[Federal Register: May 8, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 89)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 25726-25733]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08my98-19]
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD
12 CFR Part 938
[No. 98-17]
RIN 3069-AA61
Federal Home Loan Bank Standby Letters of Credit
AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance Board.
ACTION: Proposed Rule.
SUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance Board is proposing
to codify its existing policies on Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLBank)
standby letters of credit into the form of a regulation and to amend
these policies to allow for broader use of these products by FHLBank
mibers and eligible nonmiber mortgagees. The proposed rule also would
eliminate some of the restrictions currently imposed on issuance of
standby letters of credit by FHLBanks that limit the usefulness of these
products to mibers and eligible nonmiber mortgagees.
DATES: Comments are due on or before August 6, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Elaine L. Baker, Executive Secretary,
Federal Housing Finance Board, 1777 F Street, N.W., Washington D.C.
20006. Comments will be available for inspection at this address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane E. Dorius, Associate
Director, Program Development, Office of Policy, (202) 408-2576; or
Eric M. Raudenbush, Attorney-Advisor, Office of General Counsel, (202)
408- 2932, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1777 F Street, N.W., Washington,
D.C. 20006.
SUPPLiENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The FHLBanks have been permitted to engage in standby letter of credit
(LOC) transactions since 1983, when the predecessor agency to the Federal
Housing Finance Board (Finance Board), the former Federal Home Loan
Bank Board (FHLBB), first adopted its Policy Guidelines for Issuance
of FHLBank Standby Letters of Credit (FHLBB Guidelines). Underlying
this policy was a 1983 FHLBB legal opinion which concluded that FHLBank
issuance of standby LOCs on behalf of mibers is permissible under the
FHLBanks' authority to make secured advances, set forth in section 10
of the Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. 1430, because a FHLBank standby LOC is the
functional equivalent of an advance in that it involves an extension
of credit by the FHLBank to its miber. Because the FHLBB considered
the authority to issue standby LOCs to derive from the authority to
make secured advances, the 1983 FHLBB Guidelines, and the 1985 and 1989
revisions thereto, applied the statutory and regulatory requirients
pertaining to advances to standby LOC transactions. The substance of
the FHLBB Guidelines was maintained when the Finance Board (created
by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcient Act of
1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 412 (1989), to succeed the FHLBB
as regulator of the FHLBanks) adopted its first standby LOC policy in
1991.
FHLBank participation in standby LOC transactions currently is governed
by the Finance Board's Interim Policy Guidelines for FHLBank Standby
Letters of Credit (Interim Guidelines), which were adopted in 1993.
The Interim Guidelines permit FHLBanks to issue or confirm standby LOCs
on behalf of mibers to facilitate: the purchase of, or commitment to
purchase mortgage loans; the collateralization of public unit deposits;
the collateralization of Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 936 deposits
(deposits made in Puerto Rican financial institutions by corporations
operating in Puerto Rico); interest rate swaps and other transactions
that assist a miber's asset/liability managient; transactions that promote
home financing, housing activity, or mibers' involvient in commercial
and economic development activities that benefit low-and moderate-income
families or activities that are located in low-and moderate-income neighborhoods
(community development); and tax-exipt bonds or notes designed to promote
housing or the financing of community development. In addition, the
Interim Guidelines permit FHLBanks to issue LOCs on behalf of nonmiber
mortgagees eligible to obtain advances under section 10b of the Bank
Act, 12 U.S.C. 1430b, for transactions that promote home financing,
housing activity, and community development.
Because the Finance Board retained the substance of the FHLBB Guidelines
and, by implication, the 1983 FHLBB legal analysis, the Interim Guidelines
continued to impose upon LOCs all of the regulatory requirients and
restrictions that apply to advances. For example, the Interim Guidelines
require that LOCs: be fully secured with collateral eligible to secure
advances under Sec. 935.9(a) of the Finance Board's regulations, 12
CFR 935.9(a); be counted in the calculation of a miber's FHLBank stock-to-advances
ratio; be issued only for housing finance purposes if they have a term
to maturity in excess of five years, or are issued on behalf of non-qualified
thrift lender (non-QTL) mibers; and be included in the calculation of
the limitation on advances to non-QTL mibers set forth in Sec. 935.13
of the regulations, id. Sec. 935.13, if issued on behalf of non-QTL
mibers. In addition, the Interim Guidelines limit LOCs and confirmations
used for purposes other than interest rate swap transactions to terms
of ten years or less and prohibit use of LOC confirmations solely to
promote a miber's LOC program or to increase a miber's profitability
from this fee-based service.
As part of an ongoing effort to determine both how FHLBank standby
LOCs might be made more useful to miber institutions and nonmiber mortgagees
and how to encourage greater use of LOCs in carrying out the housing
and community investment mission of the FHLBank Systi, the Finance Board
recently undertook a survey of the FHLBanks to determine the uses of
standby LOCs and the needs of the FHLBanks in issuing standby
[[Page 25727]]
LOCs. The Finance Board also undertook a review of the legal bases
on which the FHLBanks' LOC authority has been, and could be, grounded.
As a result of these efforts, the Finance Board has concluded that FHLBank
authority to engage in standby LOC transactions is not limited to the
provisions addressed in the 1983 FHLBB legal opinion, but also may be
considered to be part of, and incidental to, the FHLBanks' deposit-
taking and payment processing powers set forth in section 11(e) of the
Bank Act. 12 U.S.C. 1431(e). If a FHLBank's involvient in a standby
LOC transaction is considered to be part of its payment processing activity,
however, FHLBank fees for LOCs may be subject to a private sector adjustment
factor under section 11(e)(2) of the Bank Act. 12 U.S.C. 1431(e)(2).
The Finance Board specifically requests comment regarding the consequences
of this possibility.
