![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; California and Arizona State Implementation Plan Revisions: Maricopa County, Arizona; Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District, San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, and Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: March 18, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 52)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13382-13383]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18mr99-34]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[CA/AZ 211-0126 EC; FRL-6235-6]
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans;
California and Arizona State Implementation Plan Revisions: Maricopa
County, Arizona; Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District, San
Diego County Air Pollution Control District, San Joaquin Valley Unified
Air Pollution Control District, and Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the Arizona and California State
Implementation Plans (SIP) which concern the control of emergency air
episodes.
The intended effect of this action is to protect the public from
sudden and dangerous emissions of criteria pollutants in accordance
with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or
the Act). In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA
is approving the states' SIP submittals as a direct final rule without
prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial
revision and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for
this approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse
comments are received, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA
receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final
rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting should do so at
this time.
DATES: Written comments must be received by April 19, 1999.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to: Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking
Office (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
Copies of the rule revisions and EPA's evaluation report of each
rule are available for public inspection at EPA's Region 9 office
during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rule revisions
are also available for inspection at the following locations:
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule
Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, California 95812.
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 3003 North Central
Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85012.
Maricopa County Environmental Services Department, Air Quality
Division, 1001 North Central Avenue, Suite 201, Phoenix, Arizona
85004-1942.
Antelope Valley Air Pollution Control District, 315 West Pondera
Street, Lancaster, California 93534.
San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, 9150 Chesapeake
Drive, San Diego, California 92123-1096.
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, 1999
Tuolumne Street, Suite 200, Fresno, California 93721.
Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 669 County Square
Drive, Ventura, California 93003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Steckel, Air Rulemaking [AIR-
4], Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901, Telephone:
(415) 744-1185.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document concerns Maricopa County,
Arizona Rule 600--Emergency Episodes, submitted to EPA on January 4,
1990 by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality; Antelope
Valley APCD, Rule 701--Air Pollution Emergency Contingency Actions,
submitted to EPA on June 23, 1998; San Diego County Air Pollution
Control District Rule 127--Episode Criteria Levels, Rule 128--Episode
Declaration, and Rule 130--Episode Actions, submitted to EPA on January
28, 1992; San Joaquin Valley Unified APCD Rule 6010--General Statement,
Rule 6020--Applicable Areas, Rule 6030--Episode Criteria Levels, Rule
6040--Episode Stages, Rule 6050--Division of
[[Page 13383]]
Responsibility, Rule 6060--Administration of Emergency Program, Rule
6070--Advisory of High Air Pollution Potential, Rule 6080--Declaration
of Episode, Rule 6081--Episode Action--Health Advisory, Rule 6090--
Episode Action Stage 1: (Health Advisory-Alert), Rule 6100--Episode
Action Stage 2: (Warning), Rule 6110--Episode Action Stage 3:
(Emergency), Rule 6120--Episode Termination, Rule 6130--Stationary
Source Curtailment Plans and Traffic Abatement Plans, Rule 6140--
Episode Abatement Plan, and Rule 6150--Enforcement, submitted to EPA on
March 3, 1997; Ventura County APCD--Regulation VIII--Emergency Action
with Rule 150--General, Rule 151--Episode Criteria, Rule 152--Episode
Notification Procedures, Rule 153--Health Advisory Episode Actions,
Rule 154--Stage 1 Episode Actions, Rule 155--Stage 2 Episode Actions,
Rule 156--Stage 3 Episode Actions, Rule 157--Air Pollution Disaster,
Rule 158--Source Abatement Plans, and Rule 159--Traffic Abatement
Procedures were submitted to EPA on January 28, 1992, by the California
Air Resources Board. For further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final action that is located in the
rules section of this Federal Register.
Dated: February 4, 1999.
Laura Yoshii,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 99-6178 Filed 3-17-99; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P