for the proposal and this final
action is a table showing all of the provisions of IDAPA chapter 16,
now codified at IDAPA chapter 58; the type of change made to the
provisions (e.g., new section, amended, editorial change, unchanged,
relocated, deleted); the provisions that were not submitted by IDEQ
as part of a SIP revision; and those provisions that were submitted
as part of a SIP revision but on which EPA is taking no action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Response to Comments

EPA received two comment letters in response to the proposal, one
which was submitted by IDEQ. IDEQ expressed support for EPA's proposed
action, but did identify some concerns. The other commenter, J.R.
Simplot Company (Simplot), raised a concern with the provisions in the
Idaho SIP for the control of sulfur oxides in the Eastern Idaho
Interstate Air Quality Control Region. The following is a summary of
the issues raised by the commenters, along with EPA's response to those
issues.
Comment 1: IDEQ commented that, in the notice acknowledging
consistency with the Clean Air Act, EPA proposed to conditionally
approve IDAPA 58.01.01.213. The proposed condition was that IDEQ submit
within 5 days of issuance all written approvals, draft permits, and
final permits. IDEQ noted that draft and final permits are at this time
submitted by IDEQ to EPA and that IDEQ will submit to EPA on issuance
copies of any pre-permit construction approval letters issued under
IDAPA 58.01.01.213. IDEQ further asserted that a conditional approval
is inappropriate from an administrative and legal standpoint.
Response 1: IDEQ is mistaken as to the type of action EPA proposed.
EPA did not propose conditional approval under section 110(k)(4) of the
Act, which could result in the SIP approval converting to a disapproval
if the conditions are not met. Rather, EPA proposed approval of IDAPA
58.01.01.213 under section 110(k)(3) of the Act, based on the
understanding that Idaho will provide EPA with copies of approvals
issued under that provision, as they do in the case of all new source
review permits, so that EPA can carry out its obligations to oversee
SIP implementation, provide the public with copies of the SIP
requirements for any source when requested, and enforce the SIP
requirements if a source begins actual construction without having
received the necessary approval from IDEQ.
Comment 2: IDEQ commented that IDAPA 58.01.01.220.01.a.iii requires
sources that are not specifically listed as categorically exempt under
IDAPA 58.01.01.222.02 to demonstrate, with modeling, that the source
will not cause or contribute to a violation of an ambient air quality
standard. According to IDEQ, the modeling requirement was included in
the Idaho rules as a means to ensure that sources that are not
specifically identified as categorically exempt but are exempted based
on emission levels do not cause or significantly contribute to a
violation of an ambient air quality standard. As such, Idaho continued,
the requirement is a necessary part of Idaho's program to ``assure that
national ambient air quality standards are achieved'' as required by
section 110(a)(2)(C) and (D) of the CAA. Therefore, IDEQ asserted, this
provision is appropriately included as part of Idaho's SIP, and EPA
should approve the provision into the SIP so that it may be enforced by
EPA or by citizens in Federal court.
Response 2: EPA's approval of the list of categorically exempt
sources and the ``below regulatory concern'' levels in sections IDAPA
58.01.01.221, -222.01, and -222.02 is based on EPA's determination that
the emission levels and source categories in those sections are
appropriately exempted from minor new source review. The requirement in
IDAPA 58.01.01.220.01.a.iii that a source conduct modeling to show that
its uncontrolled potential to emit will not cause or contribute to a
NAAQS violation is a determination that is initially made by the source
and is not submitted to IDEQ unless specifically requested. Because
this modeling requirement is part of Idaho's requirements for the
exemption of certain sources from minor new source review, EPA is
approving it as an enforceable requirement of the Idaho SIP, but EPA
did not base its approval of the minor new source review exemption
provisions on this modeling requirement.
Comment 3: IDEQ disagreed with EPA's proposal not to approve IDAPA
58.01.01.222.03 based on EPA's determination that it conflicts with
section 110(a)(2)(c) of the CAA and 40 CFR 51.160, which require that
the SIP identify types and sizes of sources subject to review and
enforcement. IDEQ stated that there are safeguards in the Idaho
``director's discretion'' exemption, in that the source's potential to
emit cannot equal or exceed 100 tons per year of any regulated air
pollutant, the emissions increase cannot constitute a major
modification, and IDEQ must review and approve the ambient modeling to
ensure the source's proposed emissions would not cause or significantly
contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard. IDEQ
pointed out that EPA acknowledges in the proposal that EPA regulations
do not require the issuance of a permit for the construction or
modification of minor sources, but only that the SIP include a
procedure to prevent the construction of a source or modification that
would violate the SIP control strategy or interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS. IDEQ concludes that the section 222.03
exemption should be approved because it does not violate any control
strategy nor interfere with attainment of the NAAQS.
Response 3: As discussed in the proposal, IDAPA 58.01.01.222.03
authorizes IDEQ, without going through rulemaking or a SIP revision, to
add individual sources to the list of sources that are exempt from
minor NSR as categorically insignificant. See 67 FR at 52670. Although
IDEQ states that there are safeguards on this exemption, IDEQ's
determination that the source will not cause or contribute to a
violation of an ambient air quality standard is at no point in the
process