The Finance Board also has determined that the authority of a FHLBank
to issue a standby LOC may be considered, in the alternative, to be
part of the FHLBanks' incidental authority to enter into commitments
to make advances. On the basis of this refined analysis, the Finance
Board has concluded that, although there may be safety and soundness
and other policy reasons for requiring certain restrictions, it is unnecessary
as a matter of law to subject FHLBank LOCs to all of the statutory and
regulatory restrictions and limitations that apply to advances.
This ruliaking proposes to amend the Interim Guidelines to provide
the FHLBanks with greater flexibility to respond to miber needs for
standby LOCs in a manner that ensures that FHLBanks' use of standby
LOCs is consistent with the FHLBank Systi's housing and community investment
mission and to codify these policies as a regulation. Accordingly, these
proposed standby LOC regulations permit FHLBank mibers to request standby
LOCs for a broader range of purposes and riove many of the restrictions
on FHLBank standby LOC issuance that have limited the usefulness of
such LOCs in the past.
The Finance Board requests comments on all aspects of the proposed
rule.
II. Analysis of the Proposed Rule
This ruliaking proposes to add to the Finance Board's regulations,
12 CFR chapter IX, a new part 938 to govern FHLBank Standby LOCs. Definitions
relevant to the proposed FHLBank Standby LOC regulation are set forth
in Sec. 938.1 of the proposed regulation. Because these definitions
have been drafted in order to implient substantive provisions, they
are discussed, as necessary, below in the context of their use in the
body of the regulation.
Section 938.2 of the proposed regulation governs FHLBank standby LOCs
issued or confirmed on behalf of miber institutions. Paragraph (a) authorizes
FHLBanks to issue standby LOCs on behalf of mibers, and to confirm standby
LOCs issued by mibers, that conform to the requirients of proposed part
938 and that are issued for the purposes enumerated in paragraphs (a)(1)
through (a)(4). The term "standby letter of credit," as defined in Sec.
938.1, is intended to include those instruments that are commonly referred
to as such; i.e., LOCs that effectively guarantee the applicant's payment
or performance in an underlying transaction with the beneficiary. The
term does not include LOCs that are intended to serve as a short-term
payment mechanism to finance the movient of goods (commonly known as
"commercial" LOCs). The Finance Board considers "direct pay" LOCs, which
are designed to act as the primary mechanism for satisfying an applicant's
payment obligations over a period of time (for example, to make payments
of principal and interest on commercial paper and medium-term notes)
to be a form of standby LOC which FHLBanks would be authorized to issue
under the proposed regulation.
Under paragraph (a) of proposed Sec. 938.2, FHLBanks would be authorized
to issue or confirm standby LOCs for any of four broad purposes: (1)
To facilitate residential housing finance or other housing activity;
(2) to facilitate the financing of targeted economic development projects;
(3) to assist mibers with asset/liability managient; or (4) to provide
mibers with liquidity or other funding. This list of approved purposes
would replace the more specific and restrictive list set forth in the
Interim Guidelines. By replacing the specific list with the broader
purposes set forth in paragraph (a) of Sec. 938.2, the Finance Board
intends to ensure that FHLBanks' use of standby LOCs is consistent with
the FHLBank Systi's housing and community development mission and, at
the same time, provide the FHLBanks with greater flexibility to respond
to miber needs for such credit. Under the proposed regulation, FHLBanks
would determine, subject to Finance Board review and oversight, whether
particular transactions fall within any of the above-described categories.
The term "residential housing finance" refers to the purchase or funding
of "residential housing finance assets," or other activities that support
the development or construction of residential housing. As defined in
Sec. 935.1 of the Finance Board's regulations, the term "residential
housing finance assets" includes: Loans secured by residential real
property; mortgage-backed securities; participations in loans secured
by residential real property; loans financed by CIP advances (under
the proposed Community Investment Cash Advance (CICA) rule, discussed
below, reference to CIP advances would be amended to refer to loans
or investments financed by advances made pursuant to a CICA program);
loans secured by manufactured housing; or any other assets that the
Finance Board determines to be residential housing finance assets. The
term "residential housing finance," as defined in Sec. 938.1 of the
proposed regulation, also is intended to encompass activities that are
aimed toward providing residential housing for individuals and families,
but that do not fall within the existing regulatory definition of "residential
housing finance assets," which refers only to loans and securities backed
by loans. For example, a FHLBank would be permitted to issue a standby
LOC to serve as a performance bond to secure a builder's performance
in a housing construction project. Paragraph (a)(1) of Sec. 938.2 is
intended to provide the FHLBanks with the same scope of authority to
issue and confirm housing-related standby LOCs that currently exists
under the Interim Policy.
Economic development projects that would be eligible for support through
a FHLBank standby LOC would include commercial, manufacturing, social
service, public or community facility, and public or private infrastructure
projects or activities that benefit families with incomes of 100 percent
or less of area median income in urban areas, 115 percent or less of
area median income in rural areas, or with an income at or below a target
level established by a FHLBank to address unmet housing or economic
development credit needs. Projects would be deied to benefit such families
if: The project is located in a neighborhood in which more than 50 percent
of the families have incomes at or below the targeted income level;
the project is located in a rural or urban Champion Community, a rural
or urban ipowerment Zone, or rural or urban Enterprise Community; the
project is located in a federally declared disaster area; the project
involves property
[[Page 25728]]
eligible for a federal Brownfield Tax Credit; the project is located
in an area affected by a federal military base closing or realignment;
the project is located in an area identified as a designated community
under the Community Adjustment and Investment Program; the annual salaries
for at least 75 percent of the permanent full- and part-time jobs, computed
on a full-time equivalent basis, created or retained by the project,
other than construction jobs, are at or below the targeted income level;
the project qualifies as a small business; or more than 50 percent of
the families who otherwise benefit from (other than through iployment)
or are provided services by the project have incomes at or below the
targeted income level.
