Fall 2005 Regulatory Agenda

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

[October 31,2005 (Volume 70, Number 209)]
[Unified Agenda]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [frwais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID: f:ua051024.wais]
[Page 65206-65357]

_______________________________________________________________________

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)
40 CFR Ch. I
FRL 7971-7

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.

_______________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publishes the
semiannual regulatory agenda to update the public about:

Regulations and major policies currently under development,

Reviews of existing regulations and major policies, and

Rule and major policymakings completed or canceled since the
last Agenda.

TO BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA MAILING LIST: If you would like to
subscribe, please send an e-mail with your name and address to:
ncepimal@one.net, or call 800-490-9198. There is no charge for single
copies of the agenda.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

If you have questions or comments about a particular action,
please get in touch with the agency contact listed in each agenda
entry. If you have general questions about or suggestions for
improving the agenda or questions about EPA's decisionmaking
process, please contact: Phil Schwartz (1803A), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20460; phone: (202) 564-6564; e-mail: schwartz.philip@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

A. What Are EPA's Regulatory Goals and What Key Principles, Statutes,
and Executive Orders Inform Our Rule and Policymaking Process?

B. How Can You Be Involved in EPA's Rule and Policy Making Process?

C. What Actions Are Included in the Agenda and What is the Relationship
between the Agenda and Regulatory Plan?

D. How Is the Agenda Organized?

E. What Information Is in Agenda Entries?

F. How Can You Find Out More About EPA Rulemakings?

G. What Special Attention Do We Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small
Businesses, Small Governments, and Small Nonprofit Organizations?

H. Thank You for Collaborating with Us

A. What Are EPA's Regulatory Goals and What Key Principles, Statutes,
and Executive Orders Inform Our Rule and Policymaking Process?

Our primary objective is to protect human health and the
environment. To achieve this objective and ensure that our
decisions are cost-effective and fully protective, we conduct high
quality scientific, economic, and policy analyses. These analyses
are planned and initiated at early stages in the regulatory
development process, so that Agency decision makers are well
informed of the qualitative and quantitative benefits and costs as
they select among alternative approaches. It is also important that
we continue to apply new and improved methods to protect the
environment, such as: Building flexibility into regulations from
the very beginning, creating strong partnerships with the regulated
community, vigorously engaging in public outreach and involvement,
and using effective nonregulatory approaches. Research, testing and
adoption of new environmental protection methods are also a central
tenet in environmental problem solving. The integration of all
these elements via a well managed regulatory development process
and a strong commitment to innovative solutions will ensure that we
all benefit from significant environmental improvements that are
fair, efficient, and protective. Our overall success is measured by
our effectiveness in protecting human health and the environment.

For a more expansive discussion of our regulatory philosophy
and priorities please see our new Statement of Priorities in the FY
2006 Regulatory Plan (www.epa.gov/regagenda). Besides the
fundamental environmental laws authorizing EPA actions such as the
Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, there are legal requirements
that apply to the issuance of regulations that are generally
contained in the Administrative Procedure Act, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act as amended by the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act, and the Congressional Review Act.

We also must meet a number of requirements contained in
Executive Orders. Of particular significance for EPA rulemakings
are Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review; 58 FR
51735; October 4, 1993), 12898 (Environmental Justice; 59 FR 7629;
February 16, 1994), 13045 (Children's Health Protection; 62 FR
19885; April 23, 1997), 13132 (Federalism; 64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments; 59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000), and 13211 (Energy; 66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001).

You can find information on these laws and Executive Orders
through links from http://www.epa.gov/regagenda.

B. How Can You Be Involved in EPA's Rule and Policy Making Process?

You can make your voice heard by getting in touch with the
contact person provided in each Agenda entry. We urge you to
participate as early in the process as possible. You may also
participate by commenting on proposed rules that we publish in the
Federal Register. To be most effective, comments should contain
information and data that support your position, and you also
should explain why we should incorporate your suggestion in the
rule or non-regulatory action. You can be particularly helpful and
persuasive if you provide examples to illustrate your concerns and
offer specific alternatives. We believe our actions will be more
cost-effective and protective if our development process includes
stakeholders working with us to identify the most practical and
effective solutions to problems and we stress this point most
strongly in all of our training programs for rule and policy
developers. Democracy gives real power to individual citizens, but
with that power comes responsibility. We urge you to become
involved in EPA's rule and policymaking process.

C. What Actions Are Included in the Agenda and What Is the Relationship
Between the Agenda and Regulatory Plan?

EPA includes regulations and certain major policy documents in
the Agenda. We generally do not include minor amendments or the
following categories of actions:

Administrative actions such as delegations of authority,
changes of address or phone numbers.

[[Page 65207]]

Under the Clean Air Act: Revisions to State Implementation
Plans; Equivalent Methods for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring; Deletions
from the New Source Performance Standards source categories list;
Delegations of Authority to States; Area Designations for Air Quality
Planning Purposes.

Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act:
Decision documents defining and establishing registration standards;
decision documents and termination decisions for the Special Review
Registration process; and data call-in requests made under section
3(c)(2)(B).

Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Actions
regarding pesticide tolerances and food additive regulations, including
the tolerance reassessment process.

Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act:
Authorization of State solid waste management plans; hazardous waste
delisting petitions.

Under the Clean Water Act: State Water Quality Standards;
deletions from the section 307(a) list of toxic pollutants; suspensions
of toxic testing requirements under the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES); delegations of NPDES authority to States.

Under the Safe Drinking Water Act: Actions on State
underground injection control programs.

There is no legal significance to the omission of an item from
the Agenda.

The Regulatory Plan, which is required by EO 12866, is
published along with the fall edition of the Regulatory Agenda. The
Plan includes a limited number of EPA actions, typically 20-45,
which will be published during the current fiscal year and which
are the centerpieces of our regulatory priorities. Plan entries
include all of the information included in Agenda entries described
in section E, below, as well as additional information about
alternatives, the need for a Federal solution, costs, benefits, and risks.

EPA's and other agencies' Regulatory Plans are published
together in part 2 of the Federal Register on the same day that the
Regulatory Agenda is published. To save money we do not include
detailed information on actions that are included in the Plan in
the Regulatory Agenda itself; rather, we cross-reference the Plan entries.

To Find the Regulatory Plan:

EPA's FY06 Regulatory Plan is located in part 2 of this issue
of the Federal Register. Within a day or two of publication, on-
line versions will be located at http://www.epa.gov/REGAGENDA and at
http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/ua/Fall2005/regplan/
ENVIRONMENTAL_PROTECTION_AGENCY_(EPA).html

D. How is the Agenda Organized?

We have organized the Agenda:

First, into fourteen divisions based on the law that would
authorize a particular action. These divisions are:

1. General, which includes cross-cutting actions, such as rules
authorized by multiple statutes and general acquisition rules

2. The Clean Air Act (CAA)

3. The Atomic Energy Act (AEA)

4. The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)

5. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)

6. The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)

7. The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)

8. Chemical Safety Information, Site Security and Fuels Regulatory
Relief Act

9. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

10. The Oil Pollution Act (OPA)

11. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act Superfund (CERCLA)

12. The Clean Water Act (CWA)

13. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)

14. The Shore Protection Act (SPA)

Second, by the current stage of development. The stages are:

1. Prerulemaking - Prerulemaking actions are generally intended to
determine whether EPA should initiate rulemaking. Prerulemakings may
include anything that influences or leads to rulemaking, such as
advance notices of proposed rulemaking (ANPRMs), significant studies or
analyses of the possible need for regulatory action, announcement of
reviews of existing regulations required under section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, requests for public comment on the need for
regulatory action, or important preregulatory policy proposals.

2. Proposed Rule - This section includes EPA rulemaking actions that
are within a year of proposal (publication of Notices of Proposed
Rulemakings (NPRMs)).

3. Final Rule - This section includes rules that will be issued as a
final rule within a year.

4. Long-Term Action - This section includes rulemakings for which the
next scheduled regulatory action is after October 2006.

5. Completed Action - This section contains actions that have been
promulgated and published in the Federal Register since publication of
the spring 2005 Agenda. It also includes actions that we are no longer
considering. If an action appears in the completed section, it will not
appear in future Agendas unless we decide to initiate action again, in
which case it will appear as a new entry. EPA also announces the
results of our Regulatory Flexibility Act section 610 reviews in this
section of the Agenda.

Third, by the Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) that is
assigned when an action first appears in the Agenda. The RIN has
two parts: The first part corresponds to the lead subagency within
EPA (e.g.2040 stands for the Office of Water, 2060 for the Office
of Air and Radiation); the second part corresponds to the order in
which actions were added to the agenda.

E. What Information is in Agenda Entries?

Agenda entries include the following information, where applicable:

Sequence Number: This indicates where the entry appears in the agenda.

Title: Titles for new entries (those that have not appeared in previous
agendas) are preceded by a bullet (). The notation ``Section
610 Review'' follows the title if we are reviewing the rule as part of
our periodic review of existing rules under section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 610).

Priority: Entries are placed into one of five categories described
below. OMB reviews all significant rules including both of the first
two categories,

[[Page 65208]]

``economically significant'' and ``other significant.''

Economically Significant: Under Executive Order 12866, a rulemaking
action that may have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities.

Other Significant: A rulemaking that is not economically significant
but is considered significant for other reasons. This category includes
rules that may:

1. Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency;

2. Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients; or

3. Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates,
the President's priorities, or the principles in Executive Order 12866.

Substantive, Nonsignificant: A rulemaking that has substantive impacts
but is neither Significant, nor Routine and Frequent, nor
Informational/ Administrative/Other.

Routine and Frequent: A rulemaking that is a specific case of a
recurring application of a regulatory program in the Code of Federal
Regulations (e.g., certain State Implementation Plans, National
Priority List updates, Significant New Use Rules, State Hazardous Waste
Management Program actions, and Tolerance exemptions). If an action
that would normally be classified Routine and Frequent is reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under E.O. 12866, then we would
classify the action as either ``Economically Significant'' or ``Other
Significant.''

Informational/Administrative/Other: An action that is primarily
informational or pertains to an action outside the scope of EO 12866.

Also, if we believe that a rule may be ``major'' as defined in
the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801, et seq.) because it is
likely to result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or meets other criteria specified in this law, we indicate
this under the ``Priority'' heading with the statement ``Major
under 5 U.S.C. 801.''

Legal Authority: The sections of the United States Code (U.S.C.),
Public Law (P.L.), Executive Order (E.O.), or common name of the law
that authorizes the regulatory action.

CFR Citation: The sections of the Code of Federal Regulations that
would be affected by the action.

Legal Deadline: An indication of whether the rule is subject to a
statutory or judicial deadline, the date of that deadline, and whether
the deadline pertains to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, a Final
Action, or some other action.

Abstract: A brief description of the problem the action will address.

Timetable: The dates (and citations) that documents for this action
were published in the Federal Register and, where possible, a projected
date for the next step. Projected publication dates frequently change
during the course of developing an action. The projections in the
agenda are our best estimates as of the date we submit the agenda for
publication. For some entries, the timetable indicates that the date of
the next action is ``to be determined.''

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Indicates whether EPA has
prepared or anticipates that it will be preparing a regulatory
flexibility analysis under section 603 or 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA). Generally, such an analysis is required for
proposed or final rules subject to the RFA that EPA believes may have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Small Entities Affected: Indicates whether we expect the rule to have
any effect on small businesses, small governments, or small nonprofit
organizations.

Government Levels Affected: Indicates whether we expect the rule to
have any effect on levels of government and, if so, whether the
governments are State, local, tribal, or Federal.

Federalism Implications: Indicates whether the action is expected to
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

Unfunded Mandates: Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
generally requires an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits if a
rule includes a mandate that may result in expenditures of more than
$100 million in any one year by State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector. If we expect to exceed this
$100 million threshold, we note it in this section.

Energy Impacts: Indicates whether the action is a significant energy
action under Executive Order 13211.

Agency Contact: The name, address, phone number, and e-mail address, if
available, of a person who is knowledgeable about the regulation.

SAN Number: An identification number that EPA uses to track rulemakings
and other actions under development.

URLs: For some of our actions we include the Internet addresses for:
Reading copies of rulemaking documents; submitting comments on
proposals; and getting more information about the rulemaking and the
program of which it is a part. (Note: To submit comments on proposals,
you can go to our electronic docket which is at: http://docket.epa.gov/
edkpub/index.jsp. Once there, to get into the edocket for a particular
rule you will need the edocket identification number. We include this
number in the additional information section of Agenda entries that
have already been proposed. EDOCKET, EPA's electronic public docket and
comment system, will be replaced by an enhanced Federal-wide electronic
docket management and comment system located at www.regulations.gov.
When that occurs, you should be redirected to that site to access the
docket and submit comments. Follow the on-line instructions to access
this docket and submit comments.

RIN: The Regulatory Identifier Number is used by OMB to identify and
track rulemakings. The first four digits of the RIN stand for the EPA
office with lead responsibility for developing the action.

F. How Can You Find Out More About EPA Rulemakings?

1. Public Dockets

When EPA publishes either an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking or a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register, the Agency may establish an official docket to accumulate
materials throughout the development process for that rulemaking.
The official docket serves as the repository for the collection of

[[Page 65209]]

documents or information related to a particular agency action or
activity. EPA most commonly uses dockets for rulemaking actions,
but dockets may also be used for Regulatory Flexibility Act section
610 reviews of rules with significant impacts on a substantial
number of small entities and various non-rulemaking activities,
such as Federal Register documents seeking public comments on draft
guidance, policy statements, information collection requests under
the Paperwork Reduction Act, and other non-rule activities.

2. EPA Websites

Some of the actions listed in the Agenda include a URL that
provides additional information.

3. Regulatory Agenda Databases and Search Engines

If you have access to the Internet you can use databases and
their accompanying search engines developed by the EPA and the
Regulatory Information Service Center (RISC) at the General
Services Administration to help you locate actions that are of
interest to you. The EPA Regulatory Agenda search engine is located
at www.epa.gov/regAgenda. We thoroughly update this database each
spring and fall and we partially update it several other times
during the year. RISC's searchable databases are at
http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/ua/.

4. Agenda Indexes

There are five indexes that provide:

a. A list of the existing rules that we are reviewing under section
610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act

b. A list of actions that may have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small businesses, small governments, or small
non-profit organizations

c. A list of actions that may have some impact on some small
businesses, small governments, or small non-profit organizations but
which may either have less than a significant impact or affect fewer
than a substantial number of them

d. A list of actions that may affect State, local, or tribal governments

e. A list of actions that may have federalism implications as defined
in Executive Order 13132

There is a sixth appendix included in the Unified Regulatory
Agenda, a subject matter index. This index is not included in EPA's
Agenda reprints for reasons of costs and because of the
availability of the search engines described in no. 3, immediately above.

5. Listservers

If you want to get automatic e-mails about areas of particular
interest, we maintain 12 collections including:

a. Air

b. Water

c. Wastes and emergency response

d. Pesticides

e. Toxic substances

f. Right-to-know and toxic release inventory

g. Environmental impacts

h. Endangered species

i. Meetings

j. The Science Advisory Board

k. Daily full-text notices with page numbers, and

l. General information.

For more information and to subscribe via our FR Web site, visit:

http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/subscribe.htm. If you have e-mail without
full Internet access, please send an e-mail to envsubset@epa.gov to
request instructions for subscribing to the EPA Federal Register
listservers.

G. What Special Attention Do We Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small
Businesses, Small Governments, and Small Nonprofit Organizations?

For each of our rulemakings we consider whether there will be
any adverse impact on any small entity. We attempt to fit the
regulatory requirements, to the extent feasible, to the scale of
the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to the regulation. Under RFA/SBREFA, the Agency must
prepare a formal analysis of the potential negative impacts on
small entities, convene a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel
(proposed rule stage), and prepare a Small Entity Compliance Guide
(final rule stage) unless the Agency certifies a rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. For more detailed information about the Agency's policy
and practice with respect to implementing RFA/SBREFA, please visit
the RFA/SBREFA website at http://www.epa.gov/sbrefa/. See Index B
at the end of the Agenda, ``Index to Environmental Protection
Agency Entries for which a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Is
Required'' for a list of these rules. See Index C for a list of the
rules that may affect small entities, but which we do not expect
will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of them.

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) section 610 requires that
an agency review, within 10 years of promulgation, each rule that
has or will have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (SISNOSE). There is one rule for which we
are conducting a section 610 review this year, 2050-AG26; Docket
No. OAR-2005-0166; Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk
Management Programs Under the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r) (7)
(Section 610 Review). We undertake section 610 reviews to decide
whether we should continue the rule unchanged, amend it, or
withdraw it. We announce our forthcoming section 610 reviews in the
``Prerule'' section of the Agenda. We encourage small entities to
provide comments on the need to change this rule. We will consider
all of your comments as we decide whether to continue, amend, or
withdraw this rule. We particularly encourage comments by small
entities about how this rule could be made clearer, more effective,
or remove conflicting or overlapping requirements with other
Federal or State regulations.

EPA has established an official public docket for each of our
610 Reviews. The official public docket is the collection of
materials that is available for public viewing at the docket
facility. An electronic version of the public docket is available
through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system as
described below. You may use EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/
edocket to submit or view public comments, access the index listing
of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically.
Once in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the appropriate
docket ID number.

Certain types of information will not be placed in EPA's
electronic public docket. Information claimed as confidential
business information (CBI) and other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute, which is not included in the official
public docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA's
electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material will

[[Page 65210]]

not be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be
available only in printed, paper form in the official public
docket. To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials
will be made available in EPA's electronic public docket. Although
not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may
still access any of the publicly available docket materials through
the docket facility identified above. EPA intends to work towards
providing electronic access to all of the publicly available docket
materials through EPA's electronic public docket.

Unless otherwise indicated, please direct your comments to the
identified Docket ID number for the specific 610 Review item. For
these 610 Reviews, please DO NOT submit CBI or information that is
otherwise protected by statute. You may submit comments
electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/courier using one
of the following methods:

1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed
below, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and
an e-mail address or other contact information in the body of your
comment. Also include this contact information on the outside of any
disk or CD ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the
disk or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA
will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the
comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made
available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.

i. Agency Website. Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to submit
comments to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving
comments. Go directly to EPA Dockets at http://epa.gov/edocket, and
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once in the
system, select ``search,'' and then key in the appropriate Docket ID
number. The system is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA
will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. Note
that EPA Dockets will be replaced by an enhanced Federal-wide
electronic docket management and comment system located at
www.regulations.gov. When that occurs, you should be redirected to that
site to access the docket and submit comments. Follow the on-line
instructions to access the relevant docket and submit comments.

ii. Disk or CD ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to the mailing address identified below. These electronic
submissions will be accepted in MS Word, WordPerfect or ASCII file
format. Avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption.

iii. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting comments.

2. By Mail. Send your comments, identified by the appropriate Docket ID
number, to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection
Agency, Mailcode: 28221, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC,
20460

3. By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments, identified by
the appropriate Docket ID number, to: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA
West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The EPA
Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Reading Room is (202) 566-1742. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation as identified
below. For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy
is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or on paper,
will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public
docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment
containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that
material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's
electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the
copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Public
comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or delivered to
the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public docket.
Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be
scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where practical,
physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph will be
placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief description
written by the docket staff. Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after
the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not
required to consider these late comments. For these actions, please DO
NOT submit CBI or information that is otherwise protected by statute.

H. Thank You for Collaborating with Us

Finally, we would like to thank those of you who choose to
join with us in solving the complex issues involved in protecting
human health and the environment. Collaborative efforts such as
EPA's open rulemaking process are a proven tool for solving the
environmental problems we face and the Regulatory Agenda is an
important part of that process.

Dated: October 18, 2005.

Louise P. Wise,

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Policy, Economics, and
Innovation.

GENERAL--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3012 SAN No. 4292 Proposed Revision to EPA's Implementing NEPA Regulations................. 2020-AA42

[[Page 65211]]

3013 SAN No. 4319 Revisions to Acquisition Regulation Concerning Conflict of Interest...... 2030-AA67
3014 SAN No. 4904 Security Requirements for Toxic Substances Control Act Confidential 2030-AA88
Business Information Access for Contractors...........................................
3015 SAN No. 4903 Award Term Contracting................................................... 2030-AA89
3016 SAN No. 4931 Accessibility Standards for Contract Deliverables (508).................. 2030-AA90
3017 SAN No. 4964 Amendment of the Standards for Radioactive Waste Disposal in Yucca 2060-AN15
Mountain, Nevada (Reg Plan Seq No. 108)...............................................
3018 SAN No. 4836 Project XL Site Specific Rulemaking for the NASA White Sands Test 2090-AA35
Facility in Las Cruces, New Mexico (Phases III-VI)....................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

GENERAL--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3019 SAN No. 3580 Incorporation of Class Deviations Into EPAAR............................. 2030-AA37
3020 SAN No. 4056 Utilization of Small, Minority and Women's Business Enterprises in 2020-AA39
Procurement Under Assistance Agreements...............................................
3021 SAN No. 4270 Cross-Media Electronic Reporting (ER) and Recordkeeping Rule (CROMERRR).. 2025-AA07
3022 SAN No. 4693 Privacy Act Regulations (Revised)........................................ 2025-AA13
3023 SAN No. 4813 Miscellaneous Revisions to EPAAR Clauses................................. 2030-AA84
3024 SAN No. 3671 Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment................................ 2080-AA06
3025 SAN No. 4536 Project XL Site Specific Rulemaking for NASA White Sands Test Facility 2090-AA27
Electronic Reporting in Las Cruces, New Mexico (Phases I-II)..........................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3026 SAN No. 3240 Public Information and Confidentiality Regulations....................... 2025-AA02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3027 SAN No. 4925 Technical Amendments to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human 2080-AA11
Subjects..............................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3028 SAN No. 5018 Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs 2050-AG26
Under the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r)(7) (Section 610 Review).......................
3029 SAN No. 4759 Revision to Policy on Control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)........ 2060-AK75
3030 SAN No. 4856 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amendments to the Section 608 Leak 2060-AM09
Repair Regulations....................................................................
3031 SAN No. 5009 Advance Notice for Information on Determining the Emissions Reductions 2060-AN42
Achieved From Limiting the VOC Content of Architectural Coatings......................
3032 SAN No. 5020 Action on Petition To List Diesel Exhaust as a Hazardous Air Pollutant... 2060-AN49
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 65212]]

CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3033 SAN No. 4255 Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate 2060-AI44
Matter (Reg Plan Seq No. 100).........................................................
3034 SAN No. 4531 Evaluation of Updated Test Procedures for the Certification of Gasoline 2060-AJ61
Deposit Control Additives.............................................................
3035 SAN No. 3649 Amendments to Method 24 (Water-Based Coatings)........................... 2060-AF72
3036 SAN No. 4070 General Conformity Regulations; Revisions................................ 2060-AH93
3037 SAN No. 3975 Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country................ 2060-AH37
3038 SAN No. 4752 Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule (Reg Plan Seq No. 102)....... 2060-AK74
3039 SAN No. 4119 Performance Specification 16--Specifications and Test Procedures for 2060-AH84
Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources..........................
3040 SAN No. 4478 Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources: Municipal Solid 2060-AJ41
Waste Landfills: Amendment............................................................
3041 SAN No. 4585 Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry NESHAP: Amendment To Implement 2060-AJ78
Court Remand..........................................................................
3042 SAN No. 4654 NESHAP: Ethylene Oxide for Sterilization Facilities--Residual Risk 2060-AK09
Standards.............................................................................
3043 SAN No. 4655 NESHAP: Gasoline Distribution (Stage I) Residual Risk and MACT Standards 2060-AK10
Review................................................................................
3044 SAN No. 4660 NESHAP: Industrial Process Cooling Towers Residual Risk Standards........ 2060-AK16
3045 SAN No. 4662 NESHAP: Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities Residual Risk Standards 2060-AK18
3046 SAN No. 4668 NESHAP: Halogenated Solvent Cleaning--Residual Risk Standards............ 2060-AK22
3047 SAN No. 4669 NESHAP: Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Operations Residual Risk Standard.... 2060-AK23
3048 SAN No. 4659 NESHAP: Hazardous Organic NESHAP (HON) Residual Risk Standards........... 2060-AK14
3049 SAN No. 4309 National VOC Emission Standards for Consumer Products; Amendments........ 2060-AI62
3050 SAN No. 4748 Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Mobile Sources (Reg Plan Seq No. 2060-AK70
101)..................................................................................
3051 SAN No. 4599 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone- 2060-AK26
Depleting Substances: N-Propyl Bromide................................................
3052 SAN No. 4697 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjusting Allowances for Class I 2060-AK45
Substances for Export to Article 5 Countries..........................................
3053 SAN No. 4542 Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for the Billings/Laurel, Montana Sulfur 2008-AA00
Dioxide (SO2) Area....................................................................
3054 SAN No. 4421 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Regulations: Revisions.................... 2060-AJ25
3055 SAN No. 4570 Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles and Engines: Alternative Low- 2060-AJ72
Sulfur Highway Diesel Fuel Transition Program for Alaska..............................
3056 SAN No. 4584 Performance Specifications for Continuous Parameter Monitoring Systems... 2060-AJ86
3057 SAN No. 4633 Performance-Based Measurement System for Fuels: Criteria for Self- 2060-AK03
Qualifying Alternative Test Methods; Description of Optional Statistical Quality
Control Measures......................................................................
3058 SAN No. 4758 Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Modifications to Standards and 2060-AK77
Requirements for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline Including Butane Blenders and
Attest Engagements....................................................................
3059 SAN No. 4793 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New 2060-AL75
Source Review (NSR): Allowables Plantwide Applicability Limit (PAL), Aggregation, and
Debottlenecking (Reg Plan Seq No. 103)................................................
3060 SAN No. 4796 Section 126 Rule: Withdrawal of Findings for Sources in Michigan......... 2060-AL83
3061 SAN No. 4804 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone; Allowance System for Controlling HCFC 2060-AL90
Production, Import and Export; Correction.............................................
3062 SAN No. 4809 Control of Emissions of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: On-Board 2060-AL92
Diagnostic Requirements for Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles Above 14,000 Pounds and In-
Use, Not-To-Exceed Emission Standard Test.............................................
3063 SAN No. 4829 5-Year Review of MACT Standards for Large MWC............................ 2060-AL97
3064 SAN No. 4830 Alternative Work Practice for Leak Detection and Repair.................. 2060-AL98
3065 SAN No. 4871 Control of Emissions From New Locomotives and New Marine Diesel Engines 2060-AM06
Less Than 30 Liters Per Cylinder (Reg Plan Seq No. 104)...............................
3066 SAN No. 4846 NESHAP: Municipal Solid Waste Landfills--Amendments...................... 2060-AM08
3067 SAN No. 4859 NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Ethylene Oxide Hospital Sterilization..... 2060-AM14
3068 SAN No. 4849 Petition To Delist a Hazardous Air Pollutant From Section 112 of the 2060-AM20
Clean Air Act: Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (MIBK)..........................................
3069 SAN No. 4848 NESHAP: Total Facility Low Risk Determination (TFLRD) for Residual Risk.. 2060-AM22
3070 SAN No. 4867 NESHAP: Hydrochloric Acid Production Amendments.......................... 2060-AM25
3071 SAN No. 4853 Requirements for Transmix Processing and Blending Under the Reformulated 2060-AM27
Gasoline and Gasoline Sulfur Rules....................................................
3072 SAN No. 4864 NESHAP: Surface Coating of Metal Cans--Technical Amendments.............. 2060-AM28
3073 SAN No. 4866 NESHAP: Site Remediation; Amendments..................................... 2060-AM30
3074 SAN No. 4880 Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicle 2060-AM32
Engines: Amendments to Evaporative Emissions Regulations and Technical Amendments.....

[[Page 65213]]

3075 SAN No. 4882 Control of Emissions from Spark-Ignition Engines and Fuel Systems from 2060-AM34
Marine Vessels and Small Equipment (Reg Plan Seq No. 105).............................
3076 SAN No. 4891 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous 2060-AM43
Organic Chemical Manufacturing; Amendments............................................
3077 SAN No. 4885 Flexible Air Permit Rule................................................. 2060-AM45
3078 SAN No. 4905 National Volatile Organic Compound Emission Standards for Architectural 2060-AM47
Coatings--Amendments..................................................................
3079 SAN No. 4899 Control of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel Lubricity: Notice of Proposed 2060-AM48
Rulemaking............................................................................
3080 SAN No. 4916 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone; Refrigerant Recycling; Certification 2060-AM49
of Recovery and Recovery/Recycling Equipment Intended for Use With Substitute
Refrigerants..........................................................................
3081 SAN No. 4918 Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone: Alternatives for the Motor Vehicle 2060-AM54
Air Conditioning Sector Under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program..
3082 SAN No. 4901 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Modifications to the Technician 2060-AM55
Certification Requirements Under Section 608 of the Clean Air Act.....................
3083 SAN No. 4676 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New 2060-AM62
Source Review (NSR): Routine Maintenance, Repair, and Replacement (RMRR); Maintenance
and Repair Amendments.................................................................
3084 SAN No. 4908 NESHAP: General Provisions--Amendments................................... 2060-AM75
3085 SAN No. 4909 NESHAP: Integrated Iron and Steel; Amendments............................ 2060-AM76
3086 SAN No. 4910 NESHAP: Organic Liquid Distribution--Amendments.......................... 2060-AM77
3087 SAN No. 4915 Standards of Performance for Stationary Spark Ignited Internal Combustion 2060-AM81
Engines...............................................................................
3088 SAN No. 4926 NESHAP: Defense Land Systems and Miscellaneous Equipment................. 2060-AM84
3089 SAN No. 4927 NESHAP: Iron and Steel Foundries; Amendments............................. 2060-AM85
3090 SAN No. 4940 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New 2060-AM91
Source Review (NSR): Reconsideration of Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions...............
3091 SAN No. 4941 Amendments to Compliance Certification Requirements for State and Federal 2060-AM92
Operating Permits Programs; Correction................................................
3092 SAN No. 4699 Implementing Periodic Monitoring in Federal and State Operating Permit 2060-AN00
Programs (Reg Plan Seq No. 106).......................................................
3093 SAN No. 4757 Component Durability Procedures for New Light Duty Vehicles, Light Duty 2060-AN01
Trucks and Heavy Duty Vehicles........................................................
3094 SAN No. 4955 NESHAP: Plastic Parts and Products (Surface Coating)--Area Source Rule... 2060-AN08
3095 SAN No. 4958 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface Coating 2060-AN10
of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks; Amendments......................................
3096 SAN No. 4959 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone- 2060-AN11
Depleting Substances in Foam Blowing..................................................
3097 SAN No. 4960 Response to Petition of Reconsideration for Findings of Significant 2060-AN12
Contribution and Rulemaking for Georgia for Purposes of Reducing Ozone Interstate
Transport.............................................................................
3098 SAN No. 4962 Fuel Economy Labeling of Motor Vehicles: Revisions to Improve Calculation 2060-AN14
of Fuel Economy Estimates (Reg Plan Seq No. 107)......................................
3099 SAN No. 4969 Revisions to the Continuous Emissions Monitoring Rule for the Acid Rain 2060-AN16
Program and the NOx Budget Trading Program............................................
3100 SAN No. 4972 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2006 Critical Use Exemption Rule 2060-AN18
From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide...................................................
3101 SAN No. 4951 Revisions to Air Emissions Reporting Requirements........................ 2060-AN20
3102 SAN No. 4978 NESHAP: Autobody Refinishing--Area Source Rule........................... 2060-AN21
3103 SAN No. 5008 Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone (Reg Plan 2060-AN24
Seq No. 109)..........................................................................
3104 SAN No. 4625 Implementation Rule for 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS: Reconsideration; Overwhelming 2060-AN26
Transport Classification..............................................................
3105 SAN No. 4794 Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Nonattainment New Source 2060-AN28
Review: Alternative Applicability Test for Electric Generating Units (Reg Plan Seq No.
110)..................................................................................
3106 SAN No. 4986 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Allocation of Essential Use Allowances 2060-AN29
for Calendar Year 2006................................................................
3107 SAN No. 4991 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Revision to Listing of Carbon Dioxide 2060-AN30
Total Flooding Fire Extinguishing Systems Restricting Use to Only Unoccupied Areas....
3108 SAN No. 4987 Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boiler and Process Heater 2060-AN32
NESHAP, Amendment.....................................................................
3109 SAN No. 4988 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Polyvinyl 2060-AN33
Chloride and Copolymers Production, Amendments........................................
3110 SAN No. 5010 Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds-- 2060-AN34
Exclusion of HFE-7300.................................................................
3111 SAN No. 4910 NESHAP: Organic Liquid Distribution (Non-Gasoline); Amendments........... 2060-AN37
3112 SAN No. 4989 NESHAP: Secondary Aluminum Production - Amendments....................... 2060-AN38
3113 SAN No. 4993 Optional Chassis Certification for Diesel Vehicles....................... 2060-AN39

[[Page 65214]]

3114 SAN No. 4998 Air Quality Data Affected by Exceptional, Natural, and International 2060-AN40
Events................................................................................
3115 SAN No. 5011 Federal Plan Requirements for Other Solid Waste Incineration Units 2060-AN43
Constructed On or Before December 9, 2004.............................................
3116 SAN No. 5024 Renewable Fuel Standards Requirements for 2006 (Reg Plan Seq No. 111).... 2060-AN51
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3117 SAN No. 4768 Amendment to Subparts H and I for Emissions of Radionuclides Other Than 2060-AK81
Radon From DOE Facilities.............................................................
3118 SAN No. 3470 Revision to the Guideline on Air Quality Models (Appendix W to 40 CFR 2060-AK60
Part 51): Adoption of a Preferred General Purpose (Flat and Complex Terrain)
Dispersion Model and Other Revisions..................................................
3119 SAN No. 3751 NSPS and Emission Guidelines for Other Solid Waste Incinerators.......... 2060-AG31
3120 SAN No. 2915 Methods for Measurement of Visible Emissions--Addition of Methods 203A, 2060-AF83
203B, and 203C to Appendix M of Part 51...............................................
3121 SAN No. 3900 Addition of Method 207 to Appendix M of 40 CFR Part 51 Method for 2060-AG88
Measuring Isocyanates in Stationary Source Emissions..................................
3122 SAN No. 3380 NSPS: SOCMI--Wastewater and Amendment to Appendix C of Part 63 and 2060-AE94
Appendix J of Part 60.................................................................
3123 SAN No. 3958 Amendments to Standard of Performance for New Stationary Sources; 2060-AH23
Monitoring Requirements (40 CFR Part 60, Appendix F, Procedure 3).....................
3124 SAN No. 4161 Update of Continuous Instrumental Test Methods........................... 2060-AK61
3125 SAN No. 4310 NESHAP: Printing and Publishing Industry; Amendments..................... 2060-AI66
3126 SAN No. 4313 Petitions To Delist Hazardous Air Pollutants: MEK........................ 2060-AI72
3127 SAN No. 4713 NESHAP for Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants; Amendments................. 2060-AK50
3128 SAN No. 4719 NESHAP: General Provisions; Amendments for Pollution Prevention 2060-AK54
Alternative Compliance Requirements...................................................
3129 SAN No. 4689 Section 126 Rule Withdrawal Provision.................................... 2060-AK41
3130 SAN No. 3910 Streamlined Evaporative Test Procedures.................................. 2060-AH34
3131 SAN No. 4604 Modification of the Anti-Dumping Baseline Date Cut-Off Limit for Data 2060-AJ82
Used in Development of an Individual Baseline.........................................
3132 SAN No. 4757 Emissions Durability Procedures for New Light-Duty Vehicles and Light- 2060-AK76
Duty Trucks...........................................................................
3133 SAN No. 4631 Adoption of the Amended International NOx Standard for Aircraft Engines.. 2060-AK01
3134 SAN No. 4632 Modification of Anti-dumping Baselines for Gasoline Produced or Imported 2060-AK02
for Use in Hawaii, Alaska, and the U.S. Territories...................................
3135 SAN No. 4634 Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: Extension of California 2060-AK04
Enforcement Exemptions for Reformulated Gasoline to California Phase 3 Gasoline.......
3136 SAN No. 4557 Amendments to the Requirements on Variability in the Composition of 2060-AK62
Additives Certified Under the Gasoline Deposit Control Program........................
3137 SAN No. 4706 Anti-Dumping Baseline Recalculation for Downstream Oxygenate Addition.... 2060-AK69
3138 SAN No. 4854 Amendments to Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program Requirements To 2060-AM21
Address New 8-Hour Ozone Standard.....................................................
3139 SAN No. 4857 Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection Listing Under SNAP............. 2060-AM24
3140 SAN No. 4868 Exemption of Certain Area Sources From Federal and State Operating Permit 2060-AM31
Programs..............................................................................
3141 SAN No. 4881 Prevention of Significant Deterioration for Nitrogen Oxides.............. 2060-AM33
3142 SAN No. 4895 Regulation of Fuel and Fuel Additives: Gasoline and Diesel Test Methods.. 2060-AM42
3143 SAN No. 4900 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Import Petitioning Requirements for 2060-AM46
Halon-1301 Aircraft Fire Extinguishing Vessels........................................
3144 SAN No. 4894 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Extension of the Laboratory and 2060-AM56
Analytical Use Exemption for Essential Class I Ozone Depleting Substances.............
3145 SAN No. 3259 Nonattainment Major New Source Review (NSR).............................. 2060-AM59
3146 SAN No. 4890 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous 2060-AM72
Coating Manufacturing; Amendment......................................................
3147 SAN No. 4911 NESHAP: Plywood and Composite Wood Products; Amendments.................. 2060-AM78
3148 SAN No. 4912 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Stationary Combustion 2060-AM79
Turbines..............................................................................