[[Page 2219]]

subject to public and EPA review. This is in marked contrast to the
other types of sources that are exempt from minor NSR in Idaho, for
which the public and EPA have had an opportunity to review and comment
on the emission levels and source categories that set the boundaries
for the minor NSR exemptions.
It is true that EPA regulations do not require the issuance of a
permit for the construction or modification of minor sources provided
the SIP includes a procedure to prevent the construction of a source or
modification that would violate the SIP control strategy or interfere
with attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS. EPA statutes and
regulations do require, however, that SIP revisions be subject to
public comment and EPA approval, CAA 110(l) and 40 CFR 51.104, and also
that the public have an opportunity to review and comment on a State's
proposed approval of a new source or modification, 40 CFR 51.161(a). At
no point in the process is IDEQ's decision that a particular source
does not need approval or a permit to construct because it should be
exempt under IDAPA 58.01.01.222.03 subject to EPA or public review.
Moreover, EPA regulations require that a State's new source review
regulations specifically identify the types and sizes of sources
subject to review. See 40 CFR 51.160(e). The Idaho rules do not meet
this requirement because sources that are initially required by the
rules to get a permit can subsequently be exempted from that
requirement by the Director of IDEQ without EPA or public notice or
approval.
In short, IDAPA 58.01.01.222.03 in effect authorizes IDEQ to revise
the SIP without a SIP revision that is subject to public or EPA review.
Sections 110(i) and (l) of the CAA specifically preclude States from
changing the requirements of the SIP except through SIP revisions
adopted by the State after reasonable notice and public hearing and
approved by EPA. This ``director's discretion'' provision of IDAPA
58.01.01.222.03 is inconsistent with those requirements, as well as the
requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(C), 40 CFR 51.104, 40 CFR 51.160,
and 40 CFR 51.161. Therefore, EPA is taking no action on this
provision. As noted in the proposal, if IDEQ determines to exempt a
source from new source review under the authority of IDAPA
58.01.01.222.03, the source is not exempt from new source review as a
matter of Federal law unless and until the exemption has been approved
by EPA as a source-specific SIP revision. See 67 FR 52670.
Comment 4: IDEQ commented on EPA's proposal not to act on IDAPA
58.01.01.401.04, which authorizes IDEQ to issue a Tier II operating
permit with a future compliance date and requires EPA approval prior to
issuance of such a permit. Idaho agrees that operating permits
sanctioning a requirement that conflicts with the SIP may require a SIP
revision. IDEQ asserts, however, that just as IDEQ enters into consent
orders and settlement agreements with compliance schedules, IDEQ issues
Tier II operating permits containing compliance schedules. IDEQ notes
that compliance orders in Tier II permits use language similar to that
in Tier II (title V) operating permits, that is, that the terms and
conditions of the compliance schedule are supplemental to, and do not
sanction noncompliance with, the underlying applicable requirement. For
this reason, IDEQ asserts, EPA should approve IDAPA 58.01.01.401.04 as
part of the SIP.
Response 4: By its terms, a compliance schedule issued under the
authority of IDAPA 58.01.01.401.04. allows a source a future compliance
date of up to three years beyond the compliance date of any provisions
in IDAPA chapter 58. In other words, a compliance schedule issued under
the authority of this provision is intended to delay the time for
required compliance, in essence, to change the requirement for the
source.\2\ As such, it is a SIP revision that must be approved by EPA.
This is in contrast to the kinds of compliance schedules issued under
IDEQ's Tier I (title V) operating permit program or under other
authority of State law, under which the compliance schedule sets forth
a series of milestones for bringing a source into compliance with an
applicable requirement. As noted by IDEQ, a compliance schedule issued
in a Tier I (title V) operating permit does not sanction noncompliance
with the underlying applicable requirement and does not extend the
compliance date for the source. In contrast, a compliance schedule
issued under the authority of IDAPA 58.01.01.401.04 by its terms
extends the applicable compliance date for the source. In any event,
because Idaho regulations provide that compliance schedules issued
under the authority of IDAPA 58.01.01.401.04 must be approved by EPA,
it is not necessary to include this provision as part of the SIP.
Moreover, its inclusion in the SIP could cause confusion. Therefore,
EPA is taking no action on this provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\2\ Such a mechanism would perhaps be better characterized as a
compliance extension.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

It may be that IDEQ has authority elsewhere in its Tier II permit
program or under other provisions of Idaho law to issue a compliance
schedule as part of a Tier II permit that sets forth a series of
milestones for bringing a source into compliance with certain
requirements, but that does not delay the compliance date, as does a
compliance schedule issued under the authority of IDAPA
58.01.01.401.04. EPA's decision to take no action on IDAPA
58.01.01.401.04 has no bearing on IDEQ's authority to issue other types
of compliance schedules. EPA recommends, however, that IDEQ carefully
identify in any Tier II permit that contains a compliance schedule the
regulatory provision under which such a compliance schedule is issued
so that the procedure for issuing such a compliance schedule and the
legal effect of such a compliance schedule is readily apparent.
Comment 5: IDEQ commented that EPA improperly places the burden on
Idaho to establish that it has jurisdiction within Indian country with
respect to regulation of persons who are not members of the tribe. IDEQ
asserts that, under settled Indian law principles, Idaho presumptively
has jurisdiction over persons that reside on Indian Reservations in
Idaho who are not members of Tribes, citing to County of Yakima v.
Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakima Nation, 502 U.S. 251, 257-58
(1992). Equally important, according to IDEQ, the CAA itself preserves
State law from preemption in section 116 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7416,
with respect to air emission standards except in specified situations,
and nothing in the statute itself expressly precludes the exercise of
such authority in Indian country. IDEQ asserts that EPA therefore
should expressly provide in the final rule that nothing in its approval
is intended to preclude the exercise of State regulatory authority
within Idaho Indian country independent of the CAA to the extent
consistent with applicable Indian law principles.
Response 5: EPA reads this comment as a request that EPA clarify
the status of State law as it applies within Indian reservations or
other parts of Indian country.\3\ EPA's proposed and final

