![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Partial Approval of the Clean Air Act, Section 112(l), Delegation of Authority to the Washington State Department of Health
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: February 22, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 35)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 9059-9064]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22fe06-38]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 61
[EPA-R10-OAR-2006-0001; FRL-8035-6]
Partial Approval of the Clean Air Act, Section 112(l), Delegation
of Authority to the Washington State Department of Health
AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to partially approve a delegation request
submitted by the Washington State Department of Health (WDOH). WDOH has
requested delegation authority to implement and enforce the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for radionuclide air
emission. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA or
the Act).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 24, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R10-OAR-2006-0001, by one of the following methods:
A. http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
B. E-Mail: zhen.davis@epa.gov.
C. Mail: Davis Zhen, Federal and Delegated Air Programs Unit, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Mail
Stop: AWT-107, Seattle, WA 98101.
D. Hand Delivery: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10,
Attn: Davis Zhen (AWT-107), 1200 Sixth
[[Page 9060]]
Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101, 9th Floor. Such deliveries are only
accepted during normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-
2006-0001. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an "anonymous
access" system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send
an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov
or in hard copy during normal business hours at the Office of Air,
Waste and Toxics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. Copies of the State submittal are
also available at the Washington State Department of Health, 111 Israel
Road, Tumwater, Washington 98501.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Davis Zhen, (206) 553-7660, or by e-
mail at zhen.davis@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
A. What Is the NESHAPs Program?
B. What Are the Requirements for This Partial Approval and Delegation?
C. What Is the History of This Partial Approval and Delegation?
D. How Has WDOH Satisfied the Requirements for Partial Approval
and Delegation of the Radionuclide NESHAPs?
II. EPA Action
A. What Authorities Are Included in This Partial Approval and
Delegation to WDOH?
B. What Authorities Are Excluded From This Partial Approval and
Delegation to WDOH?
III. Implications
A. How Will This Partial Approval and Delegation Affect the
Regulated Community?
B. Where Will the Regulated Community Send Notifications and Reports?
C. What Are WDOH's Reporting Obligations?
D. What Is the Effect of Other State Laws Regulating
Radionuclide Air Emissions?
E. How Will WDOH Receive Partial Approval and Delegation of
Newly Promulgated and Revised Radionuclide NESHAPs?
F. How Frequently Should WDOH Update Its Partial Approval and
Delegation?
G. How Will This Delegation Affect Indian Country?
IV. Summary of Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
A. What Is the NESHAPs Program?
Hazardous air pollutants are defined in the Act as pollutants that
threaten human health through inhalation or other type of exposure.
These pollutants are commonly referred to as ``air toxics'' or
``hazardous air pollutants'' and are listed in section 112(b)(1) of the
Act. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants or
NESHAPs control emissions of hazardous air pollutants from specific
source categories and implement the requirements of section 112 of the
Act. These standards are found in 40 CFR parts 61 and 63.
Section 112(l) of the Act authorizes EPA to approve State and local
air toxics programs or rules such that these agencies can accept full
or partial delegation of authority for implementing and enforcing the
NESHAPs. Typically, a State or local agency requests delegation based
on Federal rules adopted unchanged into State or local rules.
B. What Are the Requirements for This Partial Approval and Delegation?
Requirements for partial approval and delegation of NESHAPs adopted
unchanged into State or local law are set forth in 40 CFR 63.91(d).
This type of delegation is referred to as ``straight delegation.''
There are two basic requirements for straight delegation. First, the
requesting agency must show it has adequate authority and resources to
implement and enforce the NESHAPs. This criterion must be met for
straight delegation as well as for all other types of delegation under
section 112(l). Second, in the case of straight delegation, the
requesting agency must show that it has adopted the Federal NESHAPs for
which it is requesting delegation unchanged into State or local law.
There are two ways a State or local agency can show it has adequate
authority and resources to implement and enforce the requested NESHAPs.
First, the requesting agency can show that it has received from EPA
final or interim approval of its operating permit program under title V
of the Clean Air Act. This is because the authority and enforcement
requirements for approval of a title V program are equivalent to the
requirements for NESHAPs delegation found in 40 CFR 63.91(d). Moreover,
EPA approval of a title V program already confers the responsibility to
implement and enforce all requirements applicable to major sources and
certain other sourcof section 112.
