| You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download,
to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's
PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the
free Acrobat Reader. |
1.4MB PDF Version (16 pages)
Highlights of Clear Skies in Oregon
- Emissions in Oregon (2020) will be the same as emissions under
the base case.
- The health benefits in the West would total $8.6 billion annually
($1.6 billion under the alternative estimate) and include approximately
1,100 fewer premature deaths (600 under the alternative estimate)
and 2,500 fewer hospitalizations/emergency room visits each year.
Note: For the purposes of this analysis,
the West includes all states that would be affected by the Zone
2 cap for NOx under Clear Skies. These states are WA, OR, CA,
UT, AZ, ID, MT, WY, CO, NM, TX, OK, KS, NE, ND, and SD.
- In addition, Western states would continue to enjoy good visibility
and the other benefits of a clean environment even in the face
of increasing demand for electricity.
- Clear Skies does not significantly impact electricity prices.
With or without Clear Skies, electricity prices in the electricity
supply region that includes Oregon are expected to remain below
2000 national average prices.
Clear Skies: An Innovative Approach to Improving Human Health
and the Environment
Why Clear Skies?
- Air quality has improved, but serious concerns persist
- Oregon’s citizens suffer ill effects from air pollution, including
asthma attacks and premature death
- Electricity generation sector remains a major emissions source
- Very cost-effective to control the power sector, relative
to other sources
- Sources are concerned about upcoming complex and burdensome
regulations
Advantages of the Clear Skies Approach
- Guarantees significant nationwide emissions reductions – beginning
years before full implementation
- Oregon emissions of SO2, NOx, and mercury would remain unchanged
- Delivers dramatic progress towards achievement of critical
health and environmental goals regionwide
- Uses proven, market-based flexible approach with incentives
for innovation
- Recognizes environmental needs as well as industry constraints,
allowing industry to better manage its operations and finances
while lowering risks to the public
- Sources are projected to install pollution controls to enable
continued reliance on coal
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers
Under Current Clean Air Act Power Plants Would Face a Complex
Set of Requirements
For a larger image, click here.
Clear Skies Sets a Firm Timeline for Emission Reductions
| The existing Title IV SO2 cap-and-trade program provides
an incentive and a mechanism to begin reductions upon enactment
of Clear Skies years before regulatory action under the current
Act. |
2004: The NOx SIP call (summertime NOx cap in 19 Eastern
States + D.C.)
2008: Clear Skies NOx Phase I (2.1 million ton annual cap
assigned to two Zones with trading programs)
2010:
- Clear Skies Hg Phase I (26 ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
- SO2 Phase I (4.5 million ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
2018:
- Clear Skies NOx Phase II (1.7 million ton annual cap assigned
to two Zones with trading programs)
- Clear Skies Hg Phase II (15 ton annual cap with a national
trading program)
- Clear Skies SO2 Phase II (3.0 million ton annual cap with a
national trading program)
Clear Skies Builds Upon the Work of the WRAP
- Clear Skies is designed to support the WRAP goals and process;
in addition to a national constraint on SO2, the bill ensures
that the WRAP’s emissions reduction goal for nine states is achieved:
- If for any reason the regional reduction goal set by the
WRAP for 2018 (271,000 tons for the power sector) is not achieved,
a separate WRAP cap-and-trade program is triggered to ensure
that the regional reductions are preserved.
- This special cap-and-trade program is based on the framework
established in the WRAP process.
- This special cap can also be triggered by 2013 if States
determine there is sufficient evidence that the target will
not be met by 2018.
Note:
Yellow states are states involved in the WRAP voluntary emissions
reduction program.
The West Faces Unique Challenges
- Environmental effects of power plant emissions – including visibility
impairment and acid deposition – are broadly distributed
- Increasing ground-level ozone concentrations in national
parks
- Particle-related haze in national parks and wilderness areas
- Nitrogen deposition in high elevation ecosystems (e.g.,
Colorado Front Range)
- Brown clouds in major cities
- Few western non-attainment areas are due to stationary source
emissions

As the West Grows, Clear Skies Protects Human Health and the Environment
The West Will Continue to Grow...
- Population is projected to grow more than 20% from current levels
by 2020
- Electricity demand is expected to grow more than the national
average
- More than 10% over national average in the Pacific States
- More than 30% over national average in the Mountain States
...While the Environment Is Protected
- Clear Skies would protect air quality by lowering or halting
increases in air emissions throughout the West from today’s levels:
- Prevent degradation of visibility in parks.
- Help counties remain in attainment with health-based air
quality standards, reducing the burden on state and local
governments.
- Ensure nitrogen deposition does not increase and reduce
mercury deposition.
Emissions in Oregon under Clear Skies
|
Emissions in Oregon (2020) will be the same as emissions
in the base case:
|
Emissions: Current (2000) and Existing Clean Air Act Regulations (base case*) vs. Clear Skies in Oregon in 2010 and 2020



Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality
standards or other part of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions
in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory
actions that have not yet been promulgated.
SO2 and NOx Emissions Reductions under Clear Skies