[[Page 65215]]

3149 SAN No. 4913 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Electric Utility Steam 2060-AM80
Generating Units and Industrial and Commercial Boilers................................
3150 SAN No. 4914 Standards of Performance for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal 2060-AM82
Combustion Engines....................................................................
3151 SAN No. 4930 Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Refiner and Importer Quality 2060-AM88
Assurance Requirements for Downstream Oxygenate Blending..............................
3152 SAN No. 4934 Part 63 General Provisions--Response to Petition To Reconsider........... 2060-AM89
3153 SAN No. 4937 NESHAP for Refractory Products Manufacturing--Amendments................. 2060-AM90
3154 SAN No. 4325 NESHAP: Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing; Reconsideration 2060-AM94
3155 SAN No. 4794 Inclusion of Delaware and New Jersey in the Clean Air Interstate Rule 2060-AM95
(Reg Plan Seq No. 119)................................................................
3156 SAN No. 3837 NESHAP: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers and Process 2060-AM97
Heaters; Reconsideration Notice.......................................................
3157 SAN No. 4943 Revision to the Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Removal of VOC 2060-AM98
Exemptions for California's Aerosol Coatings Reactivity-Based Regulation..............
3158 SAN No. 4956 Rule on Section 126 Petition from NC to Reduce Interstate Transport of 2060-AM99
Fine PM and O3; FIPs to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine PM & O3; Revisions to CAIR
Rule; Revisions to Acid Rain Program (Reg Plan Seq No. 120)...........................
3159 SAN No. 4811 PM 2.5 and PM 10 Hot-Spot Analyses in Transportation Conformity Rule 2060-AN02
Amendments............................................................................
3160 SAN No. 4911 NESHAP: Plywood and Composite Wood Products; List of Hazardous Air 2060-AN05
Pollutants, Lesser Quantity Designations, Source Category List; Reconsideration.......
3161 SAN No. 4970 Small Municipal Waste Combustor New Source Performance Standards and 2060-AN17
Emission Guidelines Amendments........................................................
3162 Regional Haze Regulations; Revisions to Provisions Governing Alternative to Source- 2060-AN22
Specific Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations (Reg Plan Seq No.
121)..................................................................................
3163 SAN No. 4625 Implementation Rule for 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS - Phase 2 (Reg Plan Seq No. 2060-AN23
122)..................................................................................
3164 SAN No. 4994 Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incinerators NSPS and EG: 2060-AN31
Definitions...........................................................................
3165 SAN No. 5001 Revisions to Motor Vehicle Diesel Fuel Sulfur Transition Provisions...... 2060-AN41
3166 SAN No. 5017 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Amending Requirements To Import Used 2060-AN48
Ozone-Depleting Substances for Destruction in the U.S.................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3167 SAN No. 4315 Source-Specific Federal Implementation Plan for Navajo Generating 2009-AA00
Station; Navajo Nation................................................................
3168 SAN No. 3569 Source-Specific Federal Implementation Plan for Navajo Generating 2009-AA01
Station; Four Corners Power Plant.....................................................
3169 SAN No. 4695 NESHAP: Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations Residual Risk Standard.... 2060-AK68
3170 SAN No. 4607 Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs 2050-AE95
Under the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r)(7); Availability of Information to the Public;
Technical Amendment...................................................................
3171 SAN No. 4619 Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Programs 2050-AE96
Under the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r)(3); Revisions to the List of Substances.......
3172 SAN No. 4266 Review National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide........ 2060-AI43
3173 SAN No. 1002 NAAQS: Sulfur Dioxide (Response to Remand)............................... 2060-AA61
3174 SAN No. 3939 NESHAP: Group I Polymers and Resins and Group IV Polymers and Resins-- 2060-AH47
Amendments............................................................................
3175 SAN No. 3919 Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality: Permit 2060-AH01
Application Review Procedures for Non-Federal Class I Areas...........................
3176 SAN No. 4653 NESHAP: Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities Residual Risk 2060-AK08
Standards.............................................................................
3177 SAN No. 4657 NESHAP: Group II Polymers and Resins--Residual Risk Standards............ 2060-AK13
3178 SAN No. 4661 NESHAP: National Emission Standards for Marine Tank Vessel Loading 2060-AK17
Operations--Residual Risk Standard....................................................
3179 SAN No. 4665 NESHAP: Secondary Lead Smelting Residual Risk Standards.................. 2060-AK19
3180 SAN No. 4666 NESHAP: Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Surface Coating--Residual Risk 2060-AK20
Standards.............................................................................
3181 SAN No. 4667 NESHAP: Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations--Residual Risk Standards. 2060-AK21
3182 SAN No. 4664 NESHAP: Printing and Publishing Industry--Residual Risk Standards........ 2060-AK24
3183 SAN No. 4663 NESHAP: Petroleum Refineries--Residual Risk Standards.................... 2060-AK25

[[Page 65216]]

3184 SAN No. 4750 National Emission Standards for Chromium Emissions From Hard and 2060-AK72
Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks--Residual Risk
Standards.............................................................................
3185 SAN No. 4751 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Stationary 2060-AK73
Combustion Turbines-Petition To Delist................................................
3186 SAN No. 4782 Petition To Delist Hazardous Air Pollutant : 4,4'-Methylene Diphenyl 2060-AK84
Diisocyanate..........................................................................
3187 SAN No. 4656 NESHAP: Group I Polymers and Resins--Residual Risk Standards............. 2060-AK12
3188 SAN No. 4658 NESHAP: Group IV Polymers and Resins--Residual Risk Standards............ 2060-AK15
3189 SAN 4383. Interstate Ozone Transport: Rulemaking on Section 126 Petitions From the 2060-AI99
District of Columbia, Delaware, Maryland, and New Jersey..............................
3190 SAN No. 2665 Importation of Nonconforming Vehicles; Amendments to Regulations......... 2060-AI03
3191 SAN No. 4700 Selection of Sequence of Mandatory Sanctions To Be Applied Pursuant to 2060-AK46
Section 502 of the Clean Air Act......................................................
3192 SAN No. 3263 Performance Warranty and Inspection/Maintenance Test Procedures.......... 2060-AE20
3193 SAN No. 3262 Inspection/Maintenance Recall Requirements............................... 2060-AE22
3194 SAN No. 3917 Transportation Conformity Rule Amendment: Clarification of Trading 2060-AH31
Provisions............................................................................
3195 SAN No. 4348 Inspection/Maintenance Program Requirements for Federal Facilities; 2060-AI97
Amendment.............................................................................
3196 SAN No. 4722 California Gasoline Technical Correction................................. 2060-AK56
3197 SAN No. 4783 Voluntary Superior Monitoring............................................ 2060-AK85
3198 SAN No. 4797 Lifting the Stay of the Eight-Hour Portion of the Findings of Significant 2060-AL84
Contribution and Rulemaking for Purposes of Reducing Interstate Ozone Transport (``NOx
SIP Call'')...........................................................................
3199 SAN 4798. Deferral of Effective Date of Nonattainment Designations for 8-hour Ozone 2060-AL85
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Early Action Compact Areas.................
3200 SAN No. 4799 Consideration of Industry Petition To Remove the two-piece Can 2060-AL86
Subcategory From the Clean Air Act Hazardous Air Pollutant Source Category List.......
3201 SAN No. 4810 NESHAP: Ferroalloys Production: Ferromanganese and Silicomanganese 2060-AL93
Residual Risk Standards...............................................................
3202 SAN No. 4819 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting Emergency Uses 2060-AL94
of Methyl Bromide.....................................................................
3203 SAN No. 4825 Mineral Wool Production Residual Risk Standard........................... 2060-AL96
3204 SAN No. 4831 NESHAP for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production: Residual Risk Standards 2060-AL99
3205 SAN No. 4832 NESHAP: Pharmaceuticals Production: Residual Risk Standards.............. 2060-AM00
3206 SAN No. 4861 NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Paint Stripping........................... 2060-AM07
3207 SAN No. 4873 NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Glass Manufacturing Industry.............. 2060-AM12
3208 SAN No. 4860 NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Acrylic/ Modacrylic Fiber (AMF) Production 2060-AM13
3209 SAN No. 4851 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Restriction on the Sales of Pre- 2060-AM15
Charged Split Systems.................................................................
3210 SAN No. 4875 NESHAP: Oil and Natural Gas Production Facilities--Area Source Rule...... 2060-AM16
3211 SAN No. 4847 NESHAP: Oil and Natural Gas Production Residual Risk Standards........... 2060-AM18
3212 SAN No. 4874 NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Industrial Inorganic Chemicals 2060-AM19
Manufacturing.........................................................................
3213 SAN No. 4865 Strategy for Addressing Air Emissions From Animal Feeding Operations..... 2060-AM26
3214 SAN No. 4879 Area Source National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 2060-AM36
(NESHAP) for Iron and Steel Foundries.................................................
3215 SAN No. 4886 NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Plating and Polishing..................... 2060-AM37
3216 SAN No. 4884 Area Source National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 2060-AM44
(NESHAP) for Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers........................
3217 SAN No. 4906 NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Clay Ceramics Industry.................... 2060-AM53
3218 SAN No. 4699 Request for Comments on Potentially Inadequate Monitoring in Clean Air 2060-AM63
Applicable Requirements and on Methods To Improve Such Monitoring.....................
3219 SAN No. 4887 Area Source NESHAP for Primary Nonferrous Metals--Zn, Cd, Be............. 2060-AM69
3220 SAN No. 4888 Area Source NESHAP for Secondary Nonferrous Metals....................... 2060-AM70
3221 SAN No. 4889 NESHAP for Stainless and Nonstainless Steel Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) 2060-AM71
Manufacturing.........................................................................
3222 SAN No. 4907 NESHAP: Gasoline Distribution Stage I--Area Source Standards............. 2060-AM74
3223 SAN No. 4929 NESHAP: Taconite Iron Ore Processing; Amendments......................... 2060-AM87
3224 SAN No. 4866 NESHAP: Site Remediation Amendments--Response to Litigation.............. 2060-AN36
3225 SAN No. 5012 NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing........... 2060-AN44
3226 SAN No. 5013 NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Primary and Secondary Copper.............. 2060-AN45
3227 SAN No. 5015 NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Chemical Preparations Industry............ 2060-AN46
3228 SAN No. 5016 NESHAP: Area Source Standards--Paint and Allied Products................. 2060-AN47
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 65217]]

CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3229 SAN No. 4625 Implementation Rule for 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS - Phase 1..................... 2060-AJ99
3230 SAN No. 4571 Clean Air Mercury Rule--Electric Utility Steam Generating Unit MACT...... 2060-AJ65
3231 SAN No. 4763 NESHAP: Ethylene Processes; Amendments................................... 2060-AK80
3232 SAN No. 4391 Rescinding Finding That Preexisting PM10 Standards Are No Longer 2060-AJ05
Applicable in Northern Ada County/Boise, Idaho........................................
3233 SAN No. 4450 Clean Air Visibility Rule................................................ 2060-AJ31
3234 SAN No. 4621 Control of Hazardous Air Pollutants From Mobile Sources: Default Baseline 2060-AJ97
Revision..............................................................................
3235 SAN No. 4794 Clean Air Interstate Rule (Formerly Titled: Interstate Air Quality Rule). 2060-AL76
3236 SAN No. 4808 Amendments to the NESHAP for Cellulose Products Manufacturing............ 2060-AL91
3237 SAN No. 4840 Clean Air Fine Particle Designations..................................... 2060-AM04
3238 SAN No. 4855 NESHAP: Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing--Amendments. 2060-AM10
3239 SAN No. 4845 Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: In-Use, Not-To-Exceed 2060-AM17
Emission Standard Testing for Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines and Vehicles..................
3240 SAN No. 4863 NESHAP: Reinforced Plastic Composites--Amendments........................ 2060-AM23
3241 SAN No. 4883 Test Procedures for Testing Highway and Nonroad Engines and Omnibus 2060-AM35
Technical Amendments..................................................................
3242 SAN No. 4893 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Allocation of Essential Use Allowances 2060-AM50
for Calendar Year 2005................................................................
3243 SAN No. 4892 National Emission Standards for Pharmaceuticals Production; Amendments... 2060-AM52
3244 SAN No. 4676 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New 2060-AM58
Source Review (NSR): Routine Maintenance, Repair and Replacement (RMRR) Equipment
Replacement Provision (ERP); Reconsideration..........................................
3245 SAN No. 4919 NESHAP: Coke Ovens: Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks; Amendments... 2060-AM83
3246 SAN No. 4933 Federal Implementation Plans To Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine 2060-AM93
Particulate Matter and Ozone..........................................................
3247 SAN No. 4811 Transportation Conformity Amendments for the New PM 2.5 NAAQS Standards 2060-AN03
and PM 2.5 Precursors.................................................................
3248 SAN No. 4839 Extension of the Deferred Effective Date of Nonattainment Designations 2060-AN04
for 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS for Early Action Compact Areas.................................
3249 SAN No. 4952 Stay of the Findings of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for 2060-AN06
Georgia for Purposes of Reducing Ozone Interstate Transport...........................
3250 SAN No. 4954 Finding of Failure To Submit Section 110(a) SIP Requirements............. 2060-AN07
3251 SAN No. 4957 National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Miscellaneous 2060-AN09
Organic Chemical Manufacturing--Amendments............................................
3252 SAN No. 4961 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Process for Exempting Critical Uses of 2060-AN13
Methyl Bromide for the 2005 Supplemental Request......................................
3253 SAN No. 4973 Control of Emissions of Air Pollution From Diesel Engines and Fuels; 2060-AN19
Amendments to the Nonroad and Highway Diesel Fuel Regulations.........................
3254 SAN No. 4625 Implementation Rule for 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS: Reconsideration of NSR Anti- 2060-AN25
Backsliding Provisions................................................................
3255 SAN No. 4625 Implementation Rule for 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS; Final Identification of Ozone 2060-AN27
Areas for Which the 1-Hour Standard Has Been Revoked and Technical Corrections to
Phase 1 Rule..........................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOMIC ENERGY ACT (AEA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3256 SAN No. 4054 Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for the Disposal of Low- 2060-AH63
Activity Mixed Radioactive Waste......................................................
3257 SAN No. 4003 Technical Change to Dose Methodology for 40 CFR Part 190, Subpart B, and 2060-AH90
40 CFR 191, Subpart A.................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3258 SAN No. 4596 Pesticides; Data Requirements for Biochemical and Microbial Products..... 2070-AD51

[[Page 65218]]

3259 SAN No. 4602 Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for Those Based on Viral 2070-AD49
Coat Protein Genes....................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3260 SAN No. 4175 Pesticide Tolerance Reassessment Program................................. 2070-AD24
3261 SAN No. 4610 Protections for Test Subjects in Human Research (Reg Plan Seq No. 126)... 2070-AD57
3262 SAN No. 2659 Pesticide Management and Disposal; Standards for Pesticide Containers and 2070-AB95
Containment...........................................................................
3263 SAN No. 3222 Groundwater and Pesticide Management Plan Rule........................... 2070-AC46
3264 SAN No. 4170 Pesticides; Procedures for the Registration Review Program (Reg Plan Seq 2070-AD29
No. 124)..............................................................................
3265 SAN No. 4216 Pesticides; Emergency Exemption Process Revisions (Reg Plan Seq No. 125). 2070-AD36
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3266 SAN No. 2687 Pesticides; Data Requirements for Conventional Chemicals................. 2070-AC12
3267 SAN No. 4173 Pesticides; Data Requirements for Antimicrobials......................... 2070-AD30
3268 SAN No. 4728 Endocrine Disrupter Screening Program (EDSP); Implementing the Screening 2070-AD61
and Testing Phase.....................................................................
3269 SAN No. 4027 Pesticides; Tolerance Processing Fees.................................... 2070-AJ23
3270 SAN No. 4611 Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for Those Derived 2070-AD55
Through Genetic Engineering From Sexually Compatible Plants...........................
3271 SAN No. 4612 Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs); Exemption for PIPs That Act by 2070-AD56
Primarily Affecting the Plant.........................................................
3272 SAN No. 4618 Revision of Procedural Rules for Hearings on Cancellations, Suspensions, 2020-AA44
Changes in Classifications, and Denials of Pesticide Registrations....................
3273 SAN No. 3892 Pesticides; Registration Requirements for Antimicrobial Pesticide 2070-AD14
Products..............................................................................
3274 SAN No. 5007 Pesticides; Competency Standards for Occupational Users.................. 2070-AJ20
3275 SAN No. 5006 Pesticides; Agricultural Worker Protection Standard Revisions............ 2070-AJ22
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3276 SAN No. 4727 Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP); Chemical Selection Approach 2070-AD59
for Initial Round of Screening........................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3277 SAN No. 3493 Future Testing for Existing Chemicals (Overview Entry)................... 2070-AB94
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 65219]]

TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3278 SAN No. 3557 Lead-Based Paint Activities; Amendments for Renovation, Repair and 2070-AC83
Painting (Reg Plan Seq No. 112).......................................................
3279 SAN No. 2150 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Exemptions From the Prohibitions 2070-AB20
Against Manufacturing, Processing, and Distribution in Commerce.......................
3280 SAN No. 4635 Amendment to the Premanufacture Notification Exemptions; Revisions of 2070-AD58
Exemptions for Polymers...............................................................
3281 SAN No. 2563 Test Rule; Certain Chemicals on the ATSDR Priority List of Hazardous 2070-AB79
Substances............................................................................
3282 SAN No. 4983 Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Mercury Switches in Motor Vehicles...... 2070-AJ19
3283 SAN No. 4512 Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Selected Flame Retardant Chemical 2070-AD48
Substances for Use in Residential Upholstered Furniture...............................
3284 SAN No. 4858 Notification of Chemical Exports Under TSCA Section 12(b) (Reg Plan Seq 2070-AJ01
No. 113)..............................................................................
3285 SAN No. 4878 TSCA Inventory Nomenclature for Enzymes and Proteins..................... 2070-AJ04
3286 SAN No. 2150 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Exemption Request From U.S. Maritime 2070-AJ05
Administration (MARAD)................................................................
3287 SAN No. 4953 Lead-Based Paint; Pre-Renovation Lead Education Rule..................... 2070-AJ14
3288 SAN No. 4975 Effects of Transfers of Ownership on Obligations Under Section 5 of TSCA. 2070-AJ15
3289 SAN No. 4974 Significant New Use Rule, Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonates (PFAS)............... 2070-AJ18
3290 SAN No. 4984 Clarification on Guidance for Activated Phosphors........................ 2070-AJ21
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3291 SAN No. 3252 Lead Fishing Sinkers; Response to Citizens Petition and Proposed Ban..... 2070-AC21
3292 SAN No. 3990 Test Rule; Testing of Certain High Production Volume (HPV) Chemicals (Reg 2070-AD16
Plan Seq No. 123).....................................................................
3293 SAN No. 2178 TSCA Section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rules............... 2070-AB08
3294 SAN No. 1139 TSCA Section 8(d) Health and Safety Data Reporting Rules................. 2070-AB11
3295 SAN No. 3301 TSCA Inventory Update Rule Revisions..................................... 2070-AD63
3296 SAN No. 4176 Voluntary High Production Volume (HPV) Chemical Challenge Program........ 2070-AD25
3297 SAN No. 4870 Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Certain Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers 2070-AJ02
(PBDEs)...............................................................................
3298 SAN No. 3493 Testing Agreement for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)...................... 2070-AJ06
3299 SAN No. 3493 Testing Agreement for Diethanolamine..................................... 2070-AJ09
3300 SAN No. 3493 Testing Agreement for Hydrogen Fluoride.................................. 2070-AJ10
3301 SAN No. 3493 Testing Agreement for Phthalic Anhydride................................. 2070-AJ11
3302 SAN No. 4942 Significant New Use Rule for Glycol Ethers............................... 2070-AJ12
3303 SAN No. 3493 Testing Agreement for Maleic Anhydride................................... 2070-AJ13
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3304 SAN No. 3148 Asbestos Model Accreditation Plan Revisions.............................. 2070-AC51
3305 SAN No. 4376 Lead-Based Paint Activities; Bridges and Structures; Training, 2070-AC64
Accreditation, and Certification Rule and Model State Plan Rule.......................
3306 SAN No. 4597 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Disposal of PCBs; Implementation Issues 2070-AD52
3307 SAN No. 1976 Significant New Use Rules (SNURs); Follow-Up Rules on Non-5(e) New 2070-AA59
Chemical Substances...................................................................
3308 SAN No. 3495 Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Chemical-Specific SNURs To Extend 2070-AB27
Provisions of Section 5(e) Orders.....................................................
3309 SAN No. 4876 Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP)................. 2070-AC27
3310 SAN No. 3487 Test Rule; Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)............................... 2070-AC76
3311 SAN No. 3882 Test Rule; Certain Metals................................................ 2070-AD10
3312 SAN No. 4174 Testing Agreement for Certain Oxygenated Fuel Additives.................. 2070-AD28
3313 SAN No. 4395 Test Rule; Multiple Substance Rule for the Testing of Developmental and 2070-AD44
Reproductive Toxicity.................................................................
3314 SAN No. 1923 Follow-Up Rules on Existing Chemicals.................................... 2070-AA58

[[Page 65220]]

3315 SAN No. 3528 Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); Refractory Ceramic Fibers (RCFs)........ 2070-AC37
3316 SAN No. 4598 TSCA Policy Statement on Oversight of Transgenic Organisms (Including 2070-AD53
Plants)...............................................................................
3317 SAN No. 4777 Lead-Based Paint; Amendments to Requirements for Disclosure of Known Lead- 2070-AD64
Based Paint or Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Target Housing.............................
3318 SAN No. 3493 Testing Agreement for Aryl Phosphates (ITC List 2)....................... 2070-AJ07
3319 SAN No. 3493 Test Rule; Brominated Flame Retardants (BFRs)............................ 2070-AJ08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT--TO--KNOW ACT (EPCRA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3320 SAN No. 4753 Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act: Modification to the 2050-AF08
Threshold Planning Quantity Methodology for the Extremely Hazardous Substances That
Are Solids in Solution................................................................
3321 SAN No. 4896 Toxics Release Inventory Reporting Burden Reduction Rule (Reg Plan Seq 2025-AA14
No. 118)..............................................................................
3322 SAN No. 2425 TRI; Response to Petition To Delete Chromium, Antimony, Titanate From the 2025-AA16
Metal Compound Categories Listed on the Toxics Release Inventory......................
3323 SAN No. 2425 TRI; Response to Petition To Delete Acetonitrile From the Toxics Release 2025-AA19
Inventory List of Toxic Chemicals.....................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT--TO--KNOW ACT (EPCRA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3324 SAN No. 4595 Rulemaking To Change Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting Requirements 2025-AA10
From Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes to North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) Codes...................................................
3325 SAN No. 4692 Addition of Toxicity Equivalency (TEQ) Reporting and Quantity Data for 2025-AA12
Individual Members of the Dioxin and Dioxin-Like Compounds Category Under EPCRA,
Section 313...........................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT--TO--KNOW ACT (EPCRA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3326 SAN No. 3215 Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act: Amendments and 2050-AE17
Streamlining Rule.....................................................................
3327 SAN No. 4616 Clarify TRI Reporting Obligations Under EPCRA Section 313 for the Metal 2025-AA11
Mining Activities of Extraction and Beneficiation.....................................
3328 SAN No. 2425 TRI; Response to Petition To Add Diisononyl Phthalate to the Toxics 2025-AA17
Release Inventory List of Toxic Chemicals.............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT--TO--KNOW ACT (EPCRA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3329 SAN No. 4938 TRI Reporting Forms Modification Rule.................................... 2025-AA15
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 65221]]

RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Prerule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3330 SAN No. 4743 Land Disposal Restrictions: Determination of Equivalent Treatment for 2050-AF12
Macroencapsulation of Radioactive Lead Solids; Definition of Macroencapsulation.......
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3331 SAN No. 4470 Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Wastes Generated by 2050-AE81
Commercial Electric Power Producers...................................................
3332 SAN No. 4651 Increase Metals Reclamation From F006 Waste Streams...................... 2050-AE97
3333 SAN No. 4606 Revisions for Transboundary Shipments of Hazardous Waste for Recovery 2050-AE93
Within the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development......................
3334 SAN No. 4834 Hazardous Waste Management System: Identification and Listing of 2050-AG15
Hazardous Waste (F019 Listing Amendment in Wastewater Treatment Sludges From Zinc
Phosphating Processes in Automotive Assembly Plants)..................................
3335 SAN No. 4920 Rulemaking To Streamline Laboratory Waste Management in Academic and 2050-AG18
Research Laboratories.................................................................
3336 SAN No. 4977 Expanding the Comparable Fuels Exclusion Under RCRA (Reg Plan Seq No. 2050-AG24
117)..................................................................................
3337 SAN No. 5019 Criteria for Safe and Environmentally Protective Use of Granular Mine 2050-AG27
Tailings..............................................................................
3338 SAN No. 4828 RCRA Incentives for Performance Track Members............................ 2090-AA34
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3339 SAN No. 3545 Revisions to the Comprehensive Guideline for Procurement of Products 2050-AE23
Containing Recovered Materials........................................................
3340 SAN No. 4084 RCRA Burden Reduction Initiative (Reg Plan Seq No. 127).................. 2050-AE50
3341 SAN No. 4411 Regulation of Hazardous Oil-Bearing Secondary Materials From Petroleum 2050-AE78
Refining Industry and Other Hazardous Secondary Materials Processed in a Gasification
System To Produce Synthesis Gas.......................................................
3342 SAN No. 4091 Modifications to RCRA Rules Associated With Solvent-Contaminated 2050-AE51
Industrial Wipes......................................................................
3343 SAN No. 4092 Recycling of Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs): Changes to Hazardous Waste 2050-AE52
Regulations...........................................................................
3344 SAN No. 4670 Revisions to the Definition of Solid Waste (Reg Plan Seq No. 128)........ 2050-AE98
3345 SAN No. 4565 Project XL Site-Specific Rulemaking for the IBM Semiconductor 2090-AA29
Manufacturing Facility in Hopewell Junction, New York.................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3346 SAN No. 3856 Management of Cement Kiln Dust (CKD)..................................... 2050-AE34
3347 SAN No. 4469 Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Wastes--Non-Power 2050-AE83
Producers and Minefilling.............................................................
3348 SAN No. 4230 Revisions to Solid Waste Landfill Criteria--Leachate Recirculation on 2050-AE67
Alternative Liners....................................................................
3349 SAN No. 4735 RCRA Smarter Waste Reporting............................................. 2050-AF01
3350 SAN No. 4701 E-Cycling Pilot Project for Region 3 States (ECOS); Streamlining RCRA 2003-AA00
Regulations To Encourage Reuse, Recycling, and Recovery of Electronic Equipment.......
3351 SAN No. 3189 Final Determination of the Applicability of the Toxicity Characteristic 2050-AD69
Rule to Petroleum Contaminated Media and Debris From Underground Storage Tanks........
3352 SAN No. 4824 Hazardous Waste Generator Program Evaluation............................. 2050-AG25
3353 SAN No. 2647 RCRA Subtitle C Financial Test Criteria (Revision)....................... 2050-AC71

[[Page 65222]]

3354 SAN No. 4778 Revisions of the Lead-Acid Battery Export Notification and Consent 2050-AF06
Requirements..........................................................................
3355 SAN No. 3147 Hazardous Waste Manifest Revisions--Standards and Procedures for 2050-AG20
Electronic Manifests..................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3356 SAN No. 4028 Standardized Permit for RCRA Hazardous Waste Management Facilities....... 2050-AE44
3357 SAN No. 3989 Methods Innovation Rule.................................................. 2050-AE41
3358 SAN No. 3147 Hazardous Waste Manifest Regulation...................................... 2050-AE21
3359 SAN No. 4501 Revision of Wastewater Treatment Exemptions for Hazardous Waste Mixtures. 2050-AE84
3360 SAN No. 3333 NESHAPS: Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous Waste 2050-AE01
Combustors (Phase I Final Replacement Standards and Phase II).........................
3361 SAN No. 4092 Hazardous Waste Management System; Modification of the Hazardous Waste 2050-AG21
Program: Mercury-Containing Equipment.................................................
3362 SAN No. 4439 Project XL -- Ortho-McNeil Pilot Project Allowing On-Site Treatment of 2090-AA14
Low-Level Mixed Wastes Without RCRA Permit............................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OIL POLLUTION ACT (OPA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3363 SAN No. 2634 Revisions to the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) 2050-AG16
Rule, 40 CFR Part 112 (Reg Plan Seq No. 115)..........................................
3364 SAN No. 2634 Regulatory Actions Associated with the Notices of Data Availability on 2050-AG23
the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Rule, 40 CFR Part 112 (Reg
Plan Seq No. 116).....................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3365 SAN No. 3439 National Priorities List for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites: Proposed 2050-AD75
and Final Rules.......................................................................
3366 SAN No. 4736 Administrative Reporting Exemption for Certain Air Releases of NOx (Reg 2050-AF02
Plan Seq No. 114).....................................................................
3367 SAN No. 4971 National Contingency Plan Revisions To Align With the National Response 2050-AG22
Plan..................................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3368 SAN No. 3423 Reportable Quantity Adjustments for Carbamates and Carbamate-Related 2050-AE12
Hazardous Waste Streams; Reportable Quantity Adjustment for Inorganic Chemical
Manufacturing Process Waste (K178)....................................................
3369 SAN No. 4739 Standards and Practices for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries......... 2050-AF04
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 65223]]

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3370 SAN No. 4201 Criteria for the Designation of Hazardous Substances Under CERCLA Section 2050-AE63
102(a)................................................................................
3371 SAN No. 4737 Correction of Errors and Adjustment of CERCLA Reportable Quantities...... 2050-AF03
3372 SAN No. 4177 Revise 40 CFR Part 35 Subpart O: Cooperative Agreements and Superfund 2050-AE62
State Contracts for Superfund Response Actions........................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3373 SAN No. 4526 Revisions to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution 2050-AE87
Contingency Plan; Subpart J Product Schedule Listing Requirements.....................
3374 SAN No. 4357 Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces-- 2040-AD39
Phase II..............................................................................
3375 SAN No. 4746 Regulations for Gray and Black Water Discharges From Cruise Ships 2040-AD89
Operating in Certain Alaskan Waters...................................................
3376 SAN No. 4965 2006 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan.................................... 2040-AE76
3377 SAN No. 4996 Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation Rule............................... 2040-AE80
3378 SAN No. 4979 Oil and Gas Phase II Storm Water Permit Requirements..................... 2040-AE81
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3379 SAN No. 4540 Test Procedures: New and Updated Test Procedures for the Analysis of 2040-AD71
Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act......................
3380 SAN No. 4543 Minimizing Adverse Environmental Impact From Cooling Water Intake 2040-AD70
Structures at Existing Facilities Under Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act, Phase 3
3381 SAN No. 4950 Test Procedures for the Analysis of E. coli, Enterococci, Fecal 2040-AE68
Coliforms, and Salmonella Under the Clean Water Act...................................
3382 SAN No. 4947 Effluent Guidelines for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source 2040-AE78
Category (Revision)...................................................................
3383 SAN No. 4995 Rulemaking on Direct Application of Pesticides to Waters of the United 2040-AE79
States in Compliance With FIFRA.......................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3384 SAN No. 4370 Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard 2040-AD49
Point Source Category, Dissolving Kraft and Dissolving Sulfite Subcategories (Phase
III)..................................................................................
3385 SAN No. 3702 Test Procedures for the Analysis of Trace Metals Under the Clean Water 2040-AC75
Act...................................................................................
3386 SAN No. 3714 Test Procedures: Increased Method Flexibility for Test Procedures 2040-AC92
Approved for Clean Water Act Compliance Monitoring....................................
3387 SAN No. 3713 Test Procedures: Performance-Based Measurement System (PBMS) Procedures 2040-AC93
and Guidance for Clean Water Act Test Procedures......................................
3388 SAN No. 4049 Test Procedures for the Analysis of Co-Planar and Mono-Ortho-Substituted 2040-AD09
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Under the Clean Water Act............................
3389 SAN No. 3786 NPDES Applications Revisions............................................. 2040-AC84
3390 SAN No. 3999 NPDES Permit Requirements for Municipal Sanitary and Combined Sewer 2040-AD02
Collection Systems, Municipal Satellite Collection Systems, Sanitary Sewer Overflows,
and Peak Excess Flow Treatment Facilities.............................................
3391 SAN No. 4690 Policy Regarding National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit 2040-AD87
Requirements for Municipal Wastewater Treatment During Wet Weather Conditions.........
3392 SAN No. 4822 Effluent Guidelines and Standards: Recodification of Various Effluent 2040-AE61
Guidelines............................................................................
3393 SAN No. 4948 Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Airport Deicing 2040-AE69
Operations............................................................................
3394 SAN No. 4949 Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Drinking Water Supply 2040-AE74
and Treatment.........................................................................