A requesting agency that does not have an EPA-approved title V
program can request delegation by showing it has the authority
necessary to implement and enforce the NESHAPs, it has the resources
and ability to carry out this responsibility, and it is capable of
assuring expeditious compliance by sources, all as provided in 40 CFR
63.91(d)(3)(i) through (v). Once a requesting agency demonstrates that
it meets the approval criteria, it need only reference that
demonstration and reaffirm it still meets the criteria in future
requests for updated delegation of section 112 standards.
With respect to radionuclide emissions from licensees of the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission or licensees of Nuclear Regulatory
Commission Agreement States which are subject to 40 CFR part 61,
subparts I, T, or W, a State may request that EPA approve delegation of
implementation and enforcement of the Federal standard pursuant to 40
CFR 63.91, but no changes or modifications in the form or content of
the standard will be approved pursuant to 40 CFR 63.92, 63.93, 63.94,
[[Page 9061]]
or 63.97. See 40 CFR 63.90(f). In other words, the only approval option
for these NESHAPs is straight delegation.
EPA is authorized to grant, with the State's consent, partial
approval to a State request for delegation where the State's legal
authorities substantially meet the requirements of 40 CFR
63.91(d)(3)(i) but are not fully approvable. Section 63.91(d)(3)(i)
requires the State to show it has enforcement authorities meeting the
requirements of 40 CFR 70.11 (the enforcement authorities of the title
V program), the authority to request information from regulated sources
regarding their compliance status, and the authority to inspect sources
and any records required to determine a source's compliance status. In
addition, if a State delegates authorities to a local agency and the
local agency does not have authorities that meet the requirements of 40
CFR 70.11, the State must retain enforcement authority. In the case of
a partial approval, EPA will continue to implement and enforce those
authorities under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3)(i) that are not approved.
C. What Is the History of This Partial Approval and Delegation?
EPA granted interim delegation of 40 CFR part 61, subparts H and I,
to WDOH on August 2, 1995. See 60 FR 39263. That interim delegation
expired by its terms on November 9, 1996. Subsequent to that
delegation, EPA revised 40 CFR part 61, subparts H and I on September
9, 2002. See 67 FR 57166 and 57167, respectively. In addition, EPA
raised a concern regarding whether Washington's Regulatory Reform Act
of 1995, RCW Ch. 43.05, conflicted with requirements for delegation or
approval of Clean Air Act programs to WDOH. WDOH revised its
regulations to incorporate by reference the updated NESHAP standards
and obtained a determination that RCW Ch. 43.05 does not apply to the
Federally-delegated Radionuclide NESHAPs.
In a letter dated October 6, 2004, WDOH submitted a new request for
delegation of subparts H and I, as well as for 40 CFR part 61, subparts
B, K, Q, R, T, and W. EPA considered WDOH's October 2004 delegation
request, but determined that WDOH had not adopted into State law the
general provisions for part 61 in 40 CFR part 61, subpart A, and the
construction/modification provisions of Subpart H, which are essential
for full implementation and enforcement of the Radionuclide NESHAPs.
EPA therefore did not proceed with the October 2004 delegation request.
Since then, WDOH has revised its regulations to fully incorporate
by reference all of the Radionuclide NESHAPs, including 40 CFR part 61,
subpart A. On June 6, 2005, WDOH submitted a new request for delegation
of authority to implement and enforce 40 CFR part 61, subparts A, B, H,
I, K, Q, R, T, and W, as in effect on July 1, 2004. WDOH supplemented
this request with a letter from the Washington Attorney General's
Office dated December 14, 2005 regarding WDOH's authority to implement
and enforce the radionuclides NESHAP. In addition, WDOH clarified on
December 20, 2005 that it would consent to partial delegation in the
event EPA determined that WDOH did not have all the enforcement
authorities required by 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3)(i) for full approval.
D. How Has WDOH Satisfied the Requirements for Partial Approval and
Delegation of the Radionuclide NESHAPs?
