| You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader. |
603KB PDF Version (13 pages)
Highlights of Clear Skies in Maine
- Emissions of SO2, NOx, and mercury in Maine would remain unchanged
by 2020 due to Clear Skies.
- The health benefits in Maine would total $320 million annually
($60 million under the alternative estimate) and include for the
New England region approximately 500 fewer premature deaths (290
under the alternative estimate) and 860 fewer hospitalizations/emergency
room visits each year.
- In addition, Maine would receive environmental benefits including
reduced sulfur and nitrogen deposition and improved visibility.
The value of improved visibility for Maine residents who visit
National Parks and Wilderness areas nationwide would be $10 million
annually by 2020.
- Clear Skies does not significantly impact electricity prices.
With or without Clear Skies, electricity prices in the electric
supply region that includes Maine are expected to remain below
2000 prices.
Clear Skies: An Innovative Approach to Improving Human Health
and the Environment
Why Clear Skies?
- Air quality has improved, but serious concerns persist
- Maine's citizens suffer ill effects from air pollution, including
asthma attacks and premature death
- Electricity generation sector remains a major emissions source
- Very cost-effective to control the power sector, relative
to other sources
- Sources are concerned about upcoming complex and burdensome
regulations
Advantages of the Clear Skies Approach
- Guarantees significant nationwide emissions reductions -- beginning
years before full implementation
- Delivers dramatic progress towards achievement of critical
health and environmental goals
- Uses proven, market-based flexible approach with incentives
for innovation
- Recognizes environmental needs as well as industry constraints,
allowing industry to better manage its operations and finances
while lowering risks to the public
- Sources are projected to install pollution controls to enable
continued reliance on coal
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers
Under Current Clean Air Act Power Plants Would Face a Complex
Set of Requirements
For a larger image, click here.
Clear Skies Sets a Firm Timeline for Emission Reductions
| The existing Title IV SO2 cap-and-trade program provides an
incentive and a mechanism to begin reductions upon enactment
of Clear Skies years before regulatory action under the current
Act. |
2004: The NOx SIP call (summertime NOx cap in 19 Eastern
States + D.C.)
2008:Clear Skies NOx Phase I (2.1 million ton annual cap
assigned to two Zones with trading programs)
2010:
- Clear Skies Hg Phase I (26 ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
- SO2 Phase I (4.5 million ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
2018:
- Clear Skies NOx Phase II (1.7 million ton annual cap assigned
to two Zones with trading programs)
- Clear Skies Hg Phase II (15 ton annual cap with a national trading
program)
- Clear Skies SO2 Phase II (3.0 million ton annual cap with a
national trading program)
Emissions in Maine under Clear Skies
|
Emissions in Maine (2020) would be reduced from 2000 levels:
- 75% reduction in SO2 emissions
- 36% reduction in NOx emissions
- Mercury emissions in 2020 will be the same as in the
base case
|
Emissions: Current (2000) and Existing Clean Air Act Regulations (base case*) vs. Clear Skies in Maine in 2010 and 2020

Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality
standards or other part of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions
in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory
actions that have not yet been promulgated.
Clear Skies Health and Air Quality Benefits in Maine
Improve Public Health
| By 2020, Maine would receive approximately $320 million in
annual health benefits from reductions in fine particle and
ozone concentrations alone due to Clear Skies. (see
note 1) |
- Throughout the New England region, reduced ozone and fine particle
exposure by 2020 would result in public health benefits of:
- approximately 500 fewer premature deaths each year (see
note 1)
- approximately 320 fewer cases of chronic bronchitis each year
- approximately 1,100 fewer nonfatal heart attacks each year
- approximately 860 fewer hospital and emergency room visits
each year
- approximately 57,000 fewer days workers are out sick due to
respiratory symptoms each year
- approximately 4,600 fewer school absences each year
- Reduced mercury emissions would reduce exposure to mercury through
consumption of contaminated fish, resulting in additional, unquantified
benefits to those who eat fish from Maine's lakes and streams.
Help Maintain Health-Based Air Quality Standards
- Currently, all counties in Maine currently meet the fine particle
standard; all but 2 counties currently meet the 8-hour ozone standard.(see
note 2)
- York and Hancock Counties (population 240,000) would be brought
into attainment with the ozone standard under existing programs.
- Clear Skies would further reduce concentrations of ozone and
fine particles throughout Maine.
Clear Skies Environmental Benefits in Maine
Clear Skies Would Provide Substantial Environmental Benefits in
Maine
In comparison to existing programs,
- Visibility would improve perceptibly throughout much of the
state.
- The value of improved visibility for Maine residents who visit
National Parks and Wilderness areas nationwide would be $10
million each year by 2020.
- Sulfur deposition, a primary cause of acid rain, would decrease
by up to 30% across the state.
- Nitrogen deposition, another significant contributor to acid
rain as well as a cause of damage in nitrogen-sensitive forests
and coastal waters, such as Casco Bay, would decrease by up to
20%.
- Mercury deposition would decrease by up to 5% across the state.*