These provisions and the concepts underlying thi were developed as
part of the Finance Board's proposed Community Investment Cash Advance
(CICA) program regulation, which has been published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register. The proposed CICA Regulation would establish
a general framework under which the FHLBanks may establish programs
to provide advances to be used in support of financing for housing and
economic development activities that benefit income- targeted families
that may not benefit from advances made under the FHLBanks' existing
Affordable Housing Programs (AHP) and Community Investment Programs
(CIP).
Specifically, the proposed CICA Regulation would authorize each FHLBank
to establish: A Rural Development Advance (RDA) program to provide advances
to mibers and nonmiber borrowers to finance economic development projects
in rural areas that benefit families with incomes at or below 115 percent
of the area median income; an Urban Development Advance (UDA) program
to provide advances to mibers and nonmiber borrowers to finance economic
development projects in urban areas that benefit families with incomes
at or below 100 percent of the area median income; and other CICA programs
to provide financing for economic development projects benefiting families
with incomes at or below a level established by the Bank to address
unmet economic development credit needs (defined as those for which
financing is not generally available, or is available at lower levels
or under less attractive terms). Regulation of the existing CIP would
also be subsumed within the CICA Regulation.
Under the Interim Guidelines, FHLBanks are permitted to issue standby
LOCs to support only those economic development activities that benefit
families earning less than 80 percent of area median income, or that
are located in a neighborhood in which 51 percent or more of the households
earn less than 80 percent of area median income, for which a miber could
receive a CIP advance. Having determined that it may authorize FHLBanks
to issue standby LOCs to support a wider array of activities than is
currently permitted under the Interim Guidelines, the Finance Board
sought ways to permit FHLBanks to respond better to miber requests for
LOC products while, at the same time, assuring that FHLBanks' use of
standby LOCs is consistent with the public policy purposes of the FHLBank
Systi. The inclusion of the CICA-related targeted economic development
provisions, which already had been subject to much study and discussion
in the process of developing the proposed CICA Regulation, as one parameter
for FHLBank LOC use appears to meet both criteria by maximizing the
ability of FHLBanks to benefit areas with unmet economic development
credit needs, as well as furthering regulatory consistency.
A thorough discussion of the reasoning behind the Finance Board's
inclusion of particular substantive criteria in its conception of targeted
economic development may be found in the preamble to the proposed CICA
Regulation, published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
It is anticipated that, if and when the CICA and Standby LOC Regulations
are promulgated as final rules, the Standby LOC Regulation will describe
the economic activities that may be appropriately supported by FHLBank
LOCs merely by cross-referencing the CICA Regulation, as opposed to
including all of the CICA-related definitions therein. Because the CICA
Regulation thus far has been published only as a proposed rule, the
Finance Board found it appropriate to restate those definitions in their
entirety within the proposed Standby LOC Regulation in order to make
its scope more readily apparent to the reader.
Under paragraph (a) of proposed Sec. 938.2, FHLBanks also would be
permitted to issue standby LOCs to assist mibers with their asset/ liability
managient and to provide mibers with liquidity or other funding. Although
the Interim Guidelines permit FHLBanks to issue short-term LOCs to facilitate
interest rate swaps and other transactions that assist in asset/liability
managient, such LOCs would no longer be limited to a term of five years
or less, or limited only to QTL mibers, under the proposed regulation.
In addition, although liquidity and other funding purposes are not mentioned
expressly in the Interim Guidelines, they have been included in the
proposed regulation to make clear that the FHLBanks may use their LOC
authority to further this central miber-service function and to bring
within the purview of the regulation permissible standby LOC activities
that might not be easily traceable to a particular housing or economic
development purpose, such as securing public unit deposits and IRC Section
936 deposits.
Paragraph (b) of proposed Sec. 938.2 requires that FHLBank standby
LOCs made to mibers be secured at the time of issuance for the full
amount of the LOC by collateral described in paragraph (c) of that section.
This would continue the requirient of the Interim Guidelines that LOCs
be fully secured at the time of issuance, although, as discussed below,
mibers would be able to use a wider range of collateral and would no
longer need to pledge their FHLBank stock as additional collateral for
LOCs. Although the Finance Board has concluded that, as a matter of
law, the Bank Act does not necessarily require that LOCs be collateralized
fully at the time of issuance, it has determined that such a requirient
is advisable as a matter of safe and sound banking practice. The Finance
Board requests comments on whether there are any circumstances under
which the FHLBanks could safely and soundly issue LOCs that are not
fully collateralized.
Paragraph (c) describes the types of collateral that are eligible
to secure FHLBank standby LOCs issued on behalf of mibers. It provides
that all LOCs may be secured with collateral that is eligible to secure
FHLBank advances to mibers under Sec. 935.9(a) of the Finance Board's
regulations. 12 CFR 935.9(a). In addition, in order to facilitate the
use of LOCs to support housing and targeted economic development activities
and to permit greater access to LOCs by mibers that lack sufficient
Sec. 935.9(a)--eligible collateral, the proposed regulation also would
permit mibers to secure LOCs that are issued for the purpose of facilitating
residential housing finance or targeted economic development activities
with: (1) secured or federally- guaranteed loans to small businesses
(as defined by the Office of Thrift Supervision); (2) investment-grade
obligations of state or local government agencies; and (3) "other real
estate-related collateral" described in Sec. 935.9(a)(4) of the regulations
in excess
[[Page 25729]]
of the "30 percent of capital" limitation set forth in paragraph (a)(4)(iii)
thereof.