Although WDOH works with the Washington Department of Ecology
(Ecology) in issuing Title V permits to radionuclide sources, Ecology,
not WDOH is the EPA-approved Title V permitting program for such
sources. Therefore, EPA must determine whether WDOH meets the criteria
in 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3)(i) through (v).
Based on WDOH's June 6, 2005 request for delegation and supporting
documentation, EPA has determined that WDOH meets the criteria for
partial approval and straight delegation of the Radionuclide NESHAP.
Specifically, WDOH has submitted a letter from the Washington Attorney
General's Office dated December 14, 2005 stating that WDOH has the
enforcement, inspection, and information gathering authority required
by 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3)(i) with one exception. The exception is that,
although WDOH has the authority required by 40 CFR 70.11(a)(3)(ii) and
63.91(d)(3)(i) to recover criminal penalties for knowing violations of
the Radionuclide NESHAPs, WDOH does not currently have express
authority to recover criminal fines for knowingly making a false
material statement or knowingly rendering inadequate any required
monitoring device or method, as required by 40 CFR 70.11(a)(3)(iii) and
63.91(d)(3)(i). The letter states that WDOH intends to include express
prohibitions against these actions in the near future.
WDOH has also submitted copies of State statutes, regulations, and
requirements that grant WDOH authority to implement and enforce the
Radionuclide NESHAPs.
In addition, WDOH has submitted a demonstration that it has
adequate resources to implement and enforce all aspects of the
Radionuclide NESHAPs. This is especially important with respect to the
Radionuclide NESHAPs. EPA and other Federal agencies have traditionally
played the primary role in regulating radionuclide air emissions, both
because radiation is not a ``traditional'' hazardous air pollutant and
because very few State and local agencies have developed the technical
expertise to independently implement the Radionuclide NESHAPs. WDOH,
however, has a long history of regulating large sources of radionuclide
air emissions in the State of Washington, in particular, the Department
of Energy's Hanford site near Richland, Washington. The submittal also
includes a plan for assuring expeditious implementation and enforcement
of the Radionuclide NESHAPs.
Finally, WDOH has adopted without change or modification all of the
provisions of the Radionuclide NESHAPs, 40 CFR part 61, subparts A, B,
H, I, K, Q, R, T, and W, as in effect on July 1, 2004. WDOH does, as a
matter of State law, have additional regulations and requirements that
sources of radionuclide air emissions must meet. As discussed below,
however, those additional authorities and requirements are not part of
this partial delegation.
II. EPA Action
A. What Authorities Are Included in This Partial Approval and Delegation?
Except as provided in Section II.B., EPA is delegating to WDOH
authority to implement and enforce 40 CFR part 61, subparts A, B, H, I,
K, Q, R, T, and W, as in effect on July 1, 2004. NESHAPs that are
promulgated or revised substantively after July 1, 2004 are not
delegated to WDOH. These remain the responsibility of EPA.
Included as part of the delegation is the authority to approve:
1. ``Minor changes to monitoring,'' including the use of the
specified monitoring requirements and procedures with minor changes in
methodology as described in 40 CFR 61.14(g)(1)(i);
2. ``Intermediate changes to monitoring'';
3. ``Minor changes to recordkeeping/reporting'';
4. ``Minor changes in test methods,'' including the use of a
reference method with minor changes in methodology as described in 40
CFR 61.13(h)(1)(i);
5. Waiver of the requirement for emission testing because the owner
or operator of a source has demonstrated
[[Page 9062]]
by other means to WDOH's satisfaction that the source is in compliance
with the standard as described in 40 CFR 61.13(h)(1)(iii).
For purposes of this paragraph, the terms in quotations have the
meaning assigned to them in 40 CFR 63.90.
B. What Authorities Are Excluded From This Partial Approval and Delegation?
EPA is not delegating authorities under 40 CFR part 61 that
specifically indicate they cannot be delegated, that require rulemaking
to implement, that affect the stringency of the standard, or where
national oversight is the only way to ensure national consistency.
Table 1 below identifies the specific authorities within 40 CFR part
61, subparts A, B, H, I, K, Q, R, T, and W that EPA is specifically
excluding from this delegation.
Table 1.--Part 61 Authorities Excluded From Partial Approval and
Delegation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Authorities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
61.04(b)............................... Waiver of recordkeeping.