[[Page 65224]]

3395 SAN No. 4967 New/Revised Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC) for Recreational Waters 2040-AE77
3396 SAN No. 4980 Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Vinyl Chloride and 2040-AE82
Chlor-Alkali Point Source Categories..................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA)--Completed Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3397 SAN No. 3663 Streamlining the General Pretreatment Regulations for Existing and New 2040-AC58
Sources of Pollution..................................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Proposed Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3398 SAN No. 4770 Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation for Public Water Systems 2040-AD93
Revisions.............................................................................
3399 SAN No. 4821 Drinking Water: Regulatory Determinations Regarding Contaminants on the 2040-AE60
Second Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List......................................
3400 SAN No. 4981 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Short- 2040-AE83
Term Regulatory Revisions and Clarifications..........................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Final Rule Stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3401 SAN No. 2340 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Ground Water Rule (Reg Plan 2040-AA97
Seq No. 129)..........................................................................
3402 SAN No. 4341 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface 2040-AD37
Water Treatment Rule (Reg Plan Seq No. 130)...........................................
3403 SAN No. 4342 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Stage 2 Disinfection 2040-AD38
Byproducts Rule (Reg Plan Seq No. 131)................................................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in the Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.

SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3404 SAN No. 2281 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Radon....................... 2040-AA94
3405 SAN No. 3238 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Aldicarb.................... 2040-AC13
3406 SAN No. 4404 National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR): Methyl Tertiary 2040-AD54
Butyl Ether (MTBE) and Technical Corrections to the NSDWR.............................
3407 SAN No. 4775 National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Revisions to the Total 2040-AD94
Coliform Monitoring and Analytical Requirements and Additional Distribution System
Requirements..........................................................................
3408 SAN No. 4745 Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 3.............................. 2040-AD99
3409 SAN No. 4236 Underground Injection Control: Update of State Programs.................. 2040-AD40
3410 SAN No. 4966 Drinking Water Regulations for Aircraft Public Water System.............. 2040-AE84
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 65225]]

SHORE PROTECTION ACT (SPA)--Long-Term Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence Title Identifier
Number Number
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3411 SAN No. 2820 Shore Protection Act, Section 4103(b) Regulations........................ 2040-AB85
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
General
_______________________________________________________________________

3012. PROPOSED REVISION TO EPA'S IMPLEMENTING NEPA REGULATIONS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 4321

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 6

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The proposed revision is necessary to clarify and update
EPA's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulation. The revision
would clarify Agency responsibilities for congressionally funded
special appropriation projects and EPA-funded grant programs. The
revision would clarify public involvement procedures and organization
responsibilities. The proposal would revise the list of actions which
are categorically excluded from analyses. The revision is also needed
to incorporate a number of Executive orders and other cross-cutting
requirements into the NEPA process.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 02/00/06
Final Action- 08/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4292

Agency Contact: Katherine Biggs, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 2252A, Washington, DC
20460
Phone: 202 564-7144
Fax: 202 564-0070
Email: biggs.katherine@epamail.epa.gov

Robert Hargrove, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Enforcement
and Compliance Assurance, DEPP-SPMMP, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0000
Fax: 202 564-0070
Email: hargrove.robert@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2020-AA42
_______________________________________________________________________

3013. REVISIONS TO ACQUISITION REGULATION CONCERNING CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The purpose of this rule is to revise the Agency's conflict
of interest (COI) acquisition regulations. The specific revisions
involve more stringent requirements for submission of relevant
information from Agency contractors and potential contractors regarding
their relationships with parent companies, affiliates, subsidiaries,
and sister companies. Current Agency regulations do not require the
submission of this level of information. Receipt and evaluation of this
information is critical in order for the Agency to decide whether or
not COI situations exist and how they are to be handled. This revised
rule will also codify several COI clauses that have been developed
since the issuance of the previous rule in 1994.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/00/05
Final Action- 03/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4319

Sectors Affected: 5413 Architectural, Engineering and Related Services;
54162 Environmental Consulting Services; 5416 Management, Scientific
and Technical Consulting Services; 5417 Scientific Research and
Development Services; 562 Waste Management and Remediation Services

Agency Contact: Daniel Humphries, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4377
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: humphries.daniel@epamail.epa.gov

Cal McWhirter, Environmental Protection Agency, Administration and
Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4379
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: mcwhirter.cal@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2030-AA67
_______________________________________________________________________

3014. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION ACCESS FOR CONTRACTORS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 5 USC 301 sec 205 (c); 63 Stat 390, as amended; 40 USC
486 (c); 41 USC 418b

CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1552; 48 CFR 1535

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Current security requirements for Toxic Substances Contract
Act Confidential Business Information (TSCA CBI) access for contractors
are implemented in three Environmental Protection Agency contract
clauses, 1552.235-75, 1552.235-76, and 1552.235-78. Security
requirements for the Government and contractors have been updated in a
2003 TSCA CBI Protection Manual. This rulemaking will implement the new
TSCA CBI requirements into the three EPAAR clauses cited above.

[[Page 65226]]

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/06
Final Action- 05/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4904;

Agency Contact: Linda Clement, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW.,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4356
Fax: 202 565-2552
Email: clement.linda@epamail.epa.gov

Harry Lewis, Environmental Protection Agency, Administration and
Resources Management, 7407, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8642
Email: lewis.harry@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2030-AA88
_______________________________________________________________________

3015. AWARD TERM CONTRACTING

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

Legal Authority: 41 USC 418(b; 5 USC 301, sec 205(c); 63 Stat 390, as
amended

CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1516 and 1552

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
amend the EPA Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR) to add guidance on the use
of award-term contracts. The guidance is necessary for contracting
officers seeking to include award-term provisions in contracts. This
guidance will establish a solicitation provision and contract clause in
the EPAAR.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/00/05
Final Action- 08/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4903;

Agency Contact: Ed Chambers, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW.,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4376
Email: chambers.ed@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2030-AA89
_______________________________________________________________________

3016. ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS FOR CONTRACT DELIVERABLES (508)

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 5 USC 301, sec 205(c); 41 USC 418(b)

CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1511; 48 CFR 1552

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action will amend the Environmental Protection Agency
Acquisition Regulation (EPAAR) to require contractors to identify
applicable accessibility (508) standards in contract deliverables.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/00/05
Final Action- 03/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4931

RIN: 2030-AA90
_______________________________________________________________________

3017. AMENDMENT OF THE STANDARDS FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL IN YUCCA
MOUNTAIN, NEVADA

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 108 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AN15
_______________________________________________________________________

3018. PROJECT XL SITE SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR THE NASA WHITE SANDS TEST
FACILITY IN LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO (PHASES III-VI)

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

Legal Authority: 33 USC 2701 to 2761; 42 USC 300(f) to 300(j) to 26; 42
USC 6901 to 6992(k)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR NYD

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The United States Environmental Protection Agency has entered
into a Final Project Agreement with the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) White Sands Test Facility in Las Cruces, New
Mexico that would modify the reporting requirements under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA). The rule will allow the facility to submit regulatory reports
and permit information electronically rather than on paper to the New
Mexico Environment Department (NMED) Solid Waste Bureau, Hazardous
Waste Bureau, Groundwater Bureau, and Air Quality Bureau. Doing so will
significantly reduce its regulatory reporting costs and enhance the
State's ability to analyze and manage the facility's regulatory and
permit information. The electronic reporting involves six phases that
will transition NASA from submitting data on a CD-ROM to utilizing the
Internet to transmit data to NMED. This rule covers Phases III-VI of
the project, the previous NASA White Sands Test Facility Final Rule
covered Phases I-II.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 02/00/06
Final Action- 04/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4836

Agency Contact: Adam Levitan, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of the Administrator, 1807T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1466
Fax: 202 566-2210
Email: levitan.adam@epamail.epa.gov

Gerald Filbin, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 1807T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-2182
Fax: 202 566-2211
Email: filbin.gerald@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2090-AA35

[[Page 65227]]

_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
General
_______________________________________________________________________

3019. INCORPORATION OF CLASS DEVIATIONS INTO EPAAR

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 40 USC 486(c)

CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1537; 48 CFR 1552

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The Agency has approved a number of class deviations (e.g.,
changes to reporting requirements and monthly progress reports) to the
EPAAR since its promulgation in April 1994. This proposed rule would
incorporate most of the class deviations to the EPAAR.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 3580

Agency Contact: Frances Smith, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-4368
Fax: 202 565-2475
Email: smith.frances@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2030-AA37
_______________________________________________________________________

3020. UTILIZATION OF SMALL, MINORITY AND WOMEN'S BUSINESS ENTERPRISES IN
PROCUREMENT UNDER ASSISTANCE AGREEMENTS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: PL 101-507; PL 102-389; PL 101-549; 42 USC 9605(f); PL
100-590; EO 12432; EO 12138; EO 11625

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 33

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The regulation will codify revisions to the Agency's program
for the utilization of Small, Minority and Women's Business Enterprises
in procurements under assistance agreements (i.e., grants and
cooperative agreements awarded by EPA as well as grants and cooperative
agreements awarded by other agencies under interagency agreements with
EPA). The revisions are necessary to ensure consistency with the
Supreme Court's decision in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 115
S.Ct. 2097 (1995), and were identified as part of the Clinton
Administration's review of affirmative action programs. They include:
(1) Placing greater emphasis on requiring assistance agreement
recipients to submit documentation supporting proposed fair share
procurement objectives for Minority Business Enterprises (MBEs) and
Women's Business Enterprises (WBEs) based on the availability of
qualified MBEs and WBEs in the relevant geographic market; (2)
authorizing or requiring recipients and their prime contractors to take
reasonable race/gender-conscious measures (e.g., bidding credits) in
the event that race/gender-neutral efforts prove inadequate to meet
fair share objectives; and (3) administering statutory MBE/WBE
objectives as a national goal, allowing smaller or larger fair share
objectives for particular grants or cooperative agreements based on the
availability standard.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 07/24/03 68 FR 43824
Final Action- 05/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions,
Organizations

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4056;

Agency Contact: Kimberly Patrick, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, 1230, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5386
Fax: 202 501-0139
Email: patrick.kimberly@epamail.epa.gov

Jeanette Brown, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Enforcement
and Compliance Assurance, 1230A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4100
Fax: 202 501-0756
Email: brown.jeanettel@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2020-AA39
_______________________________________________________________________

3021. CROSS-MEDIA ELECTRONIC REPORTING (ER) AND RECORDKEEPING RULE
(CROMERRR)

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: PL 104-13; PL 105-277

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 3 (New); 40 CFR 9 (Revision)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: As proposed, the Cross-Media Electronic Reporting (ER) and
Recordkeeping Rule (CROMERRR) was intended to provide a uniform legal
framework for paperless electronic reporting and recordkeeping,
including electronic signature/certification, across EPA's
environmental compliance programs. Based on public comment, however,
EPA now plans to focus on finalizing the electronic reporting
components of proposed CROMERRR, and to defer further action on the
electronic recordkeeping components until a later time. Under current
plans, the final electronic reporting (ER) rule will address electronic
reporting by companies regulated under all of EPA's programs: Air,
water, pesticides, toxic substances, wastes, and emergency response.
The final rule would remove existing regulatory obstacles to electronic
reporting, and it would set requirements for companies choosing to
report electronically. In addition, the rule would set the conditions
for allowing electronic reporting under State, tribal or local
environmental programs that operate under EPA authorization. The final
ER rule is intended to make electronic reporting as simple, efficient,
and cost-effective as possible for regulated companies, while ensuring
that a transition from paper to electronic reporting does not
compromise EPA's compliance and enforcement programs. Consequently, the
Agency's strategy is to impose as few specific requirements as
possible, and to keep those requirements neutral with respect to
technology, so the rule will pose no obstacles to adopting new
technologies as they emerge. To ensure that authorized programs at the
State, tribal, and local levels meet EPA's electronic reporting goals,
the final ER rule would specify a set of criteria that these programs
must satisfy as they initiate electronic reporting. In response to
public comments, EPA is also planning to include provisions for a
streamlined process for EPA to review and approve authorized program

[[Page 65228]]

revisions or modifications to allow electronic reporting.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM 08/31/01 66 FR 46162
Final Action 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4270; Formerly listed as RIN 2020-AA41.

Agency Contact: Evi Huffer, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2823T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1697
Fax: 202 260-9322
Email: huffer.evi@epamail.epa.gov

David Schwarz, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental
Information, 2823T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1704
Fax: 202 566-1684
Email: schwarz.david@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2025-AA07
_______________________________________________________________________

3022. PRIVACY ACT REGULATIONS (REVISED)

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

Legal Authority: 5 USC 552a

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 16 (revised)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action proposed to revise the Privacy Act regulation to
exempt new systems and systems currently claiming to be exempt from the
Act. Other revisions are generally minor and include revising the
access provision so that a copy of a record can be obtained without a
personal inspection; changing the time limit for appeals of denials
from 10 days to 30 days; changing the process for accessing Privacy Act
records and contesting Privacy Act records from the system manager to
the Freedom of Information Office; and referring appeals from denials
of system of records maintained by the Office of Inspector General to
that office for decision. The proposed rule does not have implications
on small businesses nor State/local/tribal government.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 09/14/04 69 FR 55377
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4693

Agency Contact: Judy Hutt, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2822-T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1668
Fax: 202 566-1639
Email: hutt.judy@epamail.epa.gov

Deborah Williams, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Environmental Information, 2822-T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1659
Fax: 202 566-1648
Email: williams.deborah@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2025-AA13
_______________________________________________________________________

3023. MISCELLANEOUS REVISIONS TO EPAAR CLAUSES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 5 USC 301; sec (c), 63 Stat 390, as amended; 40 USC
486 (c); 41 USC 418(b)

CFR Citation: 48 CFR 1515; 48 CFR 1535; 48 CFR 1552

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule includes administrative changes to various EPAAR
clauses, such as address changes and points of contact. Nothing
substantive will be affected.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4813

Agency Contact: Dan Humphries, Environmental Protection Agency,
Administration and Resources Management, 3802R, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4377
Email: humphries.daniel@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2030-AA84
_______________________________________________________________________

3024. GUIDELINES FOR CARCINOGEN RISK ASSESSMENT

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

Legal Authority: Not applicable

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: In 9/86 EPA issued risk assessment guidelines relating to
five areas: Carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, chemical mixtures,
developmental toxicants, and estimating exposures. EPA publishes, and
periodically updates/revises, a series of guidelines whose purpose is
to assist risk assessors in evaluating the risks of environmental
hazards. The guidelines were developed to promote high technical
quality and Agency-wide consistency in the human health risk assessment
process. The Agency began revising the 1986 guidelines in light of
significant scientific advances in our understanding of the processes
of carcinogenesis and the modes of actions of disease at the cellular
level. The revision of these guidelines is in keeping with the Agency's
original intent when it issued the first risk assessment guidelines in
1986. The guidelines were meant to be dynamic, flexible documents that
would evolve to reflect the current state of the science and risk
assessment practices. EPA released draft final guidelines in March 2003
for public comment, along with a new draft supplemental guidance
document entitled, Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Cancer
Susceptibility Resulting from Early-life Exposure to Carcinogens, to
address early-life exposure issues. (Prior to the 2003 release,
guidance on early life exposure issues was incorporated into the cancer
guideline document. Early-life exposures issues were moved into a
separate document anticipating that updates on the science will be
necessary sooner than issues entailed in the draft final cancer
guidelines.) The Supplemental Guidance document was peer reviewed by
the SAB in May 2003. The final documents will be made available for
review by the Science Policy Council and other governmental agencies
prior to being submitted for Final Agency Closure. Revisions are being
made to the documents based on comments

[[Page 65229]]

received, balanced against input received during prior SAB reviews and
prior public comment periods. The workgroups finalizing the Guidelines
represent the major program offices and regional offices.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 3671

Agency Contact: William Wood, Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Research and Development, 8103, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3358
Email: wood.bill@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2080-AA06
_______________________________________________________________________

3025. PROJECT XL SITE SPECIFIC RULEMAKING FOR NASA WHITE SANDS TEST
FACILITY ELECTRONIC REPORTING IN LAS CRUCES, NEW MEXICO (PHASES I-II)

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

Legal Authority: Safe Drinking Water Act; 42 USC 300f to 300J-26; Solid
Waste Disposal Act; 42 USC 6901 to 6992k

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has entered
into an XL (Excellence and Leadership) Final Project Agreement (FPA)
with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) White
Sands Test Facility (WSTF) in Las Cruces, NM to implement a project
that would modify reporting requirements under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA), Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Clean Air Act (CAA). The purpose
of this NASA WSTF Electronic Reporting site-specific rule is to enable
the NASA WSTF to electronically submit compliance reports and permit
information to the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) in lieu of
submitting paper reports. The rule will set forth guidelines to ensure
that the information submitted by NASA WSTF to NMED is accurate by
outlining procedures for data authentication, use of electronic
signature and encryption processes. This rule will address Phases I and
II of the project covering reporting requirements under RCRA and the
SDWA. A second and subsequent rule will address Phases III-VI of the
project covering additional reporting requirements under the CWA and CAA.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/31/01 66 FR 55050
Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4536

Agency Contact: Kristina Heinemann, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of the Administrator, 1807T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-2183
Fax: 202 566-2220
Email: heinemann.kristina@epamail.epa.gov

Gerald Filbin, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the
Administrator, 1807T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-2182
Fax: 202 566-2211
Email: filbin.gerald@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2090-AA27
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
General
_______________________________________________________________________

3026. PUBLIC INFORMATION AND CONFIDENTIALITY REGULATIONS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 15 USC 2005; 15 USC 2601 et seq; 21 USC 346; 33 USC
1251 et seq; 33 USC 1414; 42 USC 11001 et seq; 42 USC 300(f) et seq; 42
USC 4912; 42 USC 6901 et seq; 42 USC 7401 et seq; 42 USC 9601 et seq; 5
USC 552; 7 USC 136 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 2; 40 CFR 57; 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 145;
40 CFR 233; 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 270; 40 CFR 271; 40 CFR 281; 40 CFR 350;
40 CFR 403; 40 CFR 85; 40 CFR 86

Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, August 31, 2000, Proposed rule to
eliminate the special treatment of CBI substantiations.

Abstract: EPA regulations at 40 CFR part 2, subpart B, provide
procedures for handling and disclosing information claimed as
confidential business information (CBI). Although the current
regulations have succeeded in protecting CBI, changes in Agency
workload, practice, and statutory authority have made it difficult to
handle CBI activities as expeditiously as desired. EPA is examining its
CBI regulations to determine whether changes are needed to make them
more efficient and effective. Provision 40 CFR 2.205(c), which
automatically protects CBI substantiations claimed as confidential, is
being examined individually and as part of the CBI regulations as a whole.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM 1- 11/23/94 59 FR 60446
NPRM 2- 10/25/99 64 FR 57421
NPRM 3- 12/21/99 64 FR 71366
NPRM 4- 08/30/00 65 FR 52684
ANPRM- 12/21/00 65 FR 80394
Final Action- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Additional Information: SAN No. 3240;

Agency Contact: Sara Hisel-McCoy, Environmental Protection Agency,
Office of Environmental Information, 2822-T, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1649
Fax: 202 566-1639
Email: hisel-mccoy.sara@epamail.epa.gov

Joe Sierra, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental
Information, 2822-T, Washington, DC 20460

[[Page 65230]]

Phone: 202-566-1683
Fax: 202 566-1639
Email: sierra.joe@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2025-AA02
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Completed Actions
General
_______________________________________________________________________

3027. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL POLICY FOR THE PROTECTION OF
HUMAN SUBJECTS

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 26

Completed:
________________________________________________________________________

Reason Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Final Action - Common Rule with
HHS- 06/23/05 70 FR 36325

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Agency Contact: Dennis Utterback
Phone: 202 564-6638
Fax: 202 565-2911
Email: utterback.dennis@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2080-AA11
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prerule Stage
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________

3028. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS: RISK MANAGEMENT
PROGRAMS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT, SECTION 112(R)(7) (SECTION 610 REVIEW)

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412(r)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The Agency promulgated the Accidental Release Prevention
Requirements on June 20, 1996 (61 FR 31668). The regulations apply to
all stationary sources with processes that contain more than a
threshold quantity of a regulated substance. Processes are divided into
three categories based on the potential for offsite consequences
associated with a worst-case accidental release; accident history; or
compliance with the prevention requirements under OSHA's Process Safety
Management (PSM). Processes that have no potential impact on the public
in the case of an accidental release have minimal requirements. For
other processes, sources must implement a risk management program that
includes more detailed requirements for hazard assessment, prevention,
and emergency response. Processes in industry categories with a history
of accidental releases and processes already complying with OSHA's PSM
are subject to prevention program requirements that are virtually
identical to parallel elements of the OSHA standard. All other
processes are subject to streamlined prevention requirements. All
sources must prepare a risk management plan based on the risk
management programs established at the source. The sources submit the
plan to EPA. The first submission was on June 20, 1999. Some sources
re-submitted their plans or revised their plans after the first
submission. The second submission was due on June 20, 2004. There are
approximately 15,000 sources subject to the accidental release
prevention regulations. This new entry in the Regulatory Agenda
announces that EPA will review this regulation pursuant to section 610
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 610). EPA solicits
comments on the following factors: (1) The continued need for the rule;
(2) the nature of complaints or comments received concerning the rule
from the public since promulgation; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4)
the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates or conflicts with
other Federal rule, and to the extent feasible, with State and local
governmental rules; and (5) the length of time since the rule has been
evaluated or the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or
other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. In the
Agency's view, there is a continued need for the rule because it calls
on sources to reduce the probability and adverse consequences of
accidental releases of substances that have the potential to cause
immediate harm to public health and the environment, and stimulates
dialogue between industry and the public to improve accident prevention
and emergency response practices. The Agency has received few
complaints about this rule from small businesses. The Agency has
developed many guidance documents to help small entities comply with
the rule. Efforts were made to minimize the burden and complexity of
the rule by taking a tiered approach. In other words, entities with
complex processes have to follow more rigorous requirements and those
with simple processes follow only some of the requirements. EPA
believes that there is no conflict or overlap between this rule and any
other rule except for OSHA's PSM rule as indicated above. This is the
first time the rule has been evaluated under the RFA section 610. EPA
has established a public docket for this effort, Docket No. OAR-2005-
0166 at http://www.epa.gov/edocket.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Begin Review- 10/00/05
End Comment Period- 01/00/06
End Review- 04/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 5018;

Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20004
Phone: 202 564-8019
Fax: 202 564-2625

[[Page 65231]]

Email: jacob.sicy@epa.gov

Vanessa Rodriguez, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7913
Fax: 202 564-2625
Email: rodriquez.vanessa@epa.gov

RIN: 2050-AG26
_______________________________________________________________________

3029. REVISION TO POLICY ON CONTROL OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOC)

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.100(s)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA is considering the proposal of revisions to its policy on
control of volatile organic compounds (VOC), including the use of
photochemical reactivity in controlling VOCs. As a first step, an ANPRM
may be issued soliciting public comment on various policy options.
Subsequent steps could range from taking no further action to
publishing a policy statement in the Federal Register. The ANPRM is to
announce that EPA is considering revision of its VOC policy which
appeared in the July 8, 1977 Federal Register (42 FR 35314) under the
title ``Recommended Policy on Control of Volatile Organic Compounds.''
That policy statement gave a broad description about how EPA would
approach VOC control. This policy also said that we would be exempting
certain organic compounds from control in volatile organic compound
regulations (to meet ozone ambient air quality limits) due to these
compounds having very low ozone forming potential. A list of exempt
compounds was later codified in the definition of VOC at 40 CFR
51.100(s) which was adopted on February 3, 1992 (57 FR 3941) for use in
State Implementation Plans. The ANPRM will ask for public comments on
various approaches EPA may use in the future to take photochemical
reactivity into account in controlling VOCs. The ANPRM could lead to a
policy statement, such as the 1977 policy statement, which would give a
broad outline of the new approach EPA would take in the future. This
would not be a rulemaking, but the revised policy could lead to new
rules being adopted still further in the future. (Any such rules would
be separately noticed in the Regulatory Agenda.) For example, the ANPRM
could eventually lead to a revision of the definition of VOC at 40 CFR
51.100(s). Alternatively, EPA may go directly to a proposed revision of
policy.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Guidance- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4759;

Agency Contact: William L. Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5245
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: johnson.williaml@epa.gov

Terry Keating, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6103A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1174
Fax: 202 564-1554
Email: keating.terry@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK75
_______________________________________________________________________

3030. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: AMENDMENTS TO THE SECTION 608
LEAK REPAIR REGULATIONS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.

Legal Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82, subpart F

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rulemaking will propose changes and amendments to the
refrigerant leak repair regulations (40 CFR 82, subpart F) promulgated
under section 608 of the Clean Air Act. The goal of the regulations is
to protect the stratospheric ozone layer by promulgating regulations
that reduce the use and emissions of ozone-depleting refrigerants to
the lowest achievable level. This proposal will clarify the leak repair
regulations by requiring that owners and operators of comfort cooling,
commercial refrigeration, and industrial process refrigeration
appliances that have ozone-depleting charges greater than 50 pounds
calculate leak rates, verify all repairs, and document repair efforts.
This rulemaking will provide further clarity by adding definitions and
discussing compliance scenarios.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

ANPRM- 10/00/05
NPRM- 04/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4856;

Agency Contact: Julius Banks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9870
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov

Nancy Smagin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205-
J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9126
Fax: 202 343-2337
Email: smagin.nancy@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM09
_______________________________________________________________________

3031. ADVANCE NOTICE FOR INFORMATION ON DETERMINING THE EMISSIONS
REDUCTIONS ACHIEVED FROM LIMITING THE VOC CONTENT OF ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: CAAA sec 110

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA will issue an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(ANPRM) to discuss and take comment on approaches for calculating
emission reductions from the national architectural and Industrial
maintenance (AIM) coating rule and other architectural rules. Review of
the comments received could result in a rule or policy guidance on
calculation methodology.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

ANPRM- 08/31/05 70 FR 51694
ANPRM Comment Period End- 10/17/05
Notice 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

[[Page 65232]]

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 5009;

Agency Contact: David Sanders, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Reseach Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3356
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: sanders.dave@epa.gov

Marcia Spink, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
3AP20, Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: 215 814-2104
Fax: 215 814-2124
Email: spink.marcia@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN42
_______________________________________________________________________

3032. ACTION ON PETITION TO LIST DIESEL EXHAUST AS A HAZARDOUS
AIR POLLUTANT

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, February 11, 2005.
NPRM, Judicial, June 12, 2006, Tentative deadline for proposal, under
negotiation.
Final, Judicial, May 1, 2007, Tentative, under negotiation.

Abstract: EPA received a petition from Environmental Defense to list
Diesel Exhaust as a Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP). Upon initially
reviewing the petition, we have decided the petition needs to be
reviewed and evaluated by a Workgroup to make a final determination on
how to proceed. Our initial review indicates that the petition meets
the CAAA requirements for listing as a HAP, namely that (1) It is an
air pollutant, and (2) emissions, ambient concentrations,
bioaccumulation, or deposition of the substance must be known to cause
or reasonably anticipated to cause adverse effects to human health or
the environment. The petition is based primarily on human health
effects, and relies heavily on the EPA's Health Assessment Document for
Diesel Engine Exhaust (2002), which shows that exposure to diesel
exhaust leads cancerous and non-cancerous effects. In addition, the
National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) concludes that diesel exhaust is
among the air pollutants that pose the greatest risk to human health
and that the ambient concentration of diesel exhaust exceeds EPA's non-
cancer reference concentration in multiple urban areas across the U.S.
This activity may be considered precedent-setting, as a pollutant has
not been added to the HAP list to date.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

ANPRM- 03/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 5020;

Agency Contact: Anne Rea, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0053
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: rea.anne@epamail.epa.gov

Scott Jenkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C404-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1167
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: jenkins.scott@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN49
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Proposed Rule Stage
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________

3033. REVIEW OF THE NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR
PARTICULATE MATTER

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 100 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AI44
_______________________________________________________________________

3034. EVALUATION OF UPDATED TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE CERTIFICATION OF
GASOLINE DEPOSIT CONTROL ADDITIVES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: CAA 211

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: All gasoline must contain additives to control the formation
of deposits in the fuel supply system and engine of motor vehicles. If
uncontrolled, such deposits can result in a significant increase in
motor vehicle emissions. This action will propose that updated test
procedures be adopted for the certification of gasoline deposit control
additives regarding their ability to control fuel injector and intake
valve deposits. The adoption of the updated procedures will ensure that
the gasoline deposit control program continues to ensure an adequate
level of deposit control, thereby preventing an increase in motor
vehicle emissions. The updated test procedures require less time to
perform and are less costly. Therefore, the adoption of the proposed
procedures will reduce the burden on industry of complying with the
gasoline deposit control program. The proposed action will not impact
small businesses, or state, local, or tribal governments.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Final Action- 08/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4531;

Agency Contact: Jeff Herzog, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, ASD, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4227
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: herzog.jeff@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AJ61
_______________________________________________________________________

3035. AMENDMENTS TO METHOD 24 (WATER-BASED COATINGS)

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June 15, 2001.

