| You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download,
to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's
PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the
free Acrobat Reader. |
808KB PDF Version (16 pages)
Highlights of Clear Skies in Wisconsin
- Wisconsin sources would reduce emissions of SO2 by 7%, NOx by
42%, and mercury by 20% by 2020 due to Clear Skies.
- The health benefits in Wisconsin would total $2 billion annually
($390 million under the alternative estimate) and include approximately
300 fewer premature deaths (200 under the alternative estimate)
and 700 fewer hospitalizations/emergency room visits each year.
- In addition, Wisconsin would receive environmental benefits,
including visibility improvements valued at $45 million for Wisconsin
residents who visit Americas National Parks and Wilderness
Areas.
- Clear Skies does not significantly impact electricity prices.
With or without Clear Skies, electricity prices in the electric
supply region that includes Wisconsin are expected to remain below
2000 national average prices.
Clear Skies: An Innovative Approach to Improving Human Health
and the Environment
Why Clear Skies?
- Air quality has improved, but serious concerns persist
- Wisconsins citizens suffer ill effects from air pollution,
including asthma attacks and premature death
- Electricity generation sector remains a major emissions source
- Very cost-effective to control the power sector, relative
to other sources
- Sources are concerned about upcoming complex and burdensome
regulations
Advantages of the Clear Skies Approach
- Guarantees significant nationwide emissions reductions
beginning years before full implementation
- Wisconsin sources would reduce emissions of SO2, NOx, and
mercury
- Delivers dramatic progress towards achievement of critical
health and environmental goals
- Uses proven, market-based flexible approach with incentives
for innovation
- Recognizes environmental needs as well as industry constraints,
allowing industry to better manage its operations and finances
while lowering risks to the public
- Sources are projected to install pollution controls to enable
continued reliance on coal
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers
Under Current Clean Air Act Power Plants Would Face a Complex
Set of Requirements

For a larger image, click here.
Clear Skies Sets a Firm Timeline for Emission Reductions
| The existing Title IV SO2 cap-and-trade program provides
an incentive and a mechanism to begin reductions upon enactment
of Clear Skies years before regulatory action under the current
Act. |
2004: The NOx SIP call (summertime NOx cap in 19 Eastern
States + D.C.)
2008: Clear Skies NOx Phase I (2.1 million ton annual cap
assigned to two Zones with trading programs)
2010:
- Clear Skies Hg Phase I (26 ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
- SO2 Phase I (4.5 million ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
2018:
- Clear Skies NOx Phase II (1.7 million ton annual cap assigned
to two Zones with trading programs)
- Clear Skies Hg Phase II (15 ton annual cap with a national
trading program)
- Clear Skies SO2 Phase II (3.0 million ton annual cap with a
national trading program)
Emissions in Wisconsin under Clear Skies
Emissions in Wisconsin (2020) would be reduced
from 2000 levels:
- 16% reduction in SO2 emissions
- 46% reduction in NOx emissions
- 8% reduction in mercury emissions
Emissions of SO2 and mercury would be reduced due to Wisconsin
State requirements. Since these requirements were undergoing
revisions during EPA modeling, the reductions are not fully
captured in base case.
|
Emissions: Current (2000) and Existing Clean Air Act Regulations (base case*) vs. Clear Skies in Wisconsin in 2010 and 2020


Note: The base case using IPM includes
Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific
caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX, and WI. It does not include mercury
MACT in 2007 or any other potential future regulations to implement
the current ambient air quality standards or other parts of the
Clean Air Act. Base case emissions in 2020 will likely be lower
due to state and federal regulatory actions that have not yet been
promulgated.
SO2 and NOx Emissions Reductions under Clear Skies
|
Emissions in Wisconsin and surrounding states would decrease
considerably. These emission reductions would make it much
easier for Wisconsin to comply with the national air quality
standards.
|


Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements,
and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX, and WI. It does
not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential future regulations
to implement the current ambient air quality standards or other parts
of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions in 2020 will likely be lower
due to state and federal regulatory actions that have not yet been
promulgated.
Clear Skies Health Benefits in Wisconsin
|
By 2020, Wisconsin would receive approximately $2 billion
in annual health benefits from reductions in fine particle
and ozone concentrations alone due to Clear Skies. (See
note 1)
|
Improve Public Health
- Reduced ozone and fine particle exposure by 2020 would result
in public health benefits of:
- approximately 300 fewer premature deaths each year (See
note 1)
- approximately 200 fewer cases of chronic bronchitis each
year
- approximately 500 fewer nonfatal heart attacks each year
- approximately 700 fewer hospital and emergency room visits
each year
- approximately 32,000 fewer days workers are out sick due
to respiratory symptoms each year
- approximately 6,600 fewer school absences each year
- Reduced mercury emissions would reduce exposure to mercury through
consumption of contaminated fish, resulting in additional, unquantified
benefits for those who eat fish from Wisconsins lakes.
Counties Projected to Remain Out of Attainment with the Ozone
Standards in Wisconsin

Note: Based on 1999-2001 data of
counties with monitors that have three years of complete data. The
base case includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, the Tier II, Heavy-Duty
Diesel, and Nonroad Diesel rules, final NSR settlements as of early
spring 2003, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality
standards or other parts of the Clean Air Act.
Clear Skies Would Help Wisconsin Meet Air Quality Standards
- Currently there are 11 counties exceeding the 8-hour ozone standard.
- Most of these counties are expected to be brought into attainment
with the 8-hour ozone standard under existing programs.
- By 2020, all counties except Kenosha County are projected
to be in attainment with the 8-hour ozone standard.
- Clear Skies would significantly improve air quality in Wisconsin
further and more quickly than what is expected from existing programs.
- By 2010, Clear Skies would bring Door County (population
approximately 30,000) into attainment with the 8-hour ozone
standard, earlier than under existing programs.
- In addition, Clear Skies would reduce ozone and fine particle
concentrations in counties throughout the state and move the remaining
non-attainment county in Wisconsin (Kenosha County) closer to
attainment with the ozone standard.
Note: Based on 1999-2001 data of
counties with monitors that have three years of complete data.
Clear Skies Environmental Benefits in Wisconsin

Clear Skies Would Provide Substantial Environmental Benefits in
Wisconsin
In comparison to existing programs,
- Visibility would improve perceptibly. The value of this benefit
for Wisconsin residents who visit Americas National Parks
and Wilderness Areas is $45 million.
- Sulfur deposition, a primary cause of acid rain, would decrease
up to 30% across large portions of the state.
- Nitrogen deposition, another significant contributor to acid
rain as well as a cause of damage in nitrogen-sensitive forests
and coastal waters, including the Gulf of Mexico hypoxia zone,
would decrease 5-20% across the state.
- Mercury deposition would decrease up to an additional 5% across
most of Wisconsin, and up to 15% in some small areas of the state.*
* These results are based on modeling the
Clear Skies mercury cap without triggering the safety valve.
Electricity Generation in Wisconsin under Clear Skies
|
|
Wisconsins sources are projected to reduce their
emissions through the installation of emission controls,
rather than through a switch from coal to natural gas.
- In 2010, 78% of Wisconsins coal-fired generation
is projected to come from units with advanced SO2,
NOx and/or mercury control equipment; in 2020, the
percentage is projected to increase to 93%.
- No coal-fired units in Wisconsin are projected to
be removed from operation as a result of Clear Skies.
|
|
|
Wisconsins electricity growth is projected to
be met by increases in gas-fired and coal-fired generation.
Clear Skies does not significantly alter this projection.
- Electricity from coal-fired generation will increase
by 24% from 1999 to 2020.
|
|

