Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petitions for Objection to State Operating Permits for Columbia University; Starrett City Power Plant; Elmhurst Hospital; Maimonides Medical Center; and the Bergen Point Sewage Treatment Plant
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: January 21, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 13)]
[Notices]
[Page 2763-2765]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21ja03-47]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[Regional Docket Nos. II-2000-08, -09, II-2001-01, -03, -04; FRL-7439-6]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petitions for Objection
to State Operating Permits for Columbia University; Starrett City Power
Plant; Elmhurst Hospital; Maimonides Medical Center; and the Bergen
Point Sewage Treatment Plant
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final orders on petitions to object to five State
operating permits.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces that the EPA Administrator has
responded to five citizen petitions asking EPA to object to operating
permits issued to five facilities by the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). Specifically, the Administrator
has partially granted and partially denied each of the petitions
submitted by the New York Public Interest Research Group (NYPIRG) to
object to each of the State operating permits issued to the following
facilities: Columbia University in New York, NY; Starrett City Power
Plant in Brooklyn, NY; Elmhurst Hospital in Elmhurst, NY; Maimonides
Medical Center in Brooklyn, NY; and Bergen Point Sewage Treatment Plant
in West Babylon, NY.
Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act (Act),
Petitioner may seek judicial review of those portions of the petitions
which EPA denied in the United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit. Any petition for review shall be filed within 60
days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register,
pursuant to section 307 of the Act.
ADDRESSES: You may review copies of the final orders, the petitions,
and other supporting information at the EPA, Region 2, 290 Broadway,
New York, New York 10007-1866. If you wish to examine these documents,
you should make an appointment at least 24 hours before visiting day.
Additionally, the final orders for Columbia University, Starrett City
and Elmhurst Hospital are available electronically at: http://www.epa.gov/
region07/programs/artd/air/title5/petitiondb/petitiondb2000.htm,
and the final orders for Maimonides Medical Center
and Bergen Point Sewage Treatment Plant are available electronically
at: http://www.epa.gov/region07/programs/artd/air/title5/petitiondb/
petitiondb2001.htm.
[[Page 2764]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Riva, Chief, Permitting
Section, Air Programs Branch, Division of Environmental Planning and
Protection, EPA, Region 2, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York
10007-1866, telephone (212) 637-4074.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act affords EPA a 45-day period to
review, and object to as appropriate, operating permits proposed by
State permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the Act authorizes
any person to petition the EPA Administrator within 60 days after the
expiration of this review period to object to State operating permits
if EPA has not done so. Petitions must be based only on objections to
the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity during the
public comment period provided by the State, unless the petitioner
demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise these issues during the
comment period or the grounds for the issues arose after this period.
I. Columbia University
On October 2, 2000, the EPA received a petition from NYPIRG,
requesting that EPA object to the issuance of the title V operating
permit to Columbia University. The petition raises issues regarding the
permit application, the permit issuance process, and the permit itself.
NYPIRG asserts that (1) NYSDEC violated the public participation
requirements of 40 CFR 70.7(h) by inappropriately denying NYPIRG's
request for a public hearing; (2) the permit is based on an incomplete
permit application in violation of 40 CFR 70.5(c); (3) the permit lacks
an adequate statement of basis as required by 40 CFR 70.7(a)(5); (4)
the permit distorts the annual compliance certification requirement of
CAA section 114(a)(3) and 40 CFR 70.6(c)(5); (5) the permit does not
assure compliance with all applicable requirements as mandated by 40
CFR 70.1(b) and 70.6(a)(1) because it illegally sanctions the
systematic violation of applicable requirements during startup/
shutdown, malfunction, maintenance, and upset conditions; (6) the
permit does not require prompt reporting of all deviations from permit
requirements as mandated by 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(B); and (7) the
permit does not assure compliance with all applicable requirements as
mandated by 40 CFR 70.1(b) and 70.6(a)(1) because many individual
permit conditions lack adequate monitoring and are not practically
enforceable.
On December 16, 2002, the Administrator issued an order partially
granting and partially denying the petition on Columbia University. The
order explains the reasons behind EPA's conclusion that the NYSDEC must
reopen the permit to: (1) Enforceably prohibit operation of all four
boilers simultaneously, (2) specify that continuous opacity monitors
are used, (3) incorporate monitoring for fuel sulfur content, (4)
incorporate sulfur requirements of the New Source Performance
Standards, (5) include monitoring to support the annual and hourly
NOX limits, and (6) incorporate operational restrictions to
limit the annual SO2 emissions and include monitoring to
support the hourly SO2 limits. The order also explains the
reasons for denying NYPIRG's remaining claims.
