Frequently Asked Questions
This page provides
answers to frequently asked questions about terms typically associated with alternative
dispute resolution and conflict prevention. Use of these terms varies widely in
the field. The questions and answers provided below are intended only as a guide
and do not represent a definitive EPA policy interpretation. Please contact the
CPRC for further information.
EPA uses the definition of ADR in the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 [PDF - 12 pp., 38 K. About PDF]: "any procedure that is used to resolve issues in controversy, including but not limited to, conciliation, facilitation, mediation, fact finding, minitrials, arbitration, and use of ombuds, or any combination thereof." 5 USC 571(3). All these ADR techniques involve a neutral third party, a person who assists others in designing and conducting a process for reaching agreement, if possible. The neutral third party has no stake in the substantive outcome of the process. Depending on the circumstances of a particular dispute, neutral third parties may be Agency employees or may come from outside EPA. Typically, all aspects of ADR are voluntary, including the decision to participate, the type of process used, and the content of any final agreement.
|What is Conflict Prevention?|
Sometimes it is possible to prevent disputes before they occur, by creating and strengthening communication among stakeholders regarding substantive issues, how stakeholders interact, and relationships among stakeholders. Alternative dispute resolution techniques such as mediation, facilitation, and conciliation are used in a variety of contexts (e.g., public participation, team building) to assist in preventing conflict.
|What is Consensus Building?|
Consensus Building is a process in which people agree to work together to resolve
common problems in a relatively informal, cooperative manner. It is a technique
that can be used to bring together representatives from different stakeholder
groups early in a decision making process. A neutral third party helps the people
design and implement their own strategy for developing group solutions to the
Convening (also called conflict assessment) involves the use of a neutral third party to help assess the causes of the conflict, to identify the persons or entities that would be affected by the outcome of the conflict, and to help these parties consider the best way (for example, mediation, consensus-building, or a lawsuit) for them to deal with the conflict. The convener may also help get the parties ready for participation in a dispute resolution process by providing education to the parties on what the selected process will be like.
|What is Facilitation?|
Facilitation is a process used to help a group of people or parties have constructive
discussions about complex, or potentially controversial issues. The facilitator
provides assistance by helping the parties set ground rules for these discussions,
promoting effective communication, eliciting creative options, and keeping the
group focused and on track. Facilitation can be used even where parties have not
yet agreed to attempt to resolve a conflict.
|What is Mediation?|
Mediation is a process in which a neutral third party (the mediator) assists disputants in reaching a mutually satisfying settlement of their differences. Mediation is voluntary, informal, and confidential. The mediator helps the disputants to communicate clearly, to listen carefully, and to consider creative ways for reaching resolution. The mediator makes no judgments about the people or the conflict, and issues no decision. Any agreement that is reached must satisfy all the disputants.