Abstract: The determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
content of a surface coating by reference Method

[[Page 65233]]

24 involves determination of its water content and calculation of its
VOC content as the difference of the two measurements (volatile content
minus water content). Method 24 is inherently less precise for water-
based coatings than it is for solvent-based coatings and the
imprecision increases as water content increases. This action will
amend Method 24 by adding a direct measurement procedure for measuring
VOC content of water-based coatings, thereby improving the method's
precision.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Final Action- 03/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 3649

Agency Contact: Candace Sorrell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1064
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: sorrell.candace@epamail.epa.gov

Conniesue Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D205-02, D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7774
Email: oldham.conniesue@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AF72
_______________________________________________________________________

3036. GENERAL CONFORMITY REGULATIONS; REVISIONS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.850 to 51.860; 40 CFR 93.150 to 93.160

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act prohibits Federal
entities from taking actions which do not conform to the State
implementation plan (SIP) for the attainment and maintenance of the
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). In November 1993, EPA
promulgated two sets of regulations to implement section 176(c). First,
on November 24, EPA promulgated the Transportation Conformity
Regulations to establish the criteria and procedures for determining
that transportation plans, programs, and projects which are funded
under title 23 U.S.C. or the Federal Transit Act conform with the SIP.
Then, on November 30, EPA promulgated regulations, known as the General
Conformity Regulations, to ensure that other Federal actions also
conformed to the SIPs. The EPA has not reviewed or revised the General
Conformity Regulations since their 1993 promulgation. Several Federal
agencies have identified concerns over the implementation of the
General Conformity Regulations, including the requirements for areas
designated nonattainment for the newly promulgated NAAQS. In
conjunction with an ad hoc work group of representatives from several
Federal agencies, EPA will review the implementation of the General
Conformity Regulations. The EPA will then propose and promulgate any
appropriate revision to those regulations.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/06
Final Action- 10/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4070;

Agency Contact: Dave Stonefield, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5350
Fax: 919-541-0824
Email: stonefield.dave@epa.gov

Tom Coda, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-02,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3037
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: coda.tom@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AH93
_______________________________________________________________________

3037. REVIEW OF NEW SOURCES AND MODIFICATIONS IN INDIAN COUNTRY

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 49

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: As required by the Clean Air Act's New Source Review (NSR)
provisions, the EPA is proposing Federal regulations governing
preconstruction permitting of minor stationary sources and major
stationary sources of air pollution in nonattainment areas in Indian
country. Pursuant to the Tribal Air Rule, eligible Indian tribes may
receive EPA authorization to develop and implement such programs. The
Federal NSR permitting programs would be effective throughout Indian
country and would be implemented by EPA if eligible Indian Tribes do
not elect, or do not receive authorization, to manage such programs.
The proposed Federal NSR rule would require sources in Indian country,
with certain exceptions, to obtain a permit prior to construction if
they are: (1) New minor sources, (2) existing minor sources undergoing
modification, (3) new major sources in nonattainment areas in Indian
country, or (4) existing major sources in nonattainment areas in Indian
country undergoing minor modification. The proposed rule also would
allow new or existing stationary sources of regulated NSR pollutants
and HAPs to accept enforceable limits on their production capacity or
hours of operation in order to be considered minor sources and avoid
being subject to other Clean Air Act requirements such as the title V
operating permits program. These rules would not impose any mandates on
tribal governments to implement NSR permitting programs. Tribal
governments may be affected, however, insofar as they own or operate
sources that must obtain a permit from the EPA under the final Federal
permitting program regulations.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/06
Final Action- 10/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 3975

Agency Contact: Raj Rao, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C339-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

[[Page 65234]]

Phone: 919 541-5344
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: rao.raj@epamail.epa.gov

Lynn Hutchinson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C339-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5795
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: hutchinson.lynn@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AH37
_______________________________________________________________________

3038. CLEAN AIR FINE PARTICLE IMPLEMENTATION RULE

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 102 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AK74
_______________________________________________________________________

3039. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION 16--SPECIFICATIONS AND TEST PROCEDURES
FOR PREDICTIVE EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEMS IN STATIONARY SOURCES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Performance Specification 16 is being proposed to provide
performance criteria for predictive emission monitoring systems.
Predictive systems represent a new technology that uses process
information or parameters to predict pollutant emissions instead of
directly measuring them. The Agency is allowing their use in recently-
promulgated rules and they are being considered by a number of
regulated facilities. The specification lists the requirements for
acceptable systems that are met by passing tests that compare the
monitoring system with standardized methods and audit gases to
determine system accuracy and stability. Performance Specification 16
will primarily apply to facilities whose emissions can be predicted
from process parameters such as combustion processes (including gas
turbines and internal combustion engines).

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 08/08/05 70 FR 45608
NPRM Comment Period End- 10/07/05
Final Action- 06/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4119

Sectors Affected: 336399 All Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing;
333618 Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing; 33241 Power Boiler and
Heat Exchanger Manufacturing; 333611 Turbine and Turbine Generator Set
Unit Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Foston Curtis, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-19, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1063
Email: curtis.foston@epamail.epa.gov

Conniesue Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D205-02, D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7774
Email: oldham.conniesue@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AH84
_______________________________________________________________________

3040. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES: MUNICIPAL
SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS: AMENDMENT

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401; 42 USC 7411; 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7416; 42
USC 7429; 42 USC 7601

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60.750; 40 CFR 60.751; 40 CFR
60.752(b)(2)(iii)(B); 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2)(iii)(C); 40 CFR
60.752(b)(2)(iii)(D); 40 CFR 60758

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action will amend the existing regulation entitled
Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources: Municipal Solid
Waste Landfills, subpart WWW of 40 CFR Part 60, promulgated on March
12, 1996. The amendment is being undertaken in response to requests to
clarify our intent regarding what constitutes an adequate landfill gas
treatment system. This action also clarifies our intent to exempt from
control landfill gas that is treated/upgraded. Furthermore, it
clarifies who is responsible for control of untreated landfill gas that
is sold. This action is necessary to clarify our intent regarding the
issues discussed above. It will improve implementation and compliance
with this regulation.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Proposed Amdmt- 05/23/02 67 FR 36476
Supplemental NPRM- 10/00/05
Final Action- 10/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4478;

Sectors Affected: 562212 Solid Waste Landfill

Agency Contact: Martha Smith, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2421
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: smith.martha@epamail.epa.gov

Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AJ41
_______________________________________________________________________

3041. PORTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY NESHAP: AMENDMENT TO
IMPLEMENT COURT REMAND

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1340 to 63.1359

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry NESHAP was
promulgated June 14, 1999, and has been codified in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations 63, Subpart LLL. The Sierra Club and the National Lime
Association petitioned the court to review Subpart LLL, while the
American Portland Cement Alliance (APCA) opted to negotiate a
settlement agreement. On December 15, 2000, a panel of the D.C. Circuit
issued its opinion in National Lime Ass'n v. EPA. The Court remanded
the three standards for which we established floors of no control
(hydrogen chloride [HCl], total hydrocarbon [THC], and mercury [Hg]).
The Court found that we committed

[[Page 65235]]

error in not considering other means of control, in particular, control
of HAPs in raw materials and in fossil fuels. The Court also remanded
that we consider setting beyond-the-floor standards for HAP metals, for
which particulate matter (PM) is a surrogate. This action will consist
of amendments to respond to the court remand.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Final Action- 06/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4585;

Sectors Affected: 32731 Cement Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Keith Barnett, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5605
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: barnett.keith@epamail.epa.gov

David Cozzie, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5356
Email: cozzie.david@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AJ78
_______________________________________________________________________

3042. NESHAP: ETHYLENE OXIDE FOR STERILIZATION FACILITIES--RESIDUAL RISK
STANDARDS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 6, 2002.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart O. This source category covers ethylene oxide commercial
sterilizers. The current action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA,
is to assess residual risks and develop additional emission standards,
as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety. We have completed
the risk assessment, received Work Group comments, completed Options
Selection, completed Final Agency Review, and submitted the package to
OMB on June 10, 2005. The assessment results show cancer incidence less
than 1.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4654;

Sectors Affected: 3254 Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing;
311942 Spice and Extract Manufacturing

Agency Contact: David Markwordt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0837
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: markwordt.david@epamail.epa.gov

Laura McKelvey, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5497
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: mckelvey.laura@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK09
_______________________________________________________________________

3043. NESHAP: GASOLINE DISTRIBUTION (STAGE I) RESIDUAL RISK AND MACT
STANDARDS REVIEW

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, March 31, 2006.

Abstract: On December 14, 1994, we promulgated National Emission
Standards for Gasoline Distribution Facilities (Bulk Gasoline Terminals
and Pipeline Breakout Stations) (59 FR 64318). The national emission
standards limit and control hazardous air pollutants (HAP) that are
known or suspected to cause cancer or have other serious health or
environmental effects. Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
directs EPA to assess the risk remaining (residual risk) after the
application of national emission standards controls. Also, CAA section
112(d)(6) requires us to review and revise the national emission
standards as necessary by taking into account developments in
practices, processes, and control technologies. The proposal will
announce a decision and request public comments on the residual risk
assessment and technology review for the national emission standards.
To meet a consent deadline, EPA must promulgate this decision by March
31, 2006.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4655, EDocket No. OAR-2004-0019;

Agency Contact: Steve Shedd, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5397
Fax: 919 685-3195
Email: shedd.steve@epamail.epa.gov

Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK10
_______________________________________________________________________

3044. NESHAP: INDUSTRIAL PROCESS COOLING TOWERS RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 30, 2002.

Abstract: A national emission standard for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAP) for industrial process cooling towers (IPCT) was previously
promulgated under Section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act. That standard
effectively bans the use of chromium-based water treatment chemicals in
IPCT used to remove heat from chemical or industrial processes. The
Clean Air Act Section 112(f) requires us to assess within 8 years of
promulgation of a NESHAP the remaining risk to the public and to
develop additional more stringent standards if such standards are
needed to protect the public health with an

[[Page 65236]]

ample margin of safety. This action is to examine the remaining risk
from IPCT and, if warranted, to develop new risk based standards.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4660;

Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5289
Email: mulrine.phil@epamail.epa.gov

Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK16
_______________________________________________________________________

3045. NESHAP: PERCHLOROETHYLENE DRY CLEANING FACILITIES RESIDUAL RISK
STANDARDS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, April 28, 2006, court ordered deadline
for final rule.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based emission standards for this
source category under section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act. The current
action, required by Section 112(f) of the Clean Air Act, is to assess
residual risks and develop additional emission standards, as necessary,
to provide an ample margin of safety. Approximately 27,000
perchloroethylene (perc) dry cleaning facilities are in existence.
Fifteen of these facilities are major sources (use > 2100 gallons of
perc per year), subject to MACT requirements under the technology-based
NESHAP requirements. The remaining facilities are area sources (use
<2100 gallons of perc per year) subject to GACT requirements under the
NESHAP. The peer reviewed risk assessment revealed risk from major
source dry cleaning facilities in excess of 100 in a million,
therefore, EPA is currently assessing options to reduce risk from these
facilities. EPA has agreed with litigants to a deadline of April 28,
2006 for completion of this effort.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Final Action- 05/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4662;

Sectors Affected: 81232 Drycleaning and Laundry Services (except Coin-
Operated)

Agency Contact: Rhea Jones, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK18
_______________________________________________________________________

3046. NESHAP: HALOGENATED SOLVENT CLEANING--RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 2, 2002.
Final, Judicial, December 31, 2006.

Abstract: The Halogenated Solvent Cleaning NESHAP limits emissions of
HAP from solvent cleaning machines that use any of the following
halogenated solvents: methylene chloride, perchloroethylene,
trichloroethylene, 1,1,1, - trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride,
chloroform, or any combination of these solvents in a total
concentration greater than 5 percent by weight. Each individual solvent
cleaning machine is an affected source. The Halogenated Solvent
Cleaning NESHAP was projected to reduce nationwide emissions of
hazardous air pollutants (HAP) from halogenated solvent cleaning
machines by 85,300 tons per year, or 63 percent of the 1991 baseline
emissions of 140,525 tons/year. On December 3, 1999, the rule was
amended by adding compliance options for continuous web cleaning
machines. Continuous web cleaning machines are considered a subset of
in-line cleaning machines and are defined as: ``a solvent cleaning
machine in which parts such as film, coils, wire, and metal strips are
cleaned at speeds typically in excess of 11 feet per minute. Parts are
generally uncoiled, cleaned such that the same part is simultaneously
entering and exiting the solvent application area of the solvent
cleaning machine, and then recoiled or cut.`` This action is required
by the CAA to assess residual risk and develop standards as necessary
to provide an ample margin of safety.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/06
Final Action- 01/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Federalism: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4668;

Sectors Affected: 335999 All Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment
and Component Manufacturing; 332999 All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated
Metal Product Manufacturing; 336999 All Other Transportation Equipment
Manufacturing; 337124 Metal Household Furniture Manufacturing; 332116
Metal Stamping; 339 Miscellaneous Manufacturing; 336 Transportation
Equipment Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Lynn Dail, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C-539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2363
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: dail.lynn@epamail.epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689

[[Page 65237]]

Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK22
_______________________________________________________________________

3047. NESHAP: MAGNETIC TAPE MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS RESIDUAL RISK STANDARD

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 15, 2002, Court ordered
deadline for final rule.
Other, Judicial, March 31, 2006.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA. The current action, required
by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual risks and develop
additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin
of safety. The facilities covered by the 112(d) standard and under
investigation in the project are Magnetic Tape coatings facilities that
manufacture audio and video recording and computer information storage,
and emit major source levels of air toxics. The magnetic tape coating
process entails a mixture of magnetic (metal) particles, resins, and
solvents applied to either a plastic film or paper. The HAP used in
this industry include methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), methyl isobutyl ketone
(MIBK), toluene, toluene diisocyanate, ethylene glycol, methanol,
xylenes, chromium, cobalt, ethylbenzene, and acetaldehyde. The most
common HAP solvents are MEK (68 percent) and toluene (29 percent). The
non-HAP solvents used in this industry include cyclohexanone, acetone,
and isopropyl alcohol (IPA). The magnetic particles are combinations of
iron, chrome, and cobalt. Particulate HAP emissions can result from
handling of materials, cleaning of process equipment, and adding dry
media to mix tanks during coating mix preparation. New processes for
manufacturing magnetic tape products have been developed by at least
one company in recent years. There are a total of six facilities
manufacturing magnetic tape in the nation. Half of these are located in
the State of Alabama. The residual risk analyses performed for this
source category and the final determination to develop and promulgate
additional standards for the source category is dependent on certain
policy decisions. The EPA modeled each of the six facilities with
magnetic tape manufacturing source category emission sources and found
no facilities with a cancer risk at or above 1 in 1 million. The EPA
also found the maximum noncancer risks from these facilities to be
significantly below 0.2. The EPA believes that these six facilities
constitute all of the emissions from this source category and that the
assessment is likely to overestimate rather than underestimate risks.
Therefore, EPA has determined that this source category currently
presents an acceptable level of cancer and noncancer risks and provides
an ample margin of safety.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4669;

Sectors Affected: 334613 Magnetic and Optical Recording Media
Manufacturing; 33461 Manufacturing and Reproducing Magnetic and Optical
Media

Agency Contact: Lynn Dail, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C-539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2363
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: dail.lynn@epamail.epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK23
_______________________________________________________________________

3048. NESHAP: HAZARDOUS ORGANIC NESHAP (HON) RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, April 22, 2003.
Final, Judicial, December 30, 2006, court ordered deadline for final rule.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/06
Final Action- 12/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4659

Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Randy McDonald, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5402
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov

Robin Dunkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-04, Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK14
_______________________________________________________________________

3049. NATIONAL VOC EMISSION STANDARDS FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS; AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7511b

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 59

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Amendments to the consumer products rule are being proposed
to clarify and correct the rule. There are no new categories being
regulated nor are any limits being lowered. Several definitions are
being updated to provide more clarity. The variance process is being
streamlined. A correction is being made to the address for Region 3.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/06
Final Action- 10/00/06

[[Page 65238]]

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4309

Sectors Affected: 32599 All Other Chemical Product Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Bruce Moore, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5460
Fax: 919 541-0072
Email: moore.bruce@epamail.epa.gov

Penny Lassiter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396
Fax: 919 541-0072
Email: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AI62
_______________________________________________________________________

3050. CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FROM MOBILE SOURCES

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 101 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AK70
_______________________________________________________________________

3051. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: LISTING OF SUBSTITUTES FOR
OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCES: N-PROPYL BROMIDE

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule would list whether n-propylbromide (nPB) is an
acceptable substitute for class I and class II ozone depleting
substances used as solvents for general metals, precision, and
electronics cleaning, as well as in aerosol solvent and adhesives end
uses. This could provide another alternative to solvents with higher
ozone depletion potential that industry is interested in using. The
rule also would propose specific conditions on the use of nPB as a
solvent. These might include limiting the specific applications in
which it may be used to those with low emissions and requiring exposure
limits consistent with industry practices. This will ensure that nPB is
used in a manner that is safe and environmentally protective. OSHA does
not currently regulate nPB. EPA would revise our ruling to adopt
whatever OSHA requires if OSHA later regulates the use of nPB. If
finalized as proposed, this rule would be consistent with most existing
industry practices and would impose little or no burden on industry.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 06/03/03 68 FR 33283
NPRM Correction- 10/02/03 68 FR 56809
Supplemental NPRM- 12/00/05
Final Action- 12/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4599; Split from RIN 2060-AJ58. The
previous ANPRM was under SAN No. 3525.

Sectors Affected: 334 Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing;
332 Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing; 337 Furniture and Related
Product Manufacturing; 333 Machinery Manufacturing; 331 Primary Metal
Manufacturing; 336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing; 32615
Urethane and Other Foam Product (except Polystyrene) Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9163
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: sheppard.margaret@epamail.epa.gov

Karen Thundiyil, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9464
Fax: 202 343-2342
Email: thundiyil.karen@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK26
_______________________________________________________________________

3052. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: ADJUSTING ALLOWANCES FOR CLASS
I SUBSTANCES FOR EXPORT TO ARTICLE 5 COUNTRIES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR Part 82

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action reinforces the economic incentives related to the
transition of Article 5 countries to ozone-depleting substance
alternatives. Currently, Article 5 allowances are determined as a
percentage of total production allowances assigned to U.S. companies
for Class I ozone-depleting substances. In accordance with the Beijing
Amendments of the Montreal Protocol, this action establishes Article 5
allowances independently of total production allowances.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4697

Agency Contact: Hodayah Finman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205 J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9246
Fax: 202 565-2079
Email: finman.hodayah@epamail.epa.gov; hodayah finman/dc/usepa/
us@epamail.epa.gov

2008--aa00 Ross Brennan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9226
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: brennan.ross@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK45
_______________________________________________________________________

3053. FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (FIP) FOR THE BILLINGS/LAUREL, MONTANA
SULFUR DIOXIDE (SO2) AREA

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

Legal Authority: 12 USC 1701 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52

[[Page 65239]]

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The State of Montana submitted a sulfur dioxide (SO2) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Billings/Laurel, Montana area. On 5/
2/02 and 5/22/03 we partially and limitedly approved and partially and
limitedly disapproved Montana's SO2 SIP for Billings/Laurel. EPA
intends to propose a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to cover those
parts of the State's plan we disapproved. EPA's FIP will assure that
the Billings/Laurel area will attain and maintain the SO2 NAAQS.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4542

Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries

Agency Contact: Laurie Ostrand, Environmental Protection Agency,
Regional Office Denver, 8P-AR, Denver, CO 80202
Phone: 303 312-6437
Fax: 303 312-6064
Email: ostrand.laurie@epamail.epa.gov

Cynthia Cody, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office Denver,
8P-AR, Denver, CO 80202
Phone: 303 312-6228
Fax: 303 312-6064
Email: cody.cynthia@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2008-AA00
_______________________________________________________________________

3054. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING REGULATIONS: REVISIONS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (Revision); 40 CFR 53 (Revision); 40 CFR 58
(Revision)

Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, September 27, 2005, Relevant areas of
the PM monitoring methods and network are tied to the consent decree
for the PM NAAQS.
NPRM, Judicial, December 20, 2005, Relevant areas of the PM monitoring
methods and network are tied to the consent decree for the PM NAAQS.

Abstract: Air pollution control authorities use air quality data to
determine compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
and in subsequent work to develop air pollution mitigation strategies.
The data come primarily from ambient air monitoring stations run by
State and local agencies, although Federal, tribal, and industrial
organizations also run stations. The design of the monitoring networks
is regulated under 40 CFR 58. This rule was originally written in 1979
and several revisions have been made in the intervening years. Air
pollution control authorities have improved their parts of the network
in response to changes in air quality, advances in the understanding of
the movements and health effects of air pollutants, and developments in
air pollution measurement technology. EPA has also cooperated with air
pollution control authorities to improve the networks, but we have not
revised the applicable regulations comprehensively. The proposed
revisions would remove real or perceived constraints on redeploying air
monitoring stations; more accurately reflect the roles of EPA and other
control authorities in designing, reviewing, and modifying networks;
bring provisions related to quality assurance up to date; and recognize
technological changes. The current regulations require States to
develop plans to deploy air monitoring networks. States generally
develop new plans only when new monitoring is needed, such as for a new
NAAQS. The regulations need to be revised to reflect the roles of EPA
and the State and local agencies.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/06
Final Action- 10/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4421;

Sectors Affected: 92411 Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste
Management; 334519 Other Measuring and Controlling Device Manufacturing

URL For Public Comments:
oar-2004-0018

Agency Contact: Tim Hanley, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C339-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4417
Fax: 919 541-1903
Email: hanley.tim@epamail.epa.gov

Michael Papp, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C339-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2408
Fax: 919 541-1903
Email: papp.michael@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AJ25
_______________________________________________________________________

3055. CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM MOTOR VEHICLES AND ENGINES:
ALTERNATIVE LOW-SULFUR HIGHWAY DIESEL FUEL TRANSITION PROGRAM FOR ALASKA

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a); 42 USC 7625-
1

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 69 and 80 (Revision)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action will carry out a flexibility provision for Alaska
that was included in EPA's heavy-duty diesel rule, which was
promulgated on January 18, 2001. That rule established more stringent
national emission standards for heavy-duty highway vehicles and engines
for the 2007 model year, and a technology-enabling sulfur limit of 15
ppm for highway diesel fuel beginning in 2006. In that rule, EPA
recognized Alaska's unique geographical, meteorological, air quality,
and economic factors and provided Alaska an opportunity to develop its
own plan to transition to low-sulfur highway diesel fuel, as an
alternative to the national transition program. Our goal in offering
this flexibility is to transition Alaska into the low-sulfur fuel
program in a manner that minimizes costs, while ensuring that the new
vehicles and engines receive the low-sulfur fuel they need. As stated
in the Federal Register notice for the diesel rule, if Alaska submits
an alternative plan by April 1, 2002, and if EPA determines that it
provides a reasonable alternative, EPA intends to initiate rulemaking and,

[[Page 65240]]

within one year from the date of Alaska's submittal, promulgate a final
rule to incorporate the alternative plan. A stakeholder process to
develop options is already underway in Alaska, and the State informed
EPA that it intends to submit an alternative transition plan in late
2001 or early 2002. This action will be in response to that anticipated
submittal. We are also adding a related re-proposal to implement
nationwide diesel fuel content standards for nonroad, locomotive and
marine engines as it applies to Alaska's rural areas.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4570;

Sectors Affected: 336112 Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing

Agency Contact: David Korotney, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6407, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4507
Fax: 734 214-4050
Email: korotney.david@epamail.epa.gov

Paul Machiele, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, Ann
Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4264
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: machiele.paul@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AJ72
_______________________________________________________________________

3056. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTINUOUS PARAMETER MONITORING
SYSTEMS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 app B; 40 CFR 60 app F

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action proposes Performance Specification 17 (PS-17),
Quality Assurance (QA) Procedure 4, and amendments to Appendix F, QA
Procedure 1. Performance Specification 17 and QA Procedure 4 apply to
continuous parameter monitoring systems (CPMS). Many of the rules
promulgated under 40 CFR part 63 require owners and operators of
affected emission units to install and operate CPMS to monitor various
parameters, such as temperature, pressure, flow rate, and pH,
associated with the operation and performance of emission control
devices. However, few, if any, of those rules specify complete
procedures for ensuring the quality of the data measured by CPMS. The
proposed PS-17 establishes procedures and other requirements that will
ensure that those CPMS are properly selected, installed, and placed
into operation. The proposed QA Procedure 4 specifies procedures that
will ensure that those CPMS provide quality data on an ongoing basis.
Both PS-17 and QA Procedure 4 will help to ensure compliance with
emission limitations established under 40 CFR part 63. Procedure 1 of
Appendix F currently addresses QA procedures for continuous emission
monitoring systems (CEMS) that measure a single pollutant. The proposed
amendments to QA Procedure 1 broadens the procedure to address the
unique requirements of CEMS that are used for monitoring multiple
pollutants. Because several of the regulations promulgated under 40 CFR
part 63 require multiple pollutant CEMS, these amendments are needed to
ensure those CEMS are operated in a manner that ensures the quality of
the emission data collected. This action is not expected to have any
impacts on small entities or State, local, or tribal governments.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4584;

Sectors Affected: 31-33 Manufacturing; 21 Mining; 486 Pipeline
Transportation; 562213 Solid Waste Combustors and Incinerators; 562212
Solid Waste Landfill; 22 Utilities

Agency Contact: Barrett Parker, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, EN-341W, D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5635
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: parker.barrett@epamail.epa.gov

Fred Thompson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2707
Email: thompson.fred@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AJ86
_______________________________________________________________________

3057. PERFORMANCE-BASED MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR FUELS: CRITERIA FOR SELF-
QUALIFYING ALTERNATIVE TEST METHODS; DESCRIPTION OF OPTIONAL STATISTICAL
QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7545

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Transportation fuels (like gasoline and diesel fuel) are
regulated by EPA under the Clean Air Act to control the emissions that
result when they are burned in engines, and also to protect engines'
emission control equipment. Fuels regulations require measurement of
various of the fuels' properties, and prescribe ``designated''
analytical methods for that purpose. This regulation is intended to
provide a way for regulated parties to self-qualify alternatives to the
designated measurement methods that may be cheaper, quicker, simpler,
more amenable to automation, or otherwise preferable. The regulation
will also prescribe a minimum level of statistical quality control for
all fuels test methods, designated or alternative. The regulations
should quicken the adoption of new measurement technologies by removing
the need for multiple method-specific rule-makings, but to do so in a
way that will not degrade the performance of the overall measurement
system. Introduction of statistical quality control for all methods
should improve measurement precision and accuracy in actual practice
across all methods.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4633

[[Page 65241]]

Sectors Affected: 324199 All Other Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing; 54199 All Other Professional, Scientific and Technical
Services; 334516 Analytical Laboratory Instrument Manufacturing; 42271
Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals; 48691 Pipeline Transportation of
Refined

Agency Contact: John Holley, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9305
Fax: 202 233-9557
Email: holley.john@epamail.epa.gov

Joe Sopata, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9034
Fax: 202 343-2802
Email: sopata.joe@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK03
_______________________________________________________________________

3058. REGULATION OF FUELS AND FUEL ADDITIVES: MODIFICATIONS TO STANDARDS
AND REQUIREMENTS FOR REFORMULATED AND CONVENTIONAL GASOLINE INCLUDING
BUTANE BLENDERS AND ATTEST ENGAGEMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7454(c); 42 USC 7454(k); 42 USC 7601

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Through the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Congress
mandated that EPA promulgate regulations for reformulated and
conventional gasoline. The purpose of this mandate was to reduce
vehicle emissions of toxic and ozone-forming compounds. EPA published
the regulations on February 16, 1994. On July 11, 1997, EPA published a
proposed rule that included various minor adjustments to the 1994 rule.
The emissions benefits achieved from the reformulated gasoline and
conventional gasoline programs would not be reduced by the proposed
changes. On December 31, 1997, EPA finalized many of the proposed
changes. This rule would finalize certain other of the remaining
changes that were not included in the December 31, 1997 final rule.
These changes make minor adjustments to the structure of the
reformulated gasoline and conventional gasoline programs, correct
technical errors, and codify guidance previously issued by the Agency.
This rule also makes several minor technical corrections to the
reformulated gasoline rule which were not included in the
aforementioned July 11, 1997 proposal, and makes minor technical
corrections to the gasoline sulfur rule.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM Original- 07/11/97 62 FR 37338
Final (Partial)- 12/31/97 62 FR 68196
NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4758

Sectors Affected: 42271 Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals; 32411
Petroleum Refineries

Agency Contact: Marilyn Bennett, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9624
Fax: 202 343-2803
Email: bennett.marilyn@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK77
_______________________________________________________________________

3059. PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (PSD) AND NONATTAINMENT
NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR): ALLOWABLES PLANTWIDE APPLICABILITY LIMIT (PAL),
AGGREGATION, AND DEBOTTLENECKING

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 103 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AL75
_______________________________________________________________________

3060. SECTION 126 RULE: WITHDRAWAL OF FINDINGS FOR SOURCES IN MICHIGAN

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52.34

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA coordinated the Section 126 Rule with another rule known
as the NOx State implementation plan (SIP) Call, because both rules
address ozone transport in the Eastern half of the United States. EPA
established a mechanism in the Section 126 Rule whereby the rule would
be withdrawn for sources in a State if the State submitted, and EPA
approved, a SIP that complied with the NOx SIP Call. This was a
practical way to address the overlap between the two rules and avoid
having sources be subject to two sets of potentially different NOx
transport control requirements. As the result of court actions, the
compliance dates for the Section 126 Rule and the NOx SIP Call have
been delayed and the NOx SIP Call has been divided into two phases.
Therefore, in a separate action, EPA proposed to revise the Section 126
Rule withdrawal provision so that it will continue to operate under
these new circumstances. Under that proposal, where a State submits a
NOx SIP that meets only Phase 1 of the NOx SIP Call, EPA would need to
make a determination that the SIP controls the total group of Section
126 sources to the same stringency as the Section 126 Rule would before
the Section 126 Rule could be withdrawn. In this current action, EPA is
proposing that the Michigan Phase I SIP meets the proposed revised
Section 126 Rule withdrawal criteria, and therefore, if EPA finalizes
the withdrawal criteria as proposed, EPA would withdraw the Section 126
Rule for sources in Michigan.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local

Additional Information: SAN No. 4796;

Agency Contact: Carla Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov

Doug Grano, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3292
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: grano.doug@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AL83

[[Page 65242]]

_______________________________________________________________________

3061. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE; ALLOWANCE SYSTEM FOR
CONTROLLING HCFC PRODUCTION, IMPORT AND EXPORT; CORRECTION

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (Revision)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Although an allowance allocation system for controlling
hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) production, import, and export was
established with publication of the final rule on January 21, 2003 (SAN
4120, RIN 2060-AH67), several issues associated with that system have
arisen that need to be amended for clarity and consistency.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4804

Agency Contact: Cindy Newberg, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9729
Fax: 202 343-2337
Email: newberg.cindy@epamail.epa.gov

Tom Land, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9185
Fax: 202 565-2155
Email: land.tom@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AL90
_______________________________________________________________________

3062. CONTROL OF EMISSIONS OF AIR POLLUTION FROM NEW MOTOR VEHICLES: ON-
BOARD DIAGNOSTIC REQUIREMENTS FOR HEAVY-DUTY ENGINES AND VEHICLES ABOVE
14,000 POUNDS AND IN-USE, NOT-TO-EXCEED EMISSION STANDARD TEST

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA is proposing to establish On-Board Diagnostic (OBD)
requirements for Heavy-Duty On-Highway and Non-Road vehicles and
engines greater than 14,000 pounds gross vehicle weight. This action
will also propose to require manufacturers of these vehicles and
engines to make available emissions-related service information to
after-market service providers. OBD systems are intended to monitor the
performance of emission controls on these vehicles and engines to
ensure proper functionality and compliance with emissions standards.
This notice also proposes a manufacturer run in use testing program for
heavy-duty engines and vehicles to assess compliance with the
applicable not-to-exceed standards beginning in 2007. This portion of
the notice has a court-ordered date for May 2004 and final May 2005 as
a result of a settlement between EPA, ARB, and Engine Manufacturers.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/00/05
Final Action- 03/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4809;

Agency Contact: Todd Sherwood, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4405
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: sherwood.todd@epamail.epa.gov

Holly Pugliese, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, Ann
Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4288
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: pugliese.holly@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AL92
_______________________________________________________________________

3063. 5-YEAR REVIEW OF MACT STANDARDS FOR LARGE MWC

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq.

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60

Legal Deadline: Final, Judicial, April 28, 2006.

Abstract: Under section 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), EPA is required
to adopt and implement maximum achievable control technology (MACT)
standards for both new and existing large municipal waste combustion
units (MWC). Those MACT standards have been adopted and fully
implemented with all retrofits completed. Section 129(a)(5)of the CAA
requires EPA to review and, if necessary, revise those standards every
5 years. This rulemaking addresses those requirements and is the first
5-year review of the MACT standards. Implementation of these MACT
standards has been highly effective and has reduced dioxin/furan
emissions by more than 99 percent since 1990 and mercury emissions by
more than 95 percent since 1990. Similar reductions have occurred for
other CAA section 129 pollutants.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/00/05
Final Action- 05/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4829;

Agency Contact: Walt Stevenson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5264
Fax: 919 541-5264
Email: stevenson.walt@epamail.epa.gov

Brian Shrager, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7689
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: shrager.brian@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AL97
_______________________________________________________________________

3064. ALTERNATIVE WORK PRACTICE FOR LEAK DETECTION AND REPAIR

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 61; 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 65

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule would amend existing regulations controlling

[[Page 65243]]

emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and hazardous air
pollutants (HAP)under the Clean Air Act. These regulations are codified
at 40 CFR Part 60, 61, 63, and 65. These regulations require periodic
leak detection and repair (LDAR) of pumps, valves, and connectors. The
current work practice requires each pump, valve, and connector to be
individually monitored for leaks. Facilities have had LDAR programs in
place for over 20 years and view them as burdensome because they are
labor intensive. Newer image-based monitoring technology is being
developed which will detect leaks at a reduced costs because of the
ability to monitor multiple components at one time. This rule would
amend the existing regulations to enable the plant operators to use the
new technology.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 04/00/06
Final Action- 04/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4830;

Laura McKelvey, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5497
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: mckelvey.laura@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AL98
_______________________________________________________________________

3065. CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM NEW LOCOMOTIVES AND NEW MARINE DIESEL
ENGINES LESS THAN 30 LITERS PER CYLINDER

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 104 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AM06
_______________________________________________________________________

3066. NESHAP: MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS--AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1960; 40 CFR 63.1975; 40 CFR 63.1980

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action will address issues concerning the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills, that was published on January 16, 2003. We will revise the
startup, shutdown, and malfunction provisions promulgated in the rule
in response to requests for more flexibility. We will clarify that the
moisture balance calculations should be calculated on a wet weight
basis as a response to requests about the intent of the promulgated
rule. We will correct errors in the compliance dates for the rule.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/00/05
Final Action- 10/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Local, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4846;

Agency Contact: Martha Smith, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2421
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: smith.martha@epamail.epa.gov

Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM08
_______________________________________________________________________

3067. NESHAP: AREA SOURCE STANDARDS--ETHYLENE OXIDE HOSPITAL
STERILIZATION

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 30, 2000.

