Jump to main content.


Biogenic Emissions

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.


Biogenic Compounds: VOC and NOx
Important Vegetation in the Southwestern States for Biogenic Emissions
Important Vegetation in the Northeastern States for Biogenic Emissions
Contribution to VOC Composition and Reactivity Potential
Example Isoprene Data Analyses
Biogenic Emission Research Topics
Summary
References

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]




COMPOUNDS IDENTIFIED AS EMITTED FROM PLANT SPECIES


 
Species/Class
 
Example(s)

Half-Life (hr)a

Isoprene Isopreneb

1.8

Reaction products: methacrolein
methyl-vinyl-ketone
 
Monoterpenes limonene
camphene
a -pineneb
b -pineneb

1.1
3.5
3.4
2.3

n-Alkanes n-hexane
C10-C17

>48
7-31

Alkenes 1-decene

4

Aromatics p-Cymene

24

Sesquiterpenes b -Caryophyllene  
Alcohols cis-3-hexen-1-ol  
Aldehydes n-hexanal

7.4

Ketones 2-heptanone

>24

Other n-nonanal  

a Half-life based on reaction with OH radical.
b The maximum incremental reactivity of isoprene = 2.6, pinenes = 0.6, n-hexane = 0.3 mol O3/mol C.
Sources: Winer et al., 1992, 1989; Grosjean et al., 1996; Guenther et al., 1996; Carter 1991, 1994

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]



 
IMPORTANT VEGETATION IN THE SOUTHWESTERN STATES FOR BIOGENIC EMISSIONS
 

Biogenic Species Predominant Vegetation
Isoprene Oak (mostly), citrus, eucalyptus
Monoterpenes Pine, citrus, eucalyptus

Chinkin et al., 1996a, 1996b

  • Variation in emission estimates is observed from county to county because of differences in predominant vegetation.

    [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





IMPORTANT VEGETATION IN THE NORTHEASTERN STATES FOR BIOGENIC EMISSIONS
  

Biogenic Species Predominant Vegetationa,b
Isoprene Oak (mostly), spruce
Monoterpenes Maple, hickory, pine, spruce, fir, cottonwood

a As estimated using BEIS II.
b Note that in other parts of the U.S., eucalyptus and citrus emit large amounts of isoprene. Eucalyptus is not included in BEIS II and this should be addressed when modeling emissions in the western U.S. Citrus is included in BEIS II and is important in states like Florida and California.

  • Variation in emission estimates was observed from county to county in the Northeast because of differences in predominant vegetation.
  • In the Northeast, according to BEIS II, biogenic emissions are dominated by natural vegetation (as opposed to agriculture or urban landscape emissions).

   [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]




CONTRIBUTION TO VOC COMPOSITION AND REACTIVITY POTENTIAL

  • Isoprene is typically the most abundant biogenic hydrocarbon species.
  • Isoprene is the only biogenic species required by PAMS.
  • Isoprene is emitted during daylight hours and has a distinct diurnal profile (temperature, sunlight, and growth cycle dependent); concentrations should be low at night.
  • Isoprene is very reactive.

  Ventura County Modeling Domain[Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 1

 

Land use coverage by general classification for the Ventura County expanded modeling domain (Chinkin et al., 1996a). The 111 land cover categories derived in the study were grouped into seven broad land cover classifications to identify the general distribution of land coverage.

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 2

Map of VOC Emissions in Ventura County

Total VOC emissions are 602 tons/day, processed to 2 km grid size for the expanded Ventura County domain
(Chinkin et al., 1996a).

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 3

Isoprene Concentrations

Total NOx emissions are 18 tons/day, processed to 2 km grid size for the expanded Ventura County domain
(Chinkin et al., 1996a).

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 4

Maricopa County ozone modeling domain.

Land use coverage by category for the Maricopa County (Arizona) ozone modeling domain using 1990 land use data
(Chinkin et al., 1996b).

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 5

Biogenic VOC Emissions in Maricopa County

Biogenic VOC emissions in the Maricopa County ozone modeling domain (Chink et al., 1996b).

