Proposal Guidelines for Brownfields Assessment,
Revolving Loan Fund, and Cleanup Grants -
Initial Proposal Guidelines

|
4. Initial Proposal Guidelines 15 4. Initial Proposal Guidelines To request funding, applicants must submit a single Initial Proposal. The Initial Proposal will be used to address up to three types of brownfields grant activities (assessment, RLF, and cleanup). Generally, Initial Proposals should be between 7 and 10 pages in length, not including attachments. The Initial Proposal will consist of the following items:
Please provide the following: I. Cover Letter (Optional) Submission of a cover letter is optional. If a cover letter is submitted, please prepare it on the applicant's letterhead and have it signed by an official of your organization. II. Applicant Information A. Project Title: Be as specific as possible. B. Name of Applicant: The proposed recipient of the grant funds. Note: For RLF coalition proposals, the entity named here will be considered the cooperative agreement recipient. C. Project Contact: Name, mailing address, telephone and fax numbers, and email address of the person from your organization who is responsible for the project proposal. We will contact this person if we need further information. D. Chief Executive: Name of the elected or other official who is head of your organization, mailing address, email address, and phone and fax numbers. Note: For RLF coalition proposals, provide the information for the chief executive for each eligible entity. E. Location: City, county, and state or Indian Reservation, triballyowned lands, tribal fee lands, etc., of the area targeted by your proposal. Note: For RLF coalition proposals, list the relevant information for each eligible entity. F. Population: The population of your jurisdiction and of the area targeted by your proposal. Tribes should provide the number of tribal/nontribal members affected. Note: For RLF coalition proposals, list the relevant information for each eligible entity. G. Special Consideration: Indicate whether you qualify for special consideration during proposal evaluation (i.e., population of your community under 100,000; federally recognized tribe; federally designated Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community in your community; or federally designated Renewal Community). III. Requested Programs and Funding (print/copy and complete and submit with proposal) Name of Applicant:____________________________________________ Please respond as appropriate:
IV. Project Overview Describe your proposed project and your plans for using EPA grant funds, including assessment, cleanup, and revolving loan fund grants, as appropriate. Note: Provide responses to the following threshold and ranking criteria if you are applying for assessment grant funding. Threshold criteria are pass/fail criteria. If your responses do not meet the threshold criteria, you will not be invited to prepare Final Proposals. Threshold Criteria A. Applicant Eligibility Note: For this threshold criterion, EPA may seek further clarification of responses, if needed, during the selection review process. Describe how you are an eligible entity for the grants for which you are applying. Refer to the description of applicant eligibility in Section 2.1. B. Community Notification Note: EPA will not seek further clarification of responses to this criterion. Describe how the community was notified of the preparation and submission of this proposal. Note: Those applicants selected to submit a Final Proposal will need to describe how the community was given the opportunity to be involved in the preparation of the Final Proposal. C. Letter from the State or Tribal Environmental Authority Note: EPA will not seek further clarification of responses to this criterion from the applicant. For an applicant other than a state or tribal environmental authority, provide a letter from the appropriate state or tribal environmental authority acknowledging that you plan to conduct assessment activities. If you are applying for multiple types of grant program activities, you need submit only one letter acknowledging the relevant grant activities. Provide as an attachment. D. Description of Sites If you have identified specific sites, address the following for each site: 1. List the site name and address and describe its operational history, environmental concerns, and its current site use and activity. 2. If you determine the site is not eligible for funding without a property-specific determination, then you will need to apply for a property-specific determination. To apply for a property- specific determination, attach the information requested in Appendix 4 Section 4.1. Contact your Regional representative for further guidance. Note: EPA may use available information to verify that the site is eligible for funding. 3. Identify who owns the site. 4. Identify how the site became contaminated. 5. If the site is contaminated with petroleum, describe whether Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) trust fund money has been spent at this site or whether the site is subject to a response under the Oil Pollution Act (see Appendix 3). 