[[Page 2220]]

action are under the authority of the Federal Clean Air Act to approve
revisions to the SIP so that those SIP provisions will be Federally
enforceable under the CAA. Before EPA can approve a SIP or SIP revision
as applying to a source, the State must demonstrate that it has
adequate legal authority to implement and enforce the SIP under the
Clean Air Act. See CAA sections 110(a)(2)(A), 110(a)(2)(E)(i) and
172(c)(6) of the Act. It is EPA's position that unless EPA has
explicitly approved a program as applying in Indian country, State or
local regulations are not effective within the boundaries of that
Indian country land for purposes of complying with the CAA. See Federal
Operating Permits Program Final Rule, 64 FR 8247, 8254 (February 19,
1999). EPA does not believe it would be appropriate for EPA to approve
State CAA programs as applying in Indian country where there has not
been an explicit demonstration of adequate jurisdiction. 64 FR 8253.
Moreover, EPA interprets the Clean Air Act as favoring a territorial
approach for implementing the CAA throughout Indian reservations either
under tribal authority as delegated by Congress or by EPA
implementation. 64 FR 8252. EPA believes it has the authority under the
CAA to regulate all reservation sources in order to ensure an efficient
and effective transition to Tribal administration of CAA programs and
to avoid the administratively undesirable checkerboarding of
reservations based on land ownership. Id. EPA notes that nowhere in the
State's SIP submittal did IDEQ attempt to demonstrate that it has the
authority to implement and enforce its State laws under the authority
of the Clean Air Act in Indian country in Idaho, and EPA has not
evaluated these State law authorities outside of the context of the
CAA. EPA's proposed approval and this final action do not take a
position on whether State laws regulating air resources have effect in
Indian country outside of the context of the Clean Air Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ ``Indian country'' is defined under 18 U.S.C 1151 as: ``(1)
All land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the
jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the
issuance of any patent, and including rights-of-way running through
the reservation, (2) all dependent Indian communities within the
borders of the United States, whether within the original or
subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or
without the limits of a State, and (3) all Indian allotments, the
Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-
of-way running through the same.'' Under this definition, EPA treats
as reservation lands trust lands that have not been formally
designated as a reservation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment 6: IDEQ commented that disagreement exists over the
continued existence of the Nez Perce Reservation as described in
Article 2 of the 1863 Treaty with the Nez Perces, 14 Stat. 647 (1863).
IDEQ believes that a cession agreement between the United States and
the Tribe ratified by Congress in 1894, 28 Stat. 326 (1894), has
diminished the Reservation's land base substantially and that the
Reservation now encompasses only those lands retained presently in
trust pursuant to the terms of the cession agreement, citing to United
States v. Webb, 219 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S.
1200 (2001). IDEQ asserted that EPA and IDEQ acknowledged this
controversy in a December 2000 memorandum of understanding (MOU)
concerning implementation of title V of the CAA. In view of the
decision in Michigan v. EPA, 268 F.3d 1075 (D.C. Cir. 2001), IDEQ
continued, EPA should make clear its rationale for excluding the
entirety of the 1863 Reservation from the scope of the proposed action.
Response 6: As discussed above, unless EPA has explicitly approved
a program as applying in Indian country, it is EPA's position that
State or local regulation is not effective within the boundaries of
that Indian country land for purposes of complying with the CAA. EPA is
excluding from this SIP approval the Nez Perce Reservation, as
described in the 1863 Nez Perce Treaty, because the Federal government
has long maintained that the Nez Perce Reservation, as described in
that treaty, constitutes Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.
Michigan v. EPA, 268 F.3d 1075 (D.C. Cir. 2001) does not apply to
this SIP action. That case dealt with the issue of whether EPA has
authority to require a facility to apply to EPA for a Federal operating
permit under title V of the Clean Air Act in cases where EPA had not
determined whether the facility was in Indian country. This SIP
approval is an action under title I of the CAA. Moreover, EPA's
position, and that of the United States, is that the exterior boundary
of the Nez Perce Reservation that exists today is described in the 1863
Nez Perce Treaty \4\ and that the Nez Perce Reservation, as so
described, is Indian country. In its comment, the State cites U.S. v.
Webb, Case No. CR98-80-N-EJL (9th Cir., Jan. 12, 1999), as showing
there is a controversy about the Reservation boundaries. However, the
United States' position in that case, as well as other cases raising
the issue, was that the Nez Perce Reservation is still as described in
the 1863 Treaty. Michigan v. EPA is therefore not relevant to the
issues in this SIP approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ IDEQ recognized EPA's position in the MOU referenced in
IDEQ's comment. The sixth ``Whereas'' clause of memorandum states:
``Whereas, the United States position, both in judicial proceedings
and in administrative, civil and criminal contexts is that the
present boundaries of the Nez Perce Reservation are as described in
the 1863 Nez Perce Treaty.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

EPA remains fully committed to the spirit and intent of the
December 2000 MOU referenced in the IDEQ comment. The purpose of the
MOU, however, was to address the implementation of the operating
permits program under title V of the CAA on the Nez Perce Reservation
and it does not address the issue of whether IDEQ has established that
it has authority under the Clean Air Act to implement and enforce its
State regulations approved under title I of the Act against sources
located within the boundaries of the Nez Perce Reservation as
established by the 1863 Nez Perce Treaty. Moreover, nothing in the MOU
constituted an admission by the United States that the Nez Perce
Reservation has been diminished or is otherwise in question.
Comment 7: Simplot requested reconsideration of EPA's position that
EPA approval of Idaho's ``Rules for Control of Sulfur Oxide from
Sulfuric Acid Plants'' does not alter previous EPA disapproval of the
Idaho SIP regarding the Eastern Idaho Intrastate Air Quality Control
Strategy, nor the source-specific Federal regulations at 40 CFR 52.675.
According to Simplot, EPA's position does not recognize relevant and
significant history related to the Eastern Idaho Intrastate Air Quality
Control Strategy, which has been in attainment for 20 years.
Accordingly, Simplot requested that portions of the Federal regulations
imposed upon Simplot to adequately prevent violations of the NAAQS for
SO₂, which Simplot contends are obsolete, be revisited and
deleted from this portion of the Idaho control strategy.
Response 7: This comment does not address aspects of the SIP
request submitted by the State of Idaho and on which EPA proposed to
take action. Thus, EPA views this comment as a request to conduct
rulemaking to revise the existing Federal implementation plan as it
pertains to Simplot.
As EPA has previously notified IDEQ and Simplot, EPA does not have
the authority to repeal these FIP requirements in the absence of other
Federally-enforceable limits on SO₂ emissions from the
Simplot sulfuric acid plants approved as part of a SIP or promulgated
as part of other Federal requirements and a demonstration that these
limits do not interfere with attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS for
SO₂, violate any prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD) increment, or result in visibility impairment. To date, EPA has
not received from IDEQ or Simplot a demonstration that the Federally-
enforceable limits in place at the