Under the Interim Guidelines, LOCs may be secured only by collateral
that is eligible to secure advances, regardless of the purpose for which
the LOC is issued. Such collateral includes Small Business Administration--(SBA)
guaranteed securities. However because most small business loans are
not SBA-guaranteed, the proposed regulation, by permitting all secured
or federally-guaranteed small business loans to be used as collateral
for LOCs, could encourage mibers to provide financing for smaller or
start-up businesses that often have a more difficult time accessing
credit than well-established or larger enterprises. Expanded use of
small business loans as collateral will support the FHLBanks' mission
of providing support for targeted economic development lending--the
targeted universe in this case being small commercial and business entities,
including small farms. Commercial bank mibers and Community Development
Financial Institution (CDFI) mibers, in particular, may have substantial
amounts of such loans available to use as collateral.
Under the proposed regulation, an additional source of collateral
for LOCs would be state and municipal bonds rated investment grade by
a nationally-recognized rating agency (such as bonds rated BBB or better
by Moody's or Bbb or better by Standard & Poor's). Under the Interim
Guidelines, FHLBanks may accept real estate-related state and municipal
housing bonds as collateral for LOCs only as part of the limited basket
of other real estate-related collateral. See 12 CFR 935.9(a)(4)(iii).
Expanding eligible collateral for LOCs to include investment grade state
or municipal bonds could benefit mibers who hold such investments and
who have insufficient advances-eligible collateral. Because there is
an established secondary market for these bonds, they can be easily
valued and, if necessary, liquidated by a FHLBank.
The proposed regulation also permits mibers to secure LOCs issued
for housing finance or targeted economic development purposes with other
real estate-related collateral in excess of the "30 percent of capital"
limitation set forth in Sec. 935.9(a)(4)(iii) of the Advances Regulation.
12 CFR 935.9(a)(4)(iii). If so permitted, mibers that have substantial
amounts of such collateral, such as commercial banks, could expand their
use of FHLBank LOCs. For example, mibers specializing in community development
lending could pledge, without limit, loans secured by community facilities,
such as day care centers and health clinics and lenders in rural areas
could pledge more of their farm loans.
The proposed regulation would permit each FHLBank to establish limits
on the use of these additional types of collateral. FHLBanks accepting
such collateral would be expected to include, as part of their standby
LOC policies required under Sec. 938.5(a)(1), policies and procedures
for valuing and securing such collateral that are consistent with safe
and sound banking practice. The Finance Board believes that any additional
risks that might arise from the use of these additional types of collateral
should be adequately managed in accordance with the collateral provisions
of the Advances Regulation that are referenced in proposed Sec. 938.5(d).
Among other things, the Advances Regulation requires the FHLBanks to
establish written procedures for determining the value of collateral,
and to follow those procedures in ascertaining the value of a particular
asset offered as collateral. See 12 CFR 935.12. The Advances Regulation
also permits the FHLBanks to require a miber to support the valuation
of any collateral with an appraisal or other investigation of the collateral
as the FHLBank deis necessary. Id.
The Finance Board expects that if proposed part 938 is adopted as
a final rule, each FHLBank will review its collateral valuation procedures,
and will amend thi as necessary to reflect the availability of these
additional types of collateral to secure standby LOCs, before accepting
such collateral. The Finance Board also expects that the FHLBanks, as
a matter of practice, will conduct careful review and, if necessary,
require an appraisal of such collateral. Such appraisal should take
into account the security of the loan itself, as well as any additional
risks inherent in such collateral and each FHLBank's own ability to
evaluate those risks. The Finance Board specifically requests comment
on whether there are other assets that should be considered as eligible
collateral for LOCs and whether the Finance Board should establish limits
on these additional types of collateral based upon the assets that secure
the loans thiselves.
Section 938.3 of the proposed regulation governs FHLBank standby LOCs
issued or confirmed on behalf of customers that have been certified
as eligible nonmiber mortgagees pursuant to Sec. 935.22(b) of the Finance
Board's regulations. 12 CFR 935.22(b). Paragraph (a) of proposed Sec.
938.3 would authorize FHLBanks to issue or confirm on behalf of nonmiber
mortgagees standby LOCs that are fully secured by Federal Housing Administration-(FHA)
insured loans or Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) securities
backed by FHA-insured loans, for the same broad purposes for which FHLBanks
may issue or confirm LOCs on behalf of miber institutions. In addition,
paragraph (b) of proposed Sec. 938.3 would authorize FHLBanks to issue
or confirm, on behalf of nonmiber mortgagees that have qualified as
state housing finance agencies (SHFAs) by meeting the requirients of
Sec. 935.22(d) of the regulations, 12 CFR 935.22(d), standby LOCs that
are fully secured by collateral eligible under Sec. 935.9(a) of the
regulations, id. 935.9(a), to secure advances. Standby LOCs secured
by such collateral would be required to facilitate residential or commercial
lending that benefits individuals or families meeting the income requirients
in section 142(d) or 143(f) of the IRC.
Proposed Sec. 938.3 would continue the general policy of the Interim
Guidelines by requiring that FHLBank LOCs issued on behalf of nonmiber
mortgagees be subject to the same limitations and restrictions that
apply to advances made to nonmibers under section 10b of the Bank Act,
12 U.S.C. 1430b, and Sec. 935.24 of the regulations, 12 CFR 935.24.
In its legal review of the sources of statutory authority for issuance
of LOCs by FHLBanks, the Finance Board determined that, unlike LOCs
issued on behalf of mibers, the issuance of LOCs on behalf of nonmibers
could not be considered to fall within the FHLBanks' payment processing
authority, which expressly applies only to FHLBank dealings with mibers
and financial institutions eligible to apply for FHLBank mibership.