6. If the applicant owns the site, describe how you took ownership of the site (e.g., tax foreclosure) and date of acquisition. 7. If the site is not owned by the applicant, describe your relationship with the owner and their role in the work to be performed. 8. If the applicant owns the site, describe whether you are responsible for any of the environmental concerns at the site. 9. For those sites that are not owned by the applicant, indicate how access will be secured. 10. Indicate whether you are applying for a waiver of the $200,000 per site funding limit. If so, indicate the dollar amount requested and provide a justification as to why the waiver should be granted. Justification must be based on the anticipated level of contamination, size, or status of ownership (refer to Section 2.2. for a discussion of this waiver). 11. Identify ongoing or anticipated environmental enforcement actions related to the brownfield site for which funding is sought. Ranking Criteria A. Community Need (a maximum of 40 points may be received for this criterion)
B. Leveraging of Additional Resources (a maximum of 40 points may be received for this criterion)
C. Ability to Manage Grants (a maximum of 20 points may be received for this criterion)
D. Site Selection Process (a maximum of 30 points may be received for this criterion) 1. Describe how sites were selected/will be selected and what site selection criteria were/will be developed. 4.3. Revolving Loan Fund Grants Provide responses to the following threshold and ranking criteria if you are applying for Revolving Loan Fund grant funding. Threshold criteria are pass/fail criteria. If your responses do not meet the threshold criteria, you will not be invited to prepare Final Proposals. Threshold Criteria A. Applicant Eligibility Note: For this threshold criterion, EPA may seek further clarification of responses, if needed, during the selection review process. Describe how you are an eligible entity for the grants for which you are applying. Refer to the description of applicant eligibility in Section 2.1. Note: Coalition applicants for RLF grants must demonstrate that all coalition members are eligible entities. In addition, for coalition members other than the applicant, you must submit a letter from each eligible coalition member in which they agree to be part of the coalition. B. Community Notification Note: EPA will not seek further clarification of responses to this criterion. Describe how the community was notified of the preparation and submission of this proposal. Note: Those applicants selected to submit a Final Proposal will need to describe how the community was given the opportunity to be involved in the preparation of the Final Proposal. C. Legal Authority to Manage a Revolving Loan Fund Note: EPA will not seek further clarification of responses to this criterion. Provide an opinion from your legal counsel that demonstrates your legal authority to perform the actions necessary to manage a revolving loan fund. At a minimum, legal authority must include the ability to hold funds, make loans, enter into loan agreements, and collect repayments. This authority may be based on statute, regulation, or other authority. Attach your counsel's legal opinion. D. Cleanup Authority and Oversight Structure Note: EPA will not seek further clarification of responses to this criterion.
E. Cost Share Note: EPA will not seek further clarification of responses to this criterion. RLF grant recipients are required by the new Brownfields Law to provide a 20 percent cost share.2 This cost share is calculated as 20 percent of the total federal RLF funds awarded. For example, if you are applying for $1 million of federal RLF funds, you must provide a cost share of an additional $200,000. The cost share may be in the form of a contribution of money, labor, material, or services from a non-federal source. If the cost share is in the form of contribution of labor, material, or other services, it must be incurred for an eligible and allowable cost under the grant and not for ineligible costs, such as administrative costs (see Appendix 2 for a discussion of prohibited costs).
F. Letter from the State or Tribal Environmental Authority Note: EPA will not seek further clarification of responses to this criterion from the applicant. For an applicant other than a state or tribal environmental authority, provide a letter from the appropriate state or tribal environmental authority acknowledging that the applicant plans to conduct or oversee cleanup activities. If you are applying for multiple types of grant program activities, you need only submit one letter acknowledging the relevant grant activities. Provide as an attachment. G. Description of Sites If you are identifying particular sites, address the following for each site:
Note: EPA may use available information to verify that the site is eligible for funding.
Note: For subgrants, the subgrantee must own the site at the time the subgrant is awarded.
Note: An applicant may loan RLF grant funds to itself but may not issue subgrants of RLF grant funds to itself.