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 6

Biogenic NOx Emissions in Maricopa County

Biogenic NOx emissions in the Maricopa County ozone modeling domain (Chinkin et al., 1996b).

     [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 7

Hourly Biogenic NOx Emissions

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 8

Relationship of Isoprene Emissions

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]




EXAMPLE ISOPRENE DATA ANALYSES

  • Inspect diurnal profiles using box plots, line graphs of daily concentrations, plots of hourly summary statistics.
    • Prepare spatial plots of peak concentrations or of concentrations at a given hour.
    • Compare peak concentrations and diurnal behavior to other areas and to other measurements (i.e., temperature, solar radiation).
    • Quantify concentration, weight fraction, and reactivity of isoprene as a function of time of day.

     [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 9

Isoprene Concentrations at Stafford, CT - June 1995

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 10

Time Series Plot of Isoprene.

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 11

Diurnal Variation In Isoprene Concentration

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 12

Isoprene Concentrations At Five Sites

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]





Figure 13

Average Diurnal Isoprene Contributions

  [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]






BIOGENIC EMISSION RESEARCH TOPICS

  • Are isoprene concentrations regionally, or only locally representative? Affected by nearby vegetation canopy?
  • Are other biogenic species important to the total VOC? To overall reactivity?
  • Are biogenic species an important contributor to the unidentified hydrocarbon total?
  • How do urban vs. rural biogenic concentrations differ and what is the importance of these variations to formation of ozone at downwind sites?
  • What are the products of reaction from biogenic species? Are these species readily measurable? What is their ozone formation potential?
  • What is the contribution to ambient NOx levels from natural sources? For example, approximately 1% of NOx in Raleigh, NC is from biogenic sources.

       [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]




SUMMARY

  •   Biogenic hydrocarbons may play an important role in ozone formation.

  

 Analysis/Procedure   Objectives
Spatial and Temporal

Scatter Plots
Time Series
Fingerprints
Box Plots
Summary Statistics

Investigate diurnal behavior, compare biogenic and anthropogenic species, identify outliers 
Inter-Site Comparisons

Scatter, Relational Plots

Investigate regional/local emissions
Reactivity Assessment Investigate the importance of biogenics to ozone formation

Example tools include: VOCDat, statistical software, spreadsheets, Voyager.

       [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]




BIOGENIC EMISSIONS REFERENCES

Aneja V.P. and Roelle P. (1997) Contribution of biogenic nitric oxide in urban ozone: Raleigh,NC, as a case study. Atmos. Environ. 31, 1531-1537.

Cardelino C.A. and Chameides W.L. (1995) An observation-based model for analyzing ozone precursor relationships in the urban atmosphere. J. Air & Waste Manag. Assoc. 45, 161-180.

Carter W.P.L. (1991) Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile organic compounds. Report prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, EPA-600/3-91-050.

Carter W.P.L. (1994) Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile organic compounds. J. Air & Waste Manag. Assoc. 44, 881-899.

Chameides W.L., Lindsay R.W., Richardsen J., and Kiang C.S. (1988) The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study. Science 241, 1473-1475.

Chinkin L.R., Reiss R., Haste T.L., Ryan P.A., Stoelting M.W., Karlik J., and Winer A. (1996a) Development of a gridded leaf biomass inventory for use in estimating biogenic emissions for urban airshed modeling. Final report prepared for Ventura County Air Pollution Control District by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA and School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, STI-996086-1599-FR, August.

Chinkin L.R., Ryan P.A., Reiss R., Jones C.M., Winer A., and Karlik J. (1996b) Improvements to the biogenic emission estimation process for Maricopa County. Final report prepared for Maricopa Association of Governments, Phoenix, AZ by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA and University of California, Los Angeles, School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, STI-95160-1577-FR, July.

Gong Q. and Demerjian K.L. (1995) Hydrocarbon losses on a regenerated Nafion dryer. J. Air & Waste Manag. Assoc. 45, 490-493.

