| You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download,
to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's
PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the
free Acrobat Reader. |
1.5MB PDF Version (17 pages)
Highlights of Clear Skies in South Carolina
- South Carolina sources would reduce emissions of SO2 by 49%,
NOx by 52%, and mercury by 45% by 2020 due to Clear Skies.
- The health benefits in South Carolina would total $3.1 billion
annually ($550 million under the alternative estimate) and include
approximately 400 fewer premature deaths (200 under the alternative
estimate) and 700 fewer hospitalizations/emergency room visits
each year.
- In addition, South Carolina would receive environmental benefits,
including full attainment of the clean air standards by 2020,
improved visibility, and reduced nitrogen loading to sensitive
estuaries.
- Clear Skies does not significantly impact electricity prices.
With or without Clear Skies, electricity prices in the electric
supply region that includes South Carolina are expected to remain
near 2000 prices.
Clear Skies: An Innovative Approach to Improving Human Health
and the Environment
Why Clear Skies?
- Air quality has improved, but serious concerns persist
- South Carolina citizens suffer ill effects from air pollution,
including asthma attacks and premature death
- Electricity generation sector remains a major emissions source
- Very cost-effective to control the power sector, relative
to other sources
- Sources are concerned about upcoming complex and burdensome
regulations
Advantages of the Clear Skies Approach
- Guarantees significant nationwide emissions reductions – beginning
years before full implementation
- South Carolina sources would substantially reduce emissions
of SO2, NOx, and mercury
- Delivers dramatic progress towards achievement of critical
health and environmental goals
- Uses proven, market-based flexible approach with incentives
for innovation
- Recognizes environmental needs as well as industry constraints,
allowing industry to better manage its operations and finances
while lowering risks to the public
- Sources are projected to install pollution controls to enable
continued reliance on coal
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers
Under Current Clean Air Act Power Plants Would Face a Complex
Set of Requirements

For a larger image, click here.
Clear Skies Sets a Firm Timeline for Emission Reductions
| The existing Title IV SO2 cap-and-trade program provides
an incentive and a mechanism to begin reductions upon enactment
of Clear Skies years before regulatory action under the current
Act. |
2004: The NOx SIP call (summertime NOx cap in 19 Eastern
States + D.C.)
2008: Clear Skies NOx Phase I (2.1 million ton annual cap
assigned to two Zones with trading programs)
2010:
- Clear Skies Hg Phase I (26 ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
- SO2 Phase I (4.5 million ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
2018:
- Clear Skies NOx Phase II (1.7 million ton annual cap assigned
to two Zones with trading programs)
- Clear Skies Hg Phase II (15 ton annual cap with a national
trading program)
- Clear Skies SO2 Phase II (3.0 million ton annual cap with a
national trading program)
Emissions in South Carolina under Clear Skies
|
Emissions in South Carolina (2020) would be significantly
reduced from 2000 levels:
- 50% reduction in SO2 emissions
- 63% reduction in NOx emissions
- 46% reduction in mercury emissions
|
Emissions: Current (2000) and Existing Clean Air Act Regulations (base case*) vs. Clear Skies in South Carolina in 2010 and 2020


Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality
standards or other part of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions
in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory
actions that have not yet been promulgated.
Clear Skies Health Benefits in South Carolina
Improve Public Health
| By 2020, South Carolina would receive approximately $3.1 billion
in annual health benefits from reductions in fine particle and
ozone concentrations alone due to Clear Skies. (see
note 1) |
- Reduced ozone and fine particle exposure by 2020 would result
in public health benefits of:
- approximately 400 fewer premature deaths each year (see
note 1)
- approximately 200 fewer cases of chronic bronchitis each year
- approximately 500 fewer nonfatal heart attacks each year
- approximately 700 fewer hospital and emergency room visits
each year
- approximately 40,000 fewer days workers are out sick due to
respiratory symptoms each year
- approximately 3,300 fewer school absences each year
- Reduced mercury emissions would reduce exposure to mercury through
consumption of contaminated fish, resulting in additional, unquantified
benefits to those who eat fish from South Carolina’s lakes, streams,
and coastal waters.
Counties Projected to Remain Out of Attainment with the PM2.5
and Ozone Standards in South Carolina

