| You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader. |
687KB
PDF Version (16 pages)
Highlights of Clear Skies in Alabama
- Alabama sources would reduce emissions of SO2 by 29%, NOx by
58%, and mercury by 40% by 2020 due to Clear Skies.
- The health benefits in Alabama would total $3.1 billion annually
($570 million under the alternative estimate) and include 200
fewer premature deaths (100 under the alternative estimate) and
500 fewer hospitalizations/emergency room visits each year.
- In addition, Alabama would receive environmental benefits including
improved visibility. The value of this benefit for Alabama residents
who visit National Parks and Wilderness areas throughout the
country would be $44 million each year by 2020.
- Clear Skies does not significantly impact electricity prices.
With or without Clear Skies, electricity prices in the electricity
supply region that includes Alabama are expected to remain near
2000 prices.
Clear Skies: An Innovative Approach to Improving Human Health
and the Environment
Why Clear Skies?
- Air quality has improved, but serious concerns persist
- Alabama citizens suffer ill effects from air pollution, including
asthma attacks and premature death
- Electricity generation sector remains a major emissions source
- Very cost-effective to control the power sector, relative
to other sources
- Sources are concerned about upcoming complex and burdensome
regulations
Advantages of the Clear Skies Approach
- Guarantees significant nationwide emissions reductions - beginning
years before full implementation
- Alabama sources would substantially reduce emissions of SO2,
NOx, and mercury
- Delivers dramatic progress towards achievement of critical
health and environmental goals
- Uses proven, market-based flexible approach with incentives
for innovation
- Recognizes environmental needs as well as industry constraints,
allowing industry to better manage its operations and finances
while lowering risks to the public
- Sources are projected to install pollution controls to enable
continued reliance on coal
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers
Under Current Clean Air Act Power Plants Would Face a Complex
Set of Requirements

For a larger image, click here.
Clear Skies Sets a Firm Timeline for Emission Reductions
| The existing Title IV SO2 cap-and-trade program provides
an incentive and a mechanism to begin reductions upon enactment
of Clear Skies years before regulatory action under the current
Act. |
2004: The NOx SIP call (summertime NOx cap in 19 Eastern
States + D.C.)
2008: Clear Skies NOx Phase I (2.1 million ton annual cap
assigned to two Zones with trading programs)
2010:
- Clear Skies Hg Phase I (26 ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
- SO2 Phase I (4.5 million ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
2018:
- Clear Skies NOx Phase II (1.7 million ton annual cap assigned
to two Zones with trading programs)
- Clear Skies Hg Phase II (15 ton annual cap with a national
trading program)
- Clear Skies SO2 Phase II (3.0 million ton annual cap with
a national trading program)
Emissions in Alabama under Clear Skies
|
Emissions in Alabama (2020) would be reduced from 2000 levels:
- 46% reduction in SO2 emissions
- 70% reduction in NOx emissions
- 67% reduction in mercury emissions
|
Emissions: Current (2000) and Existing Clean Air Act Regulations
(base case*) vs. Clear Skies in Alabama in 2010 and 2020


Note: The
base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other
potential future regulations to implement the current ambient
air quality standards or other part of the Clean Air Act. Base
case emissions in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and
federal regulatory actions that have not yet been promulgated.
Clear Skies Health Benefits in Alabama
Improve Public Health
| By 2020, Alabama would receive approximately $3.1 billion
in annual health benefits from reductions in fine particle
and ozone concentrations alone due to Clear Skies. (see
note 1) |
- Reduced ozone and fine particle exposure by 2020 would result
in public health benefits of:
- approximately 400 fewer premature deaths each year (see
note 1)
- approximately 200 fewer cases of chronic bronchitis each
year
- approximately 500 fewer nonfatal heart attacks each year
- approximately 800 fewer hospital and emergency room visits
each year
- approximately 40,000 fewer days workers are out sick due
to respiratory symptoms each year
- approximately 4,400 fewer school absences each year
- Reduced mercury emissions would reduce exposure to mercury
through consumption of contaminated fish, resulting in additional,
unquantified benefits to those who eat fish from Alabama's lakes,
streams, and coastal waters.
Counties Projected to Remain Out of Attainment with the PM2.5
and Ozone Standards in Alabama

