![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California State Implementation Plan Revision, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 24574-24576]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06my97-9]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[CA 192-0037a; FRL-5816-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California
State Implementation Plan Revision, South Coast Air Quality Management
District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action granting limited approval
and limited disapproval of revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The revisions concern two rules from the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). This final action
will incorporate these rules into the federally approved SIP. The
intended effect of finalizing this action is to regulate emissions of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with the requirements
of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). The rules
control VOC emissions from active and inactive landfills. Thus, EPA is
finalizing a simultaneous limited approval and limited disapproval of
the rules under CAA provisions regarding EPA action on SIP submittals
and general rulemaking authority because the rules, while strengthening
the SIP, also do not fully meet the CAA provisions regarding plan
submissions and plan requirements for nonattainment areas.
DATES: This action is effective on July 7, 1997 unless adverse or
critical comments are received by June 5, 1997. If the effective date
is delayed, a timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the rules and EPA's evaluation report for the
rules are available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX office
during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rules are also
available for inspection at the following locations:
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M'' Street,
S.W., Washington, D.C. 20460
South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 E. Copley Drive,
Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule
Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia A. Bowlin, Rulemaking Office
(AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX,
75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901, Telephone: (415)
744-1188.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicability
The rules being incorporated into the California SIP are SCAQMD
Rule 1150.1, Control of Gaseous Emissions from Active Landfills, and
SCAQMD Rule 1150.2, Control of Gaseous Emissions from Inactive
Landfills. The rules were submitted by the California Air Resources
Board (CARB) to EPA on October 16, 1985 and February 10, 1986,
respectively.
Background
On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment
areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in l977
(1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the Los Angeles-South
Coast Air Basin Area. 43 FR 8964, 40 CFR 81.305. The 1977 Act required
that nonattainment areas adopt, at a minimum, reasonably available
control technology (RACT) for all significant sources of emissions.
[[Page 24575]]
The State of California submitted many RACT rules for incorporation
into its SIP on October 16, 1985 and February 10, 1986, including the
rules being acted on in this document. This document addresses EPA's
direct-final action for SCAQMD Rule 1150.1, Control of Gaseous
Emissions from Active Landfills, and SCAQMD Rule 1150.2, Control of
Gaseous Emissions from Inactive Landfills. SCAQMD adopted Rule 1150.1
on April 5, 1985 and Rule 1150.2 on October 18, 1985. These submitted
rules are being finalized for limited approval and limited disapproval
into the SIP.
Rule 1150.1 and Rule 1150.2 control the emissions of VOCs from
active and inactive landfills, respectively. VOCs contribute to the
production of ground level ozone and smog. These rules were originally
adopted as part of SCAQMD's effort to achieve the National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. The following is EPA's evaluation
and final action for these rules.
EPA Evaluation and Action
In determining the approvability of a VOC rule, EPA must evaluate
the rule for consistency with the requirements of the CAA and EPA
regulations, as found in section 110 and Part D of the CAA and 40 CFR
Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of
Implementation Plans). The EPA interpretation of these requirements,
which forms the basis for today's action, appears in various EPA policy
guidance documents.\1\ Among those provisions is the requirement that a
VOC rule must, at a minimum, provide for the implementation of RACT for
stationary sources of VOC emissions. This requirement was carried forth
from the pre-amended Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Among other things, the pre-amendment guidance consists of
those portions of the proposed post-1987 ozone and carbon monoxide
policy that concern RACT, 52 FR 45044 (November 24, 1987); ``Issues
Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,
Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal Register
Notice'' (Blue Book) (notice of availability was published in the
Federal Register on May 25, 1988); and the existing control
technique guidelines (CTGs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the purpose of assisting state and local agencies in developing
RACT rules, EPA prepared a series of Control Technique Guideline (CTG)
documents. The CTGs are based on the underlying requirements of the Act
and specify the presumptive norms for what is RACT for specific source
categories. For source categories that do not have an applicable CTG
(such as landfills), state and local agencies may determine what
controls are required by reviewing the operation of facilities subject
to the regulation and evaluating regulations for similar sources in
other areas.
Further interpretations of EPA policy are found in the Blue Book,
referred to in footnote 1. In general, the EPA policy guidance
documents have been set forth to ensure that VOC rules are fully
enforceable and strengthen or maintain the SIP.
SCAQMD's Rule 1150.1, Control of Gaseous Emissions from Active
Landfills, and Rule 1150.2, Control of Gaseous Emissions from Inactive
Landfills are new rules for inclusion in the SIP. The submitted rules
contain the following requirements to control VOC emissions at active
and inactive landfills:
Installation of landfill gas control systems
Monitoring of off-site gas migration
Landfill surface monitoring
Periodic sampling of periphery subsurface gas and ambient
air
Periodic sampling of collected landfill gas
Disposal of collected landfill gas
Periodic evaluation of the efficiency of the gas disposal
system
Although SCAQMD Rules 1150.1 and 1150.2 will strengthen the SIP,
the rules contain the following deficiencies:
Numerous Director's discretion provisions
No specified criteria for granting exemptions
No specified control device efficiency
No test methods or monitoring protocol
Inadequate recordkeeping provisions
A detailed discussion of rule deficiencies can be found in the
Technical Support Document for Rules 1150.1 and 1150.2 (3/97), which is
available from the U.S. EPA's Region IX office. Because of these
deficiencies, the rules are not approvable because the deficiencies are
not consistent with the interpretation of section 172 of the 1977 CAA
as found in the Blue Book and may lead to rule enforceability problems.
