Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia: Approval of Revisions to Georgia State Implementation Plan
Related Material
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: July 10, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 132)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35906-35911]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10jy01-9]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[GA-47; GA-52; GA-55-200111; FRL-7009-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia:
Approval of Revisions to Georgia State Implementation Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In a December 16, 1999, Federal Register document (see 64 FR
70478), EPA proposed to approve the 1-hour ozone attainment
demonstration for the Atlanta nonattainment area (Atlanta attainment
demonstration), as well as the underlying rule revisions, which were
submitted by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD) on
October 28, 1999. EPA's proposed approval was based on the condition
that the GAEPD satisfy certain requirements established in the
proposal. Subsequently, the GAEPD submitted revisions to the Atlanta
attainment demonstration on January 31, 2000, and July 31, 2000. Those
rule revisions were proposed for approval in the Federal Register on
December 18, 2000, at 65 FR 79034. No adverse comments were received
pertaining to any rule revisions. In today's action, EPA is granting
final approval to the rule revisions contained in the December 16,
1999, and December 18, 2000, proposals. Action will be taken on the
Atlanta attainment demonstration in a separate notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule will be effective August 9, 2001.
ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to: Scott M. Martin at the
EPA, Region 4 Air Planning Branch, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta,
Georgia 30303.
Copies of the State submittals are available at the following
addresses for inspection during normal business hours:
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Air Planning Branch, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
Air Protection Branch, Georgia Environmental Protection Division,
Georgia Department of Natural Resources, 4244 International Parkway,
Suite 120, Atlanta, Georgia 30354. Telephone (404) 363-7000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott M. Martin at (404) 562-9036.
martin.scott@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In a December 16, 1999, Federal Register document (see 64 FR
70478), EPA proposed to approve the 1-hour ozone attainment
demonstration for the Atlanta nonattainment area (Atlanta attainment
demonstration), as well as the underlying rule revisions, which were
submitted by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD) on
October 28, 1999. EPA's proposed approval was based on the condition
that the GAEPD satisfy certain requirements established in the
proposal. Subsequently, the GAEPD submitted revisions to the Atlanta
attainment demonstration on January 31, 2000, and July 31, 2000. Those
rule revisions were proposed for approval in the Federal Register on
December 18, 2000, at 65 FR 79034. No adverse comments were received
pertaining to any rule revisions. In today's action, EPA is granting
final approval to the rule revisions contained in the December 16,
1999, and December 18, 2000, proposals. Action will be taken on the
Atlanta attainment demonstration in a separate notice.
Description of Major Revisions to Rules for Air Quality Submitted on
October 28, 1999
The October 28, 1999, attainment demonstration submittal included
several regulations that will reduce emissions of NOX and
VOC in the Atlanta modeling domain. EPA is approving the revisions to
Georgia's Rules for Air Quality Control Chapter 391-3-1 described
below.
Rule 391-3-.02, subparagraph (2)(ii) relating to ``VOC Emissions
from Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products'' is
being amended. This rule is amended to exempt aerospace manufacturing
and rework facilities from the rule. The rule is also being modified in
order to keep Rule (ii) consistent with the most current Architectural
Aluminum Manufacture's Association (AAMA) standard in place.
The current rule only exempts the surface coating of airplane
exteriors. Rule (ii) is no longer applicable to aerospace sources
because the State has previously submitted a new rule limiting VOC
emissions from aerospace manufacturing and rework facilities that meets
EPA requirements (i.e., AAMA standards). In order to keep Rule (ii)
consistent with the current AAMA standard, subparagraph 5.(xiii) has
been modified to state that the coatings must satisfy the requirements
of the most recent AAMA publication (number AAMA 605.2). This will
prevent the standard that is stated in Rule (ii) from becoming
outdated.
Rule 391-3-1-.02 subsection (6) relating to ``Specific Monitoring''
is being amended by adding a new subsection (a)2.(xii) which requires
affected sources to install and operate continuous emissions monitoring
[[Page 35907]]
systems for NOX and for oxygen or an approved alternative.
The affected sources are those subject to the new rules for boilers
(rule 391-3-1.02(2)(lll)). A requirement to install and operate
monitors in order to determine initial compliance and track ongoing
compliance with the above rule for boilers with a maximum design heat
input capacity equal to or greater than 100 million BTU has been added.
The rule allows, as an alternative, the use of predictive emissions
monitoring systems for certain fuels.