Note: The
base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other
potential future regulations to implement the current ambient
air quality standards or other parts of the Clean Air Act. Based
on 1999-2001 data of counties with monitors that have three years
of complete data.
Clear Skies Would Help Alabama Meet Air Quality Standards
- Currently there are 12 counties exceeding the annual fine particle
standards and 4 counties exceeding the 8-hour ozone standard.
- Some of these counties are expected to be brought into attainment
with the fine particle standards under existing programs.
- All of these counties are expected to be brought into attainment
with the ozone standard under existing programs.
- Clear Skies would significantly improve air quality in Alabama
further and more quickly than what is expected from existing
programs.
- By 2010, Clear Skies would bring 4 remaining non-attainment
counties (DeKalb, Shelby, Montgomery, and Houston--population
approximately 500,000) into attainment with the annual fine
particle standards.
- By 2020, Clear Skies would bring Morgan, Russell and Talledega
counties (pop. 240,000) into attainment with the fine particle
standard.
- By 2020, all counties except Jefferson County are projected
to be in attainment with both the annual fine particle and
8-hour ozone standards.
- In addition, Clear Skies would reduce ozone and fine particle
concentrations in counties throughout the state and move the
remaining non-attainment county for fine particles in Alabama
(Jefferson County) closer to attainment.
Note: Based
on 1999-2001 data of counties with monitors that have three years
of complete data.
Clear Skies Environmental Benefits in Alabama
Clear Skies Would Provide Substantial Environmental Benefits
in Alabama
In comparison to existing programs,
- Visibility would improve perceptibly. The value of improved
visibility for the Sipsey Wilderness area is $1.6 million.
- The value of this benefit for Alabama residents who visit
National Parks and Wilderness areas throughout the country
would be $50 million each year by 2020.
- Sulfur deposition, a primary cause of acid rain, would decrease
15-30% throughout the state.
- Nitrogen deposition, a cause of damage in nitrogen-sensitive
coastal waters, would decrease 5-20% throughout Alabama.
- Mercury deposition would decrease up to 15% in most of the
state.*


* These results are based on modeling the Clear Skies mercury
cap without triggering the safety valve.
SO2 and NOx Emissions Reductions under Clear Skies
| Emissions in Alabama and surrounding states would decrease
considerably. These emission reductions would make it much
easier for Alabama to maintain compliance with the national
air quality standards. |


Note: The
base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other
potential future regulations to implement the current ambient
air quality standards or other parts of the Clean Air Act. Base
case emissions in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and
federal regulatory actions that have not yet been promulgated.
Electricity Generation in Alabama under Clear Skies
| Current and Projected Generation by Fuel Type
in Alabama under Clear Skies (GWh) |
|
 |
- Alabama's sources are projected to reduce their emissions
through the installation of emission controls, rather than
from a switch from coal to natural gas.
- In 2010, 46% of Alabama's coal-fired generation is
projected to come from units with advanced SO2 and/or
NOx control equipment that also substantially reduce
mercury emissions; in 2020, the percentage is projected
to increase to 80%.
- No coal-fired units in Alabama are projected to be
removed from operation as a result of Clear Skies.
|
Emission Controls in Alabama under Clear Skies
Under Clear Skies by 2020...
- 16% of coal-fired capacity would install SCR
- 22% would install scrubbers
|
|
The major generation companies in Alabama include:
- Alabama Power Co.
- Tennessee Valley Authority
Total coal-fired capacity in Alabama is projected
to be 11,475 MW in 2010. |
|
Units in Alabama Projected to Be Retrofitted Due to Clear Skies
by 2020
|
Plant Name
|
Unit ID
|
Technology
|
| BARRY |
4 |
Scrubber |
| BARRY |
5 |
Scrubber |
| COLBERT |
1 |
Scrubber*/ SCR* |
| COLBERT |
2 |
Scrubber*/ SCR* |
| COLBERT |
3 |
Scrubber*/ SCR* |
| COLBERT |
4 |
Scrubber*/ SCR* |
| GORGAS |
10 |
SCR* |
| CHARLES R LOWMAN |
2 |
SCR* |
| CHARLES R LOWMAN |
3 |
SCR* |
| JAMES H MILLER JR |
2 |
SCR |
*Retrofit was installed under Clear Skies by
2010
Note: Retrofits
and total coal-fired capacity apply to coal units greater than
25 MW.
Electricity Prices in Alabama under Clear Skies
- With or without Clear Skies, retail prices in the North
American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) SERC region
(the electricity supply region that contains Alabama) are
projected to decrease between 2005 and 2020.
- With Clear Skies, retail prices are projected to be approximately
0.7 - 2.8% higher between 2005 and 2020 than in the absence
of the legislation.
|