Because of the above deficiencies, EPA cannot grant full approval
of these rules under section 110(k)(3) and Part D. Also, because the
submitted rules are not composed of separable parts which meet all the
applicable requirements of the CAA, EPA cannot grant partial approval
of the rules under section 110(k)(3). However, EPA may grant a limited
approval of the submitted rules under section 110(k)(3) in light of
EPA's authority pursuant to section 301(a) to adopt regulations
necessary to further air quality by strengthening the SIP. The approval
is limited because EPA's action also contains a simultaneous limited
disapproval. In order to strengthen the SIP, EPA is finalizing a
limited approval of SCAQMD's submitted Rules 1150.1 and 1150.2 under
sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the CAA.
At the same time, EPA is also finalizing a limited disapproval of
these rules because they contain deficiencies and, as such, the rules
do not fully meet the requirements of Part D of the Act. Under section
179(a)(2), if the Administrator disapproves a submission under section
110(k) for an area designated nonattainment, based on the submission's
failure to meet one or more of the elements required by the Act, the
Administrator must apply one of the sanctions set forth in section
179(b) unless the deficiency has been corrected within 18 months of
such disapproval. Section 179(b) provides two sanctions available to
the Administrator: highway funding and offsets. The 18 month period
referred to in section 179(a) will begin on the effective date of this
final limited disapproval. Moreover, this final limited disapproval
triggers the Federal implementation plan (FIP) requirement under
section 110(c). It should be noted that the rules covered by this
direct final rulemaking have been adopted by the SCAQMD and are
currently in effect in the District. EPA's final limited disapproval
action will not prevent the District or EPA from enforcing these rules.
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future implementation
plan. Each request for revision to the state implementation plan shall
be considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and
environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and
regulatory requirements.
EPA is publishing this document without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal
Register publication, the EPA is proposing a limited approval and
limited disapproval of the SIP revision should adverse or critical
comments be filed. This action will be effective July 7, 1997, unless,
by June 5, 1997, adverse or critical comments are received.
If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn
before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a
[[Page 24576]]
proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should
do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is
advised that this action will be effective July 7, 1997.
Regulatory Process
Regulatory Flexibility
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. Secs. 603 and
604. Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises and
government entities with jurisdiction over population of less than
50,000.
Limited approvals under sections 110 and 301(a) and subchapter I,
Part D of the CAA do not create any new requirements, but simply
approve requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore,
because the Federal SIP-approval does not impose any new requirements,
I certify that it does not have a significant impact on any small
entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-state
relationship under the CAA, preparation of a regulatory flexibility
analysis would constitute Federal inquiry into the economic
reasonableness of state action. Under the CAA, EPA may not base its
actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S.
E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
EPA's limited disapproval of the State request under sections 110
and 301 and subchapter I, Part D of the CAA does not affect any
existing requirements applicable to small entities. Federal disapproval
of the state submittal does not affect its state enforceability.
Moreover, EPA's limited disapproval of the submittal does not impose
any new Federal requirements. Therefore, EPA certifies that this
limited disapproval action does not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it does not remove
existing requirements nor does it impose any new Federal requirements.
Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 7, 1997. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
Unfunded Mandates
Under Sections 202, 203, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22,
1995, EPA must undertake various actions in association with proposed
or final rules that include a Federal mandate that may result in
estimated costs of $100 million or more to the private sector or to
State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate.
Through submission of this state implementation plan or plan
revision, the State and any affected local or tribal governments have
elected to adopt the program provided for under Part D of the Clean Air
Act. This rule may bind State, local, and tribal governments to perform
certain actions and also require the private sector to perform certain
duties. The rules being incorporated into the SIP by this action will
impose no new requirements because affected sources are already subject
to these regulations under State law. Therefore, no additional costs to
State, local, or tribal governments or to the private sector result
from this action. EPA has also determined that this final action does
not include a mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100
million or more to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate
or to the private sector.
Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the
General Accounting Office prior to publication of the rule in today's
Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
Executive Order 12866
This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature
by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the
Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a
July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation
Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the
Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
Dated: April 13, 1997.
Felicia Marcus,
Regional Administrator.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart F--California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(164)(i)(E)
and (c)(168)(i)(H)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(164) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) South Coast Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 1150.1, adopted on April 5, 1985.
* * * * *
(168) * * *
(i) * * *
(H) * * *
(2) Rule 1150.2, adopted on October 18, 1985.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 97-11911 Filed 5-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P