[[Page 2221]]

Simplot facility are sufficient to protect the SO₂ NAAQS,
PSD increments, and visibility in the absence of the requirements
Simplot requests be removed. Therefore, as noted in the proposal, EPA's
action on this SIP does not modify EPA's previous disapproval of the
Idaho SIP with respect to its adequacy to attain and maintain the NAAQS
for sulfur dioxide in the Eastern Idaho Intrastate Air Quality Control
Region. See 40 CFR 52.675(a)(1) and (2). Thus, the source-specific
Federal regulations at 40 CFR 52.675(b) that EPA promulgated in
response to that disapproval remain in place. See 67 FR 52672.

III. Final Action

EPA is taking final action to approve all of the amendments to the
Rules for the Control of Air Pollution in Idaho as submitted by the
Director of IDEQ on May 17, 1994, May 11, 1995, November 21, 1996,
February 28, 1997, December 18, 1997, April 9, 1998, May 5, 1999,
December 5, 2000, and May 30, 2002, except that EPA is taking no action
on section 008; subsections 107.03.h. through q\5\; section 222.03;
sections 300 through 387; subsection 401.01.a. and section 401.04;
sections 440 and 441; sections 525 through 538; section 577.06; section
586; sections 750 and 751; sections 775 and 776; section 818; section
819; section 820; section 824.01; and sections 835 through 839.\6\ EPA
approved section 204 on April 17, 2001 (66 FR 19722) and sections 563
through 574 and section 582 on April 12, 2001 (66 FR 18873). The entire
text of the EPA-approved Idaho rules may be viewed on line at
http://www.epa.gov/r10earth/sips.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\5\ In the notice of proposed rulemaking, EPA incorrectly cited
subsections 107.03.v. through aa.
\6\ Sections 009, 010, 140 through 149, 161, 203.03, 210, 585,
587, 590, 591, and 855 through 858 were not submitted for inclusion
in the Idaho SIP. In addition, section 710 Particulate Matter--
Process Equipment Emission Limitations on or After July 1, 2000, and
amendments to section 209 Procedures for Issuing Permits and section
700 Particulate Matter--Process Weight Limitations which were
submitted to EPA on March 9, 2001, were returned to the State as
incomplete, so they are not before EPA to act on at this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

EPA is also deleting the total suspended particulates area
designations for Idaho in 40 CFR 81.313 and adjusting the PM-10 area
designations in 40 CFR 81.313.
Consistent with EPA's proposal, this SIP approval does not extend
to Indian country in Idaho. See 67 FR 52673.
Note that, with respect to Idaho's rules relating to new source
review, EPA has determined that Idaho's rules meet the requirements of
40 CFR part 51, subpart I, as currently in effect, and is taking no
position on whether Idaho will need to make changes to its new source
review rules to meet requirements that EPA has promulgated, but are not
yet effective, as part of new source review reform.
Finally, while EPA is approving the Idaho permit to construct
rules, EPA recognizes that it has a responsibility to insure that all
States properly implement their preconstruction permitting programs.
EPA's approval of the Idaho permit to construct rules does not divest
EPA of the duty to continue appropriate oversight to insure that
permits issued by Idaho are consistent with the requirements of the
Act, EPA regulations, and the SIP. EPA's authority to oversee permit
program implementation is set forth in sections 113, 167, and 505(b) of
the Act. For example, section 167 provides that EPA shall issue
administrative orders, initiate civil actions, or take whatever other
enforcement action may be necessary to prevent construction of a major
stationary source that does not ``conform to the requirements of'' the
PSD program. Similarly, section 113(a)(5) of the CAA provides for
administrative orders and civil actions whenever EPA finds that a State
``is not acting in compliance with'' any requirement or prohibition of
the Act regarding construction of new or modified sources. Likewise,
section 113(a)(1) provides for a range of enforcement remedies whenever
EPA finds that a person is in violation of an applicable implementation
plan.
Enactment of title V of the Act and the EPA objection opportunity
provided therein has added new tools for addressing deficient new
source review decisions by States. Section 505(b) requires EPA to
object to the issuance of a permit issued pursuant to title V whenever
the Administrator finds during the applicable review period, either on
her own initiative or in response to a citizen petition, that the
permit is ``not in compliance with the requirements of an applicable
requirement of this Act, including the requirements of an applicable
implementation plan.''
Regardless of whether EPA addresses deficient permits using
objection authorities or enforcement authorities or both, EPA cannot
intervene unless the State decision fails to comply with applicable
requirements. In determining whether a title V permit incorporating PSD
provisions calls for EPA objection under section 505(b) or use of
enforcement authorities under sections 113 and 167, EPA will consider
whether the applicable substantive and procedural requirements for
public review and development of supporting documentation were
followed. In particular, EPA will review the process followed by the
permitting authority in determining best available control technology,
assessing air quality impacts, meeting Class I area requirements, and
other PSD requirements, to ensure that the required SIP procedures
(including public participation and Federal Land Manager consultation
opportunities) were met. EPA will also review whether any determination
by the permitting authority was made on reasonable grounds properly
supported on the record, described in enforceable terms, and consistent
with all applicable requirements. Finally, EPA will review whether the
terms of the PSD permit were properly incorporated into the title V
operating permit.

