Climate Change Indicators in the United States
Data source: Mote and Sharp, 2014 2
- From 1955 to 2013, April snowpack declined at about three-fourths of the sites measured (see Figure 1). The average change across all sites amounts to about a 14 percent decline.
- In general, the largest and most consistent decreases were observed in Washington, Oregon, and the northern Rockies.
- Some areas have seen increases in snowpack, primarily in the southern Sierra Nevada of California.
Temperature and precipitation are key factors affecting snowpack, which is the amount or thickness of snow that accumulates on the ground. In a warming climate, more precipitation will be expected to fall as rain rather than snow in most areas—reducing the extent and depth of snowpack. Higher temperatures in the spring can cause snow to melt earlier.
Mountain snowpack plays a key role in the water cycle in western North America, storing water in the winter when the snow falls and releasing it as runoff in spring and summer when the snow melts. Millions of people in the West depend on the melting of mountain snowpack for power, irrigation, and drinking water. In most western river basins, snowpack is a larger component of water storage than human-constructed reservoirs. 1
Changes in mountain snowpack can affect agriculture, winter recreation, and tourism in some areas, as well as plants and wildlife. For example, certain types of trees rely on snow for insulation from freezing temperatures, as do some animal species. In addition, fish spawning could be disrupted if changes in snowpack or snowmelt alter the timing and abundance of streamflows.
About the Indicator
This indicator uses a measurement called snow water equivalent to determine trends in snowpack. Snow water equivalent is the amount of water contained within the snowpack at a particular location. It can be thought of as the depth of water that would result if the entire snowpack were to melt.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture and other collaborators have measured snowpack since the early 1900s. In the early years of data collection, researchers measured snow water equivalent manually, but since 1980, measurements at some locations have been collected with automated instruments. This indicator is based on data from approximately 700 permanent measurement sites in the western United States. The indicator shows long-term rates of change for the month of April, which could reflect changes in winter snowfall as well as the timing of spring snowmelt.
EPA selected 1955 as a starting point for this analysis because many measurement sites in the Southwest were established in the early 1950s. Natural variability in the Earth's climate means that snowpack trends may vary slightly when measured over different time periods. For example, the period from 1945 to 1955 was unusually snowy in the Northwest, so if this indicator were to start in 1945 or 1950, the Northwest would appear to show larger decreases over time. However, the general direction of the trend is the same regardless of the start date.
Although most parts of the West have seen reductions in snowpack―consistent with overall warming trends shown in the U.S. and Global Temperature indicator―snowfall trends may be partially influenced by non-climatic factors such as observation methods, land-use changes, and forest canopy changes.
Data for this indicator came from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural Resources Conservation Service Water and Climate Center and the California Department of Water Resources. The map was constructed using methods described by Mote et al. (2005).
The U.S. Department of Agriculture data are available at: www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov. The California Department of Water Resources data are available at: http://cdec.water.ca.gov/
- Download related technical information PDF (6 pp, 206K)