Grosjean E., Grosjean D., Fraser M.P., and Cass G.R. (1996) Air quality model evaluation data for organics. 2. C1 - C14 carbonyls in Los Angeles air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 2687-2703.

Guenther A.B., Monson R.K., and Fall R. (1991) Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability - observations with eucalyptus and emission rate algorithm development. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 10799-10808.

Guenther A.B., Zimmerman P.R., Harley P.C., Monson R.K., and Fall R. (1993) Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability - model evaluations and sensitivity analysis. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 12609-12617.

Guenther A., Zimmerman P., Klinger L., Greenbert J., Ennis C., Davis K., and Pollock W. (1996) Estimates of regional natural volatile organic compound fluxes from enclosure and ambient measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 1345-1359.

Lindsey C.G., Dye T.S., Main H.H., Korc M.E., Blumenthal D.L., Roberts P.T., Ray S.E., and Arthur M. (1997) Air quality and meteorological data analyses for the 1994 NARSTO-Northeast Air Quality Study. Final report in preparation for Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, STI-94362-1511-FR.

Main H.H. and Roberts P.T. (1993) Validation and analysis of the Lake Michigan Ozone Study ambient VOC data. Draft final report prepared for the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, Des Plaines, IL by Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA, STI-90217-1352-DFR, April.

National Research Council (1991) Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution. National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

NESCAUM (1995) Preview of the 1994 ozone precursor concentrations in the northeastern U.S. Report prepared by the Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Committee and the Data Management Committee of the Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, Boston, MA.

Roselle J.S., Pierce T.E., and Schere K.L. (1991) The sensitivity of regional ozone modeling to biogenic hydrocarbons. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 7371-7394.

Sudol M. and Winer A.M. (1992) Estimate of biogenic emissions for South Coast air basin. prepared for the California Institute for Energy Efficiency by the University of California, Los Angeles, CA, LBL/Energy and Environment Division Report MOU-4902710.

Sudol M. and Winer A. (1994) Written communication: analysis of impact of temperature on vegetative hydrocarbon emissions.

Taha H. (1996) Modeling impacts of increased urban vegetation on ozone air quality in the South Coast Air Basin. Atmos. Environ. 30, 3423-3430.

Tanner R.L., Minor T., Hartzell J., Jackson J., Rose M.R., and Zielinska B. (1992) Emissions data collection and inventory development. Work element 2: development of a natural source emission inventory. Report prepared by Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV and Environmental Engineering Center, DRI final report no. 8303-099.FR1.

Tingey D.T., Manning M., Grothaus L.C., and Burns W.F. (1979) The influence of light and temperature on isoprene emission rates from live oak. Plant Physiol. 47, 112-118.

Tingey D.T., Manning M., Grothaus L.C., and Burns W.F. (1980) Influence of light and temperature on monoterpene emission rates from slash pine. Plant Physiol. 65, 797-801.

Winer A.M., Lurmann F.W., Coyner L.A., Colome S.D., and Poe M.P. (1989) Characterization of air pollutant exposures in the California South Coast air basin: application of a new regional human exposure (REHEX) model. Report prepared for the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA by the University of California/Riverside, Riverside, CA, Contract No. TSA 106-01-88.

Winer A.M., Arey J., Aschmann S.M., Atkinson R., Long W.D., Morrison C.L., and Olszyk D.M. (1992) Emission rates of organics from vegetation in California's central valley. Atmos. Environ. 26, 2647-2659.

Winer A.M., Chinkin L., Arey J., Atkinson R., Adams J., and Karlik J. (1995) Critical evaluation of a biogenic emission system for photochemical grid modeling in California. Final report prepared for California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA by School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Sonoma Technology, Inc., Santa Rosa, CA; and Statewide Air Pollution Research Center, University of California, Riverside, CA, ARB Contract No. 93-725, December.

Yokouchi Y. and Ambe Y. (1984) Factors affecting emission of monoterpene from red pine (pinus densiflora). Plant Physiol. 75, 1009-1012.

     [Workbook Table of Contents] [Top of Biogenic Emissions] [Previous Section] [Next Section]


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.