Jump to main content.


Ouachita River Gas Storage Company, L.L.C.; Notice of

 

Ouachita River Gas Storage Company, L.L.C.; Notice of

[Federal Register: March 3, 1995]


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP94-38-000]

Ouachita River Gas Storage Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Availability of the Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Ouachita River Gas Storage Project

February 27, 1995.
The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) on the natural gas pipeline facilities proposed by Ouachita River Gas Storage Company, L.L.C. (Ouachita) in the above-referenced docket. The EA was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. The staff concludes that approval of the proposed project, with appropriate mitigating measures, would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of the construction and operation of the proposed underground gas storage facility and related hub facilities including: <bullet> About 5 miles of 6-, 8-, and 12-inch-diameter field gathering lines (designated as Lines FG-1, FG-2, and FG-3) in Lincoln and Union Parishes, Louisiana;
<bullet> About 2.6 miles of dual 24-inch-diameter header pipeline (designated as Lines B and C) and four meter stations in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana;
<bullet> About 23.9 miles of 24-inch-diameter bi-directional flow transmission pipeline (Line A) in Lincoln, Union, and Ouachita Parishes, Louisiana;
<bullet> About 4.5 miles of 16-inch-diameter bi-directional flow transmission pipeline (line D) and one meter station in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana;
<bullet> A 6,260-horsepower (hp) Remote Compressor Station in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana;
<bullet> A 12,520-hp Central Compressor Station in Section 30-T19NR 1W, Union Parish, Louisiana; and
<bullet> Drill 11 injection/withdrawal wells and 2 observation wells in Lincoln and Union Parishes, Louisiana. The purpose of the proposed facilities would be to provide about 27 billion cubic feet of working gas capacity with an estimated peak withdrawal capacity of 550 MMcf of gas a day and an estimated peak injection capacity of 250 MMcf of gas a day via the hub facilities. The hub facilities near Monroe, Louisiana would be interconnected with certain interstate and intrastate pipelines. The EA has been placed in the public files of the FERC and is available for public inspection at: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Reference and Files Maintenance Branch, 941 North Capitol Street, NE., room 3104, Washington, DC 20426, (202) 208-1371. Copies of the EA have been mailed to Federal, State and local agencies, public interest groups, interested individuals, newspapers, and parties to this proceeding.
A limited number of copies of the EA are available from: Mr. Herman Der, Environmental Project Manager, Environmental Review and Compliance Branch I, Office of Pipeline Regulation, room 7312, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 208-0896. Any person wishing to comment on the EA may do so. Written comments must reference Docket No. CP94-38-000, and be addressed to: Office of the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC. 20426.
Comments should be filed as soon as possible, but must be received no later than April 3, 1995, to ensure consideration prior to a Commission decision on this proposal. A copy of any comments should also be sent to Mr. Herman Der, Environmental Project Manager, room 7312, at the above address. [[Page 11966]] Comments will be considered by the Commission but will not serve to make the commentor a party to the proceeding. Any person seeking to become a party to the proceeding must file a motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.214).
The date for filing timely motions to intervene in this proceeding has passed. Therefore, parties now seeking to file late interventions must show good cause, as required by section 385.214(b)(3), why this time limitation should be waived. Environmental issues have been viewed as good cause for late intervention. You do not need interventor status to have your comments considered.
Additional information about this project is available from Mr. Herman Der, Environmental Project Manager. Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 95-5223 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-M

 
 


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.