Note:
Based on 1999-2001 modeling of counties with monitors that have
three years of complete data. The base case includes Title IV, the
NOx SIP Call, the Tier II, Heavy-Duty Diesel, and Nonroad Diesel
rules, final NSR settlements as of early spring 2003, and state-specific
caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX, and WI. It does not include mercury
MACT or any other potential future regulations to implement the
current ambient air quality standards or other parts of the Clean
Air Act.
Clear Skies Would Help South Carolina Meet Air Quality Standards
- Currently there are 4 counties exceeding the annual fine particle
standards and 9 counties exceeding the 8-hour ozone standard.
- Almost all of these counties are expected to be brought into
attainment with the fine particle standards under existing programs
by 2010.
- By 2010, all 9 counties exceeding the ozone standard would
be brought into attainment under existing programs.
- By 2020, all of these counties are expected to be brought
into attainment with the fine particle and ozone standards under
existing programs.
- Clear Skies would significantly improve air quality in South
Carolina further and more quickly than what is expected from existing
programs.
- By 2010, Clear Skies would bring the sole remaining non-attainment
county (Greenville County -- population approximately 400,000)
into attainment with the annual fine particle standards.
- In addition, Clear Skies would reduce ozone and fine particle
concentrations in counties attaining the standards throughout
the state.
Note:
Based on 1999-2001 modeling of counties with monitors that have
three years of complete data.
Clear Skies Environmental Benefits in South Carolina
Clear Skies Would Provide Substantial Environmental Benefits in
South Carolina
In comparison to existing programs,
- Visibility would improve perceptibly in South Carolina.
- The value of improved visibility for South Carolina residents
who visit National Parks and Wilderness area throughout the
country would be $49 million each year 2020.
- Sulfur deposition, a primary cause of acid rain, would decrease
by 30-60% across most of the state.
- Nitrogen deposition, another significant contributor to acid
rain as well as a cause of damage in nitrogen-sensitive forests
and coastal waters, would be reduced by 5-20% across much of the
state and by up to 35% to some nitrogen-sensitive estuaries.
- Mercury deposition would decrease up to 5-15% across the state.


* These results are based on modeling the Clear
Skies mercury cap without triggering the safety valve.
Emission Reductions under Clear Skies
| Emissions in South Carolina and surrounding states would decrease
considerably These emission reductions would make it much easier
for South Carolina to maintain compliance with the national
air quality standards. |


Note:
The base case in IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements,
and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX, and WI. It does
not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential future regulations
to implement the current ambient air quality standards or other
part of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions in 2020 will likely
be lower due to state and federal regulatory actions that have not
yet been promulgated. Emissions projected for new units in 2020
are not reflected.
Airsheds for the Southern Blue Ridge Mountains


- This section shows regional airshed maps that were developed
for the Southern Blue Ridge Mountains (which includes Shenandoah
National Park).
- Multiple emission sources in numerous states contribute to air
quality degradation and acid deposition in the Southern Blue Ridge
region.
- In 2020, emissions from power plants in the Southern Blue Ridge
region are projected to be substantially lower with Clear Skies
than under the Base Case:
- SO2 emissions are projected to decrease 61%;
- NOx emissions are projected to decrease 68%.

