Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to State Operating Permit for Colorado Interstate Gas Company, Latigo Station
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: April 7, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 67)]
[Notices]
[Page 17844]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07ap06-57]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8056-1]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to State
Operating Permit for Colorado Interstate Gas Company, Latigo Station
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final action.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces that the EPA Administrator has
responded to a citizen petition asking EPA to object to an operating
permit issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment (CDPHE). Specifically, the Administrator has partially
granted and partially denied the petition submitted by Jeremy Nichols
to object to the operating permit issued to Colorado Interstate Gas
Company--Latigo Station.
Pursuant to section 505(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act (Act),
Petitioners may seek judicial review of those portions of the petitions
which EPA denied in the United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit. Any petition for review shall be filed within 60
days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register,
pursuant to section 307 of the Act.
ADDRESSES: You may review copies of the final order, the petition, and
other supporting information at the EPA Region 8 Office, 999 18th
Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466. EPA requests that if at
all possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the copies of the final order, the
petition, and other supporting information. You may view the hard
copies Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays. If you wish to examine these documents, you should make an
appointment at least 24 hours before visiting day. Additionally, the
final order for the Latigo Station is available electronically at:
http://www.epa.gov/region07/programs/artd/air/title5/petitiondb/
petitions/cig_latigo_decision2005.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hans Buenning, Air & Radiation
Program, EPA, Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 200, Denver, Colorado
80202-2466, 303-312-6438, buenning.hans@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act affords EPA a 45-day period to
review, and object to as appropriate, operating permits proposed by
State permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the Act authorizes
any person to petition the EPA Administrator within 60 days after the
expiration of this review period to object to State operating permits
if EPA has not done so. Petitions must be based only on objections to
the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity during the
public comment period provided by the State, unless the petitioner
demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise these issues during the
comment period or the grounds for the issues arose after this period.
On July 5, 2005, the EPA received a petition from Jeremy Nichols
requesting that EPA object to the issuance of the title V operating
permit to the Colorado Interstate Gas Company--Latigo Station (Latigo).
Mr. Nichols asserts that the permit: (1) Fails to ensure compliance
with volatile organic compound and hazardous air pollutant emission
standards for the glycol dehydrator; (2) fails to require opacity
monitoring; and (3) fails to appropriately control volatile organic
compound emissions from internal combustion engines.
On February 17, 2006, the Administrator issued an order partially
granting and partially denying the petition. The order explains the
reasons behind EPA's conclusion that the CDPHE must revise the permit
to refine the fuel restrictions and recordkeeping provisions to
adequately assure compliance with the State Implementation Plan opacity
condition of 20%. The order also explains the reasons for denying Mr.
Nichols' remaining claims.
Dated: March 27, 2006.
Kerrigan G. Clough,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. E6-5111 Filed 4-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)