See 12 U.S.C. 1431(e)(2). Thus, the Finance Board believes that FHLBanks
should issue LOCs to a nonmiber mortgagee only under the same conditions
that would apply if the FHLBank were to enter into an advance commitment
with that nonmiber. Because the type of collateral that a FHLBank may
accept to secure advances to nonmibers is linked, by statute, to the
purpose of the advance, the purpose for which a LOC is issued on behalf
of a nonmiber also must govern the type of collateral that the FHLBank
may accept to secure the LOC.
Section 938.4 of the proposed regulation governs the obligation of
both mibers and nonmiber mortgagees on whose behalf an FHLBank issues
a LOC to reimburse the FHLBank for any funds drawn by the beneficiary
under
[[Page 25730]]
the LOC. Paragraph (a) of proposed Sec. 938.4 requires that, as part
of the agreient pursuant to which a LOC is to be issued, a miber or
nonmiber assume an unconditional obligation to reimburse the FHLBank
fully for any amounts drawn by the beneficiary under the LOC by having
available in its FHLBank deposit or transaction account on the day of
the FHLBank's payment to the beneficiary sufficient funds to cover such
payment. The requirient that an applicant assume an unconditional obligation
to reimburse the FHLBank continues the policy of the Interim Guidelines
and is consistent with the provisions of Article 5 of the Uniform Commercial
Code (UCC), as revised in 1995, which provide that an issuer that has
honored a presentation made by a beneficiary under a LOC is entitled
to be reimbursed by the applicant in immediately available funds not
later than the date of its payment of funds. See UCC 5-108(i) (1995).
In order to facilitate reimbursient of a FHLBank, to iphasize the
applicant's responsibility to cover the amount of any draw under a LOC,
to tie the FHLBanks' LOC activities more closely to their payment processing
authority (in the case of LOCs issued on behalf of mibers) and for purposes
of regulatory consistency, paragraph (a)(1) of Sec. 938.4 requires that
reimbursient by an applicant be accomplished through its FHLBank deposit
account (if the applicant is a miber) or transaction account (if the
applicant is a nonmiber, see 12 CFR 935.24).
Paragraph (b) of proposed Sec. 938.4 requires FHLBanks to take prompt
action to recover the funds due if an applicant fails to have available
in its FHLBank deposit or transaction account on the day of a draw under
a LOC sufficient funds to cover the draw. Despite this requirient, paragraph
(b) of proposed Sec. 938.4 authorizes an issuing FHLBank, at the request
of a miber or nonmiber, but in its own discretion, to finance an applicant's
repayment of a LOC draw by making an advance to the applicant. Of course,
such an advance could be made only if the applicant is, at that time,
willing and able to comply with the advances requirients of section
10 (if the applicant is a miber) or section 10b (if the applicant is
a nonmiber) of the Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. 1430, 1430b, and part 935 of
the Finance Board's regulations, 12 CFR part 935. For purposes of complying
with the regulatory advance requirients, the "purpose" of an advance
made to a miber or nonmiber under the conditions of proposed Sec. 938.4(c)
would be determined using the same standards that apply to any other
type of advance. See 12 CFR 935.13 & .14.
Section 938.5 of the proposed regulation sets forth certain miscellaneous
provisions that would apply to all LOCs issued on behalf of mibers and
nonmibers. paragraph (a)(1) of proposed Sec. 938.5 requires that all
LOCs issued on behalf of mibers or nonmibers be issued only pursuant
to a written LOC policy established by the FHLBank to govern its standby
LOC programs. Such a policy would be required to: (1) implient all statutory
and regulatory provisions that apply to standby FHLBank LOCs; (2) to
set forth underlying criteria to apply to the issuance or renewal of
standby LOCs that is consistent with the criteria that must be applied
to the underwriting of advances; and (3) set forth criteria regarding
the pricing of standby LOCs, including any special criteria that could
apply to LOCs issued to facilitate the financing of targeted economic
development projects.
It is intended that paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of proposed Sec. 938.5, regarding
the application of underwriting criteria under the FHLBank's LOC policy
at the time of the issuance or renewal of a LOC, apply also in cases
where a LOC contains a provision stating that the LOC will automatically
renew unless the FHLBank notifies the beneficiary of its intent not
to renew the LOC. Such provisions must be carefully monitored so that
the FHLBank can control its risk exposure. The renewal of any LOC pursuant
to such a provision should be approved in the same manner as a renewal
of a LOC that does not contain this provision. However, because an issued
LOC cannot be canceled without agreient from the beneficiary, FHLBanks
are encouraged to issue LOCs only for a limited term, with the potential
for renewal if the account party riains creditworthy. This would give
the FHLBanks an opportunity to reassess periodically their exposure
on long-term transactions.
As a matter of safety and soundness regulation, paragraph (a)(2) of
proposed Sec. 938.5 would continue the policy of the Interim Guidelines
by requiring that all LOCs issued by a FHLBank either contain a specific
expiration date, or be for a specified term. This is consistent with
Comptroller of the Currency and the OTS regulations on LOCs, which specifically
require that LOCs issued by national banks and savings associations,
as a matter of sound banking practice, be limited in duration or terminable
periodically or at will upon notice or payment to the beneficiary. See
12 CFR 7.1016(b)(1)(iii) and 560.120(b)(1)(iii).
Similarly, paragraph (a)(3) of proposed Sec. 938.5 would continue
the policy of the Interim Guidelines by requiring that the transfer
of a FHLBank LOC be approved in advance by the issuing FHLBank. A transfer
of a letter of credit occurs when the beneficiary transfers to a another
party its right to draw under the LOC. Requiring approval by a FHLBank
would ensure that a LOC could not be transferred without the FHLBank's
knowledge.