61.12(d)(1)............................ Approval of alternative means
of emission limitation.
61.13(h)(1)(ii)........................ Approval of alternatives to
test methods (except as
provided in 40 CFR
61.13(h)(1)(i)).
61.14(g)(1)(ii)........................ Approval of alternatives to
monitoring that do not qualify
as ``Minor changes to
monitoring,'' ``Intermediate
changes to monitoring,'' or
``Minor changes to
recordkeeping/reporting'' For
purposes of the previous
sentence, the terms in quotes
are defined in 40 CFR 63.90.
61.16.................................. Availability of information.
61.23(b)............................... Subpart B--Radon Emissions from
Underground Uranium Mines
Alternative compliance
demonstration to COMPLY--R
(requires EPA Headquarters
approval).
61.93(b)(2)(iii), (c)(2)(iii).......... Subpart H--Emissions of
Radionuclides Other than Radon
from DOE Facilities
(alternatives to test
methods).
61.107(b)(2)(iii), (d)(2)(iii)......... Subpart I--Radionuclide
Emissions from Federal
Facilities Other than NRC
licensees and Not Covered in
Subpart H (alternatives to
test methods).
61.125(a).............................. Subpart K--Radionuclide
Emissions from elemental
Phosphorus Plants
(alternatives to test
methods).
61.206(c), (d), and (e)................ Subpart R--Emission from
Phosphogypsum Stacks (requires
Approval from Assistant
Administrator of EPA Office of
Air and Radiation).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, because WDOH does not currently have express authority
to recover criminal fines for knowingly making a false material
statement, representation, or certificate in any form, notice or report
or knowingly rendering inadequate any required monitoring device or
method, as required by 40 CFR 70.11(a)(3)(iii) and 40 CFR
63.91(d)(3)(i), EPA will continue to retain primary authority to
implement and enforce these authorities. This is the basis for partial
rather than full approval.
III. Implications
A. How Will This Partial Approval and Delegation Affect the Regulated
Community?
Once a State or local agency has been delegated the authority to
implement and enforce a NESHAP, they become the primary point of
contact with respect to that NESHAP. Generally speaking, the transfer
of authority from EPA to WDOH in this delegation changes EPA's role
from primary implementer and enforcer to overseer.
As a result, if this partial approval and delegation is finalized,
sources in Washington to the delegated Radionuclide NESHAPs should
direct questions and compliance issues to WDOH. For authorities that
are NOT delegated (those noted in Section II.B. above), affected
sources should continue to work with EPA as their primary contact and
submit materials directly to EPA. In such cases, affected sources
should copy WDOH on all submittals, questions, and requests.
EPA will continue to have primary responsibility to implement and
enforce Federal regulations that do not have current State or local
agency delegations.
B. Where Will the Regulated Community Send Notifications and Reports?
If this partial approval and delegation is finalized, sources
subject to the delegated NESHAPs will be required to send required
notifications, reports and requests to WDOH for WDOH's action and to
provide copies to EPA. For authorities that are excluded from this
delegation, sources should continue to send required notifications,
reports, and requests to EPA and to provide copies to WDOH.
C. What Are WDOH's Reporting Obligations?
WDOH must maintain a record of all approved alternatives to all
monitoring, testing, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and
provide this list of alternatives to EPA at least semi-annually, or at
a more frequent basis if requested by EPA. EPA may audit the WDOH-
approved alternatives and disapprove any that it determines are
inappropriate, after discussion with WDOH. If changes are disapproved,
WDOH must notify the source that it must revert to the original
applicable monitoring, testing, recordkeeping, and/or reporting
requirements (either those requirements of the original section 112
requirements, the alternative requirements approved under this subpart,
or the previously approved site-specific alternative requirements).
Also, in cases where the source does not maintain the conditions which
prompted the approval of the alternatives to the monitoring testing,
recordkeeping, and/or reporting requirements, WDOH must require the
source to revert to the original monitoring, testing, recordkeeping,
and reporting requirements, or more stringent requirements, if justified.
D. What Is the Effect of Other State Laws Regulating Radionuclide Air
Emissions?