Emission Controls in Wisconsin under Clear Skies
|
Under Clear Skies by 2020...
- 10% of coal-fired capacity would install SCR
- No scrubbers would be installed
- 17% would install mercury controls
|
|
|
Plant Name
|
Unit ID
|
Technology
|
| EDGEWATER |
4 |
SCR* |
| J P MADGETT |
B1 |
SCR |
| PLEASANT PRAIRIE |
1 |
ACI |
| PLEASANT PRAIRIE |
2 |
ACI |
| * Retrofit was installed
under Clear Skies by 2010 |
|
|
The major generation companies in Wisconsin include:
- We Energies
- Wisconsin Public Service Corp
- Madison Gas & Electric Company
- Midwest Power
Total coal-fired capacity in Wisconsin is projected
to be 7,072 MW in 2010
|
|
| Note:
Retrofits and total coal-fired capacity apply to coal units
greater than 25 MW. |
Electricity Prices in Wisconsin under Clear Skies
- With or without Clear Skies, retail prices in the
North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC)
MAIN region (the electricity supply region that contains
Wisconsin) are projected to increase between 2005
and 2020.
- With Clear Skies, retail prices are projected to
be approximately 1.9 6.5% higher between 2005
and 2020 than in the absence of the legislation.
|



|
In 2000, the average retail electricity price in Wisconsin
was approximately 5.7 cents/kWh, which was below the average
national retail price of approximately 6.7 cents/kWh.
|
Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality
standards or other parts of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions
in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory
actions that have not yet been promulgated.
Costs and Benefits in Wisconsin under Clear Skies
Benefits Outweigh the Costs
|
Clear Skies
.
- Guarantees significant emissions reductions beginning
years before full implementation
- Uses a proven and flexible market-based approach with
incentives for innovation
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers
|
- In Wisconsin, Clear Skies is projected to cost approximately
$24 million annually by 2020 while providing health benefits totaling
approximately $2 billion annually.
- The increases in production costs under Clear Skies represent
only a small percentage of total retail electricity sales revenue
in Wisconsin.
- Retail electricity sales revenue in Wisconsin was over $3.7
billion in 2000.
- Adjusting these sales revenues by the same growth rate used
for the modeling of costs would result in revenues of almost
$5.7 billion annually in 2020.
- Nationwide, the projected annual costs of Clear Skies (in $1999)
are $4.3 billion in 2010 and $6.3 billion in 2020; the nationwide
benefits of Clear Skies are expected to be over $113 billion annually
by 2020.
Note: Costs
include capital costs, fuel, and other operation and maintenance
costs (both fixed and variable) associated with the achievement
of the emissions caps in the legislation (for example, the installation
and operation of pollution controls). These state-level production
costs are estimates; they do not account for the costs associated
with the transfer of electricity across regions, nor the costs or
savings that could be associated with allowance movement between
sources.
Notes on EPA's Analysis
- The information presented in this analysis reflects EPA's modeling
of the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- EPA has updated this information to reflect modifications:
- Changes included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- Revisions to the Base Case to reflect newly promulgated
rules at the state and federal level since the initial
analysis was undertaken.
- The Clear Skies modeling results presented include the safety
valve feature
- This analysis compares new programs to a Base Case (Existing
Control Programs), which is typical when calculating costs and
benefits of Agency rulemakings.
- The Base Case reflects implementation of current control programs
only:
- Does not include yet-to-be developed regulations such
as those to implement the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
- The EPA Base Case for power sector modeling includes:
- Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific
caps in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire,
North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin finalized before March
2003.
- For air quality modeling, the Base Case also includes federal
and state control programs, as well as the Tier II, Heavy Duty
Diesel, and Nonroad Diesel rules.

1. An alternative methodology for calculating
health-related benefits projects approximately 200 premature deaths
prevented and $390 million in health benefits each year in Wisconsin
by 2020.
State information based on EPA's modeling of the
Clear Skies Act of 2002 is presented here for archival
reasons.
|

top
|
|