Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality (PSD); Commonwealth Chesapeake Corporation Accomack County, Virginia
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Notices]
[Page 27252-27253]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19my97-62]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5826-9]
Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality (PSD);
Commonwealth Chesapeake Corporation Accomack County, Virginia
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency, Region III (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of order denying review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action announces that the Environmental Appeals Board of
the United States Environmental Protection Agency issued an order
denying review, pursuant to the Prevention of Significant Deterioration
of Air Quality (PSD) regulations codified at 40 CFR 52.21 and the
procedures for Decisionmaking codified at 40 CFR part 124, regarding
Commonwealth Chesapeake Corporation--Accomack County, Virginia.
DATES: The effective date of the Environmental Appeals Board's decision
was February 19, 1997.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kathleen Henry, Chief, Permit
Programs Section, Air, Radiation & Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, Mail Code 3AT23, 841 Chestnut Building,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107 at (215) 566-2175, or by e-mail to
Henry. Kathleen @epamail.epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Four petitions were filed with the
Environmental Appeals Board seeking
[[Page 27253]]
review of a Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit issued
to Commonwealth Chesapeake Corporation for construction of a 397.5 MW
simple cycle peaker power plant in Accomack County, Virginia. Pursuant
to a delegation of authority from EPA, the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality (VDEQ) issued the final permit on May 21, 1996.
Because of the delegation, the Virginia permit is considered an EPA-
issued permit for purposes of federal law (40 CFR 124.41 (1991)); 45 FR
33413 (May 19, 1980)), and is subject to review by the Agency under 40
CFR 124.19 (1991).
Four private citizens, residents of Accomack county, petitioned the
Board for review of the PSD permit. PSD Appeal No. 96-2 was filed by
Elizabeth Trader; PSD Appeal No. 96-3 was filed by Dorothy Bonney; PSD
Appeal No. 96-4 was filed by Marvel Wimbrow; and PSD Appeal No. 96-5
was filed by William Reese.
The Board issued an Order denying review in the above case on
February 19, 1997. The Board held that: (1) One petitioner (Appeal No.
96-5) lacks standing to petition for review of the permit because he
failed to participate in the public hearing or provide comments on the
draft permit, and therefore that petition must be dismissed; (2) with
respect to Appeals No. 96-2, No. 96-3 and No. 96-4, the Board concludes
that petitioners have not met their burden of showing that VDEQ's
decision should be reviewed.
Anyone wishing to review the permit, petitions, order denying
review, or related materials should contact the following offices:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, Air, Radiation and
Toxics Division, Permit Programs Section (3AT23), 841 Chestnut
Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107
or
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, Tidewater Regional
Office, 5636 Southern Boulevard, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462.
Dated: May 6, 1997.
Andrew Carlin,
Acting Regional Administrator Region III.
[FR Doc. 97-13037 Filed 5-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)