Jump to main content.

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Bay Area Air Quality Management District

Related Material

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

 



[Federal Register: March 29, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 61)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 17078-17079]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29mr01-3]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[CA 179-0275; FRL-6954-9]


Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Bay Area
Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing a limited approval and limited disapproval
of revisions to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)
portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This action
was proposed in the Federal Register on July 24, 1997 and concerns
oxides of nitrogen ( NOX) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions
from boilers, steam generators and process heaters in petroleum
refineries. Under authority of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990
(CAA or the Act), this action simultaneously approves a local rule that
regulates these emission sources and directs California to correct rule
deficiencies.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective on April 30, 2001.

ADDRESSES: You can inspect copies of the administrative record for this
action at EPA's Region IX office during normal business hours. You can
inspect copies of the submitted SIP revisions at the following
locations:
Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105-3901
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), Ariel Rios
Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington D.C. 20460
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule
Evaluation Section, 1001 ``I'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Bay Area AQMD, 939 Ellis Street, San Francisco, CA 94109-7799

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed Addison, Rulemaking Office (AIR-4),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 744-1160.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

I. Proposed Action

    On July 24, 1997, 62 FR 39795, EPA proposed a limited approval and
limited disapproval of the following rule that was submitted for
incorporation into the California SIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Local agency                 Rule#                 Rule title                Adopted      Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BAAQMD.............................         9.10   Nitrogen Oxides and Carbon            01/05/94      07/23/96
                                                    Monoxide from Boilers, Steam
                                                    Generators and Process Heaters
                                                    in Petroleum Refineries.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed a limited approval because we determined that this rule
improves the SIP and is largely consistent with the relevant CAA
requirements. We simultaneously proposed a limited disapproval because
some rule provisions conflict with section 110 and part D of the Act.
These provisions include the following:

    Rule does not specify any test method for determination of
compliance with the NOX emission limit, and does not
require recordkeeping to demonstrate compliance with the emission
rate.

    Our proposed action contains more information on the basis for this
rulemaking and on our evaluation of the submittal.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the Act, EPA is finalizing a limited
approval of the submitted rule. This action incorporates the submitted
rule into the California SIP, including those provisions identified as
deficient. As authorized under section 110(k)(3), EPA is simultaneously
finalizing a limited disapproval of the rule. As a result, sanctions
will be imposed unless EPA approves subsequent SIP revisions that
correct the rule deficiencies within 18 months of the effective date of
this action. These sanctions will be imposed under section 179 of the
Act according to 40 CFR 52.31. In addition, EPA must promulgate a
federal implementation plan (FIP) under section 110(c) unless we
approve subsequent SIP revisions that correct the rule deficiencies
within 24 months. Note that the submitted rule has been adopted by the
BAAQMD, and EPA's final limited disapproval does not prevent the local
agency from enforcing it.

IV. Administrative Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. This action
merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements

[[Page 17079]]

beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre-existing
requirements under state law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain
any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104-4). For the same reason, this rule also does not
significantly or uniquely affect the communities of tribal governments,
as specified by Executive Order 13084 (63 FR 27655, May 10, 1998). This
rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999), because it merely approves a state rule implementing a
federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3
of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and provide a
clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied with
Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
section 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 29, 2001. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: March 6, 2001.
Michael Schulz,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

    2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(239)(i)(E)(6)
to read as follows:

Sec. 52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (239) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (E) * * *
    (6) Rule 9-10 adopted on January 5, 1994.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 01-7792 Filed 3-28-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

 
 

Local Navigation

Jump to main content.