UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATOR
In the Matter of
State of Illinois, Docket No. CAA-001-1995
Respondent
ORDER
On March 14, 1997, an order was issued in this matter in part directing the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency ("EPA") to show cause why this case should not be dismissed due to the
complainant's failure either to file an executed Consent Agreement and Final Order ("CAFO") by
March 10, 1997, as previously directed by this court, or to seek an extension of time for such filing. In
its response, counsel for EPA submitted an 18-page argument as to why dismissal of this case would be
improper. 1
It is not important for purposes of this order to discuss individually the arguments raised by EPA.
It is enough simply to state that they are not well-taken. EPA initiated this action against the State of
Illinois by the filing of an administrative complaint and, inasmuch as EPA bears the burden of
prosecuting this matter, it is fair under the circumstances of this case to expect the Agency to comply
with a clear and unambiguous deadline for the filing of an executed Consent Agreement. 2
Nonetheless, justice in this case requires that this matter not be dismissed for failure to timely
file an executed CAFO. 3 Accordingly, EPA's motion for reconsideration is granted and the Amended
Complaint is accepted for filing. In addition, EPA's motion for an extension of time for the filing of an
executed CAFO is granted. EPA is directed to file an executed CAFO with this court no later than
April 7, 1997.
Carl C. Charneski
Administrative Law Judge
Issued: March 24, 1997
Washington, D.C.
1 EPA also filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Denial of Motion to Amend the Complaint Instanter
and a Motion to Extend Date for Filing of the Consent Agreement and Consent Order.
2 Indeed, in a conference call held on January 9, 1997, involving the parties and this court, no objection
was raised to the court's setting March 10, 1997, as the date for the filing of the CAFO.
3 This is not to say, however, that the same result will obtain in all future cases. If EPA fails to file an
executed CAFO within the time prescribed, or fails to seek an extension of time for such filing, it runs
the risk of the case being dismissed.
IN THE MATTER OF STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent
Docket No. CAA-001-1995
Certificate of Service
I certify that the foregoing ORDER, dated March 24, 1997, was sent this day in the following
manner to the below addressees.
Original by Regular Mail to: Ms. Sonja Brooks
Regional Hearing Clerk
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60604-3590
Copy by Regular Mail to:
Attorney for Complainant: Timothy J. Chapman, Esquire
Assistant Regional Counsel
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5 (C-29A)
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, IL 60604-3590
Attorney for Respondent: Rosemarie Cazeau, Esquire
Senior Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Control Bureau
Office of the Illinois Attorney
General
100 West Randolph Street
llth Floor
Chicago, IL 60601
Marion Walzel
Legal Staff Assistant
Dated: March 24, 1997
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)