Abstract: The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to list source categories
that contribute to the emissions of 30 listed (or area source) HAPs,
and that are, or will be, subject to standards under section 112 of the
Act. Sterilization processes use ethylene oxide which is one of the 30
listed HAPs. Hospital sterilization is a major source of ethylene oxide
relative to other area source categories considered for listing.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/06
Final Action- 01/00/08

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4859

Laura McKelvey, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5497
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: mckelvey.laura@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM14
_______________________________________________________________________

3068. PETITION TO DELIST A HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT FROM SECTION 112 OF
THE CLEAN AIR ACT: METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (MIBK)

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The Ketones Panel of the American Chemistry Council (ACC) has
petitioned the Agency to remove methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK) from the
Clean Air Act (CAA) hazardous air pollutant (HAP) list. The ACC
originally submitted the petition in April of 1997. EPA suspended
review of the petition pending the completion of 2-generation
reproductive effects study. That study is now complete. On

[[Page 65244]]

October 17, 2003, the ACC submitted an addendum to the 1997 petition
which includes: The results of the 2-generation reproductive effects
study, a presentation of the updated EPA IRIS file for MIBK, updated
air dispersion modeling, and an analysis of potential transformation
products. Based on this new submission, the ACC requests that EPA
reopen its review of the MIBK petition. Since the last submittal by the
petitioner, a 2-year MIBK bioassay by the National Toxicology Program
has been completed, but the results report has not been published. The
schedule for the delisting petition is tied to a report on the results
of the bioassay.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Notice- 07/19/04 69 FR 42954
NPRM- 08/00/06
Final Action- 07/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4849

Agency Contact: Mark Morris, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5416
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: morris.mark@epamail.epa.gov

Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM20
_______________________________________________________________________

3069. NESHAP: TOTAL FACILITY LOW RISK DETERMINATION (TFLRD) FOR RESIDUAL
RISK

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Section 112(f) of the Clean Air Act requires that we assess
residual risk remaining after MACT and develop additional emission
standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety. Many
facilities have numerous MACT standards that they are subject to. This
action will provide a procedure for facilities to assess risk, and if a
facility-wide low risk determination can be shown, to avoid applicable
residual risk standards. The evaluation will be made on a facility-wide
HAP emissions basis.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 06/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4848

Agency Contact: Scott Jenkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1167
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: jenkins.scott@epamail.epa.gov

David Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C404-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5368
Email: guinnup.david@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM22
_______________________________________________________________________

3070. NESHAP: HYDROCHLORIC ACID PRODUCTION AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (revision)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: On April 17, 2003, EPA promulgated national emission
standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for the Hydrochloric
Acid Production industry. Subsequent to promulgation, EPA received a
number of concerns and issues from the industry related to technical
corrections, definitions, and applicability matters. The EPA is
amenable to making many of the suggested corrections but believes that
proposal of the changes is necessary. In addition, the OSWER would like
to include the storage and transfer operations at sources subject to
their HCl production rule to the subpart NNNNN rule which would also
require proposal. The amendments are expected to have little or no
impact on the plants now covered by the HCl production rule. No adverse
economic impacts are expected. The total nationwide capital and annual
costs associated with the amendments are negligible. No price impacts
are projected. No significant impacts on a substantial number of small
entities are expected.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 08/24/05 70 FR 49530
NPRM Comment Period End- 10/24/05
Final Action- 05/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4867, EDocket No. OAR-2002-0057

Agency Contact: Bill Maxwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5430
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: maxwell.bill@epamail.epa.gov

Robert J. Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM25
_______________________________________________________________________

3071. REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSMIX PROCESSING AND BLENDING UNDER THE
REFORMULATED GASOLINE AND GASOLINE SULFUR RULES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7545 (c) and (k)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule codifies existing guidance for transmix processors
and blenders in the reformulated gasoline regulations. Transmix is a
mixture of gasoline and distillate produced by pipelines - transmix
processors distill the transmix into separate gasoline and distillate
products, and transmix blenders blend small amounts of transmix into
gasoline. The rule also establishes gasoline sulfur standards for
transmix processors and blenders that are consistent with the sulfur
standards

[[Page 65245]]

for other entities downstream of refineries, such as pipelines and
terminals, in the gasoline distribution system. The rule will provide
operational flexibility for transmix processors and blenders without
causing any adverse environmental impacts.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4853;

Agency Contact: Chris McKenna, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9037
Fax: 240 363-8260
Email: mckenna.chris@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM27
_______________________________________________________________________

3072. NESHAP: SURFACE COATING OF METAL CANS--TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAP) for metal can surface coating operations located at major
sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) were promulgated on 11/13/
2003 (68 FR 64432). The final standards implement section 112(d) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) by requiring these operations to meet HAP emission
standards reflecting the application of the maximum achievable control
technology (MACT). The final rule will protect air quality and promote
public health by reducing emissions of HAP from facilities in the metal
can surface coating source category. This action would provide
technical amendments and clarify monitoring provisions in the surface
coating of metal cans final rule.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4864

Agency Contact: Paul Almodovar, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0283
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: almodovar.paul@epamail.epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM28
_______________________________________________________________________

3073. NESHAP: SITE REMEDIATION; AMENDMENTS

Priority: Routine and Frequent

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The Site Remediation regulation was promulgated on October 8,
2003. This action will revise language in the final rule to correct
errors or language that doesn't reflect our intent. Specifically, we
will revise language specifying where the concentration for remediation
material management units (RMMU) is measured from point of extraction
to point of treatment as proposed in the original rule. We will also
clarify that facilities with current site remediations can use the 1 Mg
HAP exemption if they currently meet that level. We will also clarify
that facilities meeting equipment leak standards for part 61 or other
part 63 standards are exempt from those provisions in 63 subpart GGGGG.
Some grammatical things and incorrect section references will be fixed
too.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 02/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4866;

Agency Contact: Greg Nizich, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3078
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: nizich.greg@epa.gov

Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM30
_______________________________________________________________________

3074. CONTROL OF AIR POLLUTION FROM NEW MOTOR VEHICLES AND NEW MOTOR
VEHICLE ENGINES: AMENDMENTS TO EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS REGULATIONS AND
TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 9; 40 CFR 86

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action includes technical amendments to several portions
of certification requirements and test procedures applicable to light-
duty vehicles, light duty trucks, and heavy-duty vehicles. These
amendments include minor revisions to clarify regulations. These
amendments also include revisions to the evaporative compliance
procedures, which are intended to reduce the certification burden
associated with conducting 2-day, 3-day, and ORVR procedures without
affecting the level of stringency, ref. EPA guidance letter CCD-02-20,
December 31, 2002; (Subject: Request for Comments on Potential
Evaporative Regulation Changes; Evaporative Guidance for Certification
and In-use Testing).

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Final Action- 06/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4880

Agency Contact: Julia Rege, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4614
Fax: 734 214-4053

[[Page 65246]]

Email: rege.julia@epamail.epa.gov

Lynn Sohacki, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, Ann
Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4851
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: sohacki.lynn@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM32
_______________________________________________________________________

3075. CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES AND FUEL SYSTEMS
FROM MARINE VESSELS AND SMALL EQUIPMENT

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 105 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AM34
_______________________________________________________________________

3076. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS:
MISCELLANEOUS ORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING; AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: A final rule for this source category was published on
November 10, 2003. Several parties petitioned the rule and this action
will address issues raised by the petitioners.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 03/00/06
Final Action- 10/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4891

Agency Contact: Randy McDonald, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5402
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov

Robin Dunkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-04, Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM43
_______________________________________________________________________

3077. FLEXIBLE AIR PERMIT RULE

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Title V

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA is conducting a flexible permits rulemaking based on what
it has learned from its field experiences. The term ``flexible permit''
is used to describe air permits with conditions designed to reduce the
administrative ``friction'' -- costs, time, delay, uncertainty, and
risk -- experienced by sources and permitting authorities when
implementing a permit or making changes under the permit. This is
typically accomplished by authorizing a source to make certain types of
changes (e.g., additional equipment and/or modifications to a source's
method of operation, equipment, raw materials, emission factors, or
monitoring parameters) without requiring further review and/or approval
provided the source meets specific criteria outlined in its permit.
While the chosen solution will depend on individual State permitting
rules and requirements, such techniques typically include descriptions
of changes or categories of changes authorized to occur under the
approved permit terms, one or more emissions caps to safeguard NAAQS
and/or to assure certain requirements are not applicable, procedures
for testing pollution control device performance and updating emissions
factors or parameter values without requiring the permit to be amended
or re-opened, streamlining of redundant requirements by applying the
most stringent applicable requirement, and provisions to encourage
pollution prevention. Flexible permitting has the potential to benefit
a wide variety of types of facilities that are regulated under the
CAA's Title V operating permits program. Among the benefits flexible
permits are anticipated to provide are: improved knowledge of a
facility's emissions for the entire site; improved public understanding
of a facility's activities over an extended period of time; increased
certainty and flexibility to make changes in response to the market;
and no less environmental protection (i.e., often more occurs from the
use of emissions caps and the increased use of pollution prevention
practices).

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 03/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4885;

Agency Contact: Dave Dellarco, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, OEA-095, Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206 553-4978
Fax: 206 553-0119
Email: dellarco.dave@epa.gov

Stacey Coburn, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6103A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2569
Fax: 202 564-1554
Email: coburn.stacey@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM45
_______________________________________________________________________

3078. NATIONAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSION STANDARDS FOR
ARCHITECTURAL COATINGS--AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 59 subpart D

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action would amend the national volatile organic
compound emission standards for architectural coatings by adding new
coating categories for certain coating chemistries which did not exist
when the original rule was promulgated. We are reviewing new data from
one architectural coating manufacturer and after this review, we will
determine if these amendments are necessary.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 04/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4905

Agency Contact: David Salman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

[[Page 65247]]

Phone: 919 541-0859
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: salman.dave@epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM47
_______________________________________________________________________

3079. CONTROL OF ULTRA LOW SULFUR DIESEL FUEL LUBRICITY: NOTICE OF
PROPOSED RULEMAKING

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action proposes to establish a new lubricity quality
requirement for ultra low sulfur diesel fuel used in diesel engines.
This requirement will seek to eliminate the incidence of emissions non-
compliance due to premature wear of fuel injection equipment caused by
inadequate fuel lubricity levels.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 04/00/06
Final Action- 04/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4899;

Agency Contact: Chris Laroo, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4937
Fax: 734 214-4055
Email: laroo.chris@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM48
_______________________________________________________________________

3080. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE; REFRIGERANT RECYCLING;
CERTIFICATION OF RECOVERY AND RECOVERY/RECYCLING EQUIPMENT INTENDED FOR
USE WITH SUBSTITUTE REFRIGERANTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule would amend the rule on refrigerant recycling
equipment intended for use with Substitute Refrigerants. This amendment
would clarify how the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 608 extend
to refrigerant recovery and/or recycling equipment intended for use
with substitutes for CFC and HCFC refrigerants.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 02/00/06
Final Action- 07/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4916;

Agency Contact: Julius Banks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9870
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov

Nancy Smagin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205-
J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9126
Fax: 202 343-2337
Email: smagin.nancy@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM49
_______________________________________________________________________

3081. PROTECTION OF THE STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: ALTERNATIVES FOR THE MOTOR
VEHICLE AIR CONDITIONING SECTOR UNDER THE SIGNIFICANT NEW ALTERNATIVES
POLICY (SNAP) PROGRAM

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671k

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.180

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rulemaking will list two new alternatives to ozone
depleting substances in the motor vehicle air conditioning sector and
outline the conditions necessary for their safe use. These new
alternatives have better energy efficiency and lower impacts on the
environment than currently available systems. By approving these
systems under SNAP, EPA will provide additional choices to the
automotive industry which, if adopted would reduce the impact of motor
vehicle air conditioners on the global environment. The automotive
industry, if they chose to adopt these technologies, would be required
to comply with the conditions necessary to deploy these systems in a
safe manner.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4918

Agency Contact: Karen Thundiyil, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9464
Fax: 202 343-2342
Email: thundiyil.karen@epamail.epa.gov

Dave Godwin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9324
Fax: 202 343-2363
Email: godwin.dave@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM54
_______________________________________________________________________

3082. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: MODIFICATIONS TO THE TECHNICIAN
CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECTION 608 OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA is amending appendix D to subpart F of 40 CFR Part 82--
Standards for Becoming a Certifying Program for Technicians. The
Refrigerant Recycling Regulations governing standards for certifying
programs for technicians were promulgated under section 608 of the
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (May 1994; 59 FR 28660). These
regulations were amended in November 9, 1994 (59 FR 559120), to clarify
the scope of the technician certification requirements and to provide a
limited exemption from certification requirements for apprentices.
Today's

[[Page 65248]]

amendment to the regulation will provide specific requirements for
programs applying to become certifying organizations, will specify
reporting and recordkeeping requirements in order to enhance
implementation of the program, and will define other administrative
components of the program to improve accountability.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 05/00/06
Final Action- 03/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4901;

Agency Contact: Nancy Smagin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205-J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9126
Fax: 202 343-2337
Email: smagin.nancy@epamail.epa.gov

Julius Banks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9870
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM55
_______________________________________________________________________

3083. PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (PSD) AND NONATTAINMENT
NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR): ROUTINE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND REPLACEMENT
(RMRR); MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR AMENDMENTS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.165; 40 CFR 51.166.; 40 CFR 52.21

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rulemaking is a follow up to SAN 4676, which is a final
rule that specifies categories of equipment replacement activities that
would qualify as ``routine maintenance, repair, and replacement''
(RMRR) under the Clean Air Act's New Source Review (NSR) Program (40
CFR parts 51 and 52). SAN 4676's final action -- referred to as the
``equipment replacement provision'' (ERP) -- was promulgated in the
Federal Register on 10/27/03 (68 FR 61248). The action summarized here,
SAN 4676.3, when finalized, will establish a regulatory definition for
maintenance and repair activities (that are not equipment replacements)
that qualify for the RMRR Exclusion from Major NSR. We previously
proposed options for this SAN in our RMRR proposal on 12/31/02 (67 FR
80920). However, this action will propose and take comments on an
additional approach.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM 09/00/06
Final Action 09/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Federalism: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4676.3; Split from RIN A2060. Split
from RIN A2060. Split from RIN 2060-AK28

Agency Contact: Jabeen Akhtar, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9313
Fax: 202 564-2155
Email: akhtar.jabeen@epamail.epa.gov

Lynn Hutchinson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C339-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5795
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: hutchinson.lynn@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM62
_______________________________________________________________________

3084. NESHAP: GENERAL PROVISIONS--AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The proposed amendments would revise and codify EPA's policy
on when a major source can become an area source, and thus become not
subject to national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAP) for major sources. EPA is reconsidering the policy,
established in May 16, 1995, memorandum, which allows sources to attain
area source status prior to the source's first substantive compliance
date of an applicable NESHAP for major sources. No source would be
subject to the requirements unless they voluntarily decided to
implement them.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 02/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4908

Agency Contact: Rick Colyer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5262
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: colyer.rick@epamail.epa.gov

David Cozzie, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5356
Email: cozzie.david@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM75
_______________________________________________________________________

3085. NESHAP: INTEGRATED IRON AND STEEL; AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Other, Judicial, September 23, 2005, 113(g) notice
established proposal deadline.

Abstract: The EPA promulgated National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for integrated iron and steel facilities on May
20, 2003. The EPA was subsequently petitioned by industry and
EarthJustice concerning several issues. The EPA has engaged in
negotiations with both industry and EarthJustice concerning the issues
and is issuing these amendments to address the concerns. The amendments
clarify several sections of the rule and provide clearer and consistent
directions on complying with the standards.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 08/30/05 70 FR 51306

[[Page 65249]]

NPRM Comment Period End- 10/31/05
Final Action- 09/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4909;

Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5289
Email: mulrine.phil@epamail.epa.gov

Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM76
_______________________________________________________________________

3086. NESHAP: ORGANIC LIQUID DISTRIBUTION--AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Two amendments will be written in which requests for
reconsideration will be addressed. End users have always been covered
by the rule. It has always been our intention to cover distribution of
organic liquids wherever it might take place. This will be clarified in
the first amendment. Recordkeeping requirements will also be reduced.
Typographical and cross-referencing errors will be corrected and
control requirement oversights will be corrected.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4910;

Agency Contact: Martha Smith, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2421
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: smith.martha@epamail.epa.gov

Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM77
_______________________________________________________________________

3087. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR STATIONARY SPARK IGNITED INTERNAL
COMBUSTION ENGINES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant. Major status under 5 USC 801 is
undetermined.

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 111

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This project is to develop New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) for stationary reciprocating internal combustion spark ignited
engines. This includes two stroke lean burn (2SLB) engines, four stroke
lean burn (4SLB) engines, and four stroke rich burn (4SRB) engines.
These standards are being developed under section 111 of the CAA to
require the application of the best system of emission reduction taking
into account the cost of achieving emission reductions and
environmental and energy impacts. The pollutants that will be addressed
in this rulemaking are PM, NOx, SO2, and CO. The project is on a
litigated schedule to propose by May 06 and to promulgate by December
07. Information gathering began in early April 04 and will result in
the development of regulatory packages to propose and promulgate an
NSPS standard.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 06/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions

Government Levels Affected: Local, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4915

Agency Contact: Sims Roy, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5263
Email: roy.sims@epamail.epa.gov

Jaime Pagan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5340
Email: pagan.jaime@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM81
_______________________________________________________________________

3088. NESHAP: DEFENSE LAND SYSTEMS AND MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This regulation will control emissions of hazardous air
pollutants (HAP) from surface coating operations performed on-site at
installations owned or operated by the Armed Forces of the United
States (including the Coast Guard and the National Guard of any such
state) or the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the
surface coating of military munitions manufactured by or for the Armed
Forces of the United States (including the Coast Guard and the National
Guard of any such state). Aerospace and shipbuilding surface coating
operations at these installations were originally covered by the
already-promulgated MACT standards for aerospace manufacturing and
rework and shipbuilding and ship repair. However, other recently-
promulgated surface coating MACT standards were also expected to
address other surface coating operations at these installations (e.g.,
miscellaneous metal parts and products, plastic parts and products,
etc.). Following proposal of these standards EPA received comments
indicating that a separate standard for defense operations is a better
approach. Accordingly, this rulemaking will address all surface coating
activities at these installations which do not meet the applicability
criteria of either the Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework or
Shipbuilding and Ship Repair MACT standards.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 05/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4926;

[[Page 65250]]

Agency Contact: Kim Teal, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5580
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: teal.kim@epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM84
_______________________________________________________________________

3089. NESHAP: IRON AND STEEL FOUNDRIES; AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The EPA promulgated National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for iron and steel foundries on April 22, 2004.
EPA was subsequently petitioned by industry concerning several issues.
EPA has engaged in negotiations with industry concerning these issues
and is issuing these amendments to address the concerns. The amendments
clarify several sections of the rule and provide clearer and more
consistent directions on complying with the standards. The amendments
are being promulgated in two groups, denoted by ``1'' and ``2'' in the
schedule below.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Final Action 1- 05/20/05 70 FR 29400
NPRM 2- 02/00/06
Final Action 2- 12/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Federalism: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4927

Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5289
Email: mulrine.phil@epamail.epa.gov

Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM85
_______________________________________________________________________

3090. PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION (PSD) AND NONATTAINMENT
NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR): RECONSIDERATION OF INCLUSION OF FUGITIVE
EMISSIONS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Title I

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 and 52

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: On July 11, 2003, EPA received a petition for reconsideration
on behalf of Newmont USA Limited, dba Newmont Mining Corporation
(``Newmont'') that stated that the December 31, 2002 (67 FR 80185)
final rule included fugitive emissions for the purposes of determining
whether a facility had undergone a major modification for the first
time. The EPA is announcing their reconsideration of this issue arising
from our final rules of December 31, 2002.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 02/00/06
Final Action- 12/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4940;

Agency Contact: Pam Long, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C339-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0641
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: long.pam@epamail.epa.gov

Lynn Hutchinson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C339-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5795
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: hutchinson.lynn@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM91
_______________________________________________________________________

3091. AMENDMENTS TO COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE AND
FEDERAL OPERATING PERMITS PROGRAMS; CORRECTION

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414a; 42 USC 7661 to 7661f

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70.6 (correction); 40 CFR 71.6 (correction)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Amendments to the compliance certification requirements for
State and Federal operating permits were published in the Federal
Register on June 27, 2003 (SAN 4671). The amendatory language of the
final rules contained an editing error; a sentence was removed from the
rules. This error could be misleading and needs to be clarified.
Today's action corrects this error by inserting the missing sentence
back into the rules.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Direct Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4941, EDocket No. OAR-2002-0062

Agency Contact: Grecia Castro, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD 304-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1351
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: castro.grecia@epamail.epa.gov

Juan Santiago, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD
C304-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1084
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: santiago.juan@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM92
_______________________________________________________________________

3092. IMPLEMENTING PERIODIC MONITORING IN FEDERAL AND STATE OPERATING
PERMIT PROGRAMS

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 106 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AN00

[[Page 65251]]

_______________________________________________________________________

3093. COMPONENT DURABILITY PROCEDURES FOR NEW LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES, LIGHT
DUTY TRUCKS AND HEAVY DUTY VEHICLES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7521

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: On October 22, 2002 the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit vacated durability provisions that
automotive manufacturers used to demonstrate that the emissions of
their vehicles would comply with emission standards for the useful
lives of those vehicles. The Court also required EPA to issue new
regulations. This action fulfills the mandate. The new durability
regulations will include options that a manufacturer may choose from to
age pre-production vehicles to determine the rate of emission
deterioration over the vehicle's useful life. The options will include
a prescribed fixed driving cycle and a prescribed bench aging cycle
that are used to age prototype vehicles or emission control components
to the equivalent of the useful life period of the vehicle in a manner
that replicates the aging that the vehicle or components would see in
actual use. This rule does not change the Federal emission standards or
the test procedures used to quantify emissions. Although there is no
court-ordered deadline, this is a court-ordered action. During the
comment period of the NPRM the Agency received a comment from the Afton
Chemical Corporation (formally known as Ethyl Corporation) suggesting
that EPA did not address the component durability portion of the new
vehicle emission certification process and should establish a procedure
for rulemaking requesting comment on whether our current component
durability process is appropriate or if we should revise the process to
include a limited amount of testing.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Supplemental NPRM- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4757.1; Split from RIN 2060-AK76.

Agency Contact: Linda Hormes, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4502
Fax: 734 214-4053
Email: hormes.linda@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN01
_______________________________________________________________________

3094. NESHAP: PLASTIC PARTS AND PRODUCTS (SURFACE COATING)--AREA SOURCE
RULE

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: These standards are being developed under the Clean Air Act,
Section 112(k). Under section 112(k), EPA developed a national strategy
to address air-toxic pollution from ``area'' sources, which are sources
that emit hazardous air pollutants (HAP) below the major source level
of 10 tons/year of a single HAP or 25 tons/year of all HAP. As part of
that strategy, several area-source categories were listed for
regulation. Plastic parts and products was listed as one of those
categories, and these standards will establish requirements to control
pollution from facilities engaged in the surface coating of plastic
parts and products. Plastic parts and products surface coating
facilities are known to emit cadmium compounds, chromium compounds,
lead compounds, manganese compounds, and nickel compounds. In 2004, EPA
promulgated national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAP) for major sources engaged in the surface coating of plastic
parts and products NESHAP.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 06/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4955;

Agency Contact: Kim Teal, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5580
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: teal.kim@epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN08
_______________________________________________________________________

3095. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS: SURFACE
COATING OF AUTOMOBILES AND LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS; AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 subpart IIII

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action will amend the final National Emission Standard
for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the surface coating of automobiles and
light-duty trucks. These amendments will clarify the interaction
between this rule and the NESHAP for surface coating of plastic parts
and products. These amendments also will improve the rule by clarifying
specific provisions and correcting errors in the original printing of
the final rule and announce the availability of a revised version of
the Protocol for Determining the Daily Volatile Organic Compound
Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations.
The original final rule was published in the Federal Register on April
26, 2004. (69 FR 22602). The rule affects the surface coating of
automobile and light-duty truck bodies and body parts for use in new
vehicles at facilities that are major sources of hazardous air
pollutants.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 02/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4958

Agency Contact: David Salman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0859
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: salman.dave@epa.gov

[[Page 65252]]

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN10
_______________________________________________________________________

3096. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: LISTING OF SUBSTITUTES FOR
OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCES IN FOAM BLOWING

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 612

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA is initiating this rulemaking in response to a DC Circuit
action. In July 2004, the DC Circuit Court vacated a portion of an SNAP
Final Rule published on July 22, 2002 (67 FR 47703). This rule responds
to that vacature and would rule on the use of HCFC-22 and -142b as
substitutes for HCFC-141b in foam blowing. This rule will address
effects of stratospheric ozone depletion and health and environmental
impacts of substitutes for ozone-depleting substances. The ultimate
impact will be to reduce skin cancer, cataracts, and other adverse
impacts of ozone depletion.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/00/05
Final Action- 04/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4959

Agency Contact: Suzanne Kocchi, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9387
Email: kocchi.suzanne@epamail.epa.gov

Jeff Cohen, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9005
Fax: 202 343-2363
Email: cohen.jeff@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN11
_______________________________________________________________________

3097. RESPONSE TO PETITION OF RECONSIDERATION FOR FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION AND RULEMAKING FOR GEORGIA FOR PURPOSES OF
REDUCING OZONE INTERSTATE TRANSPORT

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Title I

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 78; 40 CFR 97

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: In this action, EPA is responding to a petition for
reconsideration of a final rule we issued under Section 110 of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) related to the interstate transport of nitrogen
oxides (NOx). On April 21, 2004, EPA issued a final rule that required
the State of Georgia to submit SIP revisions that prohibit specified
amounts of NOx emissions-one of the precursors to ozone (smog)
pollution-for the purposes of reducing NOx and ozone transport across
state boundaries in the eastern half of the United States.
Subsequently, the Georgia Coalition for Sound Environmental Policy
(GCSEP) filed a petition for reconsideration requesting that EPA
reconsider the inclusion of the state of Georgia in the rule and also
requested a stay of the applicability of the requirements as to the
state of Georgia. In response to that petition, EPA proposed to stay
the effectiveness of the 2004 rule on 3/1/05 (70 FR 9897), and is
undertaking the rulemaking described here to address the issues raised
by the petitioners.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Final Action- 01/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: This action may have federalism implications as defined in
EO 13132.

Additional Information: SAN No. 4960

Agency Contact: Jan King, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5665
Email: king.jan@epa.gov

Winifred Okoye, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
2344A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5446
Email: okoye.winifred@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN12
_______________________________________________________________________

3098. FUEL ECONOMY LABELING OF MOTOR VEHICLES: REVISIONS TO IMPROVE
CALCULATION OF FUEL ECONOMY ESTIMATES

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 107 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AN14
_______________________________________________________________________

3099. REVISIONS TO THE CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS MONITORING RULE FOR THE ACID
RAIN PROGRAM AND THE NOX BUDGET TRADING PROGRAM

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 75 (Revision)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule would modify the existing requirements for sources
affected by the Acid Rain Program, and the NOx Budget Trading Program.
The Acid Rain Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) rule would be
revised to improve implementation by making improvements to the
monitoring and reporting process that will benefit both EPA and the
facilities affected by the rule. These amendments will have no
environmental impacts, and are expected to reduce the ongoing costs and
burden associated with reporting emissions under the current rule by
instituting a revised reporting procedure that will reduce the
redundancy that currently exists with the existing procedures.
Specifically, as part of its reengineering efforts, EPA is replacing
the existing record type dependant reporting format to an XML data
reporting format that takes advantage of technological advances in data
management. This fundamental change is expected to reduce the costs of
programming data collection systems at the affected facilities and
should provide EPA with the flexibility to better adapt its systems to
unique data configurations, which are not currently easily (or
properly) adaptable by the current reporting structure. EPA expects to
reduce the cost and burden associated with resubmittals of data

[[Page 65253]]

reports due to errors identified after the submittals are made. This
action also attempts to clarify, simplify, and enhance certain sections
in the CEM rule to make it easier for sources to understand and comply
with the regulation. Examples include: providing a mechanism for a
source to utilize the concept of long-term cold storage; clarifying
that only one monitoring methodology should be specified at any time;
and modifying the quality assurance timing requirements for ozone
season only reporters. These amendments need to be finalized prior to
the planned implementation date of January 1, 2007.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/00/05
Final Action- 10/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4969

Agency Contact: Matthew Boze, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6204J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9211
Fax: 202 343-9211
Email: boze.matthew@epamail.epa.gov

Beth Murray, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6204J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9211
Fax: 202 343-9211
Email: murray.beth@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN16
_______________________________________________________________________

3100. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: THE 2006 CRITICAL USE EXEMPTION
RULE FROM THE PHASEOUT OF METHYL BROMIDE

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Title VI

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: With this action, EPA would amend section 82.8 of 40 CFR Part
82, Subpart A, entitled ``Grant of essential use allowances and
critical use allowances'' for the chemical methyl bromide. Methyl
bromide is an ozone-depleting substance. Specifically, the rule lists
uses that qualify for the critical use exemption in 2006, and the
amount of additional methyl bromide that may be produced or imported
for those uses in 2006.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4972

Agency Contact: Marta Montoro, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205 J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9321
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: montoro.marta@epamail.epa.gov

Hodayah Finman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6205 J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9246
Fax: 202 565-2079
Email: finman.hodayah@epamail.epa.gov; hodayah finman/dc/usepa/
us@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN18
_______________________________________________________________________

3101. REVISIONS TO AIR EMISSIONS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51, subpart A

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action seeks to combine and consolidate air emission
reporting requirements from three regulations. The three regulations
are the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), the Consolidated Emissions
Reporting Rule (CERR) and the NOX SIP Call. Each of these regulations
has associated emissions reporting requirements. The purpose of this
action is to resolve differences in the reporting requirements in the
three regulations so that the regulated community will have a single
location in the Code of Federal Regulations that details air emission
reporting requirements. For example, the CERR and the NOX SIP Call use
similar but not identical terminology to describe what data must be
reported to EPA. The proposed rule would resolve these differences.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Local, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4951

Agency Contact: Bill Kuykendal, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, D205-01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5372
Fax: 919 541-0684
Email: kuykendal.bill@epa.gov

Phil Lorang, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, D205-
01, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5463
Fax: 919 541-0684
Email: lorang.phil@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN20
_______________________________________________________________________

3102. NESHAP: AUTOBODY REFINISHING--AREA SOURCE RULE

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: These standards are being developed under the Clean Air Act,
Section 112(k). Under section 112(k), EPA developed a national strategy
to address air-toxic pollution from ``area'' sources, which are sources
that emit hazardous air pollutants (HAP) below the major source level
of 10 tons/year of a single HAP or 25 tons/year of all HAP. As part of
that strategy, several area-source categories were listed for
regulation. Autobody Refinishing was listed as one of those categories,
and these standards will establish requirements to control pollution
from facilities engaged in autobody refinishing. Autobody refinishing
facilities are known to emit benzene, cadmium compounds, chromium
compounds, lead compounds, manganese compounds, and nickel compounds.
In 2004, EPA promulgated national emission standards for hazardous air
pollutants (NESHAP) for major sources engaged in the surface coating of
assembled on-road vehicles as a subcategory of the plastic parts and
products NESHAP.

[[Page 65254]]

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 07/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4978

Agency Contact: Kim Teal, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5580
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: teal.kim@epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN21
_______________________________________________________________________

3103. REVIEW OF THE NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR OZONE

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 109 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AN24
_______________________________________________________________________

3104. IMPLEMENTATION RULE FOR 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS:
RECONSIDERATION; OVERWHELMING TRANSPORT CLASSIFICATION

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7501 to 7511f; 42 USC
7601(a)(1)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 50; 40 CFR 81

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule was issued as a result of EPA's Reconsideration of
the Phase 1 Rule to Implement the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS as requested by
EarthJustice. Specifically, this rule will address the Overwhelming
Transport Classification. The Phase 1 Rule provided specific
requirements for State and local air pollution control agencies and
Tribes to prepare State implementation plans (SIPs) and Tribal
Implementation Plans (TIPs) under the 8-hour national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS) for ozone, published by EPA on July 18, 1997.
The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to set ambient air quality
standards and requires States to submit SIPs to implement those
standards. The 1997 standards were challenged in court, but in February
2001, the Supreme Court determined that EPA has authority to implement
a revised ozone standard, but ruled that EPA must reconsider its
implementation plan for moving from the 1-hour standard to the revised
standard. The Supreme Court identified conflicts between different
parts of the CAA related to implementation of a revised NAAQS, provided
some direction to EPA for resolving the conflicts, and left it to EPA
to develop a reasonable approach for implementation. Thus, the Phase 1
Rule addressed the requirements of the CAA and the Supreme Court's
ruling. .

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4625.4; Split from RIN 2060-AJ99.