This partial approval and delegation delegates to WDOH authority to
implement and enforce 40 CFR part 61, subparts A, B, H, I, K, Q, R, T,
and W, as in effect on July 1, 2004. The partial approval and
delegation does not extend to any additional State standards, including
other State standards regulating radionuclide air emissions.
[[Page 9063]]
However, if both a State or local regulation and a Federal regulation
apply to the same source, both must be complied with, regardless of
whether the one is more stringent than the other, pursuant to the
requirements of section 116 of the Clean Air Act.
E. How Will WDOH Receive Partial Approval and Delegation of Newly
Promulgated and Revised Radionuclide NESHAPs?
WDOH may receive partial approval and delegation of newly
promulgated or revised Radionuclide NEHAPs by the following streamlined
process: (1) WDOH will send a letter to EPA requesting delegation for
such new or revised NESHAPs which WDOH has adopted by reference into
Washington regulations; (2) EPA will send a letter of response back to
WDOH granting partial approval of the delegation request (or explaining
why EPA cannot grant the request), and publish only EPA's approval in the
Federal Register; (3) WDOH does not need to send a response back to EPA.
F. How Frequently Should WDOH Update Its Partial Approval and Delegations?
WDOH is not obligated to request or receive future delegations.
However, EPA encourages WDOH, on an annual basis, to revise its rules
to incorporate by reference newly promulgated or revised Radionuclide
NESHAPs and request updated delegation. Preferably, WDOH should adopt
Federal regulations effective July 1, of each year; this corresponds
with the publication date of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
G. How Will This Partial Approval and Delegation Affect Indian Country?
This partial approval and delegation to WDOH to implement and
enforce the Radionuclide NESHAPs does not extend to sources or
activities located in Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151.
``Indian country'' is defined under 18 U.S.C. 1151 as: (1) All land
within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of
the United States Government, notwithstanding the issuance of any
patent, and including rights-of-way running through the reservation;
(2) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United
States, whether within the original or subsequently acquired territory
thereof, and whether within or without the limits of a State; and (3)
all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been
extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same. Under
this definition, EPA treats as reservations trust lands validly set
aside for the use of a Tribe, even if the trust lands have not been
formally designated as a reservation. Consistent with previous Federal
program approvals or delegations, EPA will continue to implement the
NESHAPs in Indian country, because WDOH has not adequately demonstrated
its authority over sources and activities located within the exterior
boundaries of Indian reservations and other areas in Indian country.
IV. Summary of Proposed Action
EPA proposes to grant partial approval to WDOH's request for
program approval and delegation of authority to implement and enforce
the Radionuclide NESHAPs. Pursuant to the authority of section 112(l)
of the Act, this partial approval is based on EPA's finding that State
law, regulations, and agency resources meet the requirements for
partial program approval and delegation of authority specified in 40
CFR 63.91 and applicable EPA guidance.
The purpose of this partial approval and delegation is to
acknowledge WDOH's ability to implement a Radionuclide NESHAPs program
and to transfer primary implementation and enforcement responsibility
for this program from EPA to WDOH. Although EPA will look to WDOH as
the lead for implementing delegated Radionuclide NESHAPs for its
sources, EPA retains authority under Section 113 of the Act to enforce
any applicable emission standard or requirement, if needed. With
partial program approval, WDOH may request newly promulgated or revised
Radionuclide NESHAPs by way of a streamlined process.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under State law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
The rule also does not have Tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175
(59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000). Consistent with EPA policy, however, EPA
nonetheless initiated consultation with representatives of tribal
governments in the process of developing this proposal to permit them
to have meaningful and timely input into its development. In the spirit
of Executive Order 13175, and consistent with EPA policy to promote
communications between EPA and tribal governments, EPA specifically
solicits additional comment on this proposed rule from tribal officials.
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This action merely approves a State request to receive
delegation of certain Federal standards, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities
established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because
it is not economically significant.
In reviewing program approval and delegation submissions, EPA's
role is to approve submissions provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing
requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to disapprove a delegation submission for failure
to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA
to use VCS in place of a delegation submission that otherwise satisfies
the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
[[Page 9064]]
apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 61
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Radionuclides,
Reporting, and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 27, 2006.
Julie M. Hagensen,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. E6-2472 Filed 2-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P