NYPIRG raises each of the above seven issues in the petitions on
Starrett City Power Plant and Elmhurst Hospital, as well. NYPIRG raises
each of the above issues except the public hearing issue in the
petitions on Maimonides Medical Center and Bergen Point Sewage
Treatment Plant. Further, in the Starrett City and Maimonides
petitions, NYPIRG raises an additional issue: the permit fails to
include the applicable particulate matter limitation that is part of
New York's State Implementation Plan. Finally, in the petition on
Bergen Point, NYPIRG raises a new issue: the permit lacks federally
enforceable conditions that govern the procedures for permit renewal.
In each of these petitions, the issue on monitoring is subdivided into
several detailed points, some of which are permit-specific and some of
which are shared among the other permits.
II. Starrett City Power Plant
On January 3, 2001, the EPA received a petition from NYPIRG,
requesting that EPA object to the issuance of the title V operating
permit to Starrett City, on the grounds listed above. On December 16,
2002, the Administrator issued an order partially granting and
partially denying the petition. The order explains the reasons behind
EPA's conclusion that the NYSDEC must reopen the permit to: (1) Revise
the permit's sulfur-in-fuel provisions to incorporate the applicable
SIP citation; (2) add the requirement for annual tune-ups for the
facility's four boilers; (3) add operational restrictions for the
facility's three reciprocating engines; (4) add recordkeeping and
operational limits based on the most recent stack test for the
facility's three reciprocating engines; (5) add the requirement for
annual tune-ups for the facility's three reciprocating engines; and (6)
add the applicable SIP particulate matter limit and appropriate
monitoring for the facility's four boilers and three reciprocating
engines. The order also explains the reasons for denying NYPIRG's
remaining claims.
III. Elmhurst Hospital
On October 10, 2000, the EPA received a petition from NYPIRG,
requesting that EPA object to the issuance of the title V operating
permit to Elmhurst Hospital on the grounds listed above. On December
16, 2002, the Administrator issued an order partially granting and
partially denying the petition. The order explains the reasons behind
EPA's conclusion that the NYSDEC must reopen the permit to add
requirements for prompt reporting of temperature excursions at the
ethylene oxide abatement system. The order also explains the reasons
for denying NYPIRG's remaining claims.
IV. Maimonides Medical Center
On October 29, 2001, the EPA received a petition from NYPIRG,
requesting that EPA object to the issuance of the title V operating
permit to the Maimonides Medical Center on the grounds listed above. On
December 16, 2002, the Administrator issued an order partially granting
and partially denying the petition. The order explains the reasons
behind EPA's conclusion that the NYSDEC must reopen the permit to: (1)
Add the requirements for annual tune-ups for the facility's five
boilers; (2) add the applicable SIP particulate matter limit and
appropriate monitoring and recordkeeping; (3) move compliance
requirements relating to the ethylene oxide control device from the
State side to the federally enforceable side of the permit; (4) revise
monitoring compliance requirements to express permissible emission
rates in terms of those same units that are expressed in the SIP; (5)
specify which of two proposed emission control scenarios, stated in the
permit, is being retained for implementation regarding the ethylene
oxide operation; (6) upgrade the existing monitoring relating to the
ethylene oxide operation; and (7) add opacity monitoring requirements
to the ethylene oxide operation. The order also explains the reasons
for denying NYPIRG's remaining claims.
V. Bergen Point Sewage Treatment Plant
On October 15, 2001, the EPA received a petition from NYPIRG,
requesting that EPA object to the issuance of the title V operating
permit to Bergen Point on the grounds listed above. On December 16,
2002, the Administrator issued an order partially granting and
partially denying the petition. The order explains the reasons
[[Page 2765]]
behind EPA's conclusion that the NYSDEC must reopen the permit to: (1)
Upgrade existing monitoring relating to stack testing and stack
emissions; (2) include both particulate matter emission limits (State
and Federal) as applicable requirements of the incinerators; (3)
require permittee to keep a log of the incinerators' operating hours;
(4) incorporate calibration methods and frequencies for monitoring
devices; (5) specify a test method and appropriate recordkeeping for
the sludge sampling activity; (6) incorporate the average scrubber
pressure drop from the most recent performance test; and (7) specify
QA/QC requirements with respect to the continuous opacity monitors. The
order also explains the reasons for denying NYPIRG's remaining claims.
Dated: January 7, 2003.
Jane M. Kenny,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
[FR Doc. 03-964 Filed 1-17-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)