IV. Regulatory Assessment Requirements

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under State law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the

[[Page 2222]]

distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This action merely approves a State rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 17, 2003. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

40 CFR Part 81

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wilderness areas.

Dated: December 4, 2002.
Ronald A. Kreizenbeck,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.

Part 52, subpart N, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart N--Idaho

2. Section 52.670 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(37) to read as
follows:

Sec. 52.670 Identification of plan.

* * * * *
(c) * * *
(37) On May 17, 1994, May 11, 1995, November 21, 1996, February 28,
1997, December 18, 1997, April 9, 1998, May 5, 1999, December 5, 2000,
and May 30, 2002, the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality
submitted amendments to State of Idaho Rules for Control of Air
Pollution in Idaho (IDAPA 58.01.01) as revisions to the Idaho State
implementation plan.
(i) Incorporation by Reference.
(A) IDAPA 58.01.01 as in effect on March 30, 2001 except for the
following provisions: section 000; section 002; section 003; section
008; section 009; section 010; subsections 107.03; section 128;
sections 140 through 149; section 161; subsection 203.03; section 209;
section 210; section 214; subsection 222.03; section 223; sections 300
through 387; subsection 401.01.a. and 401.04; sections 440 and 441;
sections 525 through 538; sections 552, 553, 556, 558, and 561;
subsection 577.06; sections 585, 586, 587, 590 and 591; section 700;
section 710; sections 750 and 751; sections 775 and 776; section 818;
section 819; section 820; subsection 824.01; sections 835 through 839;
and sections 855 through 862.
(B) IDAPA 58.01.01 sections 209 and 700 as in effect on April 5,
2000.
(C) IDAPA 58.01.01 sections 552, 553, 556, 558, and 561 as in
effect on March 15, 2002.

Sec. 52.674 [Removed and Reserved]

3. Section 52.674 Legal Authority is removed and reserved.

4. Section 52.679 is revised to read as follows:

Sec. 52.679 Contents of Idaho State Implementation Plan.

Implementation Plan for the Control of Air Pollution in the State of
Idaho

Chapter I--Introduction (submitted 1-15-80)
Chapter II--Administration (submitted 1-15-80)
Chapter III--Emission Inventory (submitted 1-15-80)
Chapter IV--Air Quality Monitoring (submitted 1-15-80, and 2-14-80)
Chapter V--Source Surveillance (submitted 1-15-80)
Chapter VI--Emergency Episode Plan (submitted 1-15-80)
Chapter VIII--Nonattainment Area Plans
VIII-a--Silver Valley TSP Nonattainment Area Plan (submitted 1-
15-80): EPA effective 7-28-82.
VIII-b--Lewiston TSP Nonattainment Plan (submitted 1-15-80, 12-
4-80, and 2-5-81): EPA effective 7-28-82.
VIII-c--Transportation Control Plan for carbon monoxide, Ada
County (submitted 5-24-84, 1-3-85, 3-25-85, and 6-29-94): EPA
effective 7-28-82, 8-5-85, and 1-30-95.
VIII-d--Pocatello TSP Nonattainment Plan (submitted 3-7-80, and
2-5-81): EPA effective 7-28-82.
VIII-e--Soda Springs TSP Nonattainment Plan (submitted 1-15-80):
EPA effective 7-28-82.
VIII-f--Pinehurst PM-10 Nonattainment Plan (4-14-92): EPA
effective 10-24-94.
VIII-g--North Ada County PM10 Nonattainment Area Plan (submitted
11-14-91, 12-30-94, and 7-13-95): EPA effective 7-29-96.
VIII-h--Fort Hall PM-10 Nonattainment Area Plan (FIP): EPA
effective 9-22-00.
VIII-i--Sandpoint PM10 Nonattainment Area Plan (submitted 8-16-
96): EPA effective 8-26-02.
VIII-j--North Ada County CO Limited Maintenance Plan (submitted
1-17-02): EPA effective 11-27-02.
Chapter IX--Reserved
Chapter X--Plan for Maintenance of National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Lead (submitted 2-3-84): EPA effective 6-4-84.
Small Business Assistance Program (submitted 1-3-94): EPA effective
11-18-94.

[[Page 2223]]

Appendix A Legal Authority and other General Administrative Matters
(submitted 1-15-80)
Appendix A.2 Idaho Environmental Protection and Health Act, Idaho
Code Section 39-101 et seq. (submitted 3-15-01)
Appendix A.3 Idaho Administrative Procedures Act (IDAPA) Chapter 58,
Rules for the Control of Air Pollution in Idaho, previously codified
at IDAPA Chapter 39 (submitted 5-17-94, 5-11-95, 11-21-96, 2-28-97,
12-18-97, 4-9-98, 5-5-99, 12-5-00, and 5-30-02)

