| You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader. |
796KB PDF Version (14 pages)
Highlights of Clear Skies in Florida
- Florida sources would reduce emissions of SO2 by 25%, NOx by
68%, and mercury by 50% by 2020 due to Clear Skies.
- The health benefits in Florida would total $6.9 billion ($1.3
billion under an alternative estimate) and include 900 fewer premature
deaths (500 under an alternative estimate) and 2,000 fewer hospitalizations/emergency
room visits for asthma.
- In addition, Florida would receive environmental benefits including
reductions in mercury deposition and reduced nitrogen deposition
to coastal waters.
- Clear Skies does not significantly impact electricity prices.
With or without Clear Skies, electricity prices in the electricity
supply region that includes Florida are expected to remain near
2000 prices.
Clear Skies: An Innovative Approach to Improving Human Health
and the Environment
Why Clear Skies?
- Air quality has improved, but serious concerns persist
- Florida's citizens suffer ill effects from air pollution,
including asthma attacks and premature death
- Electricity generation sector remains a major emissions source
- Very cost-effective to control the power sector, relative
to other sources
- Sources are concerned about upcoming complex and burdensome
regulations
Advantages of the Clear Skies Approach
- Guarantees significant nationwide emissions reductions - beginning
years before full implementation
- Florida sources would substantially reduce emissions of SO2,
NOx, and mercury
- Delivers dramatic progress towards achievement of critical
health and environmental goals
- Uses proven, market-based flexible approach with incentives
for innovation
- Recognizes environmental needs as well as industry constraints,
allowing industry to better manage its operations and finances
while lowering risks to the public
- Sources are projected to install pollution controls to enable
continued reliance on coal
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers
Under Current Clean Air Act Power Plants Would Face a Complex
Set of Requirements

For a larger image, click here.
Clear Skies Sets a Firm Timeline for Emission Reductions
| The existing Title IV SO2 cap-and-trade program provides
an incentive and a mechanism to begin reductions upon enactment
of Clear Skies years before regulatory action under the current
Act. |
2004: The NOx SIP call (summertime NOx cap in 19 Eastern
States + D.C.)
2008: Clear Skies NOx Phase I (2.1 million ton annual cap
assigned to two Zones with trading programs)
2010:
- Clear Skies Hg Phase I (26 ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
- SO2 Phase I (4.5 million ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
2018:
- Clear Skies NOx Phase II (1.7 million ton annual cap assigned
to two Zones with trading programs)
- Clear Skies Hg Phase II (15 ton annual cap with a national
trading program)
- Clear Skies SO2 Phase II (3.0 million ton annual cap with a
national trading program)
Emissions in Florida under Clear Skies
|
Emissions in Florida (2020) would be reduced from 2000 levels:
- 70% reduction in SO2 emissions
- 82% reduction in NOx emissions
- 56% reduction in mercury emissions
|
Emissions: Current (2000) and Existing Clean Air Act Regulations (base case*) vs. Clear Skies in Florida in 2010 and 2020


Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality
standards or other part of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions
in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory
actions that have not yet been promulgated.
SO2 and NOx Emission Reductions under Clear Skies
| Emissions in Florida and surrounding states would decrease
considerably. These emission reductions would make it much easier
for Florida to maintain compliance with the national air quality
standards. |


Note:
The base case in IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements,
and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX, and WI. It does
not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential future regulations
to implement the current ambient air quality standards or other
part of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions in 2020 will likely
be lower due to state and federal regulatory actions that have not
yet been promulgated. Emissions projected for new units in 2020
are not reflected.
Clear Skies Health and Air Quality Benefits in Florida
Improve Public Health
| By 2020, Florida would receive approximately $6.9 billion
(see note 1) in annual health benefits from
reductions in fine particle and ozone concentrations alone due
to Clear Skies. |
- Reduced ozone and fine particle exposure by 2020 would result
in public health benefits of:
- approximately 900 fewer premature deaths each year (see
note 1)
- approximately 500 fewer cases of chronic bronchitis each year
- approximately 1,300 fewer nonfatal heart attacks each year
- approximately 2,000 fewer hospital and emergency room visits
each year
- approximately 84,000 fewer days workers are out sick due to
respiratory symptoms each year
- approximately 23,000 fewer school absences each year
- Reduced mercury emissions would reduce exposure to mercury through
consumption of contaminated fish, resulting in additional, unquantified
benefits to those who eat fish from Florida's lakes, streams,
and coastal waters.
Help Maintain Health-Based Air Quality Standards (see
note 2)
- All Florida counties currently attain the annual fine particle
standards; all but two currently attain the 8-hour ozone standard.
- Escambia and St. Lucie counties (population approximately 600,000)
are expected to come into attainment with the 8-hour ozone standard
by 2010 under existing programs.
- Clear Skies would also reduce concentrations of ozone and fine
particles in other counties throughout Florida.
Clear Skies Environmental Benefits in Florida
Clear Skies Would Provide Substantial Environmental Benefits in
Florida
In comparison to existing programs,
- Visibility would improve perceptibly.
- The value of this benefit for Florida residents visiting National
Parks and Wilderness areas around the country is $230 million.
- Sulfur deposition, a primary cause of acid rain, would decrease
15-30% in most of the state, and up to 15% in the southeastern
portion of the state.
- Nitrogen deposition, a cause of damage in nitrogen-sensitive
coastal waters, would decrease 5-20% throughout most of Florida
and more than 20% in some coastal portions of northern Florida.
- Mercury deposition would decrease up to 15% in some parts of
northern Florida.*