Finally, paragraph (b) of proposed Sec. 938.5 would apply to FHLBank
LOCs issued on behalf of mibers and nonmibers certain provisions set
forth in the Finance Board's Advances Regulation, 12 CFR part 935, including
provisions regarding the FHLBank's right to require additional collateral
or to limit the type of collateral that it will accept, and matters
of collateral verification, safekeeping and valuation.
Proposed part 938 would not include many of the restrictions on FHLBank
standby LOC transactions that currently are imposed by the Interim Guidelines.
The Interim Guidelines require a miber to purchase FHLBank stock when
a FHLBank issues a LOC, which is an off-balance sheet iti, on behalf
of that miber. This causes a decrease in the FHLBank's leverage because
the FHLBank's outstanding stock is increased without a corresponding
increase in on-balance sheet assets. Under proposed part 938, FHLBanks
would no longer be required to include LOCs in the computation of a
miber's advances/FHLBank capital stock ratio, because the Finance Board
no longer considers LOCs to be the legal equivalent of outstanding advances.
Eliminating this requirient would riove the deleveraging effect of the
current policy and would make FHLBank standby LOCs more attractive to
mibers.
By applying uniform requirients to standby LOCs issued on behalf of
any miber, without regard to the QTL status of the miber, proposed part
938 would not require that standby LOCs issued on behalf of non- QTL
mibers be issued only for housing finance purposes, as is the case under
the Interim Guidelines. In addition, proposed part 938 would not require
that standby LOCs issued on behalf of non-QTL mibers be included with
total FHLBank Systi advances and advances to non-QTL mibers for purposes
of monitoring compliance with the FHLBank Systi's statutory 30 percent
limit on advances to non-QTL mibers. See 12 U.S.C. 1430(e)(2). Again,
the Finance Board has determined that these restrictions are not required
by law because the Finance
[[Page 25731]]
Board no longer considers LOCs to be the legal equivalent of outstanding
advances.
Rioving these restrictions on standby LOCs issued on behalf of non-QTL
mibers, many of which are actively involved in financing housing and
economic development transactions, would expand the opportunities for
FHLBanks to issue standby LOCs to support such housing and economic
development activities. In addition, rioval of these restrictions would
enhance the ability of FHLBanks to assist non- QTL mibers with their
liquidity needs.
The Interim Guidelines limit the use of standby LOCs with tax- exipt
bonds to those issues designed to promote housing or commercial and
economic development that benefits low-and moderate-income families
or that is located in low-and moderate-income neighborhoods. Under IRC
section 149, 26 U.S.C. 149, it is unclear whether tax-exipt bonds financing
economic development would lose their tax-exipt status if supported
by a FHLBank standby LOC. The Finance Board currently is working with
Congress to resolve this issue legislatively. In the meantime, the Finance
Board considers this issue to be a matter for the Internal Revenue Service
to determine and, therefore, has not specified in the proposed regulation
the types of tax-exipt bonds for which a FHLBank standby LOC may be
issued.
The Interim Guidelines provide that FHLBank LOC confirmations may
not be used solely to support a miber's own LOC program or to increase
a miber's profitability. LOC confirmations serve essentially the same
purpose, and incur for a FHLBank the same contingent liability, as the
issuance of a LOC. A miber's access to a FHLBank's LOC confirmation
presumably would make a miber's LOC more acceptable to a beneficiary
and would help to increase a miber's profitability. Because all of the
products and services offered by a FHLBank to its mibers are designed
to assist mibers improve their liquidity, to offer additional financing
options to its customers, and consequently increase its income, the
current restriction on confirmations appears to conflict with these
goals. Therefore, this restriction has not been included in proposed
part 938.
The Interim Guidelines limit the term of a FHLBank standby LOC issued
on behalf of a QTL miber to 5 years for non-housing finance purposes
and 10 years for housing finance purposes, but impose no limit for issues
that support a miber's performance in interest rate swap transactions.
The Interim Guidelines limit the term of a FHLBank standby LOC issued
on behalf of a non-QTL miber to 10 years or less for housing finance.
In contrast, FHLBanks may offer advances with maturities of any length
consistent with the safe and sound operation of the FHLBank. See 12
CFR 935.6(a).
Expanding the terms for LOCs would benefit low-income housing tax
credit transactions that often require a 15-year letter of credit. In
addition, a longer term would permit LOCs to be used with industrial
development and other bonds used to fund local economic development
that typically have terms longer than 10 years. Because standby LOCs
posses no more credit risk than an advance, there appears to be no reason
to limit the maturity of a LOC as long as a FHLBank has established
controls that ensure the safe and sound operation of the FHLBank. Therefore,
the proposed regulation imposes no term limitations on FHLBank standby
LOCs.
Proposed part 938 would not require that outstanding FHLBank LOCs
be reflected on the books of the FHLBank as contingent liabilities,
as is required under the Interim Guidelines, because this is already
required under General Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), which
the FHLBanks must follow. Finally, the requirient of the Interim Guidelines
that FHLBanks must submit monthly LOC reports has not been included
in the proposed regulation because this is already subsumed within the
current general requirient that FHLBanks report monthly to the Finance
Board on all FHLBank activities. See 12 CFR 934.7(e).
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The proposed rule applies only to the FHLBanks, which do not come
within the meaning of "small business," as defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA). See 5 U.S.C. 601(6). Therefore, in accordance
with section 605(b) of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Finance Board hereby
certifies that this proposed rule, if promulgated as a final rule, will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 938
Community development, Credit, Federal home loan banks, Housing, Mortgages.
Accordingly, the Finance Board hereby proposes to amend chapter IX,
title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, to add a new part 938 to read
as follows:
PART 938--STANDBY LETTERS OF CREDIT
Sec.
938.1 Definitions.
938.2 Standby letters of credit on behalf of mibers.
938.3 Standby letters of credit on behalf of nonmiber mortgagees.
938.4 Obligation to Bank under all standby letters of credit.
938.5 Additional provisions applying to all standby letters of credit.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1422b, 1429, 1430, 1430b, 1431.