EPA-approved rules which are incorporated by reference are listed
in the table below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Citation Title effective
date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IDAPA 58--Department of Environmental Quality
------------------------------------------------------------------------
58.01.01--Rules for the Control of Air Pollution in Idaho
------------------------------------------------------------------------
001. Title and Scope........................... 5/1/94
004. Catchlines................................ 5/1/94
005. Definitions............................... 5/1/94
006. General Definitions....................... 4/5/00
3/20/97
5/1/95
5/1/94
007. Definitions for the Purposes of Sections 4/5/00
200 Through 225 and 400 Through 461. 6/30/95
5/1/95
5/1/94
106. Abbreviations............................. 5/1/94
107. Incorporations by Reference (Except 7/1/97
subsection 03.). 5/1/94
121. Compliance Requirements by Department..... 5/1/94
122. Information Orders by the Department...... 4/5/00
5/1/94
123. Certification of Documents................ 5/1/94
124. Truth, Accuracy and Completeness of 5/1/94
Documents.
125. False Statements.......................... 3/23/98
126. Tampering................................. 3/23/98
127. Format of Responses....................... 5/1/94
130. Startup, Shutdown, Scheduled Maintenance, 4/5/00
Safety Measures, Upset and Breakdown.
131. Excess Emissions.......................... 4/5/00
132. Correction of Condition................... 4/5/00
133. Startup, Shutdown and Scheduled 4/5/00
Maintenance Requirements. 3/20/97
134. Upset, Breakdown, and Safety Requirements. 4/5/00
3/20/97
135. Excess Emission Reports................... 4/5/00
3/20/97
136. Excess Emission Records................... 4/5/00
3/23/98
3/20/97
155. Circumvention............................. 4/5/00
156. Total Compliance.......................... 5/1/94
157. Test Methods and Procedures............... 4/5/00
160. Provisions Governing Specific Activities 4/5/00
and Conditions.
162. Modifying Physical Conditions............. 5/1/94
163. Source Density............................ 5/1/94
164. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs).......... 5/1/94
200. Procedures and Requirements for Permits to 4/5/00
Construct.
201. Permit to Construct Required.............. 3/30/01
202. Application Procedures.................... 4/5/00
5/1/94
203. Permit Requirements for New and Modified 5/1/94
Stationary Sources (Except subsection
203.03).
204. Permit Requirements for New Major 3/30/01
Facilities or Major Modifications in 4/5/00
Nonattainment Areas. 5/1/94
205. Permit Requirements for New Major 4/5/00
Facilities or Major Modifications in 5/1/94
Attainment or Unclassifiable Areas.
206. Optional Offsets for Permits to Construct. 6/30/95
207. Requirements for Emission Reduction Credit 5/1/94
208. Demonstration of Net Air Quality Benefit.. 4/5/00
5/1/94
209. Procedures for Issuing Permits............ 4/5/00
3/19/99
3/23/98
5/1/94
211. Conditions for Permits to Construct....... 5/1/94
212. Obligation to Comply...................... 5/1/94

[[Page 2224]]

213. Pre-permit Construction................... 4/5/00
3/23/98
220. General Exemption Criteria for Permit to 4/5/00
Construct Exemptions.
221. Category I Exemption...................... 4/5/00
222. Category II Exemption (Except subsection 4/5/00
222.03.). 7/1/97
5/1/94
400. Procedures and Requirements for Tier II 5/1/94
Operating Permits.
401. Tier II Operating Permit (Except 4/5/00
subsections 401.01.a and 401.04). 3/19/99
5/1/94
402. Application Procedures.................... 4/5/00
5/1/94
403. Permit Requirements for Tier II Sources... 5/1/94
404. Procedures for Issuing Permits............ 4/5/00
5/1/94
405. Conditions for Tier II Operating Permits.. 5/1/94
406. Obligation to Comply...................... 5/1/94
460. Requirements for Emission Reduction Credit 4/5/00
5/1/94
461. Requirements for Banking Emission 4/5/00
Reduction Credits (ERC's). 5/1/94
470. Permit Application Fees for Tier II 3/7/95
Permits.
500. Registration Procedures and Requirements 5/1/94
for Portable Equipment.
510. Stack Heights and Dispersion Techniques... 5/1/94
511. Applicability............................. 4/5/00
512. Definitions............................... 4/5/00
5/1/94
513. Requirements.............................. 4/5/00
514. Opportunity for Public Hearing............ 5/1/94
515. Approval of Field Studies and Fluid Models 5/1/94
516. No Restriction on Actual Stack Height..... 5/1/94
550. Air Pollution Emergency Rule.............. 5/1/94
551. Episode Criteria.......................... 5/1/94
552. Stages.................................... 3/15/02
5/1/94
553. Effect of Stages.......................... 3/15/02
556. Criteria for Defining Levels Within Stages 3/15/02
4/5/00
557. Public Notification....................... 5/1/94
558. Information to Be Given................... 3/15/02
5/1/94
559. Manner and Frequency of Notification...... 5/1/94
560. Notification to Sources................... 4/5/00
561. General Rules............................. 3/15/02
4/5/00
5/1/94
562. Specific Emergency Episode Abatement Plans 5/1/94
for Point Sources.
563. Transportation Conformity................. 3/30/01
564. Incorporation by Reference................ 3/30/01
565. Abbreviations............................. 3/30/01
566. Definitions for the Purpose of Sections 3/30/01
563 Through 574 and 582.
567. Agencies Affected by Consultation......... 3/30/01
568. ICC Member Roles in Consultation.......... 3/30/01
569. ICC Member Responsibilities in 3/30/01
Consultation.
570. General Consultation Process.............. 3/30/01
571. Consultation Procedures................... 3/30/01
572. Final Conformity Determinations by USDOT.. 3/30/01
573. Resolving Conflicts....................... 3/30/01
574. Public Consultation Procedures............ 3/30/01
575. Air Quality Standards and Area 4/5/00
Classification.
576. General Provisions for Ambient Air Quality 5/1/94
Standards.
577. Ambient Air Quality Standards for Specific 5/1/94
Air Pollutants (Except subsection 577.06).
578. Designation of Attainment, Unclassifiable, 5/1/94
and Nonattainment Areas.
579. Baselines for Prevention of Significant 4/5/00
Deterioration. 5/1/94
580. Classification of Prevention of 4/5/00
Significant Deterioration Areas. 5/1/94
581. Prevention of Significant Deterioration 4/5/00
(PSD) Increments. 7/1/97
5/1/94
582. Interim Conformity Provisions for Northern 3/30/01
Ada County Former Nonattainment Area for
PM-10.
600. Rules for Control of Open Burning......... 3/19/99