Rule 391-3-1-.03 subsection (6)(b)11 relating to ``Stationary
Engines'' is being amended to narrow the group of stationary engines
that are not required to obtain air quality permits. Stationary engines
with a rated capacity of 300 kilowatts or greater that are used for
emergency and/or peaking power and that are located in a 45 county area
in and around Atlanta would no longer be exempt from air quality
permitting.
Rule 391-3-1-.03, paragraph (8)(c)(9) relating to ``Permit
Requirements'' is being amended to correct a typographical error.
Federal regulation 40 CFR part 52, appendix S is referenced in this
regulation. It was incorrectly listed as part 51.
Rule 391-3-1-.03 subsection (8)(e) relating to ``Permit
Requirements'' is being amended to require those sources in the
additional 32 counties outside the designated nonattainment area to
comply with new source permitting requirements because the emissions
from these counties have been determined to affect ozone formation in
the metro-Atlanta area. This rule identifies the 32 counties in the
modeling analysis but outside the 13 county nonattainment area where
the rule will apply and requires new or modified stationary sources in
the counties to comply with the requirements of section (c). This rule
will apply to new or modified stationary sources emitting 100 tons per
year or more of volatile organic compounds or nitrogen oxides.
Description of Major Revisions to the Inspection and Maintenance Rules
The EPA is approving the revisions to Georgia's Rules for Enhanced
Inspection and Maintenance Chapter 391-3-20 described below.
Rule 391-3-20-.01 relating to ``Definitions'' is being amended to
change or delete definitions related to biennial testing, to modify the
definition of ASM to include a dual-mode ASM test for older vehicles,
to update the reference to the Federal I/M regulations, to define the
term ``Waiver,'' and to renumber the definitions.
The ASM test requirement is modified to require a dual-mode ASM
2525/5015 test, effective January 1, 2002. The GAEPD also revised the
I/M rule to require annual testing effective January 1, 2000. The
definitions of ``Off-Year Inspection'' and ``Regular Inspection'' are
deleted since they are not relevant after the change to an annual
program. The term ``Waiver'' is defined. The Federal I/M regulations,
as of July 1, 1999, are referenced. Other clarifications are made.
Rule 391-3-20-.03 paragraph (4) relating to ``Covered Vehicles;
Exemptions'' is being amended to extend the exemption period for new
vehicles. Effective January 1, 2001, new vehicles are exempt from
testing until the test year three years following the model year of the
vehicle.
Description of Major Revisions to Rules for Air Quality Submitted on
January 31, 2000
The January 31, 2000, submittal included several regulations that
will reduce emissions of NOX and VOC in the Atlanta modeling
domain. EPA is approving the revisions to Georgia's Rules for Air
Quality Control Chapter 391-3-1 described below.
The October 28, 1999, submittal expanded the coverage of several
rules outside the 13 county nonattainment area to an additional 32
counties for a total of 45 counties. After receiving adverse comment
from many of the counties affected by the expansion, the EPD agreed to
revise the rules to reduce the economic hardship imposed on the smaller
and more rural counties. The following 26 counties shall no longer be
subject to the requirements of the rules listed below: Banks, Barrow,
Butts, Chattooga, Clarke, Dawson, Floyd, Gordon, Haralson, Heard,
Jackson, Jasper, Jones, Lamar, Lumpkin, Madison, Meriwether, Monroe,
Morgan, Oconee, Pickens, Pike, Polk, Putnam, Troup and Upson; these
rules are 391-3-1-.02(2)(tt), (vv), (yy), (ccc), (ddd), (eee), (hhh)
and 391-3-1-.03(8)(c)(14). In addition to the 13 counties in the
Atlanta 1-hour ozone nonattainment area, Bartow, Carroll, Hall, Newton,
Spalding, and Walton counties shall be subject to the rules listed
above.
Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(jjj) relating to ``NOX Emissions
from Electric Utility Steam Generating Units'' is being amended to
expand the coverage of the rule to include affected coal-fired electric
utility steam generating units in the counties of Monroe and Putnam and
to include a lower average NOX emissions limit for all
affected units.
Effective May 1, 2003, the NOX emissions from all
affected units at Plants Bowen (Bartow County), Hammond (Floyd County),
McDonough (Cobb County), Wansley (Heard County), and Yates (Coweta
County) will be limited to the equivalent of 0.13 lb/million BTU five
plant average. An overlapping requirement, also effective May 1, 2003,
limits NOX emissions from all the same units described above
plus the units at Plants Branch (Putnam County) and Scherer (Monroe
County) to the equivalent of 0.20 lb/million BTU seven plant average.