Agency Contact: John Silvasi, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5666
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: silvasi.john@epa.gov

Denise Gerth, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5550
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: gerth.denise@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN26
_______________________________________________________________________

3105. PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION AND NONATTAINMENT
NEW SOURCE REVIEW: ALTERNATIVE APPLICABILITY TEST FOR ELECTRIC
GENERATING UNITS

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 110 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AN28
_______________________________________________________________________

3106. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: ALLOCATION OF ESSENTIAL
USE ALLOWANCES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2006

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82.8(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule will allocate essential use allowances for import
and production of class I controlled substances for calendar year 2005.
Essential use allowances enable a company to obtain ozone depleting
substances as an exemption to the regulatory ban on production and
import of these chemicals, which took effect on January 1, 1996. EPA
allocates essential use allowances for exempted production and import
of a specific quantity of chlorofluorocarbons solely for use in
medically essential asthma inhalers.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Final Action- 01/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4986

Agency Contact: Scott Monroe, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9712
Fax: 202 343-2363
Email: monroe.scott@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN29

[[Page 65255]]

_______________________________________________________________________

3107. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: REVISION TO LISTING OF
CARBON DIOXIDE TOTAL FLOODING FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS RESTRICTING USE
TO ONLY UNOCCUPIED AREAS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Section 612 of the Clean Air Act requires EPA to identify
alternatives to Class I and II ozone-depleting substances and to
publish lists of acceptable and unacceptable substitutes. Producers of
substitutes must notify EPA at least 90 days before alternatives are
introduced into interstate commerce. Substitutes which are deemed by
EPA to be unacceptable or acceptable subject to use restrictions must
go through notice and comment rulemaking. Substitute lists are updated
intermittently depending on the volume of notifications. Independent of
any petitions or notifications received, EPA may also initiate updates
to the substitute lists based on new data on either additional
substitutes or on characteristics of substitutes previously reviewed.
Based on new information on the continued and growing use of carbon
dioxide total flooding fire extinguishing systems, EPA is revising its
listing of carbon dioxide as an acceptable total flooding substitute
for ozone-depleting halons to acceptable subject to narrowed use
limits. Use would be limited to unoccupied areas where personnel could
not be exposed to lethal concentration of the agent. Recent changes to
national fire protection industry standards reflect need to improve
personnel safety requirements for carbon dioxide systems by limiting
its applications. Carbon dioxide total flooding fire extinguishing
systems are used in some industrial applications such as automobile
paint rooms and in marine applications such as machinery spaces.
Restricted use limits on carbon dioxide total flooding systems supports
the use of substitutes that are not potentially lethal to personnel
that could be exposed.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/06
Final Action- 09/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4991

Agency Contact: Bella Maranion, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9749
Fax: 202 343-2363
Email: maranion.bella@epa.gov

Jeff Cohen, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6205J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9005
Fax: 202 343-2363
Email: cohen.jeff@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN30
_______________________________________________________________________

3108. INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL BOILER AND
PROCESS HEATER NESHAP, AMENDMENT

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.7480

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: On September 13, 2004, national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for industrial, commercial and
institutional boilers, and process heaters were promulgated. Following
promulgation, EPA received a petition for reconsideration filed by the
General Electric Company. The petitioner claim that the proposal did
not provide sufficient information on the emission averaging provision
added in the final rule upon which to provide meaningful comment. The
petitioner requests reconsideration or clarification that the rule
allows for consolidated testing of commonly vented boilers. This
rulemaking will address that petition.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4987

Agency Contact: Jim Eddinger, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5426
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: eddinger.jim@epa.gov

Robert Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN32
_______________________________________________________________________

3109. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS:
POLYVINYL CHLORIDE AND COPOLYMERS PRODUCTION, AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 4701 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.210 - 17

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action re-proposes the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Polyvinyl Chloride and
Copolymers. These standards were proposed on December 8, 2000 (65 FR
76958) and originally promulgated on July 10, 2002 (67 FR 45886) but
are expected to be vacated. As of the date of the tiering application,
the actual vacatur has not yet occurred. This action assures continuity
of the parts of the standard that were upheld by the court in the event
of expected vacatur, and precludes implications of CAA section 112(j)
which is triggered when the EPA does not have a standard for a source
category subject to 112(d) promulgated. This action also recognizes
that one component of these standards, regarding the use of vinyl
chloride as a surrogate for all other HAP, was not upheld by the court
and warrants further study. This action also recognizes that these MACT
standards are effective in the absence of this one component for the
purposes of 112(j), and this component will be addressed in a separate
subsequent rulemaking.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Final Action- 02/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

[[Page 65256]]

Government Levels Affected: Federal, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4988, EDocket No. OAR-2002-0037

Agency Contact: Warren Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5124
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: johnson.warren@epa.gov

Robin Dunkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-04, Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN33
_______________________________________________________________________

3110. AIR QUALITY: REVISION TO DEFINITION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS--EXCLUSION OF HFE-7300

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Title I

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.100(s)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This is a deregulatory action to exclude HFE-7300 from the
list of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on the basis that, as a
precursor, this compound makes a negligible contribution to the
formation of tropospheric ozone. This compound has potential for use as
a refrigerant because it also is not a stratospheric ozone depleter.
This action will remove the necessity to control HFE-7300 as a VOC in
State Implementation Plans for attaining the ozone standard.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 5010

Agency Contact: Dave Sanders, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3356
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: sanders.dave@epa.gov

William L. Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5245
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: johnson.williaml@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN34
_______________________________________________________________________

3111. NESHAP: ORGANIC LIQUID DISTRIBUTION (NON-GASOLINE); AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Amendment in response to Petition for Reconsideration of the
final rule. It will address control of air emissions from wastewater at
OLD facilities. The petitioner who requested that wastewater be
controlled was the Prince William Sound Regional Citizens' Advisory
Council (PWSRCAC). The facility of concern for PWSRCAC is the Valdez
Marine terminal operated by the Alyeska trans Alaska pipeline company.
Their specific concern is the ballast water treatment facility. Both
Alyeska and PWSRCAC have been testing at the Marine terminal to
determine the functionality of the existing system. This amendment will
also deal with wastewater emissions from tank draw downs and
maintenance which occur at Valdez and other OLD facilities.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 05/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4910.1; Split from RIN 2060-AM77.

Agency Contact: Martha Smith, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2421
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: smith.martha@epamail.epa.gov

Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN37
_______________________________________________________________________

3112. NESHAP: SECONDARY ALUMINUM PRODUCTION - AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.1500

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This technical amendment will correct a punctuation error in
the existing Secondary Aluminum NESHAP (40 CFR 63.1500).

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/05
Direct Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4989;

Agency Contact: Rick Colyer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5262
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: colyer.rick@epamail.epa.gov

David Cozzie, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5356
Email: cozzie.david@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN38
_______________________________________________________________________

3113. OPTIONAL CHASSIS CERTIFICATION FOR DIESEL VEHICLES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601(a)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86.1863-07

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Prior to the heavy-duty 2007 rulemaking (HD 2007), we have
required that crankcase emissions be controlled only on naturally
aspirated diesel engines. We made an exception for turbocharged heavy-
duty diesel

[[Page 65257]]

engines in the past because of concerns regarding fouling that could
occur from diesel PM and engine oil, which are included in the
crankcase emissions, when routing the crankcase blow-by into the
turbocharger and aftercooler. However, this was an environmentally
significant exception since most heavy-duty diesel trucks use
turbocharged engines, and a single engine can emit over 100 pounds of
NOx, NMHC, and PM from the crankcase over its lifetime. Therefore,
given the availability of technologies to control crankcase emissions
and the significant environmental benefit for eliminating those
emissions, we set new requirements for crankcase emissions in the HD
2007 rulemaking. Those provisions require that heavy-duty diesel
engines either close the crankcase or account for any crankcase
emissions within the total compliance limits of the tailpipe emissions
standard. This requirement had the unintended consequence of confusing
which crankcase provisions should apply to these heavy-duty diesel
engines, those of Subpart S or the newly defined diesel provisions of.
It was our intention that these vehicles meet the newly defined
requirements of closed crankcase provisions just as other heavy-duty
diesel engines must. Therefore, we are finalizing a change to the HD
2007 that explicitly defines the crankcase provisions applicable for
heavy-duty chassis certified diesel engines under 14,000 pounds as
those provisions defined under CFR section 86.007-11. There is no
environmental impact. This represents a cost savings to the
manufacturers of highway heavy duty diesel engines.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/00/05
Final Action- 04/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4993;

Agency Contact: Zuimdie Guerra, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4387
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: guerra.zuimdie@epa.gov

Cleophas Jackson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 734 214-4824
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: jackson.cleophas@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN39
_______________________________________________________________________

3114. AIR QUALITY DATA AFFECTED BY EXCEPTIONAL, NATURAL, AND
INTERNATIONAL EVENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act title I

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This regulation would codify EPA policy concerning how to
address air quality data that has been identified as being affected by
exceptional, natural, or international events. The rulemaking provides
guidance to States, local, and tribal air quality agencies on how to
address the air quality and public health impacts caused by these types
of events. EPA is developing this rule to better address situations
where data resulting from uncontrollable, natural, or exceptional
events--for example forest fires, structural fires, high wind, volcanic
or seismic activities--may require special consideration. In some
cases, it may be appropriate to exclude data from such events from
regulatory consideration because they could result in inappropriate air
quality values being compared with the level of the affected air
quality standard. In other cases it may be appropriate to retain the
data for comparison with the level of the affected standard and then
allow EPA time to formulate the appropriate regulatory response.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/00/05
Final Action- 12/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4998

Agency Contact: Larry Wallace, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, C-504-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0906
Fax: 919 541-5489
Email: wallace.larry@epa.gov

Eric Ginsburg, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C-
304-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0877
Fax: 919 541-4511
Email: ginsburg.eric@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN40
_______________________________________________________________________

3115. FEDERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS FOR OTHER SOLID WASTE
INCINERATION UNITS CONSTRUCTED ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 9, 2004

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: CAA sec 129 and 111(d)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 62 (New)

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 31, 2007, Section 129(b)(3)
of CAA - 2 Years after promulgation of underlying emission guidelines
is deadline for this action.
Other, Statutory, December 31, 2008, Section 129(e)(1) of CAA - 3 Years
after promulgation of underlying emission guidelines is Hammer Date for
Permit Applications.

Abstract: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 directed the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set emission guidelines under
sections 111 and 129 for existing incinerators categorized as other
solid waste incinerators (OSWI), a catch-all grouping for those classes
of incinerators not directly named in the Act. Under court order, EPA
published proposed regulations for OSWI on December 9, 2004 and is
under a judicial requirement to establish final regulations for OSWI by
November 30, 2005. In accordance with section 129, any State with
affected sources must submit a State plan by one year after publication
of the final rule describing how the State will implement the emission
guidelines for existing CISWI. Section 129 also requires the
Administrator to develop and implement a Federal plan for existing
CISWI units located in any State which has not submitted an approvable
plan within 2 years of promulgation of the emissions guidelines. In
this OSWI Federal plan rulemaking, EPA becomes the implementing
authority in those instances where the State or local

[[Page 65258]]

agency has failed to submit a plan or a plan has not yet been approved.
Therefore, consistent with section 129(b)(3) of the Act, this
rulemaking would impose a Federal plan that applies to OSWI in any
State, tribe or locale that has not submitted an approvable plan within
the time allotted. This action makes no changes to the requirements in
the November 2005 rule, and is intended to fulfill EPA's duty under
section 129(b)(3) to promulgate a Federal plan as a gap-filling measure
until the State fulfills its statutory obligations. When the State
submits an approvable State Plan, the Federal plan will no longer apply
to units in that State.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 07/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 5011;

Agency Contact: David Painter, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, E 143-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Phone: 919 541-5515
Fax: 919 541-2664
Email: painter.david@epa.gov

Karen Blanchard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, E
143-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Phone: 919 541-5503
Fax: 919 541-2664
Email: blanchard.karen@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN43
_______________________________________________________________________

3116. RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARDS REQUIREMENTS FOR 2006

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 111 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AN51
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Final Rule Stage
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________

3117. AMENDMENT TO SUBPARTS H AND I FOR EMISSIONS OF RADIONUCLIDES OTHER
THAN RADON FROM DOE FACILITIES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: PL 95-95; CAAA 112(g) or (q)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 61

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Subparts H and I of 40 CFR Part 61 establish standards under
the Clean Air Act for emissions of radionuclides other than radon from
Department of Energy (DOE) and other non-DOE federal facilities. Under
subparts H and I, regulated entities currently determine compliance
with the emission standards by utilizing the approved computer models
CAP88 and AIRDOS-PC or any other procedures for which EPA has granted
prior approval. Since promulgation of Subparts H and I, EPA has
developed an additional model, GENII-NESHAPS, which is suitable for
regulated entities to use to determine compliance, in addition to the
currently-approved models mentioned above. The model was developed to
incorporate the internal dosimetry models recommended by the
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the
radiological risk estimating procedures of Federal Guidance Report 13
into updated versions of existing environmental pathway analysis
models. The model was developed under the direction of OAR's Office of
Radiation and Indoor Air, in consultation with OAR's Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). Also, GENII-NESHAPs has
undergone Science Advisory Board (SAB) review. In this direct final
rule, EPA is updating Subparts H and I to include GENII-NESHAPS as an
approved compliance model.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 01/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4768

Agency Contact: Behram Shroff, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6608J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9773
Fax: 202 343-9707
Email: shroff.behram@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK81
_______________________________________________________________________

3118. REVISION TO THE GUIDELINE ON AIR QUALITY MODELS (APPENDIX W TO 40
CFR PART 51): ADOPTION OF A PREFERRED GENERAL PURPOSE (FLAT AND COMPLEX
TERRAIN) DISPERSION MODEL AND OTHER REVISIONS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410, CAAA 110(a)(2); CAAA 165(e); CAAA 172(a);
CAAA 172(c); 42 USC 7601 CAAA 301(a)(1); CAAA 320

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.112; 40 CFR 51.160; 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action would revise the Guideline on Air Quality Models,
published as appendix W to 40 CFR part 51. The Guideline provides EPA-
recommended models for use in predicting ambient concentrations of
pollutants for programs ranging from Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) to State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for
controlling air pollution sources. The Guideline fulfills a Clean Air
Act mandate for EPA to specify models for air management purposes. This
revision would enhance the Guideline by incorporating a new, general-
purpose dispersion model called AERMOD, which would replace the
existing Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) model in many air-quality
assessments, including those involving complex terrain. An earlier
version of the AERMOD revision was previously

[[Page 65259]]

proposed (65 FR 21505, 4/21/2000; see SAN 3470), but not promulgated.
In response to public comments received on the April 2000 proposal, we
integrated the PRIME downwash algorithm and made other incidental
modifications, creating AERMOD(02222). On September 8, 2003, we issued
a Notice of Data Availability (NDA) to announce the AERMOD revisions,
and to reveal new performance data. Public comments taken for 30 days
have now been summarized and Agency responses have been developed that
support the intended action.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 04/21/00 65 FR 21505
Notice of Data Availability- 09/08/03 68 FR 52934
Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 3470.1; Split from RIN 2060-AF01.

Agency Contact: Tyler Fox, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, D243-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5562
Email: fox.tyler@epamail.epa.gov

Mark Evangelista, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D243, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2803
Email: evangelista.mark@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK60
_______________________________________________________________________

3119. NSPS AND EMISSION GUIDELINES FOR OTHER SOLID WASTE INCINERATORS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7509 CAA 129

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60

Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, November 30, 2004.
Final, Judicial, November 30, 2005.

Abstract: Section 129 of the Clean Air Act requires the EPA to
promulgate New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for new sources and
Emission Guidelines (EG) for existing sources for solid waste
incinerators. On November 30, 2004, EPA proposed rules to reduce
emissions from the category of incinerators known as ``other solid
waste incinerators'' (OSWI). OSWI consists of two classes of
incinerators: (1) Institutional waste incinerators and (2) very small
municipal waste combustors. Institutional waste incinerators are
located at institutions (e.g., public or private school; college or
university; church or civic organization; fire or police department;
town, city, county, State or Federal government; etc.) which burn waste
generated at that institution. Very small municipal waste combustors
are incinerators which burn less than 35 tons per day of municipal
solid waste. Municipal solid waste is nonhazardous solid waste or
refuse collected from residential, commercial, institutional, and
industrial sources. Emission standards were proposed for the following
nine air pollutants: particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen
chloride, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, lead, cadmium, mercury, and
dioxins. Opacity limits were also proposed. EPA must promulgate
standards by November 30, 2005.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Notice- 08/28/00 65 FR 52058
Prop. Stds & Guidance- 11/09/00 65 FR 67357
NPRM- 12/09/04 69 FR 71472
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions

Government Levels Affected: Local, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 3751

Agency Contact: Mary Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5025
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: johnson.mary@epamail.epa.gov

Brian Shrager, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7689
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: shrager.brian@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AG31
_______________________________________________________________________

3120. METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS--ADDITION OF METHODS
203A, 203B, AND 203C TO APPENDIX M OF PART 51

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401(b)(1); 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7470 to 7479;
42 USC 7501 to 7508; 42 USC 7601(a)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rulemaking adds Test Methods 203A, 203B, and 203C to 40
CFR part 51, appendix M (entitled Example Test Methods for State
Implementation Plans). These methods describe procedures for estimating
the opacity of visible emissions. States have requested that EPA
promulgate these methods so that they can use them in State
Implementation Plans in enforcing visible emissions regulations from
Stationary Sources.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/22/93 58 FR 61640
Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 2915

Agency Contact: Solomon Ricks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5242
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: ricks.solomon@epamail.epa.gov

Fred Thompson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2707
Email: thompson.fred@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AF83
_______________________________________________________________________

3121. ADDITION OF METHOD 207 TO APPENDIX M OF 40 CFR PART 51 METHOD FOR
MEASURING ISOCYANATES IN STATIONARY SOURCE EMISSIONS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7410

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51

Legal Deadline: None

[[Page 65260]]

Abstract: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 listed certain
isocyanate compounds as hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). The Agency
does not have any published test methods that would measure air
emissions of these isocyanate compounds from stationary sources. This
action would add a validated test method to measure isocyanate
emissions to appendix M of part 51. Test methods in part 51 can be
adopted by any State for use in any regulation that requires the
measurement of any of the isocyanate compounds on the HAP list. This
action would not impose any new regulatory requirements that do not
already exist. It should benefit State governments by providing them
with a validated test procedure for measuring the emissions of
isocyanate compounds.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/08/97 62 FR 64532
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 3900

Agency Contact: Gary McAlister, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1062
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: mcalister.gary@epamail.epa.gov

Conniesue Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D205-02, D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7774
Email: oldham.conniesue@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AG88
_______________________________________________________________________

3122. NSPS: SOCMI--WASTEWATER AND AMENDMENT TO APPENDIX C OF PART 63 AND
APPENDIX J OF PART 60

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 - SOCMI Wastewater NSPS and app J; 40 CFR 63 -
app C to part 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: These standards are based on a combination of control
techniques that require removal or destruction of volatile organic
compounds from wastewater at synthetic organic chemical manufacturing
industry plants. Designated chemical process units, i.e., process lines
or process units, would be subject to the rule. Constructed,
reconstructed, or modified designated chemical process units would be
required to apply appropriate controls to affected wastewater tanks,
surface impoundments, containers, individual drain systems, and oil and
water separators, and to treat process wastewater to remove or destroy
the volatile organic compounds. On September 12, 1994, EPA proposed
Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources: Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions from the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing
Industry (SOCMI) Wastewater (40 CFR part 60, subpart YYY). On October
11, 1995, the EPA issued a supplemental proposal, which clarified and
revised the previously proposed rule. On December 9, 1998, EPA
published a supplement to the proposed rule that consisted of revised
definitions, alternative test procedures, and clarifications of
requirements, and that proposed to add appendix J to 40 CFR part 60.
The final rule will encompass the clarifications and revisions to
subpart YYY and appendix J that will reduce emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOC). VOC, when emitted into the ambient air, are
precursors to the formation of tropospheric ozone. A wide variety of
acute and chronic respiratory health effects and welfare (agricultural,
ecosystem) effects have been attributed to concentrations of ozone
commonly measured in the ambient air throughout the U.S. In conjunction
with the rule development for the NSPS, amendments to appendix C to
part 63 were proposed on June 30, 2004. On June 30, 2004, amendments to
Appendix C to part 63 were proposed (69 FR 39383). See http://
www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/nsps/socww/socwwpg.html for more information.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM (NSPS)- 09/12/94 59 FR 46780
Supplemental NPRM 1- 10/11/95 60 FR 52889
Supplemental NPRM 2- 12/09/98 63 FR 67988
NPRM Amdmt- 06/30/04 69 FR 39383
Final Action- 01/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 3380

Sectors Affected: 3251 Basic Chemical Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Mary Kissell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4516
Fax: 919 685-3219
Email: kissell.mary@epa.gov

Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AE94
_______________________________________________________________________

3123. AMENDMENTS TO STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES;
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (40 CFR PART 60, APPENDIX F, PROCEDURE 3)

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June 15, 2001.

Abstract: This rulemaking proposes to add a method, Method 203, for the
measurement of opacity from stationary sources, to appendix M (Example
Test Methods for State Implementation Plans) in 40 CFR part 51. This
action provides States with an instrumental test method which can be
used in determining, on a continuous basis, compliance with stationary
source opacity emission limitations.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM1- 10/07/92 57 FR 46114
Supplemental NPRM- 05/08/03 68 FR 24692
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

[[Page 65261]]

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 3958

Agency Contact: Solomon Ricks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5242
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: ricks.solomon@epamail.epa.gov

Fred Thompson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2707
Email: thompson.fred@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AH23
_______________________________________________________________________

3124. UPDATE OF CONTINUOUS INSTRUMENTAL TEST METHODS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, 10, and 20 of 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A
are instrumental methods that are being revised to make their
performance criteria consistent. Analyzer calibration error tests and
sampling system bias tests now required in Methods 3A, 6C, and 7E are
being added to Methods 10 and 20. Inconsistent acceptance criteria for
other performance tests and calibration gas quality are also being made
uniform. Performance criteria currently determined based on the
instrument span is being revised to an emission limit basis. This
change will fix the acceptance limits for all source tests on the
applicable emission limit and not on a span value that sources have
some discretion in choosing. These revisions were proposed on August
27, 1997 in an announcement entitled ``Amendments for Testing and
Monitoring Provisions.'' They were considered not significant at that
time. The public did not feel that the preamble to the rule provided
adequate notice of the changes being made to the methods. The
commenters requested a reproposal of these revision to the instrumental
methods to allow for adequate public review. Methods 7F and 7G are new
methods that measure nitrogen oxides electrochemically. These methods
are being proposed in response to requests made by vendors/sources.
These methods will add flexibility to the testing provisions currently
in place and will not add requirements or affect the stringency of the
underlying emission standards.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/10/03 68 FR 58838
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4161

Agency Contact: Foston Curtis, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-19, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1063
Email: curtis.foston@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK61
_______________________________________________________________________

3125. NESHAP: PRINTING AND PUBLISHING INDUSTRY; AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, November 15, 1994.

Abstract: Since publication of the final Printing and Publishing
NESHAP, we have discovered several minor errors. This action will
correct those errors and clarify some of the rule language. The main
change will be to correct the instructions for determining HAP content
of inks and other materials from formulation data. No substantive
changes will be made to the stringency of the rule.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4310

Agency Contact: Dave Salman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0859
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: salman.dave@epamail.epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AI66
_______________________________________________________________________

3126. PETITIONS TO DELIST HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS: MEK

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: ``Clean Air Act sec 112(b)(3)''

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: NPRM, Statutory, February 28, 2000.

Abstract: The Agency has received a petition to remove methyl ethyl
ketone (MEK) from the list of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) under
Section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act. The Agency must review the
petitions and either grant or deny the petition within 18 months of the
date the complete petition was received. If the Agency grants a
petition, a notice of proposed rulemaking will be published in the
Federal Register, allowing the opportunity for public comment. If the
Agency denies a petition, a notice of denial will be published in the
Federal Register providing an explanation for such denial. If the
Agency grants a petition and ultimately removes the pollutant from the
HAP list then sources emitting such pollutants would not be required to
meet MACT emissions standards for the pollutant. If on the other hand,
the Agency denies the petition, then MACT standards would be issued as
currently planned under Section 112(c) and 112(d) of the Clean Air Act
for sources emitting such pollutants.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Final Action- 01/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4313

Agency Contact: Kelly Rimer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

[[Page 65262]]

Phone: 919 541-2962
Email: rimer.kelly@epamail.epa.gov

Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AI72
_______________________________________________________________________

3127. NESHAP FOR PRIMARY ALUMINUM REDUCTION PLANTS; AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The NESHAP for Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants was
promulgated in 1997 (40 CFR part 63, subpart LL). The amendments
described here would revise the emission limit for polycyclic organic
matter applicable to one subcategory of source based on newly available
data more representative of performance from the top five performing
sources. The proposed amendments would also clarify language on
compliance dates and add specific provisions for startup of new or
reconstructed affected sources and affected sources that restart after
being idled for long periods of time. More time would be allowed due to
the nature of the process operation, depending on the type of source.
No additional costs or information collection requirements would be
incurred as a result of the amendments. There also are no significant
policy issues. State agency and industry representatives concur with
the changes, which will improve implementation of the 1997 rule.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 03/17/03 68 FR 12645
Final Action- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4713

Agency Contact: Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK50
_______________________________________________________________________

3128. NESHAP: GENERAL PROVISIONS; AMENDMENTS FOR POLLUTION PREVENTION
ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.2; 40 CFR 63.17; 40 CFR 63.18

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: We are amending the part 63 General Provisions to allow
facilities that are subject to a maximum achievable control technology
(MACT) Subpart to discontinue unnecessary requirements if, through
pollution prevention measures, they achieve and can demonstrate
continued hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emission reductions equivalent
to or better than the MACT level of control. We are promulgating these
amendments to encourage and promote pollution prevention, which is our
strategy of first choice in reducing HAP emissions. We expect these
amendments to result in no additional burden for sources and air
pollution control agencies. This effort is the product of discussions
with State and local air pollution control officials. There also are no
significant policy issues.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 05/15/03 68 FR 26249
Final Action- 02/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4719;

Agency Contact: Rick Colyer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5262
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: colyer.rick@epamail.epa.gov

David Cozzie, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5356
Email: cozzie.david@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK54
_______________________________________________________________________

3129. SECTION 126 RULE WITHDRAWAL PROVISION

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7426

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA is proposing to revise one narrow aspect of the Section
126 Rule, which was promulgated January 18, 2000. That rule requires
certain sources located in the eastern United States to reduce their
NOx emissions for purposes of reducing ozone transport. EPA coordinated
the Section 126 Rule with a related ozone transport rule, known as the
NOx State implementation plan call (NOx SIP Call), which also addresses
ozone transport in the eastern United States. The EPA established the
same compliance date for both rules, May 1, 2003. The EPA included a
provision in the Section 126 Rule which provided that where a State
adopted, and EPA approved, a SIP controlling transport under the NOx
SIP Call, and with a May 1, 2003 compliance date, EPA would withdraw
the Section 126 requirements for sources in that State. This was a
practical way to address the overlap between the two rules and avoid
having sources be subject to two sets of potentially different NOx
transport control requirements. As the result of court actions, the
compliance dates for the Section 126 Rule and the NOx SIP Call have
both been delayed until May 31, 2004. In addition, the NOx SIP Call has
been divided into two phases. Therefore, it is necessary to revise the
Section 126 Rule withdrawal provision so that it will continue to
operate under these new circumstances. This action also proposes to
withdraw the Section 126 Rule in States that meet the proposed revised
criteria.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 04/04/03 68 FR 16644
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4689

[[Page 65263]]

Agency Contact: Carla Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov

Doug Grano, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3292
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: grano.doug@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK41
_______________________________________________________________________

3130. STREAMLINED EVAPORATIVE TEST PROCEDURES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7521(m)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86 (Revision)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action will streamline the test procedure used to
establish compliance with evaporative emission requirements for light
duty vehicles and trucks. The current test procedure requires both two
and three day diurnal emission tests, as well as running-loss testing.
The revisions will delete the three day requirement and add
flexibilities for running-loss compliance. This will enable
manufacturers to save significant resources without any decrease in
environmental benefits.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Rule- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 3910;

Agency Contact: David Good, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734-214-4450
Email: good.david@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AH34
_______________________________________________________________________

3131. MODIFICATION OF THE ANTI-DUMPING BASELINE DATE CUT-OFF LIMIT FOR
DATA USED IN DEVELOPMENT OF AN INDIVIDUAL BASELINE

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7521(1); 42 USC 7545; 42 USC
7601(a)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.91(b)(1)(i); 40 CFR 80.93(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4604

Agency Contact: Patrice Simms, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 2344, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5593
Fax: 202 564-5603
Email: simms.patrice@epamail.epa.gov

Christine Brunner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
4206, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4287
Fax: 734 214-4051
Email: brunner.christine@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AJ82
_______________________________________________________________________

3132. EMISSIONS DURABILITY PROCEDURES FOR NEW LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES AND
LIGHT-DUTY TRUCKS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7521

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86

Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 04/02/04 69 FR 17532
Final Action- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4757;

Sectors Affected: 3361 Motor Vehicle Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Linda Hormes, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4502
Fax: 734 214-4053

[[Page 65264]]

Email: hormes.linda@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK76
_______________________________________________________________________

3133. ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED INTERNATIONAL NOX STANDARD FOR AIRCRAFT
ENGINES

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq; 42 USC 7571-7572; 5 USC 552(a)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 87.1; 40 CFR 87.21; 40 CFR 87.64; 40 CFR 87.71; 40
CFR 87.10; 40 CFR 87.31(b); 40 CFR 87.82; 40 CFR 87.89

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The purpose of this final rulemaking is to amend the existing
United States regulations governing the exhaust emissions from new
commercial aircraft gas turbine engines. The amendment will codify into
United States law the recently amended voluntary NOx emission standard
of the United Nation's International Civil Aviation Organization
(ICAO), thus bringing the United States emission standards into
alignment with the internationally adopted standards. This NOx standard
was adopted at the ICAO/Committee on Aviation Environmental Protection
(CAEP) 4 meeting in 1998. The implementation of the standard is to
begin in January 2004. Further, this amendment will establish
consistency between U.S. and international requirements and test
procedures. This action is necessary to ensure that domestic commercial
aircraft meet international standards and the public can be assured
that they are receiving the air quality benefits of the international
standards.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 09/30/03 68 FR 56226
Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4631;

Sectors Affected: 33641 Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing;
336412 Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing; 3336 Engine,
Turbine, and Power Transmission Equipment Manufacturing; 336413 Other
Aircraft Part and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Bryan Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6407, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4832
Fax: 734 214-4018
Email: manning.bryan@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK01
_______________________________________________________________________

3134. MODIFICATION OF ANTI-DUMPING BASELINES FOR GASOLINE PRODUCED OR
IMPORTED FOR USE IN HAWAII, ALASKA, AND THE U.S. TERRITORIES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (Revision)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: ``Dumping'' refers to the practice whereby refiners making
clean fuels for certain markets (such as reformulated gasoline for
clean-air purposes) take the pollutants removed from the clean fuels
and ``dump'' them into other fuels they are producing for other
markets. This, if allowed, would make those other fuels even dirtier
than before, and so the Clean Air Act prohibits this practice. EPA has
existing ``anti-dumping'' rules on the books that codify this Clean Air
Act prohibition. This action proposes to allow refiners and importers
of conventional gasoline produced or imported for use in Hawaii,
Alaska, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam and
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to petition EPA to
modify their baselines to use the most appropriate seasonal baseline
and Complex Model for purposes of compliance with the RFG program's
anti-dumping requirements. Specifically, this action would allow
refiners and importers to petition EPA to use the summer Complex Model
for all anti-dumping baseline and compliance determinations for
conventional gasoline produced or imported for use in Hawaii, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. This action would allow
refiners and importers to petition EPA to use the winter Complex Model
for all anti-dumping baseline and compliance purposes in Alaska. We are
proposing this action to address certain inconsistencies in the RFG
program's anti-dumping provisions which may have significant unintended
negative impacts on refiners and importers. Today's proposed actions
would not compromise the environmental goals of the RFG program, or
result in any environmental degradation. Today's proposed actions would
not have any negative impact on small businesses or State/local/tribal
governments.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/04/05 70 FR 646
Final Action- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4632

Agency Contact: Marilyn Bennett, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9624
Fax: 202 343-2803
Email: bennett.marilyn@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK02
_______________________________________________________________________

3135. REGULATION OF FUEL AND FUEL ADDITIVES: EXTENSION OF CALIFORNIA
ENFORCEMENT EXEMPTIONS FOR REFORMULATED GASOLINE TO CALIFORNIA PHASE 3
GASOLINE

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.81

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA is proposing to exempt refiners, importers, and blenders
of gasoline subject to the State of California's reformulated gasoline
regulations from certain enforcement provisions in the Federal
reformulated (RFG) regulations. Certain exemptions under the Federal
RFG program already apply to California Phase 2 gasoline, but
additional exemptions are necessary to cover Phase 3 gasoline.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 08/11/04 69 FR 48827
Final Action- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

[[Page 65265]]

Additional Information: SAN No. 4634

Sectors Affected: 32511 Petrochemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum
Refineries

Agency Contact: Anne-Marie Pastorkovich, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9623
Email: pastorkovich.anne-marie@epamail.epa.gov

Dave Kortum, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9022
Fax: 202 343-2802
Email: kortum.dave@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK04
_______________________________________________________________________

3136. AMENDMENTS TO THE REQUIREMENTS ON VARIABILITY IN THE COMPOSITION
OF ADDITIVES CERTIFIED UNDER THE GASOLINE DEPOSIT CONTROL PROGRAM

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80

Legal Deadline: Other, Statutory, May 30, 2001, Settlement Agreement
with American Chemistry Council in 8/2000 requires publication of NPRM
``as expeditiously as practicable.''.

Abstract: A Direct Final Rule (DFRM) and parallel Notice of Proposed
Rule (NPRM) was published on November 5, 2001 in response to a
settlement agreement reached with the American Chemical Council (ACC)
regarding their litigation on the Gasoline Deposit Control Additive
Rule. This litigation pertained to the information that manufacturers
must provide on additive composition at the time of certification.
Adverse comments were received on two of the four amendments. A partial
withdrawal notice was published on January 24, 2002 which withdrew the
amendments on which we received adverse comments. In this action, we
plan to finalize the provisions that were withdrawn. The provisions we
plan to finalize are based on an ACC consensus position, which reduces
the burden on manufacturers in demonstrating compliance with limits on
the compositional variability of the deposit control additives, while
maintaining the emissions control benefits of the gasoline deposit
control program.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action 1- 11/05/01 66 FR 55885
Final Action 2- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4557.1; Split from RIN 2060-AJ69.
Action is consistent with Settlement Agreement signed with American
Chemistry Council in January 2000, which became final in August, 2000
(no comments were received in the public notice and comment). ACC v.
EPA, D.C. Cir. No. 94-1778 (consol).

