Adequacy Status of the Nashua, New Hampshire and Manchester, New
Hampshire Submitted Carbon Monoxide Redesignation Requests for
Transportation Conformity Purposes
[Federal Register: February 29, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 40)]
[Notices]
[Page 10785]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29fe00-62]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[NH-044-7171, FRL-6542-1]
Adequacy Status of the Nashua, New Hampshire and Manchester, New
Hampshire Submitted Carbon Monoxide Redesignation Requests for
Transportation Conformity Purposes
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that we have found
the motor vehicle emissions budgets for the New Hampshire cities of
Nashua and Manchester, received on February 8, 1999 as part of the
carbon monoxide redesignation requests for each of those areas,
adequate for conformity purposes. On March 2, 1999, the D.C. Circuit
Court ruled that submitted SIPs cannot be used for conformity
determinations until EPA has affirmatively found them adequate. As a
result of our finding, the New Hampshire Department of Transportation
and the Federal Highway Administration are required to use the motor
vehicle emissions budgets from the submitted carbon monoxide
redesignation requests in future conformity determinations.
DATES: These budgets are effective March 15, 2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The finding and the response to
comments will be available at EPA's conformity website: http://
www.epa.gov/oms/traq, (once there, click on the ``Conformity'' button,
then look for ``Adequacy Review of SIP Submissions for Conformity'').
You may also contact Jeff Butensky, Environmental Planner, One Congress
Street, Suite 1100 (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023; (617) 918-1665;
butensky.jeff@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today's notice is simply an announcement of
a finding that we have already made. EPA New England sent a letter to
the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services on November 2,
1999 stating that the motor vehicle emissions budgets contained in the
submitted carbon monoxide redesignation requests for Nashua and
Manchester for the year 2010 were adequate for conformity purposes.
This finding will also be announced on EPA's conformity website: http:/
/www.epa.gov/oms/traq, (once there, click on the ``Conformity'' button,
then look for ``Adequacy Review of SIP Submissions for Conformity'').
Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the
Clean Air Act. EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation
plans, programs, and projects conform to state air quality
implementation plans (SIPs) and establishes the criteria and procedures
for determining whether or not they conform. Conformity to a SIP means
that transportation activities will not produce new air quality
violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of
the national ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle
emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in
40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). Please note that an adequacy review is separate
from EPA's completeness review, and it also should not be used to
prejudge EPA's ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if we find a budget
adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved.
We've described our process for determining the adequacy of
submitted SIP budgets in guidance (May 14, 1999 memo titled
``Conformity Guidance on Implementation of March 2, 1999 Conformity
Court Decision''). We followed this guidance in making our adequacy
determination.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Dated: February 14, 2000.
Mindy S. Lubber,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. 00-4784 Filed 2-28-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P