Compliance will be determined potentially in two steps. First, each
source will be assigned a specific alternative emission limit. If the
actual emission rate from each source is less than its alternative
limit, then all affected sources would be in compliance. If the actual
emission rate from any source is greater than its alternative limit,
then compliance would be demonstrated by showing that the actual BTU-
weighted average emission rate for all affected sources is less than
0.13 lb/million BTU for the 5 plants and 0.20 lb/million BTU for the 7
plants listed above. Compliance with the alternative emission limits
would be determined such that their BTU-weighted average does not
exceed the 0.13 and 0.20 lb/million BTU limits. The compliance period
will be based on a 30-day rolling average beginning May 1 and ending
September 30 of each year.
Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(kkk) relating to ``VOC Emissions from Aerospace
Manufacturing and Rework Facilities'' is being amended by adding
compliance dates. Compliance dates have been added which give affected
sources located outside of the Atlanta 1-hour ozone nonattainment area
until January 1, 2001, to comply with the rule.
Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(mmm) relating to ``NOX Emissions
from Stationary Gas Turbines and Stationary Engines used to Generate
Electricity'' is being amended to remove an exemption from the rule.
The exemption, ``Stationary engines used exclusively in the handling
and distribution of natural gas,'' is being removed. Stationary engines
used to pump, compress, or liquefy natural gas are still exempt under
another exemption which exempts engines not connected to an electrical
generator. Therefore, the removal of the exemption makes engines used
to generate electricity at natural gas pumping, compression, or
liquefaction plants subject to the rule consistent with other
industries.
Rule 391-3-1-.03(8)(c)(15) relating to ``Additional Provisions for
Electrical Generating Units Located in Areas Contributing to the
Ambient Air Level of Ozone in the Metropolitan Atlanta Ozone
Nonattainment Area'' is being
[[Page 35908]]
added. ``Electrical generating unit'' is defined as a fossil fuel fired
stationary boiler, combustion turbine, or combined cycle system that
serves a generator which produces electricity for sale. Any new
electrical generating unit located at a ``major source'' (which is
defined as any source which has the potential to emit at least 100 tons
per year NOX) or any physical change or change in the method
of operation of an existing electrical generating unit located at an
existing major source which results in a net increase of 40 tons or
more NOX is subject to additional permitting requirements.
This rule is applicable to electrical generating units at major sources
located in 26 counties surrounding the 13 county Atlanta nonattainment
area and the six counties subject to Rule 391-3-1-.03(8)(c)(14).
Sources subject to this rule are required to use best achievable
control technology (BACT) to control emissions and are required to
obtain emission offsets at a ratio of 1.1 to 1. Sources located in the
counties of Banks, Barrow, Bartow, Butts, Carroll, Chattooga, Clarke,
Dawson, Floyd, Gordon, Hall, Haralson, Heard, Jackson, Jasper, Jones,
Lamar, Lumpkin, Madison, Meriwether, Monroe, Monroe, Morgan, Newton,
Oconee, Pickens, Pike, Polk, Putnam, Spalding, Troup, Upson, and Walton
(32 county area) shall be subject to this rule.
Rule 391-3-1-.03(13) relating to ``Emission Reduction Credits'' is
being amended. The purpose of this rule is to facilitate construction
permitting for sources undertaking major modifications or new
constructions in federally designated ozone nonattainment areas and
areas contributing to ambient concentrations of ozone in nonattainment
areas in the state of Georgia. The proposed amendments to this rule
revise the eligibility requirements for major sources to make them
consistent with corresponding changes that are being proposed for Rule
391-3-1-.03, Section (8); respond to comments received from EPA
concerning applicability of its recently issued Economic Incentives
Program to the Emission Reductions Credit Program; clarify the
provisions for discounting of credits based on time banked; consolidate
and move all definitions to the end of the rule; and strike a section
referring to provisions of Rule 391-3-1-.03, Section (8).
Description of Major Revisions to Rules for Air Quality Submitted on
July 31, 2000
Rule 391-3-1-.01, Definitions, subsection (nnnn) ``Procedure for
Testing and Monitoring Sources of Air Pollutants'' is amended to
reference a revised version of the Procedures for Testing and
Monitoring Sources of Air Pollutants (``PTM'') effective April 1, 2000,
which includes changes to specific test methods and procedures and to
include a new section describing compliance procedures and monitoring
requirements for a new emission standard for large combustion turbines.
These revisions have been reviewed and meet applicable requirements.
Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(lll) relating to ``NOX Emissions
from Fuel-Burning Equipment'' is being amended to exempt fuel burning
equipment brought on site by May 1, 1999, but which had not been
installed or obtained an air quality permit under 391-3-1-.03(1) by May
1, 1999 and to provide an exemption for duct burners associated with
combined cycle gas turbine systems. The original rule exempted existing
boilers in their current locations because the cost of retrofitting
existing boilers to comply with this rule was determined to be
prohibitive. The rule was amended in January 2000, with an effective
date of February 16, 2000, to exempt fuel burning equipment which had
been permitted by May 1, 1999, even if the equipment was not yet
installed and operational by that date. The intent was to grandfather
such units because the permittee was likely to have contracted for a
new boiler that could have not complied with the emission limit and
incurred unrecoverable expense. Likewise, the intent in proposing this
second amendment is to grandfather fuel burning equipment which had
been purchased and brought on site, but which had not been installed
nor made application sufficiently in time to obtain a permit by May 1,
1999. Another exemption is being added for duct burners associated with
combined cycle gas turbine systems. These emission units will be
subject to more stringent NOX limits under Georgia Rule 391-
3-1-.02(2)(nnn) or Georgia Rule 391-3-1-.03(8)(c) as part of the
overall combined cycle system.
Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(nnn) relating to ``NOX Emissions
from Large Stationary Gas Turbines'' is being amended. This rule will
regulate NOX emissions from new and existing stationary gas
turbines greater than 25MW that are located in a 45 county area in and
around Atlanta (i.e. 13 county nonattainment area and the 32 county
area adjacent to the nonattainment area) NOX emissions from
affected stationary gas turbines permitted before April 1, 2000 will be
limited to not more than 30 parts per million (or 50 parts per million
for the oil-fired unit) at 15 percent oxygen with a compliance date of
May 1, 2003. NOX emissions from affected stationary gas
turbines permitted on or after April 1, 2000, will be limited to not
more than 6 parts per million at 15 percent oxygen with a compliance
requirement upon startup. The limits in this rule will apply during the
period May 1 through September 30 of each year. New units subject to a
NOX limit under 391-3-1-.03(8)(c)14. or 15. would be exempt
from this rule. For existing units, a provision was included in the
rule allowing the owner/operator to petition the Director for a
revision to the rule in case a source is unable to meet the 30 parts
per million (or 50 parts per million for the oil-fired unit) through
combustion modifications.
Rule 391-3-1-.02(5) relating to ``Open Burning'' is being amended.
The coverage of the rule is being expanded beyond the existing 13
county Atlanta 1-hour ozone nonattainment area to include the
additional 32 county area. Subparagraph (a) is amended to add a
``prescribed burning'' and a ``slash burning'' exemption to the rule.
Subparagraph (b) is reorganized to add clarity to the rule and is
amended to add county specific restrictions for the six counties of
Bartow, Carroll, Hall, Newton, Spalding, and Walton as well as the
remaining 26 counties of the 32 county area. The six counties listed
above will have the same restrictions as those in the Atlanta
nonattainment area. The 26 counties remaining of the 32 county area
will have the same restrictions as those in the Atlanta nonattainment
area with the exception that ``prescribed burning'' is allowed in the
26 counties. Subparagraph (f) is added to include the definitions for
``Prescribed Burning'' and ``Slash Burning.''
Rule 391-3-1-.03(6)(h)3 relating to ``SIP Permit Exemptions for
Industrial Operations'' is being amended. A new exemption from
permitting for small feed mill or grain mill ovens and for surface
coating drying ovens is being added.
Rule 391-3-1-.03(8) is being amended. Provisions for internal
offsets at a ratio of 1.3 to 1 to avoid New Source Review permitting
requirements are being restored in paragraphs (c)(13)(iii) and (iv).
These provisions will allow existing sources located within the Atlanta
1-hour ozone nonattainment area to avoid becoming subject to federal
New Source Review permitting requirements by offsetting emission
increases associated with modifications at a 1.3 to 1.0 ratio.
Rule 391-3-1-.03(11) relating to ``Permit by Rule'' is being
amended. A typographical error in the citation of
[[Page 35909]]
federal operating permit regulations is being corrected. The reference
to 40 CFR 70.5(6)(f) is being replaced with the correct reference to 40
CFR 70.6(f).
III. Final Action
EPA is granting final approval to the rule revisions to the Georgia
SIP as discussed above because they are consistent with Clean Air Act
and Agency requirements.