[[Page 2225]]

601. Fire Permits, Hazardous Materials and 5/1/94
Liability.
602. Nonpreemption of Other Jurisdictions...... 5/1/94
603. General Restrictions...................... 5/1/94
604. Alternatives to Open Burning.............. 5/1/94
606. Categories of Allowable Burning........... 5/1/94
607. Recreational and Warming Fires............ 5/1/94
608. Weed Control Fires........................ 5/1/94
609. Training Fires............................ 5/1/94
610. Industrial Flares......................... 5/1/94
611. Residential Solid Waste Disposal Fires.... 5/1/94
612. Landfill Disposal Site Fires.............. 3/19/99
613. Orchard Fires............................. 4/5/00
5/1/94
614. Prescribed Burning........................ 5/1/94
615. Dangerous Material Fires.................. 5/1/94
616. Infectious Waste Burning.................. 5/1/94
625. Visible Emissions......................... 4/5/00
5/1/94
626. General Restrictions on Visible Emissions 4/5/00
from Wigwam Burners.
650. Rules for Control of Fugitive Dust........ 5/1/94
651. General Rules............................. 5/1/94
675. Fuel Burning Equipment--Particulate Matter 4/5/00
676. Standards for New Sources................. 5/1/94
677. Standards for Minor and Existing Sources.. 5/1/94
678. Combinations of Fuels..................... 5/1/94
679. Averaging Period.......................... 4/5/00
5/1/94
680. Altitude Correction....................... 5/1/94
681. Test Methods and Procedures............... 4/5/00
700. Particulate Matter--Process Weight 4/5/00
Limitations.
701. Particulate Matter--New Equipment Process 4/5/00
Weight Limitations.
702. Particulate Matter--Existing Equipment 4/5/00
Process Weight Limitations. 5/1/94
703. Particulate Matter--Other Processes....... 4/5/00
725. Rules for Sulfur Content of Fuels......... 4/5/00
726. Definitions as Used in Sections 727 5/1/94
Through 729.
727. Residual Fuel Oils........................ 5/1/94
728. Distillate Fuel Oil....................... 5/1/94
729. Coal...................................... 5/1/94
785. Rules for Control of Incinerators......... 5/1/94
786. Emission Limits........................... 4/5/00
787. Exceptions................................ 3/23/98
805. Rules for Control of Hot-mix Asphalt 5/1/94
Plants.
806. Emission Limits........................... 5/1/94
807. Multiple Stacks........................... 5/1/94
808. Fugitive Dust Control..................... 5/1/94
815. Rules for Control of Kraft Pulping Mills.. 5/1/94
816. Statement of Policy....................... 5/1/94
817. General Rules............................. 5/1/94
821. Recovery Furnace Particulate Standards.... 5/1/94
822. Lime Kiln Standards....................... 5/1/94
823. Smelt Tank Standards...................... 5/1/94
824. Monitoring and Reporting (Except 4/5/00
subsection 824.01). 5/1/94
825. Special Studies........................... 5/1/94
826. Exceptions................................ 5/1/94
845. Rules for Control of Sulfur Oxide 5/1/94
Emissions from Sulfuric Acid Plants.
846. Emission Limits........................... 4/5/00
847. Monitoring and Testing.................... 4/5/00
848. Compliance Schedule....................... 5/1/94
------------------------------------------------------------------------

5. Section 52.681 is revised to read as follows:

Sec. 52.681 Permits to construct and tier II operating permits.

(a) Except as otherwise provided in pargraph (b) of this section,
emission limitations and other provisions contained in Permits to
Construct and Tier II Operating Permits issued by the Idaho Department
of Environmental Quality in accordance with the Federally-approved
State of Idaho Rules for Control of Air Pollution in Idaho,
incorporated by reference in section 52.670 (IDAPA 58.01.01.200 through
222, IDAPA 58.01.01.400 through 406), shall be applicable requirements
of the Federally-approved Idaho SIP (in addition to any other
provisions) for the purposes of section 113 of the Clean Air Act and
shall be enforceable by EPA and by any person in the same manner as
other requirements of the SIP.
(b) Operating Permits authorizing the use of alternative emission
limits (bubbles) under IDAPA

[[Page 2226]]

58.01.01.401.01.a, 58.01.01.440, and 58.01.01.441 (including the use of
banked emission reduction credits in a bubble pursuant to IDAPA
58.01.01.461), and Tier II Operating Permits authorizing compliance
schedule extensions under IDAPA 58.01.01.401.04 must be submitted to
EPA for approval as revisions to the Idaho SIP before they become
applicable requirements of the Idaho SIP.

6. Section 52.683 is revised to read as follows:

Sec. 52.683 Significant deterioration of air quality.

(a) The State of Idaho Rules for Control of Air Pollution in Idaho,
specifically, IDAPA 58.01.01.005 through 007 (definitions), IDAPA
58.01.01.200 through 222 (permit to construct rules), IDAPA
58.01.01.510 through 516 (stack height rules), and IDAPA 58.01.01.575
through 581 (standards, increments and area designations) are approved
as meeting the requirements of title I, part C, subpart 1 of the Clean
Air Act for preventing significant deterioration of air quality.
(b) The requirements of title I, part C, subpart 1 of the Clean Air
Act are not met for Indian reservations because Idaho has not
demonstrated authority to implement and enforce under the Clean Air Act
Idaho State rules in Indian country. Therefore, the provisions of Sec.
52.21 (b) through (w) are hereby incorporated and made part of the
applicable plan for Indian country in the State of Idaho.
(c) The requirements of section 165 of the Clean Air Act are not
met for sources subject to prevention of significant deterioration
requirements prior to August 22, 1986, the effective date of EPA's
original approval of Idaho's prevention of significant deterioration
regulations.
Therefore, the provisions of Sec. 52.21(b), (c), (d), and (h)
through (w) are hereby incorporated and made part of the applicable
plan for sources subject to Sec. 52.21 prior to August 22, 1986.