Sectors Affected: 325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product
Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Jeff Herzog, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, ASD, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4227
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: herzog.jeff@epamail.epa.gov

Andrea Medici, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
ARLO/PTSLO, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5634
Fax: 202 564-5653
Email: medici.andrea@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK62
_______________________________________________________________________

3137. ANTI-DUMPING BASELINE RECALCULATION FOR DOWNSTREAM OXYGENATE
ADDITION

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.91

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule would allow a refiner who added oxygenate after
sampling and just before shipment to exclude that oxygenate from its
anti-dumping baseline determination. This exclusion of oxygenate is
already allowed for a refinery's gasoline to which oxygenate was added
outside of the refinery gate. This rule will have limited application,
and could provide relief to small refiners.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4706;

Agency Contact: Christine Brunner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 4206, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4287
Fax: 734 214-4051
Email: brunner.christine@epamail.epa.gov

Patrice Simms, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
2344, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5593
Fax: 202 564-5603
Email: simms.patrice@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK69
_______________________________________________________________________

3138. AMENDMENTS TO VEHICLE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
REQUIREMENTS TO ADDRESS NEW 8-HOUR OZONE STANDARD

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This final rule amends the current vehicle inspection and
maintenance (I/M) rule to establish deadlines for areas newly required
to begin I/M testing as a result of their classification under the 8-
hour ozone standard. Specifically, the amendments will address: The
deadline for submitting I/M State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for those
new areas; the deadline for the new program start-up; and the model
year coverage and evaluation timeframes associated with new programs
that will potentially be required as part of EPA's implementation of
the 8-hour ozone standard.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/06/05 70 FR 1314
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

[[Page 65266]]

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4854;

Agency Contact: Dave Sosnowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4823
Fax: 734 214-4906
Email: sosnowski.dave@epamail.epa.gov

Joe Pedelty, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, Ann
Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4410
Email: pedelty.joe@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM21
_______________________________________________________________________

3139. FIRE SUPPRESSION AND EXPLOSION PROTECTION LISTING UNDER SNAP

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This direct final rule updates the current SNAP list of
acceptable alternatives for ozone-depleting substances in the fire
suppression and explosion protection sector. The revisions to the SNAP
lists will be done through a ``direct final'' rulemaking because we
view them as non-controversial and anticipate no adverse comment. In
this direct final rule, we are introducing new substitutes giving
businesses and users additional flexibility in safely transitioning
away from ozone-depleting halons in the fire protection sector. This
action does not place any significant burden on users but provides new
halon substitutes while continuing to protect human health and the
environment.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 02/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4857

Agency Contact: Bella Maranion, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9749
Fax: 202 343-2363
Email: maranion.bella@epa.gov

Karen Thundiyil, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9464
Fax: 202 343-2342
Email: thundiyil.karen@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM24
_______________________________________________________________________

3140. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN AREA SOURCES FROM FEDERAL AND STATE OPERATING
PERMIT PROGRAMS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 502

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70; 40 CFR 71; 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action implements the Agency's decision on whether to
require title V permits for six area (nonmajor) sources subject to air
toxic requirements under Clean Air Act. The affected source categories
are: dry cleaners, halogenated solvent degreasers, chrome plating,
ethylene oxide sterilizers, secondary lead, and secondary aluminum.
Under the Act, these sources are subject to operating permit programs;
however, EPA may exempt them from such programs if it finds that
permitting would be impracticable, infeasible or unnecessarily
burdensome on the sources. This action makes these findings for all
categories except secondary lead. Secondary lead would remain subject
to permitting because few area sources are affected and most have
already been permitted.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 03/25/05 70 FR 15250
Final Action- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Federalism: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4868, EDocket No. OAR-2004-0010;

Agency Contact: Jeff Herring, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C304-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3195
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: herring.jeff@epamail.epa.gov

Ray Vogel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C304-03,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3153
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: vogel.ray@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM31
_______________________________________________________________________

3141. PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION FOR NITROGEN OXIDES

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 52

Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, February 14, 2005, Proposal signed 02/
14/2005: Published: 70 FR 8880, 02/23/2005. 60-day comment period,
ending 04/25/2005.
Final, Judicial, September 30, 2005, Signature.

Abstract: Section 166 of the Clean Air Act authorizes the Environmental
Protection Agency to establish regulations to prevent significant
deterioration of air quality due to emissions of nitrogen oxides. On
October 17, 1988, EPA promulgated regulations which included maximum
allowable increases in ambient nitrogen dioxide concentrations (NO2
increments) allowed in an area above the baseline concentration.
Following promulgation, the Environmental Defense (formerly the
Environmental Defense Fund) filed a petition asking the Court to order
EPA to remand the regulations and to impose an immediate deadline of
two years for promulgating new regulations. In 1990, the Court did not
impose a deadline but remanded the case for EPA to develop an
interpretation of Section 166 that considered the statutory provisions
contained in subsections (c) and (d), and if necessary to take new
evidence and modify the regulations. In July 2003, EarthJustice, on
behalf of Environment Defense, asked the Court to put EPA on an
enforceable schedule to issue new regulations under the original court
remand. Consequently, EPA agreed to a 2-year schedule for promulgating
such regulations by September 30, 2005. At a minimum, the regulations
will provide EPA's interpretation of the statutory requirements for
developing adequate

[[Page 65267]]

increments to prevent significant deterioration for nitrogen oxides.
Based on our interpretation, we will consider the need for revising the
existing increments for nitrogen dioxide, including both an annual and
short-term averaging period, and the regulation of other nitrogen oxide
compounds other than nitrogen dioxide.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 02/23/05 70 FR 8880
Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4881, EDocket No. http://www.epa.gov/
edocket, OAR-2004-0013;

Agency Contact: Dan Deroeck, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C339-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5593
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: deroeck.dan@epamail.epa.gov

Lisa Sutton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C339-
03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3450
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: sutton.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM33
_______________________________________________________________________

3142. REGULATION OF FUEL AND FUEL ADDITIVES: GASOLINE AND DIESEL TEST
METHODS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.46(a)(1); 40 CFR 80.46(a)(2); 40 CFR
80.46(f)(3)(i); 40 CFR 80.46(g)(2)(i); 40 CFR 80.580(a)(2)(i); 40 CFR
80.580(a)(3)(ii)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Fuel manufacturers of gasoline and diesel fuel are required
to measure certain properties in order to demonstrate compliance with
our motor vehicle fuels programs at 40 CFR part 80. This rule
promulgates test method changes which are approved under the
jurisdiction of the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM).
Except as specified below, the American Petroleum Institute (API)
recently recommended these test method changes to the Agency. The
Agency has evaluated these recommended test methods changes, agrees
with them, and believes they are based on good science. Furthermore,
they would provide additional flexibility to the regulated parties.
Specifically, the following changes would occur by this action: 1)
Update ASTM analytical test methods, ASTM D 2622, ASTM D 3120, ASTM D
5453, ASTM D 1319 and ASTM D 4815 to their most recent ASTM version, 2)
update the regulations to refer to analytical test method ASTM D 6920-
03 in our regulations, rather than ASTM D 6428-99, 3) change the
designated test method for measuring sulfur in butane to ASTM D 6667-
01, and continuing to allow ASTM D 3246-96 as an alternative test
method for measuring sulfur in butane until the Agency promulgates a
performance-based test method approach, 4) upon petition to the Agency
by X-Ray Optical Systems, Inc., allow an additional alternative test
method for measuring sulfur in gasoline, ASTM D 7039-04, and 5) remove
the September 1, 2004, sunset provisions for the alternative analytical
test methods, ASTM D 1319, which measures aromatics in RFG and CG, and
ASTM D 4815, which measures oxygenate content in RFG and CG. These
alternative test methods will be continued to be allowed to be used
until the Agency promulgates a performance-based test method approach
for qualifying alternative analytical test methods.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4895;

Agency Contact: Joe Sopata, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9034
Fax: 202 343-2802
Email: sopata.joe@epamail.epa.gov

Dave Kortum, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, 6406J,
Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9022
Fax: 202 343-2802
Email: kortum.dave@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM42
_______________________________________________________________________

3143. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: IMPORT PETITIONING REQUIREMENTS
FOR HALON-1301 AIRCRAFT FIRE EXTINGUISHING VESSELS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule will provide an exemption under the import
petitioning requirements for used ozone-depleting substances. The
petitioning requirements outline the information that importers must
submit to the Administrator at least forty working days before a
shipment is to leave the foreign port of export. This rule will reduce
the administrative burden of anyone petitioning to import aircraft fire
extinguishing spherical pressure vessels containing halon-1301 (``halon
bottles'') for hydrostatic testing in the United States. The rule would
require importers to adhere to all import petitioning requirements but
would require one petition to be submitted annually for all shipments
rather than submission of a petition for each individual shipment forty
working days prior to export. Halon bottles are individual bottles
containing halon-1301 that are connected to a larger fire suppression
system within an aircraft. The halon bottles are brought into the
United States for hydrostatic testing in which the halon is removed,
the bottles are tested to ensure durability and effectiveness, and the
same amount or more of halon is replaced back in the bottles and
exported once again. The halon bottles must be routinely tested under
Federal Aviation Administration and United States Department of
Transportation regulations. The exemption to minimize the import
petitioning requirements is being initiated because the bottles are not
being imported for the eventual use or resale of the halon contained in
the bottles and because hydrostatic testing of the bottles is required
under FAA and DOT regulations.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 11/00/05

[[Page 65268]]

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4900;

Ross Brennan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9226
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: brennan.ross@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM46
_______________________________________________________________________

3144. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: EXTENSION OF THE LABORATORY AND
ANALYTICAL USE EXEMPTION FOR ESSENTIAL CLASS I OZONE DEPLETING
SUBSTANCES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule extends the period of applicability of an existing
exemption to the ban on import and production of class I ozone
depleting substances (ODSs), authorized by the Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and consistent with the Clean
Air Act Amendments. The exemption applies to production and import of
ODSs for essential laboratory and analytical uses as defined by the
Montreal Protocol. The Montreal Protocol has permitted this exemption
since 1994. At the 2003 Meeting of the Parties, the Parties took
Decision XV/8, which extended the period of the exemption through
December 31, 2007. EPA is updating its regulations to incorporate
Decision XV/8. The rule also proposes to make typographical changes to
its regulations for the essential use program. Earlier rules published
by EPA shifted the paragraph order but did not update all of the
references to deleted paragraphs.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 05/13/05 70 FR 25726
NPRM Comment Period End- 07/12/05
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4894;

Agency Contact: Scott Monroe, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9712
Fax: 202 343-2363
Email: monroe.scott@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM56
_______________________________________________________________________

3145. NONATTAINMENT MAJOR NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR)

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51, app S

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action will promulgate changes to regulations that
govern NSR permitting of major stationary sources in nonattainment
areas where there is no approved SIP. Appendix S of 40 CFR part 51
contains the permitting program for major stationary sources in
nonattainment areas in transition periods before approval of a SIP to
implement part D of title I. This action will revise appendix S to
conform it to the changes made to regulations at 40 CFR 51.165 for SIP
programs for nonattainment major NSR (67 FR 80816; December 31, 2002).
It will cover Baseline Emissions Determination, Actual-to- Future-
Actual Methodology, Plantwide Applicability Limitations. The action
will also cover Clean Units and Pollution Control Projects to the
extent they are covered in the NSR base program as affected by recent
court decisions.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Final Action- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 3259.2; Split from RIN 2060-AE11. See
also SAN 4390

Agency Contact: Janet McDonald, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C339-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1450
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: mcdonald.janet@epamail.epa.gov

Lynn Hutchinson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C339-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5795
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: hutchinson.lynn@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM59
_______________________________________________________________________

3146. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS:
MISCELLANEOUS COATING MANUFACTURING; AMENDMENT

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (Revision)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The final rule was published on December 11, 2003. These
minor amendments clarify the requirements for process vessels and
include several technical corrections.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 05/13/05 70 FR 25684
Direct Final Action- 05/13/05 70 FR 25676
Withdrawal Notice- 07/06/05 70 FR 38780
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4890;

Agency Contact: Randy McDonald, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5402
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov

Robin Dunkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-04, Research Triangle Park , NC 27711

[[Page 65269]]

Phone: 919 541-5335
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM72
_______________________________________________________________________

3147. NESHAP: PLYWOOD AND COMPOSITE WOOD PRODUCTS; AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This amendment will make technical corrections, clarify
intent, and propose changes to the testing requirements for risk
assessments. Changes to the testing requirements would reduce costs of
testing and address hard-to-test process units.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 07/29/05 70 FR 43826
NPRM Comment Period End- 09/12/05
Final Action- 09/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4911;

Agency Contact: Mary Kissell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4516
Fax: 919 685-3219
Email: kissell.mary@epa.gov

K.C. Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919-541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM78
_______________________________________________________________________

3148. NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NSPS) FOR STATIONARY COMBUSTION
TURBINES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: CAA 111

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60

Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, February 9, 2005, Must propose revision
to NSPS.
Final, Judicial, February 9, 2006, Must promulgate final rule.

Abstract: Stationary combustion turbines emit varying amount of air
pollutants. These emissions have effects on both human health and the
environment. New source performance standards set the minimum level of
control for criteria pollutants (maximum emission rate) for new
emission sources. These standards help to assure that new sources of
pollution do not release excessive amounts of pollution to the
atmosphere. This action is necessary since the Clean Air Act requires
these standards to be reviewed periodically. The Environmental
Protection Agency intends to review and, if appropriate, revise the new
source performance standards for combustion turbines. New combustion
turbines will be affected by this action. This action will ensure that
the standards properly account for presently economically available
pollution prevention and pollution control technologies.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 02/18/05 70 FR 8314
Final Action- 03/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4912;

Agency Contact: Jaime Pagan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5340
Email: pagan.jaime@epamail.epa.gov

Christian Fellner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4003
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: fellner.christian@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM79
_______________________________________________________________________

3149. NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NSPS) FOR ELECTRIC UTILITY STEAM
GENERATING UNITS AND INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BOILERS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: CAA 111

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60

Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, February 9, 2005, Under consent with
Sierra Club and Our Children's Earth Foundation must propose amendments
to the NSPS standards.
Final, Judicial, February 9, 2006, Under consent with Sierra Club and
Our Children's Earth Foundation must promulgate amendments to the NSPS
standards.

Abstract: Electric utility steam generating units and industrial and
commercial boilers emit varying amount of air pollutants. These
emissions have effects on both human health and the environment. New
source performance standards set the minimum level of control for
criteria pollutants (maximum emission rate) for new emission sources.
These standards help to assure that new sources of pollution do not
release excessive amounts of pollution to the atmosphere. This action
is necessary since the Clean Air Act requires these standards to be
reviewed periodically. The Environmental Protection Agency intends to
amend the new source performance standards for electric utility steam
generating units and industrial and commercial boilers. New utility
steam generating units (40 CFR part 60, subpart Da) and industrial and
commercial boilers (40 CFR part 60, subparts Db and Dc) will be
affected by this action. This action will ensure that the standards
properly account for presently economically available pollution
prevention and pollution control technologies.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 02/28/05 70 FR 9706
Final Action- 03/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4913, EDocket No. OAR-2005-0031;

Agency Contact: Christian Fellner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4003
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: fellner.christian@epamail.epa.gov

Bill Maxwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

[[Page 65270]]

Phone: 919 541-5430
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: maxwell.bill@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM80
_______________________________________________________________________

3150. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR STATIONARY COMPRESSION IGNITION
INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 111

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: NPRM, Judicial, June 29, 2005, court ordered deadline.
Final, Judicial, June 29, 2006, court ordered deadline.

Abstract: This project is to develop New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) for stationary reciprocating internal combustion compression
ignition (diesel) engines. These standards are being developed under
section 111 of the CAA to require the application of the best system of
emission reduction taking into account the cost of achieving emission
reductions and environmental and energy impacts. The pollutants that
will be addressed in this rulemaking are PM, NOx, SO2, and CO. The
project is on a tight litigated schedule to be promulgated by June
2006.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 07/11/05 70 FR 39870
NPRM Comment Period End- 09/09/05
Final Action- 07/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions

Government Levels Affected: Local, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4914;

Agency Contact: Sims Roy, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5263
Email: roy.sims@epamail.epa.gov

Jaime Pagan, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5340
Email: pagan.jaime@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM82
_______________________________________________________________________

3151. REGULATION OF FUELS AND FUEL ADDITIVES: REFINER AND IMPORTER
QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DOWNSTREAM OXYGENATE BLENDING

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7545(c) and (k)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule would amend the reformulated gasoline regulations
to allow refiners and importers of ``reformulated gasoline blendstock
for oxygenate blending,'' or RBOB, to use an alternative method of
fulfilling the regulatory requirement to conduct quality assurance
sampling and testing at downstream oxygenate blending facilities. This
alternative method would consist of a comprehensive program of quality
assurance sampling and testing calculated to achieve the same
objectives as the current regulatory quality assurance requirement;
i.e., to ensure that all facilities that blend oxygenate with RBOB in a
given reformulated gasoline area are blending the required amounts of
oxygenate. The program would be carried out by an independent
association funded by an industry consortium. The program would be
conducted pursuant to a survey plan, approved by EPA. This action will
not have any adverse environmental impact.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4930;

Agency Contact: Marilyn Bennett, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6406J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9624
Fax: 202 343-2803
Email: bennett.marilyn@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM88
_______________________________________________________________________

3152. PART 63 GENERAL PROVISIONS--RESPONSE TO PETITION TO RECONSIDER

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This notice will propose a response to the Natural Resource
Defense Council's petition to reconsider certain aspects of the May 30,
2003 amendments to the part 63 General Provisions. The primary issue is
public access to startup, shutdown, and malfunction plans. At this
point it is not known if there will be any regulatory revisions.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 07/29/05 70 FR 43992
NPRM Comment Period End- 09/12/05
Final Action- 07/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4934;

Agency Contact: Rick Colyer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C504-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5262
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: colyer.rick@epamail.epa.gov

David Cozzie, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5356
Email: cozzie.david@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM89
_______________________________________________________________________

3153. NESHAP FOR REFRACTORY PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING--AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: PL 91-190, sec 203

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAP) for new and existing refractory products manufacturing
facilities, were promulgated on April 16, 2003, under section 112(d) of
the Clean Air Act (CAA). These amendments clarify the testing and
monitoring requirements of the NESHAP, bring the NESHAP into
consistency with recent changes to the General Provisions to part 63,
and make certain technical corrections to the rule.

[[Page 65271]]

We view the revisions as noncontroversial and anticipate no significant
adverse comments.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4937;

Agency Contact: Susan Fairchild, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C-504-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5167
Fax: 919 541-5600
Email: fairchild.susan@epamail.epa.gov

David Cozzie, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C504-
05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5356
Email: cozzie.david@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM90
_______________________________________________________________________

3154. NESHAP: BRICK AND STRUCTURAL CLAY PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING;
RECONSIDERATION

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: On May 16, 2003, national emission standards for hazardous
air pollutants (NESHAP) for new and existing sources at brick and
structural clay products (BSCP) manufacturing facilities were
promulgated (the final rule). Subsequently, the Administrator received
a petition for reconsideration of the final rule. The petition was
granted with respect to one issue arising from the final rule. The
reconsideration issue involves the petitioner's claim that the MACT
floors (and MACT standards based on the floors) at promulgation were
set using a different control technology than the control technologies
upon which the proposed standards were based and that EPA did not
provide adequate opportunity for public comment on the revised MACT
floors. Because the proposed MACT floors and standards were changed in
response to comments received on the proposed rule, reconsideration
provides an opportunity for public comment on the floors and standards
reflected in the final rule.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Notice of Reconsideration- 04/22/05 70 FR 21094
Final Action- 11/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4325.1; Split from RIN 2060-AJ91.

Sectors Affected: 327121 Brick and Structural Clay Tile Manufacturing;
327123 Other Structural Clay Product Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Mary Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5025
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: johnson.mary@epamail.epa.gov

Robert J. Wayland, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM94
_______________________________________________________________________

3155. INCLUSION OF DELAWARE AND NEW JERSEY IN THE CLEAN AIR INTERSTATE
RULE

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 119 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AM95
_______________________________________________________________________

3156. NESHAP: INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL BOILERS AND
PROCESS HEATERS; RECONSIDERATION NOTICE

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: On September 13, 2004, EPA promulgated national emission
standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for industrial,
commercial, and institutional boilers and process heaters. The final
rule (subpart DDDDD) contains health-based compliance alternatives
based on authority under sections 112(d)(4) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
The methodology and criteria for affected sources to use in
demonstrating that they are eligible for the compliance alternatives
were promulgated in Appendix A to subpart DDDDD. Affected sources
demonstrating that they are eligible for the health-based compliance
alternatives are not required to demonstrate compliance with the
hydrogen chloride (HCl) emission limit and/or may demonstrate
compliance with the total selected metals (TSM) emission limit based on
the sum of emissions for seven metals by excluding manganese emissions.
Following promulgation of the final rule, the Natural Resources Defense
Council (NRDC) and Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) filed a
petition for reconsideration. The petition requested reconsideration of
seven aspects of the final rule. With the exception of the petitioners'
issue with adoption of numerous ``no control'' standards in subpart
DDDDD, all of the petitioners' issues relate to the health-based
compliance alternatives in the final rule. The petitioners stated that
reconsideration of the issues is appropriate because the issues could
not have been practicably raised during the public comment period. The
petition for reconsideration also requested a stay of the effectiveness
of the health-based compliance alternatives. In response to granting
the petition, we are requesting comment on the approach used to
demonstrate eligibility for the health-based compliance alternatives,
as outlined in Appendix A of the final rule, and on an issue related to
the inclusion of manganese in the health-based compliance alternative
provisions. We are not requesting comments on any other provisions of
the final rule. The petitioners also requested that we stay the
effectiveness of the health-based compliance provisions of the final
rule, pending reconsideration of those provisions. We are not granting
that request.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Reconsideration Notice- 06/27/05 70 FR 36907
Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

[[Page 65272]]

Small Entities Affected: Businesses, Governmental Jurisdictions

Government Levels Affected: Federal, State, Local

Additional Information: SAN No. 3837.1; Split from RIN 2060-AG69

Agency Contact: Jim Eddinger, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5426
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: eddinger.jim@epa.gov

Bill Maxwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5430
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: maxwell.bill@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM97
_______________________________________________________________________

3157. REVISION TO THE DEFINITION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS--REMOVAL
OF VOC EXEMPTIONS FOR CALIFORNIA'S AEROSOL COATINGS REACTIVITY-BASED
REGULATION

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 110

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action would revise EPA's definition of VOCs so that
compounds which were previously identified as negligibly reactive and
exempt from EPA's regulatory definitions of VOCs will count towards a
product's reactivity-based VOC limit for the purpose of California's
aerosol coating regulation.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/07/05 70 FR 1640
Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4943, EDocket No. OAR-2003-0200;

Agency Contact: Stanley Tong, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, AIR4, San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: 415 947-4122
Fax: 415 947-3579
Email: tong.stanley@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AM98
_______________________________________________________________________

3158. RULE ON SECTION 126 PETITION FROM NC TO REDUCE INTERSTATE
TRANSPORT OF FINE PM AND O3; FIPS TO REDUCE INTERSTATE TRANSPORT OF FINE
PM & O3; REVISIONS TO CAIR RULE; REVISIONS TO ACID RAIN PROGRAM

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 120 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AM99
_______________________________________________________________________

3159. PM 2.5 AND PM 10 HOT-SPOT ANALYSES IN TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
RULE AMENDMENTS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671q

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 and 93

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action would promulgate a supplemental NPRM that was
proposed under the SAN number 4811, which is an amendment to the
existing transportation conformity rule. The transportation conformity
rule ensures that transportation planning is consistent with a state's
plans for achieving the air quality standards. The SAN 4811 amendments
to the existing transportation conformity rule are necessary as a
result of the new 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 air quality standards. The
main issues that will be addressed in these amendments are the regional
emissions tests that apply before new SIPs are submitted and which
particulate matter provisions of the rule apply to PM2.5. The current
action, SAN 4811.1, will promulgate the aforementioned SAN 4811
supplemental NPRM.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Supplemental NPRM- 12/13/04 69 FR 72140
Final Action- 04/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4811.1; Split from RIN 2060-AL73. 2060-
AI56 was merged into this action May 2004

Agency Contact: Rudolph Kapichak, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4574
Fax: 734 214-4052
Email: kapichak.rudolph@epamail.epa.gov

Laura Berry, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, Ann
Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4858
Fax: 734 214-4052
Email: berry.laura@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN02
_______________________________________________________________________

3160. NESHAP: PLYWOOD AND COMPOSITE WOOD PRODUCTS; LIST OF HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS, LESSER QUANTITY DESIGNATIONS, SOURCE CATEGORY LIST;
RECONSIDERATION

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This notice for reconsideration re-opens the comment period
for the risk provisions and start-up, shutdown, and malfunction
provisions. The notice is in response to a petition for reconsideration
EPA received from NRDC and EIP. The notice references relevant portions
of the final rule and preamble. The notice was published on 07/29/2005.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Reconsideration Notice- 07/29/05 70 FR 44012
Final Action- 02/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4911.1; Split from RIN 2060-AM78.

Agency Contact: Mary Kissell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4516
Fax: 919 685-3219
Email: kissell.mary@epa.gov

K.C. Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

[[Page 65273]]

Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919-541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN05
_______________________________________________________________________

3161. SMALL MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTOR NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
AND EMISSION GUIDELINES AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: CAA sec 111 and 129

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 subparts AAAA and BBBB, 40 CFR 62 s

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule would amend the final (Dec. 2000) small municipal
waste combustors (MWC) new source performance standards (NSPS),
emission guidelines (EG), and Federal 111(d) plan. The small MWC rule
regulates owners and operators of small MWC, which are MWC units with
capacities between 35 tons per day (tpd) and 250 tpd. The amendments
will not change the response (the types of emission controls that will
be used) of the facilities to the rule, but will provide clarification
and correction. Specifically, the amendments will include: (1) Fixing
typographical errors created by the Office of the Federal Register; (2)
approval of State operator training programs for MWC operators in the
State of Minnesota (this was previously done for MWC operators in the
States of Maryland and Connecticut); (3) addressing carbon monoxide
(CO) emission limits during MWC malfunctions (this same provision was
already added to large MWC standards in a previous rulemaking); (4)
revising a CO limit for one type of MWC and a NOx limit for another
type of MWC; and (5) removing one voluntary consensus standard, ASTM D-
6522, which is not an appropriate test method for this industry. These
changes need to be made to address compliance issues for this rule
prior to the December 6, 2005, compliance date.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 12/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4970;

Agency Contact: Brian Shrager, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7689
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: shrager.brian@epamail.epa.gov

Walt Stevenson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5264
Fax: 919 541-5264
Email: stevenson.walt@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN17
_______________________________________________________________________

3162. REGIONAL HAZE REGULATIONS; REVISIONS TO PROVISIONS
GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE TO SOURCE-SPECIFIC BEST AVAILABLE RETROFIT
TECHNOLOGY (BART) DETERMINATIONS

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 121 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AN22
_______________________________________________________________________

3163. IMPLEMENTATION RULE FOR 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS - PHASE 2

Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 122 in part II of this issue
of the Federal Register.

RIN: 2060-AN23
_______________________________________________________________________

3164. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATORS NSPS AND
EG: DEFINITIONS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: CAA sec 111 and 129

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 2060-AF-91

Legal Deadline: Other, Judicial, September 14, 2005, Oral commitment to
litigants to take final action on definitional issue.

Abstract: In response to the petition for reconsideration related to
the definitions of ``solid waste'' and ``commercial and industrial
solid waste'' in the promulgated NSPS and EG for commercial and
industrial solid waste incineration (CISWI) units, EPA published a
notice soliciting comments on the definitions on February 17, 2004 (69
FR 7390). This action will present our decisions with regard to these
definitions and the related definition of ``commercial and industrial
solid waste incineration unit.'' These final definitions will be
effective following a future action that will revise the CISWI NSPS and
EG in response to the voluntary remand of the rules that was granted by
the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
on September 6, 2001. This action is consistent with earlier agency
actions on the related source category of Industrial Boilers and
Process Heaters. This action will provide definitions that will be
used, at the completion of a future action, to regulate owners and
operators of CISWI Units. The rules will limit emissions of the
following pollutants: particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen
oxides, carbon monoxide, lead, mercury, cadmium, hydrogen chloride, and
dioxin. The rules also will include requirements for siting of new
sources, operator training, monitoring, and emissions testing.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4994;

Agency Contact: Brian Shrager, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7689
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: shrager.brian@epamail.epa.gov

Mary Johnson, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5025
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: johnson.mary@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN31
_______________________________________________________________________

3165. REVISIONS TO MOTOR VEHICLE DIESEL FUEL SULFUR TRANSITION PROVISIONS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7545(c) and 7545(i)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80

Legal Deadline: None

[[Page 65274]]

Abstract: The highway diesel fuel sulfur rule, issued in 2001, becomes
effective in June of 2006. The fuel industry has raised concerns that
the required nationwide transition from higher sulfur to ultra-low
sulfur diesel (ULSD) fuel may require a limited amount of additional
time. This action will provide 45 additional days for the transition to
be completed while ensuring that ULSD will be available exclusively
when new diesel engines are introduced.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 10/00/05

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 5001;

Agency Contact: Tad Wysor, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4332
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: wysor.tad@epa.gov

Paul Machiele, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, Ann
Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4264
Fax: 734 214-4816
Email: machiele.paul@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN41
_______________________________________________________________________

3166. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE: AMENDING REQUIREMENTS TO
IMPORT USED OZONE-DEPLETING SUBSTANCES FOR DESTRUCTION IN THE U.S.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This regulation will streamline the process for importing
used ozone-depleting substances for destruction in the U.S. This will
further reduce the amount of substances that could otherwise harm the
ozone layer.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 04/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Additional Information: SAN No. 5017;

Agency Contact: Kirsten Cappel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9556
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: cappel.kirsten@epamail.epa.gov

Julius Banks, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
6205J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9870
Fax: 202 343-2338
Email: banks.julius@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AN48
_______________________________________________________________________
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Long-Term Actions
Clean Air Act (CAA)
_______________________________________________________________________

3167. SOURCE-SPECIFIC FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR NAVAJO GENERATING
STATION; NAVAJO NATION

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 123

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA proposes to federalize standards from the Arizona and New
Mexico State Implementation Plans (SIPS) applicable to the Navajo
generating station. Where necessary, EPA's proposed emission standards
modify the standards extracted from the States' regulatory programs to
ensure comprehensive emission control and Federal consistency.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 09/08/99 64 FR 48725
Notice- 01/26/00 65 FR 4244
Reproposal- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4315; Formerly listed as RIN 2060-AI79

Agency Contact: Doug McDaniel, Environmental Protection Agency,
Regional Office San Francisco, AIR5, San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: 415-947-4106
Fax: 415-947-3579
Email: mcdaniel.doug@epamail.epa.gov

Colleen McKaughan, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office San
Francisco, AIR1, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 520-498-0118
Fax: 520-498-1333
Email: mckaughan.colleen@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2009-AA00
_______________________________________________________________________

3168. SOURCE-SPECIFIC FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR NAVAJO GENERATING
STATION; FOUR CORNERS POWER PLANT

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 1740

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA proposes to federalize standards from the Arizona and New
Mexico State Implementation Plans (SIPS) applicable to the Four Corners
Plant. Where necessary, EPA's proposed emission standards modify the
standards extracted from the States' regulatory programs to ensure
comprehensive emission control and Federal consistency.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Reproposal - To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Federalism: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 3569; NPRM- http://www.epa.gov/
fedrgstr/EPA-; AIR/1999/September/Day-08 /a23277.htm.; Formerly listed
as RIN 2060-AF42

Agency Contact: Doug McDaniel, Environmental Protection Agency,

[[Page 65275]]

Regional Office San Francisco, AIR5, San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: 415-947-4106
Fax: 415-947-3579
Email: mcdaniel.doug@epamail.epa.gov

Colleen McKaughan, Environmental Protection Agency, Regional Office San
Francisco, AIR1, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 520-498-0118
Fax: 520-498-1333
Email: mckaughan.colleen@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2009-AA01
_______________________________________________________________________

3169. NESHAP: OFF-SITE WASTE AND RECOVERY OPERATIONS RESIDUAL RISK
STANDARD

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, July 1, 2004.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based emissions standards (``MACT''
standards]
for this source category under section 112(d) of the Clean
Air Act, codified in 40 CFR part 63, subpart DD. The current action,
required by section 112(f) of the Clean Air Act, is to assess residual
risks after compliance with subpart DD, and develop additional emission
standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 04/00/07
Final Action- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4695;

Sectors Affected: 56221 Waste Treatment and Disposal

Agency Contact: Greg Nizich, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3078
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: nizich.greg@epa.gov

Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK68
_______________________________________________________________________

3170. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS: RISK MANAGEMENT
PROGRAMS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT, SECTION 112(R)(7); AVAILABILITY OF
INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC; TECHNICAL AMENDMENT

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

Legal Authority: CAA 112(r)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68.210

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Section 112(r)(7) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and its
implementing regulations at 40 CFR Part 68 require certain stationary
sources to report an Off-site Consequence Analysis (OCA), including a
worst-case release scenario, in a Risk Management Plan (RMP) that is to
be made available to the public. In response to concerns that posting
OCA information on the Internet might increase the risk of terrorist
and other criminal activities, on August 5, 1999 the Chemical Safety
Information, Site Security and Fuels Regulatory Relief Act (CSISSFRRA)
was enacted. The Act requires the President to promulgate regulations
governing the distribution of the OCA sections of RMPs that, in the
opinion of the President, would minimize the likelihood of accidental
releases and the risk of terrorist and other criminal activities
associated with posting this information. The President delegated his
rulemaking authority to the Attorney General and the Administrator of
EPA, who jointly promulgated the required regulations at 40 CFR Part
1400. The part 1400 regulations restrict the public's access to the OCA
sections of RMPs in certain ways. As currently drafted, however,
section 68.210(a) of part 68 states that RMPs are available to the
public under CAA section 114, which makes information collected under
the CAA, including RMPs in their entirety, available to the public,
except for confidential business information. EPA is therefore revising
40 CFR Section 68.210(a) to reflect the August 2000 rulemaking. The
revision will state that OCA data is made available to the public under
the provisions of 40 CFR part 1400. This revision is not meant to
regulate any new entities.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Final Action- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4607;

Agency Contact: Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20004
Phone: 202 564-8019
Fax: 202 564-2625
Email: jacob.sicy@epa.gov

RIN: 2050-AE95
_______________________________________________________________________

3171. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PREVENTION REQUIREMENTS: RISK MANAGEMENT
PROGRAMS UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT, SECTION 112(R)(3); REVISIONS TO THE
LIST OF SUBSTANCES

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: CAA 112(r)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 68.130

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The list of substances subject to the Chemical Accident
Prevention requirements at 40 CFR part 68 was promulgated on January
31, 1994. The Clean Air Act states that the list may be revised from
time to time by EPA's own motion or by petition and shall be reviewed
at least every 5 years. Since the January 1994 final list rule, EPA has
modified the listing for hydrochloric acid; deleted a category of
explosive chemicals; exempted flammable substances in gasoline used as
fuel and in naturally occurring hydrocarbon mixtures prior to initial
processing; and excluded flammable substances used as a fuel or held
for sale as a fuel at a retail facility. In fulfillment of the
statute's five-year review requirement, EPA has conducted a thorough
review of the list. Based on that review, EPA is proposing additions,
deletions and modifications to the list of substances. Deletions are
based on EPA's review of the chemical toxicity, physical property,
production/use quantity and accident history of currently listed
substances and new information or erroneous data that impacts the basis
of the chemical's listing. Other toxic and flammable chemicals are
proposed to be added

[[Page 65276]]

because they meet the criteria for listing a toxic or flammable
substance. In addition, EPA proposes to revise the reporting threshold
and toxic endpoints of several toxic substances based on updated
toxicity information. Facilities (such as chemical manufacturers,
processors, and users), with more than the threshold quantity of a
listed substance in a process, are required to develop a Risk
Management Program and submit a Risk Management Plan to EPA. The
proposed changes to the list will ensure that facilities are properly
managing risks of the most acutely toxic and flammable chemicals that
could have an adverse impact on the facility and surrounding community
in event of an accidental release.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4619;

Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 32411 Petroleum
Refineries

Agency Contact: Kathy Franklin, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-7987
Fax: 202 564-2625
Email: franklin.kathy@epamail.epa.gov

Sicy Jacob, Environmental Protection Agency, Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5104A, Washington, DC 20004
Phone: 202 564-8019
Fax: 202 564-2625
Email: jacob.sicy@epa.gov

RIN: 2050-AE96
_______________________________________________________________________

3172. REVIEW NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR CARBON MONOXIDE

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 31, 2001, Clean Air Act requires
reviews every five years.