IV. Administrative Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. This action
merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). For the same reason,
this rule also does not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order
13084 (63 FR 27655, May 10, 1998). This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely approves a state rule implementing a federal standard, and does
not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3
of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and provide a
clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied with
Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the Executive Order.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 10, 2001. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Hydrocarbons, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Sulfur oxides.
Dated: June 12, 2001.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart L--Georgia
2. a. In the table in Sec. 52.570(c), the following entries are
revised: 391-3-.01; 391-3-1-.02(2)(ii); 391-3-1-.02(2)(ccc); 391-3-
1-.02(2)(eee); 391-3-1-.02(2)(hhh); 391-3-1-.02(2)(jjj); 391-3-
1-.02(2)(5); 391-3-1-.02(2)(6); 391-3-1-.03; 391-3-20.
b. In the table in Sec. 52.570(c), the following entries are added:
391-3-1-.02(2)(tt); 391-3-1-.02(2)(vv); 391-3-1-.02(2)(yy); 391-3-
1-.02(2)(ddd); 391-3-1-.02(2)(kkk); 391-3-1-.02(2)(lll); 391-3-
1-.02(2)(mmm); 391-3-1-.02(2)(nnn).
3. In Sec. 52.570 paragraph (e), the table is amended by adding a
new entry ``14'' and ``15''.
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 52.570 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA Approved Georgia Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective EPA approval date Comments
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
*
391-3-1-.01.................................. Definitions....... 8/16/00 July 10, 2001
[[Page 35910]]
* * * * * *
*
391-3-1-.02(2)(ii)........................... VOC Emissions from 10/7/99 July 10, 2001
surface Coating
of Miscellaneous
Metal Parts and
Products.
* * * * * *
*
391-3-1-.02(2)(tt)........................... VOC Emissions from 2/16/00 July 10, 2001
Major Sources.
* * * * * *
*
391-3-1-.02(2)(vv)........................... Volatile Organic 2/16/00 July 10, 2001
Liquid Handling
and Storage.
* * * * * *
*
391-3-1-.02(2)(yy)........................... Emissions of 2/16/00 July 10, 2001
Nitrogen Oxides
from Major
Sources.
* * * * * *
*
391-3-1-.02(2)(ccc).......................... VOC Emissions from 2/16/00 July 10, 2001
Bulk Mixing tanks.
391-3-1-.02(2)(ddd).......................... VOC Emissions from 2/16/00 July 10, 2001
Offset
Lithography.
391-3-1-.02(2)(eee).......................... VOC Emissions from 2/16/00 July 10, 2001
Expanded
Polystyrene
Products
Manufacturing.
* * * * * *
*
391-3-1-.02(2)(hhh).......................... Wood Furniture 2/16/00 July 10, 2001
Finishing and
Cleaning
Operations.
* * * * * *
*
391-3-1-.02(2)(jjj).......................... NOX Emissions from 2/16/00 July 10, 2001
Electric Utility
Steam Generating
Units.
391-3-1-.02(2)(kkk).......................... VOC Emissions from 2/16/00 July 10, 2001
Aerospace
Manufacturing and
Rework Facilities.
391-3-1-.02(2)(lll).......................... NOX Emissions from 8/16/00 July 10, 2001
Fuel-Burning
Equipment.
391-3-1-.02(2)(mmm).......................... NOX Emissions from 2/16/00 July 10, 2001
Stationary Gas
Turbines and
Stationary
Engines used to
Generate
Electricity.
391-3-1-.02(2)(nnn).......................... NOX Emissions from 8/16/00 July 10, 2001
Large Stationary
Gas Turbines.
* * * * * *
*
391-3-1-.02(2)(5)............................ Open Burning...... 8/16/00 July 10, 2001
391-3-1-.02(2)(6)............................ Source Monitoring. 10/7/99 July 10, 2001
* * * * * *
*
391-3-1-.03.................................. Permits........... 8/16/00 July 10, 2001
* * * * * *
*
391-3-20..................................... Enhanced 10/7/99 July 10, 2001
Inspection and
Maintenance.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(e) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable geographic State submittal date/
Name of nonregulatory SIP provision or nonattainment area effective date EPA approval date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
*
14. Procedures for Testing and Atlanta Metropolitan July 31, 2000.......... July 10, 2001.
Monitoring Sources of Air Pollutants. Area.
15. Enhanced Inspection/Maintenance Atlanta Metropolitan September 20, 2000..... July 10, 2001.
Test Equipment, Procedures and Area.
Specifications.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 35911]]
[FR Doc. 01-17076 Filed 7-9-01; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)