| You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader. |
551KB PDF Version (15 pages)
Highlights of Clear Skies in Kansas
- Kansas sources would reduce emissions of SO2 by 12%, NOx by
74%, and mercury by 53% by 2020 due to Clear Skies.
- The health benefits in Kansas would total $940 million ($180
million under the alternative estimate) and include 100 fewer
premature deaths (70 under the alternative estimate) and 200 fewer
hospitalizations/emergency room visits for asthma.
- In addition, Kansas would receive environmental benefits including
reduced nitrogen deposition to the Mississippi and Missouri River
watersheds.
- Clear Skies does not significantly impact electricity prices.
With or without Clear Skies, electricity prices in the electricity
supply region that includes Kansas are expected to remain below
2000 prices.
Clear Skies: An Innovative Approach to Improving Human Health
and the Environment
Why Clear Skies?
- Air quality has improved, but serious concerns persist
- Kansas's citizens suffer ill effects from air pollution,
including asthma attacks and premature death.
- Electricity generation sector remains a major emissions source
- Very cost-effective to control the power sector, relative
to other sources
- Sources are concerned about upcoming complex and burdensome
regulations.
Advantages of the Clear Skies Approach
- Guarantees significant nationwide emissions reductions - beginning
years before full implementation
- Kansas sources would substantially reduce emissions of SO2,
NOx, and mercury
- Delivers dramatic progress towards achievement of critical
health and environmental goals.
- Uses proven, market-based flexible approach with incentives
for innovation
- Recognizes environmental needs as well as industry constraints,
allowing industry to better manage
its operations and finances while lowering risks to the public
- Sources are projected to install pollution controls to enable
continued reliance on coal.
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers.
Under Current Clean Air Act Power Plants Would Face a Complex
Set of Requirements

For a larger image, click here.
Clear Skies Sets a Firm Timeline for Emission Reductions
| The existing Title IV SO2 cap-and-trade program provides
an incentive and a mechanism to begin reductions upon enactment
of Clear Skies years before regulatory action under the current
Act. |
2004: The NOx SIP call (summertime NOx cap in 19 Eastern
States + D.C.)
2008: Clear Skies NOx Phase I (2.1 million ton annual cap
assigned to two Zones with trading programs)
2010:
- Clear Skies Hg Phase I (26 ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
- SO2 Phase I (4.5 million ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
2018:
- Clear Skies NOx Phase II (1.7 million ton annual cap assigned
to two Zones with trading programs)
- Clear Skies Hg Phase II (15 ton annual cap with a national
trading program)
- Clear Skies SO2 Phase II (3.0 million ton annual cap with a
national trading program)
The West Faces Unique Challenges
- Environmental effects of power plant emissions - including visibility
impairment and acid deposition - are broadly distributed
- Increasing ground-level ozone concentrations in national parks
- Particle-related haze in national parks and wilderness areas
- Nitrogen deposition in high elevation ecosystems (e.g., Colorado
Front Range)
- Brown clouds in major cities
- Few western non-attainment areas are due to stationary source
emissions

Emissions in Kansas under Clear Skies
|
Emissions in Kansas (2020) would be reduced from 2000 levels:
- 50% reduction in SO2 emissions
- 70% reduction in NOx emissions
- 44% reduction in mercury emissions
|
Emissions: Current (2000) and Existing Clean Air Act Regulations (base case*) vs. Clear Skies in Kansas in 2010 and 2020



Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current air quality standards
or other parts of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions in 2020
will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory actions
that have not yet been promulgated.
SO2 and NOx Emissions Reductions under Clear Skies
| Emissions in Kansas and surrounding states would decrease
considerably. These emission reductions would help Kansas maintain
compliance with national air quality standards. |


Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality
standards or other parts of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions
in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory
actions that have not yet been promulgated.
Clear Skies Health and Air Quality Benefits in Kansas
| By 2020, Kansas would receive approximately $940 million
in annual health benefits from reductions in fine particle and
ozone concentrations alone due to Clear Skies. (see
note 1) |
Improve Public Health
- Reduced ozone and fine particle exposure by 2020 would result
in public health benefits of:
- approximately 100 fewer premature deaths each year (see
note 1)
- approximately 80 fewer cases of chronic bronchitis each
year
- approximately 200 fewer nonfatal heart attacks each year
- approximately 300 fewer hospital and emergency room visits
each year
- approximately 15,000 fewer days workers are out sick due
to respiratory symptoms each year
- approximately 3,900 fewer school absences each year
- Reduced mercury emissions would reduce exposure to mercury through
consumption of contaminated fish, resulting in additional, unquantified
benefits to those who eat fish from lakes, streams, coastal waters
where mercury contamination is a problem.
Help Maintain Health-Based Air Quality Standards (see
note 2)
- All counties in Kansas are currently expected to meet the 8-hour
ozone and fine particle standards.
- Clear Skies would reduce concentrations of ozone and fine particles
throughout Kansas, causing additional benefits to public health.
Clear Skies Environmental Benefits in Kansas