Abstract: Review of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
for carbon monoxide (CO) every 5 years is mandated by the Clean Air
Act. This review assesses the available scientific data about the
health and environmental effects of CO and translates the science into
terms that can be used in making recommendations about whether or how
the standards should be changed. The last review of the CO NAAQS was
completed in 1994 with a final decision that revisions were not
appropriate at that time.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/08
Final Action- 11/00/08

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4266;

Agency Contact: Dave Mckee, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5288
Fax: 919 541-0237
Email: mckee.dave@epa.gov

Harvey Richmond, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5271
Fax: 919 541-0237
Email: richmond.harvey@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AI43
_______________________________________________________________________

3173. NAAQS: SULFUR DIOXIDE (RESPONSE TO REMAND)

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409 ``CAA 109''

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50.4; 40 CFR 50.5

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: On November 15, 1994, the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) proposed not to revise the existing 24-hour and annual primary
standards. The EPA sought public comment on the need to adopt
additional regulatory measures to address the health risk to asthmatic
individuals posed by short-term peak sulfur dioxide exposure. On March
7, 1995, EPA proposed implementation strategies for reducing short-term
high concentrations of sulfur dioxide emissions in the ambient air. On
May 22, 1996, EPA published its final decision not to revise the
primary sulfur dioxide NAAQS. The notice stated that EPA would shortly
propose a new implementation strategy to assist States in addressing
short-term peaks of sulfur dioxide. The new implementation strategy -
the Intervention Level Program - was proposed on January 2, 1997. In
July 1996, the American Lung Association and the Environmental Defense
Fund petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit for a
judicial review of EPA's decision not to establish a new 5-minute
NAAQS. On January 30, 1998, the court found that EPA did not adequately
explain its decision and remanded the case so EPA could explain its
rationale more fully. EPA published a schedule for responding to the
remand in the May 5, 1998 Federal Register. Since that notice, EPA has
continued to work on the proposed response to the remand by reviewing
additional SO2 air quality information. EPA published an informational
notice in the Federal Register on January 9, 2001 (66 R 1665). EPA
conducted monitoring to evaluate sources of SO2 peaks and is currently
analyzing these data.. The results of this project will inform the
response to the remand.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM NAAQS Review- 11/15/94 59 FR 58958
NPRM NAAQS implementation- 03/07/95 60 FR 12492
Final NAAQS Review- 05/22/96 61 FR 25566
NPRM rev. NAAQS impl- 01/02/97 62 FR 210
Notice resp to remand- 05/05/98 63 FR 24782
NPRM- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 1002;

Agency Contact: Dave Mckee, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5288
Fax: 919 541-0237
Email: mckee.dave@epa.gov

[[Page 65277]]

Susan Stone, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-1146
Email: stone.susan@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AA61
_______________________________________________________________________

3174. NESHAP: GROUP I POLYMERS AND RESINS AND GROUP IV POLYMERS AND
RESINS--AMENDMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63.480 to 63.506 (Revision); 40 CFR 63.1310 to
63.1335 (Revision)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: During the development of the National Emission Standard for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for elastomers (Group I polymers and
resins) and thermoplastics (Group IV polymers and resins) (RINs 2060-
AD56 and 2060-AE37), many of the provisions contained in the Hazardous
Organic NESHAP (HON) were referenced directly by these polymers and
resins regulations due to similarities in processes, emission
characteristics, and control technologies. On January 17, 1997, the EPA
promulgated changes to the HON to remove ambiguity, to clearly convey
EPA intent, and to make the rule easier to understand and implement in
response to industry petitions. It is necessary to make parallel
changes to the polymers and resins NESHAP; otherwise inconsistencies
will exist for NESHAPs regulating similar source categories. An ANPRM
was published in the Federal Register on 11/25/96 (61 FR 59849), to
explain the nature of changes planned. Subsequently, six litigants have
petitioned for review of the elastomers and thermoplastics regulations.
Four companies have petitioned EPA to reconsider specific provisions in
the thermoplastics regulation. Revisions will be proposed to parallel
HON changes and to resolve petitioners' issues.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

ANPRM- 11/25/96 61 FR 59849
Direct Final-pet jud rev- 03/09/99 64 FR 11536
NPRM-pet jud rev- 03/09/99 64 FR 11555
Direct Final-comp ext- 05/07/99 64 FR 24511
Direct Final-pet rec equip
leaks- 06/08/99 64 FR 30406
NPRM 2- 06/08/99 64 FR 30453
NPRM 3- 06/08/99 64 FR 30456
Direct Final-stay notice- 06/30/99 64 FR 35023
NPRM-stay notice- 06/30/99 64 FR 35107
Direct Final00- 08/29/00 65 FR 52319
NPRM00- 08/29/00 65 FR 52392
Direct Final 4- 10/26/00 65 FR 64161
Final Action01- 02/23/01 66 FR 11233
Direct Final Comp.- 02/26/01 66 FR 11543
NPRM Compliance01- 02/26/01 66 FR 1550
Final 1- 07/16/01 66 FR 36924
Final 2- 08/06/01 66 FR 40903
NPRM- 10/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 3939;

Sectors Affected: 325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Bob Rosensteel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5608
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: rosensteel.bob@epa.gov

Robin Dunkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-04, Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AH47
_______________________________________________________________________

3175. PREVENTION OF SIGNIFICANT DETERIORATION OF AIR QUALITY: PERMIT
APPLICATION REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR NON-FEDERAL CLASS I AREAS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7670-7479 ``CAA 160-169''

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act's prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) program, a State or tribe may redesignate their
lands as class I areas to provide enhanced protection for their air
quality resources. This rule will clarify the PSD permit review
procedures for new and modified major stationary sources near these
non-Federal class I areas. EPA seeks to develop clarifying PSD permit
application procedures that are effective, efficient, and equitable.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

ANPRM- 05/16/97 62 FR 27158
NPRM- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 3919;

Agency Contact: Darrel Harmon, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6101A, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-7416
Fax: 202 501-1153
Email: harmon.darrel@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AH01
_______________________________________________________________________

3176. NESHAP: AEROSPACE MANUFACTURING AND REWORK FACILITIES RESIDUAL
RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 30, 2003.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR part 63,
subpart GG. The current action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA,
is to assess residual risks from the same source category, and develop
additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin
of safety.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/00/07
Final Action- 12/00/08

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4653;

Sectors Affected: 33641 Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing

[[Page 65278]]

Agency Contact: Bob Rosensteel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5608
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: rosensteel.bob@epa.gov

Robin Dunkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-04, Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK08
_______________________________________________________________________

3177. NESHAP: GROUP II POLYMERS AND RESINS--RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, March 8, 2003.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA. This source category covers
certain chemical process units used to manufacture products. The
current action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess
residual risks from this same source category, and develop additional
emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/00/08

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4657;

Sectors Affected: 325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Randy McDonald, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5402
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: mcdonald.randy@epa.gov

Robin Dunkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-04, Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK13
_______________________________________________________________________

3178. NESHAP: NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR MARINE TANK VESSEL LOADING
OPERATIONS--RESIDUAL RISK STANDARD

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 19, 2003, Final Action.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR part 63,
subpart Y. This source category covers tanks or ships that contain
gasoline, crude oil, or HAPs in bulk. The current action, required by
section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual risks from this same
source category, and develop additional emission standards, as
necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/08
Final Action- 01/00/09

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4661;

Sectors Affected: 483 Water Transportation

Laura McKelvey, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5497
Fax: 919 541-0942
Email: mckelvey.laura@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK17
_______________________________________________________________________

3179. NESHAP: SECONDARY LEAD SMELTING RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, June 23, 2003.

Abstract: National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants
(NESHAP) for secondary lead smelting were promulgated on June 23, 1995
under Clean Air Act Section 112(d). The standards establish emission
limitations and work practice standards for all new and existing
secondary lead smelters that produce refined lead from lead scrap,
mainly lead acid batteries. Clean Air Act Section 112(f) requires us to
assess within 8 years of promulgation of a NESHAP the remaining risk to
the public and to develop additional more stringent standards if such
standards are needed to protect the public health with an ample margin
of safety. This action is to examine the remaining risk from secondary
lead smelters and to develop new risk based standards, if warranted.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 01/00/08
Final Action- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4665;

Sectors Affected: 331492 Secondary Smelting, Refining, and Alloying of
Nonferrous Metal (except Copper and Aluminum)

Agency Contact: Iliam Rosario, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5308
Fax: 919 541-5450
Email: rosario.iliam@epamail.epa.gov

Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK19

[[Page 65279]]

_______________________________________________________________________

3180. NESHAP: SHIPBUILDING AND SHIP REPAIR SURFACE COATING--RESIDUAL
RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 31, 2003.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart II. This source category covers air-toxic emissions from the
painting (and associated cleaning), welding, and sandblasting of ships
under construction or repair at major sources. Shipbuilding and ship
repair operations means any building, repair, repainting, converting,
or alteration of ships. A ``ship'' any marine or freshwater vessel used
for military or commercial operations, including self-propelled
vessels, and navigational aids (buoys). The term shipyard applies to
any facility that performs construction or repair of ships, or self
identifies its SIC Codes as 3731 (and National Security SIC Code), with
no regard to physical location or type of operation. A 1987 study
showed that 14 out of 590 establishments (2.4 percent) accounted for
about 66 percent of the industry value shipments. We estimate that
there are 52 potential major source facilities today. The current
action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual
risks from this same source category, and develop additional emission
standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety. We
completed a preliminary assessment ``Residual Risk (RR) Test'' using
readily available information from 10 representative, high emitting,
facilities in December 2002. A relatively simple health protective
analysis was performed to assess the emission's potential to produce
chronic cancer and non-cancer risks and acute non-cancer risks to
humans via the inhalation pathway. The results of the RR test showed
that we ``do not'' have sufficient data to remove the shipbuilding
source category from consideration for a residual risk rule. Seven out
of the 10 modeled shipyards either had cancer risk > 1.00 E-6 or
chronic hazard index (HI) = 0.2. The results were presented to the Work
Group, EPA management, and the appropriate stakeholders.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/00/06
Final Action- 12/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: Federal, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4666;

Sectors Affected: 336611 Ship Building and Repairing

Agency Contact: Mohamed Serageldin, Environmental Protection Agency,
Air and Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2379
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: serageldin.mohamed@epamail.epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK20
_______________________________________________________________________

3181. NESHAP: WOOD FURNITURE MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS--RESIDUAL RISK
STANDARDS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 7, 2003.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR part 63,
subpart JJ. This source category covers air-toxic emissions from wood-
furniture manufacturing, including wood finishing, gluing, and
painting. The current action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA, is
to assess residual risks from this same source category, and develop
additional emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin
of safety.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 05/00/07
Final Action- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4667;

Sectors Affected: 337 Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing;
337211 Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Lynn Dail, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C-539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2363
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: dail.lynn@epamail.epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK21
_______________________________________________________________________

3182. NESHAP: PRINTING AND PUBLISHING INDUSTRY--RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, May 30, 2004.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR part 63,
subpart KK. This source category covers air-toxic emissions from many
activities located at printing and publishing facilities--primarily the
printing process itself, plus affiliated equipment such as cleaning,
ink and solvent mixing, chemical storage, and solvent recovery. The
current action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess
residual risks from this same source category, and develop additional
emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 07/00/07
Final Action- 07/00/08

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4664;

[[Page 65280]]

Sectors Affected: 322221 Coated and Laminated Packaging Paper and
Plastics Film Manufacturing; 322222 Coated and Laminated Paper
Manufacturing; 323112 Commercial Flexographic Printing; 323111
Commercial Gravure Printing; 322212 Folding Paperboard Box
Manufacturing; 322225 Laminated Aluminum Foil Manufacturing for
Flexible Packaging Uses; 323119 Other Commercial Printing; 322223
Plastics, Foil, and Coated Paper Bag Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Dave Salman, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0859
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: salman.dave@epamail.epa.gov

Elaine Manning, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5499
Fax: 919 541-5689
Email: manning.elaine@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK24
_______________________________________________________________________

3183. NESHAP: PETROLEUM REFINERIES--RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, August 31, 2003.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart CC. This source category covers air-toxic emissions from
equipment at petroleum refineries, such as process vents, storage
vessels, and valve leaks. The current action, required by section
112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual risks from this same source
category, and develop additional emission standards, as necessary, to
provide an ample margin of safety.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 07/00/07
Final Action- 07/00/08

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4663;

Sectors Affected: 32411 Petroleum Refineries

Agency Contact: Bob Lucas, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0884
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: lucas.bob@epamail.epa.gov

Kent Hustvedt, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C439-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5395
Fax: 919 541-0246
Email: hustvedt.ken@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK25
_______________________________________________________________________

3184. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR CHROMIUM EMISSIONS FROM HARD AND
DECORATIVE CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING AND CHROMIUM ANODIZING TANKS--
RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, January 25, 2003.

Abstract: A national emission standard for chromium emissions from hard
and decorative chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks was
previously promulgated under Section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act. That
standard set emission limits for chromium emissions from hard and
decorative chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks. The
Clean Air Act Section 112(f) requires us to assess within 8 years of
promulgation of a NESHAP the remaining risk to the public and to
develop additional more stringent standards if such standards are
needed to protect the public health with an ample margin of safety.
This action is to examine the remaining risk from hard and decorative
chromium electroplating and chromium anodizing tanks and, if warranted,
to develop new risk based standards.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 03/00/07
Final Action- 05/00/08

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: Federal, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4750;

Agency Contact: Phil Mulrine, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C439-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5289
Email: mulrine.phil@epamail.epa.gov

Steve Fruh, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C439-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2837
Fax: 919 541-3207
Email: fruh.steve@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK72
_______________________________________________________________________

3185. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS FOR
STATIONARY COMBUSTION TURBINES-PETITION TO DELIST

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The Agency has received a petition to remove the Gas Turbines
source category from the list of hazardous air pollutant sources under
Section 112(c) of the Clean Air Act. The Agency must review the
petition and either grant or deny the petition within 12 months of the
date the complete petition is received. If the Agency grants the
petition, a notice of proposed rulemaking will be published in the FR,
allowing the opportunity for public comment. If the Agency denies the
petition, a notice of denial will be published in the FR providing an
explanation of the denial.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM -- Delisting- 04/07/04 69 FR 18327
NPRM-STAY- 04/07/04 69 FR 18338
Final Action - STAY- 08/18/04 69 FR 51184
Final Action - Delisting- 06/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4751;

[[Page 65281]]

Sectors Affected: 3336 Engine, Turbine, and Power Transmission
Equipment Manufacturing; 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation

Agency Contact: Kelly Rimer, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2962
Email: rimer.kelly@epamail.epa.gov

Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK73
_______________________________________________________________________

3186. PETITION TO DELIST HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT : 4,4'-METHYLENE
DIPHENYL DIISOCYANATE

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The Clean Air Act requires EPA to regulate 188 compounds that
are listed as air toxics, also known as hazardous air pollutants. Air
toxics are those pollutants known, or suspected, to cause cancer and
other human health problems. The law allows EPA to consider petitions
to modify the list, by adding or removing substances. Individuals
seeking to remove a substance must demonstrate that there are adequate
data to determine that emissions, outdoor concentrations,
bioaccumulation, or atmospheric deposition of the substance may not
reasonably be anticipated to damage human health or the environment.
The Agency received a petition to remove 4,4'-Methylene Diphenyl
Diisocyanate (MDI) from the American Chemistry Council on December 26,
2002. Once EPA receives a petition, it conducts two reviews: a
completeness review, to determine whether there is sufficient
information on which to base a decision; and a technical review, to
evaluate the merits of the petition. The EPA also requests and
considers information from the public. After a comprehensive technical
review of both the petition and the information received from the
public to determine whether the petition satisfies the requirements of
the CAA, the review team is required to make a recommendation to the
Administrator on whether to grant the petition. If the Administrator
decides to grant a petition, a proposed rule is published in the
Federal Register which proposes a modification of the HAP list and
presents the reasoning for doing so. The proposed rule is open to
public comment and public hearing and all additional substantive
information received during the public's involvement is evaluated prior
to the decision on the issuance of a final rule. However, if the
Administrator decides to deny a petition, a notice setting forth an
explanation of the reasons for denial is published instead. A notice of
denial constitutes final Agency action of nationwide scope and
applicability, and is subject to judicial review as provided in the
CAA.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Notice of Complete Petition- 05/26/05 70 FR 30407
NPRM- 11/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 4782;

Agency Contact: Scott Jenkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C404-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1167
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: jenkins.scott@epamail.epa.gov

Dave Guinnup, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C404-
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5368
Fax: 919 541-0840
Email: guinnup.dave@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK84
_______________________________________________________________________

3187. NESHAP: GROUP I POLYMERS AND RESINS--RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 6, 2004.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR part 63,
subpart U. This source category covers process units used to
manufacture elastomer products from raw materials. The current action,
required by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual risks from
this same source category, and develop additional emission standards,
as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/07
Final Action- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4656;

Sectors Affected: 325212 Synthetic Rubber Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Bob Rosensteel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5608
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: rosensteel.bob@epa.gov

Robin Dunkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-04, Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK12
_______________________________________________________________________

3188. NESHAP: GROUP IV POLYMERS AND RESINS--RESIDUAL RISK STANDARDS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, September 12, 2004.

Abstract: EPA developed technology-based standards for this source
category under section 112(d) of the CAA, codified in 40 CFR part 63,
subpart JJJ. This source category covers chemical process units used to
manufacture thermoplastic products from raw materials. The current
action, required by section 112(f) of the CAA, is to assess residual
risks from this same source category, and develop additional

[[Page 65282]]

emission standards, as necessary, to provide an ample margin of safety.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/07
Final Action- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4658;

Sectors Affected: 325211 Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Bob Rosensteel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C504-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5608
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: rosensteel.bob@epa.gov

Robin Dunkins, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C504-04, Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335
Fax: 919 541-3470
Email: dunkins.robin@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK15
_______________________________________________________________________

3189. INTERSTATE OZONE TRANSPORT: RULEMAKING ON SECTION 126 PETITIONS
FROM THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, AND NEW JERSEY

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7426

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52; 40 CFR 97

Legal Deadline: Final, Statutory, December 14, 1999, The rulemaking
includes action on four separate petitions. See Additional Information.

Abstract: In April through July 1999, three Northeastern States (New
Jersey, Maryland, and Delaware) and the District of Columbia submitted
individual petitions to EPA in accordance with section 126 of the Clean
Air Act (CAA). Each petition specifically requests that EPA make a
finding that nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from certain stationary
sources in other States significantly contribute to ozone nonattainment
and maintenance problems with respect to the 1-hour and 8-hour ozone
standards in the petitioning State. If EPA makes such a finding of
significant contribution, EPA is authorized to establish Federal
emissions limits for the sources. The petitions rely on the analyses
from EPA's NOx SIP call. The sources targeted by the petitions are
large electricity generating units and large non-electricity generating
units, as defined in EPA's NOx SIP call. The EPA took rulemaking action
on similar petitions from eight other Northeastern States that were
submitted in 1997.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN 4383. There is a different statutory
deadline associated with each petition based on the date of receipt by
EPA: New Jersey - 12/14/99, Maryland - 01/01/00, Delaware - 02/10/00,
District of Columbia - 03/07/00

Agency Contact: Carla Oldham, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3347
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: oldham.carla@epamail.epa.gov

David Cole, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, MD-15,
C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5565
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: cole.david@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AI99
_______________________________________________________________________

3190. IMPORTATION OF NONCONFORMING VEHICLES; AMENDMENTS TO REGULATIONS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7522 ``CAA 203''; 42 USC 7525 ``CAA 206''; 42
USC 7541 ``CAA 207''; 42 USC 7542 ``CAA 208''; 42 USC 7601 ``CAA 301'';
42 USC 7522 ``CAA 203''; 42 USC 7550 ``CAA 216''; 42 USC 7601 ``CAA
301''

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 85

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action will amend the regulations in 40 CFR part 85,
subpart P to allow entry into the United States of vehicles which are
originally sold in Canada and which are identical to their U.S.
counterparts, without obtaining a certificate of conformity from EPA.
This action is in response to a petition for review of import rules.
The final rule also will address certain other issues in part 85,
subpart P and subpart R, including: (1) Formalizing a long-standing EPA
policy regarding the importation of owned vehicles that are proven to
be identical to a vehicle certified for sale in the United States (2)
establishing new emission standards applicable to imported
nonconforming vehicles; (3) clarifying the regulatory language that
concerns exclusions and exemptions from meeting Federal emission
requirements; and (4) providing several minor clarifications to the
existing regulations.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 03/24/94 59 FR 13912
Final Action- 05/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 2665;

Agency Contact: Bob Doyal, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, 6405J, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9258

RIN: 2060-AI03
_______________________________________________________________________

3191. SELECTION OF SEQUENCE OF MANDATORY SANCTIONS TO BE APPLIED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 502 OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7661a(d); 42 USC 7661a(g); 42 USC 7661a(i)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule would establish the order of sanctions for
operating permits program deficiencies under the mandatory sanctions
provisions of title V of the Clean Air Act. This rule would stipulate
that an emission offset sanction applies first and a highway funding
sanction six months later. Sanction application under section 502 of
the Clean Air Act is automatic under the timeframes prescribed once EPA

[[Page 65283]]

selects the sanction order; EPA's only discretion concerns the ordering
of sanctions as discussed above. Thus, the only relevant potential
impact is the effect of applying, as a general matter, the emission
offset sanction six months before the highway sanction. The EPA does
not believe this will have a significant impact given the short period
of time the offset sanction will apply before the highway sanction
would apply when States fail to correct title V deficiencies. Moreover,
EPA also believes that, in the event applying the highway sanction is
not necessary six months following the offset sanction, because the
State has corrected the deficiency prompting the finding, applying the
offset sanction first eliminates the need for EPA and other agencies to
bear the greater administrative and implementation burden of having to
effectuate the highway sanction.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4700;

Agency Contact: Scott Voorhees, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, C304-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5348
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: voorhees.scott@epamail.epa.gov

Ray Vogel, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C304-03,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3153
Fax: 919 541-5509
Email: vogel.ray@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK46
_______________________________________________________________________

3192. PERFORMANCE WARRANTY AND INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE TEST PROCEDURES

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7541; 42 USC 7601

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 85

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action establishes a new short test procedure for use in
I/M programs required by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Vehicles
that are tested and failed using this procedure and that meet
eligibility requirements established by the act would be eligible for
free warranty repair from the manufacturers.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/00/06
Final Action- 01/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 3263;

Agency Contact: David Sosnowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734-214-4823
Email: sosnowski.david@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AE20
_______________________________________________________________________

3193. INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE RECALL REQUIREMENTS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7511(a)(2)(b); 42 USC 7511(a)(2)(b)(2)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This action specifies requirements for enhanced I/M programs
to establish a program to ensure compliance with recall notices. This
is pursuant to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 10/00/06
Final Action- 05/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: Businesses

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 3262;

Agency Contact: David Sosnowski, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734-214-4823
Email: sosnowski.david@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AE22
_______________________________________________________________________

3194. TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY RULE AMENDMENT: CLARIFICATION OF TRADING
PROVISIONS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7671 ``CAA 176(c)''

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 93

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The transportation conformity rule, promulgated in November
1993, ensures that transportation and air quality planning are
consistent with Clean Air Act air quality standards. The Open Market
Trading Guidance provides guidance to states for establishing a method
to quantify emissions reductions (called discrete emissions reductions
or DERs) that can be traded among parties and how such trading should
occur. This action will amend the transportation conformity rule to
clarify how emissions trading could be reconciled in the conformity
process.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 11/00/06

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Additional Information: SAN No. 3917;

Agency Contact: Angela Spickard, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, NFEVL, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734-214-4238
Email: spickard.angela@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AH31
_______________________________________________________________________

3195. INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL
FACILITIES; AMENDMENT

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 23 USC 101; 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (Revision); 40 CFR 93 (New)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has had oversight
and policy development authority for Inspection and Maintenance (I/M)
programs since the

[[Page 65284]]

passage of the Clean Air Act (CAA) in 1970. The 1977 amendments to the
CAA mandated I/M for certain areas with long-term air quality problems
and the 1990 amendments set forth standards for implementation of I/M
programs. EPA used the statutory requirements of the Act, including I/M
requirements for Federal facilities, to promulgate regulations which
States would use in the development of their I/M State Implementation
Plans (SIPs). Those rule requirements effectively gave States certain
authorities over the Federal government. The Department of Justice has
now ruled that Federal sovereign immunity was not fully waived under
the CAA for those requirements and EPA should amend its rule to remove
the requirement that States include those elements in their SIPs. EPA
is proposing to: (1) Amend the Federal facilities I/M requirements by
removing that section; (2) correct existing I/M SIP approval actions
which include these elements; (3) establish new Federal facilities I/M
program requirements which Federal facilities in I/M program areas must
meet in order to comply with the Act; and (4) designate for each State
which section of the Act Federal agencies must comply with based on how
that State promulgated its I/M regulations. These changes will have
minimal to no impact on the States as no new requirements are being
created. The States are under no obligation, legal or otherwise, to
modify existing SIPs meeting the previously applicable requirements as
a result of this action, nor will emissions reduction credit be
affected. However, the changes will clarify for affected Federal
facilities what they must do to meet the CAA requirements by
establishing new regulations per those requirements.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- 12/00/06
Final Action- 12/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, State

Additional Information: SAN No. 4348;

Agency Contact: Buddy Polovick, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 6406, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734-214-4928
Fax: 734 214-4052
Email: polovick.buddy@epamail.epa.gov

Sara Schneeberg, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20460
Phone: 202-564-5592
Email: schneeberg.sara@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AI97
_______________________________________________________________________

3196. CALIFORNIA GASOLINE TECHNICAL CORRECTION

Priority: Info./Admin./Other

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7521(1); 42 USC 7545; 42 USC
7601(a)

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80.81(a)

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: This rule corrects final regulations, which were published in
the Federal Register on March 29, 2001 (66 FR 17230). The corrected
regulatory provision restores the definition of California gasoline as
used in the enforcement exemptions for California gasoline under the
regulation of fuels and fuel additives.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

Direct Final Action- 10/00/07

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: None

Additional Information: SAN No. 4722;

Agency Contact: Christine Brunner, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
and Radiation, 4206, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4287
Fax: 734 214-4051
Email: brunner.christine@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK56
_______________________________________________________________________

3197. VOLUNTARY SUPERIOR MONITORING

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 to 61; 40 CFR 63; 40 CFR 70; 40 CFR 71

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: The Voluntary Superior Monitoring (VSM) project has been
revised from a regulatory to non-regulatory effort. Initially, the VSM
project was designed to provide incentives to industry to induce them
to conduct better or ``superior'' emissions monitoring than what is
required through regulation and permitting. We had planned to revise
the parts 60, 61, and 63 general provisions to allow sources an option
to install and operate better emissions monitoring (than what is
regulatorily required) in return for incentives. This approach was
deemed unworkable; therefore we revised the goals of the VSM project to
aim for identifying opportunities for better or superior monitoring in
new rulemakings. Thus, the focus of VSM now is to work with EPA
regulation writers to find rules that would benefit from voluntary
upgrades of emissions monitoring. For example, we have inserted
language in an upcoming rule that allows states to receive SIP credits
for requiring sources to install better emissions monitors. This is a
``win-win'' situation. Sources install the superior monitors, find
problems sooner, correct them quicker, and emit less pollutants. This
measure can save sources money in maintenance of control devices while
emitting less pollutants. Additionally, this measure is much less
expensive, but just as effective, than other control measures.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Federal, Local, State, Tribal

Additional Information: SAN No. 4783;

Sectors Affected: 325 Chemical Manufacturing; 332 Fabricated Metal
Product Manufacturing; 337 Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing;
333 Machinery Manufacturing; 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product
Manufacturing; 322 Paper Manufacturing; 324 Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing; 326 Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing; 331
Primary Metal Manufacturing; 323 Printing and Related Support
Activities; 336 Transportation Equipment Manufacturing; 221 Utilities;
321 Wood Product Manufacturing

Agency Contact: Tom Driscoll, Environmental Protection Agency, Air

[[Page 65285]]

and Radiation, D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5135
Fax: 919 541-0516
Email: driscoll.tom@epamail.epa.gov

Barrett Parker, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, EN-
341W, D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5635
Fax: 919 541-1039
Email: parker.barrett@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AK85
_______________________________________________________________________

3198. LIFTING THE STAY OF THE EIGHT-HOUR PORTION OF THE FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION AND RULEMAKING FOR PURPOSES OF REDUCING
INTERSTATE OZONE TRANSPORT (``NOX SIP CALL'')

Priority: Other Significant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.121

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: In the Nitrogen Oxides State Implementation Plan Call (NOx
SIP Call)(63 FR 57356, October 27, 1998), EPA found that emissions of
NOx from 22 States and the District of Columbia (hereinafter referred
to as `23 States') significantly contribute to downwind areas'
nonattainment of the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA also separately found that
NOx emissions from the same 23 States significantly contribute to
downwind nonattainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Subsequently, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C.
Circuit) remanded the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. [American Trucking
Associations, Inc. v. EPA, 175 F.3d 1027 on rehearing 195 F.3d 4 (D.C.
Cir. 1999).]
EPA stayed the 8-hour basis of the NOx SIP Call rule on
September 18, 2000 (65 FR 56245) based on the uncertainty created by
the D.C. Circuit's decision. EPA has now completed the actions
necessary to address the aforementioned remand, and therefore is now
conducting rulemaking to lift the stay. EPA is proposing to lift the
stay of our findings in the NOx SIP Call contained in 40 CFR sec
51.121(a)(2), related to the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS). This action does not create any new requirements; it
merely reinstitutes a requirement of the NOx SIP Call that had
previously been stayed.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM- To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: State, Local

Additional Information: SAN No. 4797;

Agency Contact: Jan King, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5665
Email: king.jan@epa.gov

Doug Grano, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation, C539-
02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3292
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: grano.doug@epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AL84
_______________________________________________________________________

3199. DEFERRAL OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATIONS FOR 8-
HOUR OZONE NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR EARLY ACTION
COMPACT AREAS

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal Authority: 42 USC 7407; 42 USC 7601

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81

Legal Deadline: None

Abstract: EPA is proposing to defer the effective date of nonattainment
air quality designations for ``Early Action Compact Areas'' that are
violating the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard, but
have agreed to reduce ground-level ozone pollution earlier than the
Clean Air Act requires. This proposal establishes the first of three
dates by which EPA would defer the effective date of nonattainment
designations for any of these areas that continues to meet all compact
milestones. In a separate action, EPA will designate these areas
``nonattainment'' by April 15, 2004; however, as long as Early Action
Compact areas meet agreed-upon milestones, the impact of nonattainment
designation for the 8-hour ozone standard will be deferred until
September 30, 2005.

Timetable:
________________________________________________________________________

Action Date FR Cite

________________________________________________________________________

NPRM 12/16/03 68 FR 70108
Final Action To Be Determined

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No

Small Entities Affected: No

Government Levels Affected: Local, State

Additional Information: SAN 4798. This action has been merged with SAN
4839. All further action will be under SAN 4839. SAN 4798 is hereby
withdrawn.

Agency Contact: David Cole, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation, MD-15, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5565
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: cole.david@epa.gov

Valerie Broadwell, Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation,
C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3310
Fax: 919 541-0824
Email: broadwell.valerie@epamail.epa.gov

RIN: 2060-AL85
_______________________________________________________________________

3200. CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRY PETITION TO REMOVE THE TWO-PIECE CAN
SUBCATEGORY FROM THE CLEAN AIR ACT HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT SOURCE
CATEGORY LIST

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant

Legal