2 Applicants for an RLF grant may use fees from borrowers, interest on loans, repayments of loan principal, and other "program income" to meet the cost share requirement. However, if an RLF grant applicant plans to use anticipated program income for cost share, the applicant also must demonstrate how alternative sources for obtaining money, labor, material, or services can be used to meet its cost share requirement if program income is less than anticipated during the performance period for the grant. Ranking Criteria A. Community Need (a maximum of 40 points may be received for this criterion)
B. Leveraging of Additional Resources (a maximum of 40 points may be received for this criterion)
C. Ability to Manage Grants/Management Structure (a maximum of 20 points may be received for this criterion)
D. Description of Target Market for RLF Loans and Subgrants (a maximum of 40 points may be received for this criterion)
3 Note, cooperative agreement recipients must comply with 40 CFR 31.36 when entering into procurement contracts with RLF grant funds and 40 CFR 31.37 when issuing subgrants with RLF grant funds. Nonprofit organizations receiving RLF loans/subgrants and cleanup grants must comply with 40 CFR Part 30 when entering into procurement contracts with RLF grant funds. 4 Note, cooperative agreement recipients cannot award subgrants to for-profit organizations. 5 Note, RLF cooperative agreement recipients must take these into consideration when awarding a subgrant. Provide responses to the following threshold and ranking criteria if you are applying for cleanup grant funding. Threshold criteria are pass/fail criteria. If your responses do not meet the threshold criteria, you will not be invited to prepare Final Proposals. Note: One eligible entity may apply for up to 5 sites within its Initial Proposal, at up to $200,000 per site. Each site will be evaluated separately. Threshold Criteria A. Applicant Eligibility Note: For this threshold criterion, EPA may seek further clarification of responses, if needed, during the selection review process. Describe how you are an eligible entity for the grants for which you are applying. Refer to the description of applicant eligibility in Section 2.1. Note: In order to receive a cleanup grant, the applicant must own the property at the time of award. B. Community Notification Note: EPA will not seek further clarification of responses to this criterion. Describe how the community was notified of the preparation and submission of this proposal.
Note: Those applicants selected to submit a Final Proposal will need to describe how the community was given the opportunity to be involved in the preparation of the Final Proposal. C. Description of Sites Note: For this threshold criterion, EPA may seek further clarification of responses, if needed, during the selection review process. For each site, provide the following:
Note: EPA may use available information to verify that the site is eligible for funding.
D. Cleanup Authority and Oversight Structure Note: EPA will not seek further clarification of responses to this criterion.
E. Cost Share Note: EPA will not seek further clarification of responses to this criterion. Cleanup grant recipients are required by the new Brownfields Law to provide a 20 percent cost share. This cost share is calculated as 20 percent of the total federal cleanup funds awarded. For example, if you are applying for $1 million of federal cleanup funds, you must provide a cost share of an additional $200,000. The cost share may be in the form of a contribution of money, labor, material, or services from a non-federal source. If the cost share is in the form of contribution of labor, material, or other services, it must be incurred for an eligible and allowable cost under the grant and not for ineligible costs, such as administrative costs (see Appendix 2 for a discussion of prohibited costs).
F. Letter from the State or Tribal Environmental Authority Note: EPA will not seek further clarification of responses to this criterion from the applicant. For an applicant other than a state or tribal environmental authority, provide a letter from the appropriate state or tribal environmental authority acknowledging that the applicant plans to conduct cleanup activities. If you are applying for multiple grant programs, you need only submit one letter acknowledging the relevant grant activities. Provide as an attachment. Ranking Criteria A. Community Need (a maximum of 40 points may be received for this criterion)
B. Leveraging of Additional Resources (a maximum of 40 points may be received for this criterion)
C. Ability to Manage Grants (a maximum of 20 points may be received for this criterion)
When EPA invites applicants to submit Final Proposals, EPA may provide additional information about Final Proposal guidelines.Go to Part 5. Final Proposal Guidelines Table of Contents 1. The National Brownfields Program and the
New Brownfields Law 3 2. Summary of Brownfields Grant Programs 5 3. Proposal Submission and Selection Process
Overview 9 4. Initial Proposal Guidelines 15 5. Final Proposal Guidelines 29 Appendix 1. EPA Regional and Headquarters Contacts 39 Appendix 2. Prohibitions on Use of Funds 41 Appendix 3. Guidance on Sites Eligible for Brownfields Funding Under CERCLA §104(k) 43 Appendix 4. Guidance for Requests for Property-Specific Determinations for Funding 55
|
|||||
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)
