![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District
Related Material
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: January 2, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 1)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19-21]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr02ja02-6]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[CA 252-312a; FRL-7118-1]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Mojave
Desert Air Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) emissions from cement kilns. We are
approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the
Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on March 4, 2002 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by February 1, 2002. If we receive
such comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register to notify the public that this rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andy Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR-
4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
You can inspect copies of the submitted SIP revisions and EPA's
technical support document (TSD) at our Region IX office during normal
business hours. You may also see copies of the submitted SIP revisions
at the following locations:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, Rulemaking Office
(AIR-4), Air Division, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.
California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule
[[Page 20]]
Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95812.
Mojave Desert AQMD, 14306 Park Avenue, Victorville, CA 92392-2310.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charnjit Bhullar, Rulemaking Office
(AIR-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, (415) 972-
3960.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
C. What Is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action.
A. How is EPA evaluating this rule?
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
C. Public comment and final action.
III. Background information.
Why was this rule submitted?
IV. Administrative Requirements
I. The State's Submittal
A. What Rule Did the State Submit?
Table 1 lists the rule we are approving with the dates that it was
adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB).
Table 1.--Submitted Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MDAQMD............ 1161 Portland Cement 10/22/01 11/8/01
Kilns.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 21, 2001, this rule submittal was found to meet the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, which must be met
before formal EPA review.
B. Are There Other Versions of This Rule?
We approved a version of Rule 1161 into the SIP on May 11, 2000.
The MDAQMD adopted revisions to the SIP-approved version on October 22,
2001 and CARB submitted them to us on November 8, 2001.
C. What Is the Purpose of the Submitted Rule Revisions?
Rule 1161 applies to cement manufacturing operation within the
Federal Ozone non-attainment area regulated by the MDAQMD. This rule
controls emission of oxides of nitrogen (NOX) from Portland
cement kilns.
On May 11, 2000, the EPA published a limited approval and limited
disapproval of this rule, because some rule provisions conflicted with
section 110 and part D of the Clean air Act. Those provisions included
the following:
1. Alternative Compliance strategy in section (D).
2. Exemption during start-up and shutdown in section (G)(1)(a).
3. Referring to a rule not approved in the SIP in section
(G)(1)(c).
The revisions are designed primarily to correct these deficiencies.
The TSD has more information about this rule.
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How Is EPA Evaluating This Rule?
Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for
major sources in nonattainment areas (see sections 182(a)(2)(A) and
182(f)), and must not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l)
and 193). The MDAQMD regulates an ozone nonattainment area (see 40 CFR
part 81), so Rule 1161 must fulfill RACT.
Guidance and policy documents that we used to define specific
enforceability and RACT requirements include the following:
1. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the
General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of
Title I; Proposed Rule,'' (the NOX Supplement), 57 FR 55620,
November 25, 1992.
2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations; Clarification to Appendix D of November 24, 1987 Federal
Register Notice,'' (Blue Book), notice of availability published in the
May 25, 1988 Federal Register.
3. Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for the repowering of Utility Boilers, U.S. EPA
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, March 9, 1994.
B. Does This Rule Meet the Evaluation Criteria?
We believe this rule corrects the deficiencies identified in our
May 11, 2000 action and is consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP relaxations. The TSD
has more information on our evaluation.
C. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully
approving the submitted rule because we believe it fulfills all
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rule. If we
receive adverse comments by February 1, 2002, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on March 4, 2002. This will incorporate this
rule into the federally enforceable SIP.
III. Background Information
Why Was This Rule Submitted?
NOX helps produce ground-level ozone, smog and
particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that
control NOX emissions. Table 2 lists some of the national
milestones leading to the submittal of this local agency NOX
rule.
Table 2.--Ozone Nonattainment Milestones
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Event
------------------------------------------------------------------------
March 3, 1978.......................... EPA promulgated a list of ozone
nonattainment areas under the
Clean Air Act as amended in
1977. 43 FR 8964; 40 CFR
81.305.
May 26, 1988........................... EPA notified Governors that
parts of their SIPs were
inadequate to attain and
maintain the ozone standard
and requested that they
correct the deficiencies
(EPA's SIP- Call). See section
110(a)(2)(H) of the pre-
amended Act.
November 15, 1990...................... Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990 were enacted. Pub. L. 101-
549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified
at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
[[Page 21]]
May 15, 1991........................... Section 182(a)(2)(A) requires
that ozone nonattainment areas
correct deficient RACT rules
by this date.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Administrative Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 32111,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045,
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 4, 2002. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 29, 2001.
Laura Yoshii,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(286) and
(c)(287) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(286) [Reserved].
(287) New and amended regulations for the following APCD were
submitted on November 8, 2001 by the Governor's designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 1161 adopted on October 22, 2001.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 01-32099 Filed 12-31-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P