Sec. 938.1 Definitions.
As used in this part:
Act means the Federal Home Loan Bank Act, as amended (12 U.S.C.
1421-49).
Applicant means a person or entity at whose request or for
whose account a standby letter of credit is issued.
Bank means a Federal Home Loan Bank established under the authority
of the Act.
Beneficiary means a person or entity who, under the terms of
a standby letter of credit, is entitled to have its complying presentation
honored.
Benefit. An economic development project is deied to benefit
families with incomes at or below a targeted income level if:
- The project is located in a neighborhood in which more than 50 percent
of the families have incomes at or below the targeted income level;
- The project is located in a rural Champion Community, or a rural
ipowerment Zone or rural Enterprise Community, as designated by the
Secretary of Agriculture (in the case of projects located in rural
areas);
- The project is located in an urban Champion Community, or an urban
ipowerment Zone or urban Enterprise Community, as designated by the
Secretary of HUD (in the case of projects located in urban areas);
- The project is located in a federally declared disaster area;
- The project involves property eligible for a federal Brownfield
Tax Credit authorized by 26 U.S.C. 198;
- The project is located in an area impacted by a federal military
base closing or realignment;
- The project is located in an area identified as a designated community
under the Community Adjustment and Investment Program;
- The annual salaries for at least 75 percent of the permanent full-and
part-time jobs, computed on a full-time equivalent basis, created
or retained by the project, other than construction jobs, are at or
below the targeted income level;
- The project qualifies as a small business; or
[[Page 25732]]
- More than 50 percent of the families who otherwise benefit from
(other than through iployment) or are provided services by the project
have incomes at or below the targeted income level.
Champion Community means a community which developed a strategic plan
and applied for designation by either the Secretary of Housing and Urban
Development or the Secretary of Agriculture as an ipowerment Zone or
Enterprise Community, but was designated a Champion Community.
Confirm means to undertake, at the request or with the consent
of the issuer, to honor a presentation under a standby letter of credit
issued by a miber or nonmiber mortgagee.
Document means a draft or other diand, document of title, investment
security, certificate, invoice, or other record, statient, or representation
of fact, law, right, or opinion that is presented under the terms of
a standby letter of credit.
Economic development projects means:
- Commercial, manufacturing, social service, and public facility projects
and activities; and
- The construction or rehabilitation of public or private infrastructure,
such as roads, utilities, and sewers.
Family means one or more persons living in the same dwelling unit.
Finance Board means the agency established by the Act as the
Federal Housing Finance Board.
Issuer means a person or entity that issues a standby letter
of credit.
Median income for the area means one or more of the following,
as determined by the Bank:
- The median income for the area, as published annually by the Department
of Housing and Urban Development;
- The applicable median family income, as determined under 26 U.S.C.
143(f) (Mortgage Revenue Bonds) and published by a State agency or
instrumentality;
- The median income for the area, as published by the United States
Department of Agriculture; or
- The median income for any definable geographic area, as published
by a federal, state, or local government entity for purposes of that
entity's housing programs, and approved by the Board of Directors
of the Finance Board, at the request of a Bank, for use under the
Bank's Community Investment Cash Advance (CICA) programs, as provided
for in part 970 of this chapter.
Miber means an institution that has been approved for mibership in
a Bank and has purchased capital stock in the Bank in accordance with
Sec. Sec. 933.20 and 933.24 of this chapter.
Metropolitan statistical area means a "metropolitan statistical
area," as that term is defined by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.
Neighborhood means:
- A census tract or block numbering area;
- A unit of general local government with a population of 25,000 or
less;
- A rural county;
- A trust or restricted Indian land, Native Hawaiian Home Land, or
Alaskan Native Village; or
- A geographic location designated in comprehensive plans, ordinance,
or other local documents as a neighborhood, village, or similar geographic
designation that is within the boundary of but does not encompass
the entire area of a unit of general local government.
Nonmiber mortgagee means an entity certified as a nonmiber mortgagee
pursuant to Sec. 935.22(b) of this chapter.
Nonmiber SHFA means a nonmiber mortgagee that is a "state housing
finance agency," as that term is defined in Sec. 935.1 of this chapter,
and that has met the requirients of Sec. 935.22(d) of this chapter.
Presentation means delivery of a document to an issuer, or
an entity that has undertaken a confirmation at the request or with
the consent of the issuer, for the giving of value under a standby letter
of credit.
Residential housing finance means:
- The purchase or funding of "residential housing finance assets,"
as that term is defined in Sec. 935.1 of this chapter; or
- Other activities that support the development or construction of
residential housing.
Rural area means:
- A unit of general local government or an unincorporated place outside
a metropolitan statistical area that has a population of less than
30,000; or
- A trust or restricted Indian land, Native Hawaiian Home Land, or
Alaskan Native Village.
Small business means a "small business concern," as that term is defined
by section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) and impliented
by the Small Business Administration at 13 CFR part 121, or any successor
provisions.
Standby letter of credit means a definite undertaking by an
issuer on behalf of an applicant that represents an obligation to the
beneficiary, pursuant to a complying presentation, to repay money borrowed
by, advanced to, or for the account of the applicant; to make payment
on account of any indebtedness undertaken by the applicant; or to make
payment on account of any default by the applicant in the performance
of an obligation. The term standby letter of credit does not include
a commercial letter of credit, or any short-term self- liquidating instrument
used to finance the movient of goods.
Targeted income level means:
- For projects or activities that benefit primarily individuals or
families residing in an urban area, 100 percent of the median income
for the area;
- For projects or activities that benefit primarily individuals or
families residing in a rural area, 115 percent of the median income
for the area; or
- An income level that is based on a percentage of median income established
by the Bank to address unmet community investment credit needs.