*These results are based on modeling the Clear
Skies mercury cap without triggering the safety valve.
Emission Reductions under Clear Skies
|
Emissions in states surrounding Maine would decrease considerably.
These emission reductions would make it much easier for Maine
to comply with the national air quality standards.
|


Note:
The base case in IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements,
and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX, and WI. It does
not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential future regulations
to implement the current ambient air quality standards or other
part of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions in 2020 will likely
be lower due to state and federal regulatory actions that have not
yet been promulgated. Emissions projected for new units in 2020
are not reflected.
Electricity Generation and Pollution Controls in Maine under Clear
Skies
- Maine's electricity growth is projected to be met by increases
in gas-fired and coal-fired generation. Clear Skies does not
significantly alter this projection.
- Electricity from coal-fired generation will increase
by 28% from 1999 to 2020.
|
| Current and Projected Generation by Fuel Type in Maine
under Clear Skies (GWh) |
- The major generation companies in Maine include:
- FPL Energy
- Duke Energy Power Services
- Calpine
- Great Northern Paper
- Total coal-fired capacity in Maine is projected to
be 76 MW in 2010
|
|
 |
Pollution Controls:
- In 2010, and 2020 none of Maine's coal-fired generation
is projected to come from units with advanced SO2 and/or
NOx control equipment.
- No pollution controls are projected to be installed
in Maine under Clear Skies.
- No coal-fired units in Maine are projected to be removed
from operation as a result of Clear Skies
|

Electricity Prices in Maine under Clear Skies
- With or without Clear Skies, retail prices in the
North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) NPCC
region (the electricity supply region that contains
Maine) are projected to increase between 2005 and 2020.
- With Clear Skies, retail prices are projected to be
approximately 0.5 - 2.7% higher between 2005 and 2020
than in the absence of the legislation.
|

|


|
In 2000, the average retail electricity price
in Maine was approximately 9.8 cents/kWh, which was above
the average national retail price of approximately
6.7 cents/kWh.
|
Note:
The base case using IPM includes Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR
settlements, and state-specific caps in CT, MA, MO, NC, NH, TX,
and WI. It does not include mercury MACT in 2007 or any other potential
future regulations to implement the current ambient air quality
standards or other part of the Clean Air Act. Base case emissions
in 2020 will likely be lower due to state and federal regulatory
actions that have not yet been promulgated.
Costs and Benefits in Maine under Clear Skies
Benefits Outweigh the Costs
Clear Skies....
- Guarantees significant emissions reductions - beginning
years before full implementation
- Uses a proven and flexible market-based approach with
incentives for innovation
- Increases certainty across the board for industry, regulators,
and consumers
|
- In Maine, Clear Skies is projected to cost approximately $9
million annually by 2020 while providing health benefits totaling
approximately $320 million annually.
- The increases in production costs under Clear Skies represent
only a small percentage of total retail electricity sales revenue
in Maine.
- Retail electricity sales revenue in Maine was almost $1.7
billion in 2000.
- Adjusting these sales revenues by the same growth rate used
for the modeling of costs would result in revenues of over $2.6
billion annually in 2020.
- Nationwide, the projected annual costs of Clear Skies (in $1999)
are $4.3 billion in 2010 and $6.3 billion in 2020; the nationwide
benefits of Clear Skies are expected to be over $113 billion annually
by 2020.
- An alternate estimate projects annual health benefits totaling
$23 billion.
Note: Costs
include capital costs, fuel, and other operation and maintenance
costs (both fixed and variable) associated with the achievement
of the emissions caps in the legislation (for example, the installation
and operation of pollution controls). These state-level production
costs are estimates; they do not account for the costs associated
with the transfer of electricity across regions, nor the costs or
savings that could be associated with allowance movement between
sources.
Notes on EPA's Analysis
- The information presented in this analysis reflects EPA's modeling
of the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- EPA has updated this information to reflect modifications:
- Changes included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003.
- Revisions to the Base Case to reflect newly promulgated
rules at the state and federal level since the initial analysis
was undertaken.
- The Clear Skies modeling results presented include the safety
valve feature
- This analysis compares new programs to a Base Case ( Existing
Control Programs), which is typical when calculating costs and
benefits of Agency rulemakings.
- The Base Case reflects implementation of current control programs
only:
- Does not include yet-to-be developed regulations such
as those to implement the National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
- The EPA Base Case for power sector modeling includes:
- Title IV, the NOx SIP Call, NSR settlements, and state-specific
caps in Maine, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Hampshire, North
Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin finalized before March 2003.
- For air quality modeling, the Base Case also includes federal
and state control programs, as well as the Tier II, Heavy Duty
Diesel, and Nonroad Diesel rules.

1. An alternative
methodology for calculating health-related benefits projects approximately
approximately 290 premature deaths prevented throughout New England
and $60 million in health benefits each year in Maine by 2020.
2. Based on 1999-2001
data of counties with monitors that have three years of complete
data.
State information based on EPA's modeling of the Clear
Skies Act of 2002 is presented here for archival reasons.
|

top
|