Note: An
airshed depicts a modeled approximation of a large proportion of
sources contributing to air quality in a particular receptor region.
Electricity Generation in South Carolina under Clear Skies
| Current and Projected Generation by Fuel Type
in South Carolina under Clear Skies (GWh) |
- South Carolina's electricity growth is projected to
be met by increases in gas-fired and coal-fired generation.
Clear Skies does not significantly alter this projection.
- Electricity from coal-fired generation will increase
by 18% from 1999 to 2020.
|
|
 |
- South Carolina's sources are projected to reduce their
emissions through the installation of emission controls,
rather than through a switch from coal to natural gas.
- In 2010, 70% of South Carolina's coal-fired generation
is projected to come from units with advanced SO2 and/or
NOx control equipment that also substantially reduce mercury
emissions; in 2020, the percentage is projected to increase
to 74%.
- No coal-fired units in South Carolina are projected
to be removed from operation as a result of Clear Skies.
|
Emission Controls in Alabama under Clear Skies
Under Clear Skies by 2020...
- 5% of coal-fired capacity would install SCR
- 20% would install scrubbers
|
|
- The major generation companies in Alabama include:.
- South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
- Santee Cooper
- Duke Energy Corporation
- Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc
- Total coal-fired capacity in South Carolina is projected
to be 5,867 MW in 2010.
|
|
Units in South Carolina Projected to Be Retrofitted Due to Clear
Skies by 2020
|
Plant Name
|
Unit ID
|
Technology
|
| WATEREE |
WAT2 |
Scrubber |
| WILLIAMS |
WIL1 |
Scrubber |
| WINYAH |
1 |
Scrubber |
| JEFFERIES |
3 |
SCR |
| JEFFERIES |
4 |
SCR |
*Retrofit was installed under Clear Skies by
2010
Note: Retrofits
and total coal-fired capacity apply to coal units greater than 25
MW.
Electricity Prices in South Carolina under Clear Skies
Under Clear Skies by 2020...
- 5% of coal-fired capacity would install SCR
- 20% would install scrubbers
|
|
The major generation companies in South Carolina include:
- South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
- Santee Cooper
- Duke Energy Corporation
- Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
Total coal-fired capacity in South Carolina is projected
to be 5,867 MW in 2010.
|
|
Units in South Carolina Projected to Be Retrofitted Due to Clear
Skies by 2020
WATEREE
|
WAT2 |
Scrubber |
| WATEREE |
WIL1 |
Scrubber |
WINYAH
|
1 |
Scrubber |
| JEFFERIES |
2 |
SCR |
| JEFFERIES |
4 |
SCR |
* Retrofit was installed under Clear Skies by 2010
Note: Retrofits
and total coal-fired capacity apply to coal units greater than 25
MW.
Electricity Prices in South Carolina under Clear Skies
- With or without Clear Skies, retail prices in the North
American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) SERC region
(the electricity supply region that contains South Carolina)
are projected to decrease between 2005 and 2020.
- With Clear Skies, retail prices are projected to be approximately
0.7-2.8% higher between 2005 and 2020 than in the absence
of the legislation.
|


| In 2000, the average retail electricity price
in South Carolina was approximately 5.5 cents/kWh, which was
below the average national retail price of approximately
6.7 cents/kWh. |
Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality
standards or other part of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions
in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory
actions that have not yet been promulgated.
Costs and Benefits in South Carolina under Clear Skies
Benefits Outweigh the Costs
Clear Skies....
- Guarantees significant emissions reductions – beginning
years before full implementation
- Uses a proven and flexible market-based approach with
incentives for innovation
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers
|
- In South Carolina, Clear Skies is projected to cost approximately
$128 million annually by 2020 while providing health benefits
totaling approximately $3.1 billion annually.
- The increases in production costs under Clear Skies represent
only a small percentage of total retail electricity sales revenue
in South Carolina.
- Retail electricity sales revenue in South Carolina was almost
$4.2 billion in 2000.
- Adjusting these sales revenues by the same growth rate used
for the modeling of costs would result in revenues of over $6.5
billion annually in 2020.
- Nationwide, the projected annual costs of Clear Skies (in $1999)
are $4.3 billion in 2010 and $6.3 billion in 2020; the nationwide
benefits of Clear Skies are expected to be over $113 billion annually
by 2020.
- An alternate estimate projects annual health benefits totaling
$23 billion.
Note: Costs
include capital costs, fuel, and other operation and maintenance
costs (both fixed and variable) associated with the achievement
of the emissions caps in the legislation (for example, the installation
and operation of pollution controls). These state-level production
costs are estimates; they do not account for the costs associated
with the transfer of electricity across regions, nor the costs or
savings that could be associated with allowance movement between
sources.
Notes on EPA’s Analysis
- The information presented in this analysis reflects EPA's modeling
of the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- EPA has updated this information to reflect modifications:
- Changes included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- Revisions to the Base Case to reflect newly promulgated
rules at the state and federal level since the initial analysis
was undertaken.
- The Clear Skies modeling results presented include the safety
valve feature
- This analysis compares new programs to a Base Case (Existing
Control Programs), which is typical when calculating costs and
benefits of Agency rulemakings.
- The Base Case reflects implementation of current control programs
only:
- Does not include yet-to-be developed regulations such
as those to implement the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
- The EPA Base Case for power sector modeling includes:
- Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific
caps in South Carolina, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire,
North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin finalized before March
2003.
- For air quality modeling, the Base Case also includes federal
and state control programs, as well as the Tier II, Heavy Duty
Diesel, and Nonroad Diesel rules.

|
State information based on EPA's modeling of the Clear Skies
Act of 2002 is presented here for archival reasons.
|
1. An alternative
methodology for calculating health-related benefits projects approximately
200 premature deaths prevented and $550 million in health benefits
each year in South Carolina by 2020.

top
|