Urban area means a unit of general local government or an unincorporated
place that is:
- Within a metropolitan statistical area; or
- Outside a metropolitan statistical area and has a population of
more than 30,000.
Sec. 938.2 Standby letters of credit on behalf of mibers.
(a) Authority and purposes. Each Bank is authorized to issue or confirm
on behalf of mibers standby letters of credit that comply with the requirients
of this part, for any of the following purposes:
- To assist mibers in facilitating residential housing finance;
- To assist mibers in facilitating the financing of economic development
projects that benefit families with incomes at or below a targeted
income level;
- To assist mibers with asset/liability managient; or
- To provide mibers with liquidity or other funding.
(b) Fully secured. A Bank, at the time it issues or confirms a
standby letter of credit on behalf of a miber, shall obtain and
maintain a security interest in collateral that is sufficient to secure
fully the miber's unconditional obligation described Sec. 938.4(a)(2),
and that complies with the requirients set forth in paragraph (c) of
this section.
(c) Eligible collateral.
- Any standby letter of credit issued on
behalf of a miber may be secured by collateral that is eligible to
secure advances under Sec. 935.9(a) of this chapter. In making the
calculation required under Sec. 935.9(a)(4)(iii) of this chapter, only
standby letters of credit issued for the
[[Page 25733]]
purposes described in paragraphs (a)(3) or (a)(4) of this section
shall be counted as "outstanding advances."
- A standby letter of credit issued on behalf of a miber for a
purpose described in paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section may,
in addition to the collateral described in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section, be secured by:
- Secured or federally-guaranteed loans to small businesses or securities representing
interests in such loans; or
- Obligations of state or local government units or agencies,
rated as investment grade by a nationally-recognized rating agency.
Sec. 938.3 Standby letters of credit on behalf of nonmiber mortgagees.
(a) Nonmiber mortgagees. Each Bank is authorized to issue or confirm
on behalf of nonmiber mortgagees standby letters of credit that are
fully secured by collateral described in Secs. 935.24(b)(1)(i) or (ii)
of this chapter, and that otherwise comply with the requirients of this
part, for any of the following purposes:
- To assist nonmiber mortgagees in facilitating residential housing
finance;
- To assist nonmiber mortgagees in facilitating the financing of economic
development projects that benefit families with incomes at or below
a targeted income level;
- To assist nonmiber mortgagees with asset/liability managient; or
- To provide nonmiber mortgagees with liquidity or other funding.
(b) Nonmiber SHFAs. Each Bank is authorized to issue or confirm on behalf
of nonmiber SHFAs standby letters of credit that are fully secured by
collateral described in Secs. 935.24(b)(2)(i)(A), (B) or (C) of this
chapter, and that otherwise comply with the requirients of this part,
for the purpose of facilitating residential or commercial mortgage lending
that benefits individuals or families meeting the income requirients
in section 142(d) or 143(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.
142(d) or 143(f)).
Sec. 938.4 Obligation to Bank under all standby letters of credit.
(a) Obligation to reimburse. A Bank may issue or confirm a standby
letter of credit only on behalf of a miber or nonmiber mortgagee that
has:
- Established with the Bank a cash account pursuant to Secs. 934.5,
935.24(b)(2)(i)(B) or 935.24(d) of this chapter; and
- Assumed an unconditional obligation to reimburse the Bank for value
given by the Bank to the beneficiary under the terms of the standby
letter of credit by depositing immediately available funds into the
account described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section not later than
the date of the Bank's payment of funds to the beneficiary.
(b) Prompt action to recover funds. If a miber or nonmiber mortgagee fails
to fulfill the obligation described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section,
the Bank shall take action promptly to recover the funds that such miber
or nonmiber mortgagee is obligated to repay.
(c) Obligation financed by advance. Notwithstanding the obligations
and duties of the Bank and its miber or nonmiber mortgagee under paragraphs
(a) and (b) of this section, the Bank may, at its discretion, permit
such miber or nonmiber mortgagee to finance repayment of the obligation
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section by receiving an advance
that complies with sections 10 or 10b of the Act and part 935 of this
chapter.
Sec. 938.5 Additional provisions applying to all standby letters
of credit.
(a) Written policy; other requirients. Each standby letter of credit
issued or confirmed by a Bank shall:
- Be issued or confirmed only in compliance with a written
policy, developed and impliented by the Bank to govern its standby
letter of credit programs, that:
- Is consistent with the provisions of the Act and this part;
- Sets forth credit underwriting criteria, consistent with the
provisions of Sec. 935.5 of this chapter, to be applied in evaluating
applications for standby letters of credit and renewals thereof;
and
- Sets forth criteria regarding the pricing of standby letters
of credit, including any special pricing provisions for letters
of credit that facilitate the financing of economic development
projects that benefit families with incomes at or below a targeted
income level;
- Contain a specific expiration date, or be for a specific term; and
- Require approval in advance by the Bank of any transfer of the standby
letter of credit from the original beneficiary to another person or
entity.
(b) Additional collateral provisions.
- A Bank may take such steps as it deis necessary to protect its secured
position on standby letters of credit, including requiring additional
collateral, whether or not such additional collateral conforms to
the requirients of Secs. 938.2 or 938.3.
- Collateral pledged by a miber or nonmiber mortgagee to secure a
letter of credit issued or confirmed on its behalf by a Bank shall
be subject to the provisions of Secs. 935.9(b), 935.9(e), 935.11 and
935.12 of this chapter.
Dated: April 22, 1998.
By the Board of Directors of the Federal Housing Finance Board.
Bruce A. Morrison,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 98-11948 Filed 5-7-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P |