Part 81, subpart C, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 81--[AMENDED]

1. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

2. In Sec. 81.313, the table entitled ``Idaho-TSP'' is removed and
the table entitled ``Idaho PM-10'' is revised to read as follows:

Sec. 81.313 Idaho.

* * * * *

Idaho PM-10
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation Classification
Designated area ----------------------------------------------------------------
Date Type Date Type
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastern Idaho Intrastate AQCR 61:
Power-Bannock Counties, part 11/15/90 Nonattainment............ 11/15/90 Moderate
of: (Pocatello).
State Lands--Portneuf
Valley Area:
T.5S, R.34E Sections
25-36
T.5S, R.35E Section 31
T.6S, R.34E Sections 1-
36
T.6S, R.35E Sections 5-
9, 16-21, 28-33, plus
the West \1/2\ of
Sections 10, 15, 22,
27, 34
T.7S, R.34E Sections 1-
4, 10-14, and 24
T.7S, R.35E Sections 4-
9, 16-21, 28-33, plus
the West \1/2\ of
Sections 3, 10, 15,
22, 27, 34
T.8S, R.35E Section 4,
plus the West \1/2\
of Section 3
Power-Bannock Counties, part 11/15/90 Nonattainment............ 11/15/90 Moderate
of: (Pocatello).
Fort Hall Indian
Reservation:
T.5S, R.34E Sections
15-23
T.5S, R.33E Sections
13-36
T.6S, R.33E Sections 1-
36
T.7S, R.33E Sections
4, 5, 6
T.7S, R.34E Section 8
Pocatello: 336 square mile 11/15/90 Unclassifiable...........
area from Schiller at the
northwest to Inkom at
southeast, excluding the
Portneuf Valley and Fort Hall
nonattainment areas.
Soda Springs: 96 square mile 11/15/90 Unclassifiable...........
area encompassing Soda
Springs, Conda and the
industrial area in between.
Remainder of AQCR 61.......... 11/15/90 Unclassifiable...........
Eastern Washington-Northern Idaho
Interstate AQCR 62 (Idaho
portion):
Shoshone County: Pinehurst 11/20/94 Nonattainment............ 1/20/94 Moderate.
Expansion Area Northwest
quarter of the Northwest
quarter, Section 8, Township
48 North, Range 2 East;
Southwest quarter of the
Northwest quarter, Section 8,
Township 48, North, Range 2
East; Northwest quarter of
the Southwest quarter,
Section 8, Township 48 North,
Range 2 East; Southwest
quarter, Section 8, Township
48 North, Range 2 East;
Southwest quarter of the
Southwest quarter, Section 48
North, Range 2 East, Boise
Base (known as ``Pinehurst
expansion area'').
City of Pinehurst............. 11/15/90 Nonattainment............ 11/15/90 Moderate.
Silver Valley (Shoshone 11/15/90 Unclassifiable...........
County), excluding the
Pinehurst Expansion Area and
City of Pinehurst PM-10
nonattainment areas.
Lewiston...................... 11/15/90 Unclassifiable...........
Remainder of AQCR 62 (Idaho 11/15/90 Unclassifiable...........
portion).
Idaho Intrastate AQCR 63:
Bonner County: Sandpoint Area: 11/15/90 Nonattainment............ 11/15/90 Moderate.
Section 1-3, 9-12, 15, 16,
21, 22, 27, 28 of range 2
west and Township 57 north;
and the western \3/4\ of
Sections 14, 23 and 26 of the
same Township and range
coordinates.

[[Page 2227]]

Remainder of AQCR 63.......... 11/15/90 Unclassifiable...........
Metropolitan Boise the Intrastate
AQCR 64:
Ada County: Boise............. 3/12/99 Pre-existing............. 3/12/99 Pre-existing
PM-10 PM-10
NAAQS NA NAAQS NA
Northern Boundary--
Beginning at a point in
the center of the channel
of the Boise River, where
the line between sections
15 and 16 in Township 3
north (T3N), range 4 east
(R4E), crosses said Boise
River; thence, west down
the center of the channel
of the Boise River to a
point opposite the mouth
of More's Creek; thence,
in a straight line north
44 degrees and 38 minutes
west until the said line
intersects the north line
T5N (12 Ter. Ses. 67);
thence west to the
northwest corner T5N,
R1W.
Western Boundary--Thence,
south to the northwest
corner of T3N, R1W;
thence east to the
northwest corner of
section 4 of T3N, R1W;
thence south to the
southeast corner of
section 32 of T2N, R1W;
thence, west to the
northwest corner of T1N,
R1W; thence, south to the
southwest corner of
section 32 of T2N, R1W;
thence, west to the
northwest corner of T1N,
R1W; thence south to the
southwest corner of T1N,
R1W.
Southern Boundary--Thence,
east to the southwest
corner of section 33 of
T1N, R4E.
Eastern Boundary--Thence,
north along the north and
south center line of
Townships T1N, R4E, T2N,
R4E, and T3N, R4E, Boise
Meridian to the beginning
point in the center of
the channel of the Boise
River.
Remainder of AQCR 64.......... 11/15/90 Unclassifiable...........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 03-856 Filed 1-15-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Notices For
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho; Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Idaho

Local Navigation