| In 2000, the average retail electricity price
in Alabama was approximately 5.6 cents/kWh, which was below
the average national retail price of approximately
6.7 cents/kWh. |
Note: The
base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other
potential future regulations to implement the current ambient
air quality standards or other parts of the Clean Air Act. Base
case emissions in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and
federal regulatory actions that have not yet been promulgated.
Costs and Benefits in Alabama under Clear Skies
Benefits Outweigh the Costs
Clear Skies....
- Guarantees significant emissions reductions - beginning
years before full implementation
- Uses a proven and flexible market-based approach with
incentives for innovation
- Increases certainty across the board for industry,
regulators, and consumers
|
- In Alabama, Clear Skies is projected to cost approximately
$287 million annually by 2020 while providing health benefits
totaling approximately $3.1 billion annually.
- The increases in production costs under Clear Skies represent
only a small percentage of total retail electricity sales revenue
in Alabama.
- Retail electricity sales revenue in Alabama was almost $4.7
billion in 2000.
- Adjusting these sales revenues by the same growth rate used
for the modeling of costs would result in revenues of over
$7.2 billion annually in 2020.
- Nationwide, the projected annual costs of Clear Skies (in $1999)
are $4.3 billion in 2010 and $6.3 billion in 2020; the nationwide
benefits of Clear Skies are expected to be over $113 billion
annually by 2020.
- An alternate estimate projects annual health benefits totaling
$23 billion.
Note: Costs
include capital costs, fuel, and other operation and maintenance
costs (both fixed and variable) associated with the achievement
of the emissions caps in the legislation (for example, the installation
and operation of pollution controls). These state-level production
costs are estimates; they do not account for the costs associated
with the transfer of electricity across regions, nor the costs
or savings that could be associated with allowance movement between
sources.
Notes on EPA's Analysis
- The information presented in this analysis reflects EPA's modeling
of the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- EPA has updated this information to reflect modifications:
- Changes included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- Revisions to the Base Case to reflect newly promulgated
rules at the state and federal level since the initial
analysis was undertaken.
- The Clear Skies modeling results presented include the
safety valve feature
- This analysis compares new programs to a Base Case (Existing
Control Programs), which is typical when calculating costs and
benefits of Agency rulemakings.
- The Base Case reflects implementation of current control
programs only:
- Does not include yet-to-be developed regulations such
as those to implement the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.
- The EPA Base Case for power sector modeling includes:
- Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific
caps in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire,
North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin finalized before
March 2003.
- For air quality modeling, the Base Case also includes federal
and state control programs, as well as the Tier II, Heavy Duty
Diesel, and Nonroad Diesel rules.
1. An alternative
methodology for calculating health-related benefits projects approximately
200 premature deaths prevented and $570 million in health benefits
each year in Alabama by 2020.
State information based on EPA's modeling of the Clear
Skies Act of 2002 is presented here for archival reasons.
|

top
|