![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Alaska Summary: 2006 Swimming Season
May 2007
- Introduction
- 2006 Summary Results
- For More Information
- Print version (PDF) of this document (158 K, 2 pages, About PDF)
- Raw data (MS-Excel) for Alaska (38 K)
Introduction
Figure 1. Alaska coastal counties with 2006 monitored beach data.
The BEACH Act of 2000 requires that coastal and Great Lakes states and territories report to EPA on beach monitoring and notification data for their coast recreation waters. The BEACH Act defines coastal recreation waters as the Great Lakes and coastal waters (including coastal estuaries) that states, territories, and authorized tribes officially recognize or designate for swimming, bathing, surfing, or similar activities in the water.
This fact sheet summarizes beach monitoring and notification data submitted to EPA by the state of Alaska for the 2006 swimming season.
| County | Total Beaches | Monitored | Not Monitored |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bristol Bay | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dillingham | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Juneau | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Totals | 3 | 3 | 0 |
2006 Summary Results
How many beaches had notification actions?
Figure 2: Monitored beaches with and without notification actions in 2006.
When monitoring of water at beaches shows that levels of certain bacteria exceed standards, Alaska's beach managers post a beach advisory, warning people of the possible risks of swimming, or formally notify the public that the beach is closed. None of the 3 coastal beaches that were monitored in 2006 had an advisory during the 2006 season (Figure 2).
How many notification actions were reported and how long were they?
Figure 3: Beach notification actions by duration.
No beach notification actions were reported in the 2006 swimming season. Figure 3 presents breakdowns of action durations.
What percentage of days were beaches under a notification action?
Figure 4: Beach days with and without notification actions.
For Alaska's 2006 swimming season, EPA determined there were a total of 276 beach days associated with the 3 monitored beaches. No actions were reported on any of those days (Figure 4).
How do 2006 results compare to previous years?
Beginning in 2003, states are required to submit data to EPA under the BEACH Act for beaches which are in coastal and Great Lakes waters. Table 2 compares 2006 data with data reported in previous years.
| Year | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of monitored beaches | ND | 2 | 3 |
| Number of beaches affected by notification actions | ND | 2 | 0 |
| Percentage of beaches affected by notification actions | ND | 100% | 0% |