Note:
The base case in IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements,
and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX, and WI. It does
not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential future regulations
to implement the current ambient air quality standards or other
parts of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions in 2020 will likely
be lower due to state and federal regulatory actions that have not
yet been promulgated. Emissions projected for new units in 2020
are not reflected.
Clear Skies Health and Air Quality Benefits in Oregon
Improve Public Health
| By 2020, the West would receive approximately $8.6 billion
in annual health benefits from reductions in fine particle and
ozone concentrations alone due to Clear Skies.1 (see
note 1) |
- Reduced ozone and fine particle exposure by 2020 would result
in public health benefits of:
- approximately 1,100 fewer premature deaths each year (see
note 1)
- approximately 800 fewer cases of chronic bronchitis each year
- approximately 1,800 fewer nonfatal heart attacks each year
- approximately 2,500 fewer hospital and emergency room visits
each year
- approximately 150,000 fewer days workers are out sick due
to respiratory symptoms each year
- approximately 19,000 fewer school absences each year
- Reduced mercury emissions would reduce exposure to mercury through
consumption of contaminated fish, resulting in additional, unquantified
benefits to those who eat fish from mercury-contaminated lakes
and streams in the West.
Help Maintain Health-Based Air Quality Standards (see
note 2)
- All counties in Oregon are currently expected to meet the 8-hour
ozone and fine particle standards.
Clear Skies Would Provide Important Environmental Benefits in
the West
Clear Skies would produce significant visibility benefits in highly
visited national parks and wilderness areas in the West.
- Quantifiable visibility benefits in just 5 parks (Grand Canyon,
Rocky Mountain, Zion, Bryce Canyon, and Mesa Verde National Parks)
total over $300 million.
- Visibility benefits in the Grand Canyon alone are estimated
to be $100 million annually by 2020.
- Visibility improvements are also projected to improve tourism.
- In comparison to existing programs, nitrogen deposition would
decrease by 5-20% in the intermountain West, and in some areas,
such as the Four Corners region, by up to 35%. Sulfur and mercury
deposition would not increase despite growth in electricity demand.
Click here for a larger image
Electricity Generation in Oregon under Clear Skies
| Current and Projected Generation by Fuel Type
in Oregon under Clear Skies (GWh) |
- Oregon’s electricity growth is projected to be met
by increases in gas-fired and coal-fired generation.
Clear Skies does not significantly alter this projection.
- Electricity from coal-fired generation will increase
by 2% from 1999 to 2020.
|
|
 |
The major generation companies in Oregon include:
- Portland General Electric Company
- Klamath Energy
- PacifiCorp
Total coal-fired capacity in Oregon is projected to be 508
MW in 2010
|
Pollution Controls:
- No pollution controls are projected to be installed
in Oregon under Clear Skies. However, increased production
costs with Clear Skies are a result of additional gas-fired
capacity in Oregon.
- No coal-fired units in Oregon are projected to be removed
from operation as a result of Clear Skies.
|

Electricity Prices in Oregon under Clear Skies
- With or without Clear Skies, retail prices in the North
American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) WECC/NWP region
(the electricity supply region that contains Oregon) are
projected to decrease between 2005 and 2020.
- With Clear Skies, retail prices are projected to be approximately
0.5 – 1.2% higher between 2005 and 2020 than in the absence
of the legislation.
|



| In 2000, the average retail electricity price
in Oregon was approximately 4.8 cents/kWh, which was below
the average national retail price of approximately 6.7 cents/kWh. |
Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality
standards or other parts of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions
in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory
actions that have not yet been promulgated.
Costs and Benefits in Oregon under Clear Skies
Clear Skies....
- Guarantees significant emissions reductions – beginning
years before full implementation
- Uses a proven and flexible market-based approach with
incentives for innovation
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers
|
- In Oregon, Clear Skies is projected to cost approximately $46
million annually by 2020, and $1.2 billion throughout the West,
while providing health and visibility benefits region wide that
will total approximately $9.5 billion annually. These added production
costs are a result of additional gas-fired capacity in the state
with Clear Skies.
- The increases in production costs under Clear Skies represent
only a small percentage of total retail electricity sales
revenue in Oregon.
- Retail electricity sales revenue in Oregon was almost
$2.5 billion in 2000.
- Adjusting these sales revenues by the same growth rate
used for the modeling of costs would result in revenues
of over $3.9 billion annually in 2020.
- Nationwide, the projected annual costs of Clear Skies (in $1999)
are $4.3 billion in 2010 and $6.3 billion in 2020; the nationwide
benefits of Clear Skies are expected to be over $113 billion annually
by 2020.
- An alternate estimate projects annual health benefits totaling
$23 billion.
Note:
Costs include capital costs, fuel, and other operation and maintenance
costs (both fixed and variable) associated with the achievement of
the emissions caps in the legislation (for example, the installation
and operation of pollution controls). These state-level production
costs are estimates; they do not account for the costs associated
with the transfer of electricity across regions, nor the costs or
savings that could be associated with allowance movement between sources.
Notes on EPA’s Analysis
- The information presented in this analysis reflects EPA's modeling
of the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- EPA has updated this information to reflect modifications:
- Changes included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- Revisions to the Base Case to reflect newly promulgated
rules at the state and federal level since the initial analysis
was undertaken.
- The Clear Skies modeling results presented include the safety
valve feature
- This analysis compares new programs to a Base Case (Existing
Control Programs), which is typical when calculating costs and
benefits of Agency rulemakings.
- The Base Case reflects implementation of current control programs
only:
- Does not include yet-to-be developed regulations such
as those to implement the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
- The EPA Base Case for power sector modeling includes:
- Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific
caps in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire,
North Carolina, Oregon, and Wisconsin finalized before March
2003.
- For air quality modeling, the Base Case also includes federal
and state control programs, as well as the Tier II, Heavy Duty
Diesel, and Nonroad Diesel rules.
1. An alternative methodology
for calculating health-related benefits projects approximately 600
premature deaths prevented and $1.6 billion in health benefits each
year in the West by 2020.
2. Based on 1999-2001 data of
counties with monitors that have three years of complete data.
State information based on EPA's modeling of the Clear
Skies Act of 2002 is presented here for archival reasons.
|

top
|