Proposed Settlement Agreement
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: January 14, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 9)]
[Notices]
[Page 1845-1846]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14ja03-55]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-7438-3]
Proposed Settlement Agreement
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement agreement; request for public
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed
settlement agreement in the following case: Communities for a Better
Environment, et al. v. U.S. EPA, No. 02-70191 (9th Circuit). This case
concerns the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) full approval
of the part 70 operating permit program for the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District in the State of California, published at 66 FR
63503 (December 7, 2001). The proposed settlement agreement was signed
by the last party on January 7, 2003.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, EPA will receive written comments relating to the
proposed settlement agreement from persons who were not named as
parties or interveners to the litigation in question. EPA or the
Department of Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed
settlement agreement if the comments disclose facts or considerations
that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate,
or inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the
Department of Justice determine, based on any comment which may be
submitted, that consent to the settlement agreement should be
withdrawn, the terms of the agreement will be affirmed.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be
received by February 13, 2003.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to Paul Cort, Office of
Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA (ORC-2), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
CA 94105. A copy of the proposed settlement agreement is available on
EPA's webpage at http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/index.html. You may
also obtain a copy from David Wampler, Region IX Air Permits Office,
U.S. EPA (AIR-3), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94109, (415)
972-3975.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA granted full approval of the 34
California part 70 operating permit programs (also known as ``title V''
permit programs) on November 29, 2001. 66 FR 63503 (December 7, 2001).
Communities for a Better Environment and Our Children's Earth
Foundation filed petitions challenging EPA's approval of the Bay Area
Air Quality Management District (``BAAQMD'' or ``District'') part 70
program. Petitioners alleged deficiencies in the District's program
related to the exemption for portable equipment and the definition of
``administrative permit amendment.'' The parties engaged in settlement
discussions and entered the Ninth Circuit Mediation Program.
The proposed settlement agreement outlines rulemaking actions and
deadlines to be met by the District. If the District fails to take any
of the outlined actions or fails to meet any of the specified
deadlines, the settlement agreement provides that EPA will send a
proposed Notice of Deficiency (NOD) for publication to the Office of
the Federal Register no later than 30 days from the relevant deadline.
After considering comment on the proposed NOD, EPA shall forward to the
Office of Federal Register a final rulemaking on the NOD within 90 days
after publication of the proposal.
As appropriate, the proposed NOD will inform the District that the
portable engine exemption in BAAQMD Rule 2-6-113 must be revised to be
consistent with the term ``stationary source'' as it is defined in the
Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7602(z), and EPA's implementing regulations,
40 CFR 70.2, as well as the definition of ``nonroad engine'' at 40 CFR
89.2. In addition, if applicable, the notice of proposed rulemaking
shall inform the District that the definition of ``administrative
permit amendment'' in BAAQMD Rule 2-6-201 must be revised to be
consistent with the definition of ``administrative permit amendment''
set forth in 40 CFR 70.7(d)(i)--(iv).
Dated: January 7, 2003.
Lisa K. Friedman,
Associate General Counsel, Air and Radiation Law Office.
[FR Doc. 03-738 Filed 1-13-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)