In comparison to existing programs,
- Visibility would improve perceptibly.
- The value of this benefit for Kansas is $22 million.
- Sulfur deposition, a primary cause of acid rain, would decrease
by 15-30% in eastern Kansas and up to 15% in the western half
of the state.
- Nitrogen deposition, a cause of damage to nitrogen-sensitive
coastal waters, including the Gulf of Mexico hypoxia zone, would
decrease 5-20% in eastern Kansas
- Mercury deposition would decrease by up to 15% in the easternmost
part of the state.*
* These results are based on modeling the Clear
Skies mercury cap without triggering the safety valve.
Electricity Generation in Kansas under Clear Skies
|
Current and Projected Generation by Fuel Type in Kansas
under Clear Skies (GWh)
 |
- Kansas's electricity growth is projected to be met
by increases in coal-fired generation. Clear Skies
does not significantly alter this projection.
- Electricity from coal-fired generation will increase
by 30% from 1999 to 2020.
|
|
- Kansas's sources are projected to reduce their emissions
through the installation of emission controls, rather than
through a switch from coal to natural gas.
- In 2010, 85% of Kansas's coal-fired generation is projected
to come from units with advanced SO2 and/or NOx control
equipment that also substantially reduce mercury emissions;
in 2020, the percentage is projected to decrease to 83%.
- No coal-fired units in Kansas are projected to be removed
from operation as a result of Clear Skies
|

Emission Controls in Kansas under Clear Skies
- Under Clear Skies by 2020...
- 74% of coal-fired capacity would install SCR
- No scrubbers would be installed.
|
- The major generation companies in Kansas include:
- Western Resources, Inc.
- Kansas City Power & Light Company
- Kansas Gas & Electric Company
- Total coal-fired capacity in Kansas is projected to be
5,219 MW in 2010.
|
Units in Kansas Projected to Be Retrofitted Due to Clear Skies
by 2020
| Plant Name |
Unit ID |
Technology |
| JEFFREY ENERGY CENTER |
1 |
SCR* |
| JEFFREY ENERGY CENTER |
2 |
SCR* |
| JEFFREY ENERGY CENTER |
3 |
SCR* |
| LA CYGNE |
1 |
SCR* |
| LA CYGNE |
2 |
SCR* |
| LAWRENCE |
5 |
SCR* |
* Retrofit was installed under Clear Skies by
2010
Note: Retrofits and total coal-fired capacity
apply to coal units greater than 25 MW.
Electricity Prices in Kansas under Clear Skies
- With or without Clear Skies, retail prices in the North
American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) SPP region
(the electricity supply region that contains Kansas) are
projected to increase between 2005 and 2020.
- With Clear Skies, retail prices are projected to be approximately
0.8 - 4.0% higher between 2005 and 2020 than in the absence
of the legislation.
|
| In 2000, the average retail electricity price in Kansas
was approximately 6.3 cents/kWh, which was below the average
national retail price of approximately 6.7 cents/kWh. |
|
|
|


Note: The base case using IPM includes
Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific
caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX, and WI. It does not include mercury
MACT in 2007 or any other potential future regulations to implement
the current ambient air quality standards or other parts of the
Clean Air Act. Base case emissions in 2020 will likely be lower
due to state and federal regulatory actions that have not yet been
promulgated.
Costs and Benefits in Kansas under Clear Skies
Benefits Outweigh the Costs
Clear Skies....
- Guarantees significant emissions
reductions - beginning years before full implementation
- Uses a proven and flexible market-based
approach with incentives for innovation
- Increases certainty across the
board for industry, regulators, and consumers
|
- In Kansas, Clear Skies is projected to cost approximately $37
million annually by 2020 while providing health benefits totaling
approximately $960 million annually.
- The increases in production costs under Clear Skies represent
only a small percentage of total retail electricity sales revenue
in Kansas.
- Retail electricity sales revenue in Kansas was $2.2 billion
in 2000.
- Adjusting these sales revenues by the same growth rate
used for the modeling of costs would result in revenues of
almost $3.4 billion annually in 2020.
- Nationwide, the projected annual costs of Clear Skies (in $1999)
are $4.3 billion in 2010 and $6.3 billion in 2020; the nationwide
benefits of Clear Skies are expected to be over $113 billion annually
by 2020.
- An alternative estimate projects annual health benefits
totaling $23 billion.
Note: Costs include capital costs, fuel,
and other operation and maintenance costs (both fixed and variable)
associated with the achievement of the emissions caps in the legislation
(for example, the installation and operation of pollution controls).
These state-level production costs are estimates; they do not account
for the costs associated with the transfer of electricity across
regions, nor the costs or savings that could be associated with
allowance movement between sources.
Notes on EPA's Analysis
- The information presented in this analysis reflects EPA's modeling
of the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- EPA has updated this information to reflect modifications:
- Changes included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- Revisions to the Base Case to reflect newly promulgated
rules at the state and federal level since the initial
analysis was undertaken.
- The Clear Skies modeling results presented include the safety
valve feature
- This analysis compares new programs to a Base Case (Existing
Control Programs), which is typical when calculating costs and
benefits of Agency rulemakings.
- The Base Case reflects implementation of current control programs
only:
- Does not include yet-to-be developed regulations such
as those to implement the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
- The EPA Base Case for power sector modeling includes:
- Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific
caps in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire,
North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin finalized before March
2003.
- For air quality modeling, the Base Case also includes federal
and state control programs, as well as the Tier II, Heavy Duty
Diesel, and Nonroad Diesel rules.

1. An alternative
methodology for calculating health-related benefits projects approximately
70 premature deaths prevented and $180 million in health benefits
each year in Kansas by 2020.
2. Based on 1999-2001
data for counties with monitors that have three years of complete
data.
State information based on EPA's modeling of the Clear
Skies Act of 2002 is presented here for archival reasons.
|

top
|