* These results are based on modeling the Clear
Skies mercury cap without triggering the safety valve.
Electricity Generation in Florida under Clear Skies
| Current and Projected Generation by Fuel Type
in Florida under Clear Skies (GWh) |
- Florida's electricity growth is projected to be met
by increases in gas-fired and coal-fired generation.
Clear Skies does not significantly alter this projection.
- Electricity from coal-fired generation will increase
by 12% from 1999 to 2020.
|
|
 |
- Florida's sources are projected to reduce their emissions
through the installation of emission controls, rather than
through a switch from coal to natural gas.
- In 2010, 80% of Florida's coal-fired generation is projected
to come from units with advanced SO2 and/or NOx control
equipment that also substantially reduce mercury emissions;
in 2020, the percentage projected to increase to 94%.
- No coal-fired units in Florida are projected to be removed
from operation as a result of Clear Skies.
|
Electricity Prices in Florida under Clear Skies
Under Clear Skies by 2020...
- 72% of coal-fired capacity would install SCR
- 13% would install scrubbers
|
|
The major generation companies in Florida include:
- Florida Power & Light Company
- Tampa Electric Company
- Jacksonville Electric Authority
- Gulf Power Company
Total coal-fired capacity in Florida is projected
to be 10,210 MW in 2010.
|
|
Units in Florida Projected to Be Retrofitted Due to Clear Skies
by 2020
CRYSTAL RIVER
|
4 |
Scrubber*/ SCR* |
| CRYSTAL RIVER |
5 |
Scrubber*/ SCR* |
C D MCINTOSH JR
|
3 |
SCR* |
| Cedar Bay Generating Company L P |
GEN1 |
SCR |
| Central Power and Lime Incorporated |
GEN1 |
SCR |
| CRIST |
6 |
SCR* |
| CRIST |
7 |
SCR* |
| CRYSTAL RIVER |
1 |
SCR |
| CRYSTAL RIVER |
2
|
SCR |
| Indiantown Cogeneration Facility |
GEN1 |
SCR |
| SEMINOLE |
1 |
SCR* |
| SEMINOLE |
2 |
SCR* |
| SMITH |
1 |
SCR |
| SMITH |
2 |
SCR |
| ST JOHNS RIVER POWER |
1 |
SCR* |
| ST JOHNS RIVER POWER |
2 |
SCR* |
| STANTON ENERGY |
1 |
SCR* |
* Retrofit was installed under Clear Skies by 2010
Note: Capacity
and retrofit data apply to coal and IGCC units greater than 25 MW
Electricity Prices in Florida under Clear Skies
- With or without Clear Skies, retail prices in the North
American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) FRCC region
(the electricity supply region that contains Florida) are
projected to decrease between 2005 and 2020.
- With Clear Skies, retail prices are projected to be approximately
0.4 - 1.8% higher between 2005 and 2020 than in the absence
of the legislation.
|
Note: Retrofits and total coal-fired capacity
apply to coal and IGCC units greater than 25 MW.



| In 2000, the average retail electricity price
in Florida was approximately 6.9 cents/kWh, which was above
the average national retail price of approximately
6.7 cents/kWh. |
Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality
standards or other part of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions
in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory
actions that have not yet been promulgated.
Costs and Benefits in Florida under Clear Skies
Benefits Outweigh the Costs
Clear Skies....
- Guarantees significant emissions reductions - beginning
years before full implementation
- Uses a proven and flexible market-based approach with
incentives for innovation
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers
|
- In Florida, Clear Skies is projected to cost approximately $320
million annually by 2020 while providing health benefits totaling
approximately $6.9 billion annually.
- The increases in production costs under Clear Skies represent
only a small percentage of total retail electricity sales revenue
in Florida.
- Retail electricity sales revenue in Florida was over $13.5
billion in 2000.
- Adjusting these sales revenues by the same growth rate used
for the modeling of costs would result in revenues of almost
$20.8 billion annually in 2020.
- Nationwide, the projected annual costs of Clear Skies (in $1999)
are $4.3 billion in 2010 and $6.3 billion in 2020; the nationwide
benefits of Clear Skies are expected to be over $113 billion annually
by 2020.
- An alternate estimate projects annual health benefits totaling
$23 billion.
Note: Costs
include capital costs, fuel, and other operation and maintenance
costs (both fixed and variable) associated with the achievement
of the emissions caps in the legislation (for example, the installation
and operation of pollution controls). These state-level production
costs are estimates; they do not account for the costs associated
with the transfer of electricity across regions, nor the costs or
savings that could be associated with allowance movement between
sources.
Notes on EPA's Analysis
- The information presented in this analysis reflects EPA's modeling
of the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- EPA has updated this information to reflect modifications:
- Changes included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- Revisions to the Base Case to reflect newly promulgated
rules at the state and federal level since the initial analysis
was undertaken.
- The Clear Skies modeling results presented include the safety
valve feature
- This analysis compares new programs to a Base Case (Existing
Control Programs), which is typical when calculating costs and
benefits of Agency rulemakings.
- The Base Case reflects implementation of current control programs
only:
- Does not include yet-to-be developed regulations such
as those to implement the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
- The EPA Base Case for power sector modeling includes:
- Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific
caps in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire,
North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin finalized before March
2003.
- For air quality modeling, the Base Case also includes federal
and state control programs, as well as the Tier II, Heavy Duty
Diesel, and Nonroad Diesel rules.
State information based on EPA's modeling of the Clear
Skies Act of 2002 is presented here for archival reasons.
|
1. An alternative
methodology for calculating health-related benefits projects approximately
500 premature deaths prevented and $1.3 billion in health benefits
each year in Florida by 2020.
2. Based on 1999-2001
data of counties with monitors that have three years of complete
data.

top
|