Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
National Park Service
[Federal Register: March 3, 1995]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park ServiceLake Mead National Recreation Area, Arizona and Nevada; Notice of Availability of Final Environmental Impact Statement
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190, as amended), the National Park Service, Department of Interior, has prepared a final environmental impact statement (FEIS) that describes and analyzes a proposed action and four alternatives for burro management within Lake Mead National Recreation Area (NRA), Mohave County, Arizona, and Clark County, Nevada.
The draft Environmental Impact Statement for Burro Management was released for public review on June 28, 1994 (59 FR 123), and the public comment period closed August 31, 1994. During this period written comments were received. The FEIS contains responses to the comments received and modifications to the text as needed in response to the comments.
The goal of the proposed action, designated in the FEIS as ``Alternative B: Resource Based Management'', is the cessation of environmental change caused by burros, and the protection of the natural, cultural, and recreational resources of Lake Mead NRA. It intends to allow the restoration of damaged park lands and the protection and preservation of native ecosystems not yet altered by burros. Burros would be removed, using live-removal techniques, fencing, sterilization and/or birth control, from portions of the park that have been so severely overutilized by burros in the past that habitat recovery is not possible with any level of burro use. Burros would also be removed within areas that have threatened, endangered, sensitive, or unique resources, or where burros cause a threat to public safety. Burros would not be allowed to expand into areas that are currently burro free. Burro presence would be tolerated in certain areas of the park where reducing the burro populations to zero is not prudent or feasible at this time, due to presence of burro populations on adjacent Bureau of Land Management administered lands, few or nonexistent barriers, and the lack of practical and cost effective control methods for these areas of the park. Lands within the park near the Muddy Mountains and Gold Butte, Nevada and Arizona; portions of the Grand Wash not designated as critical tortoise habitat; and lands within the park south of the Eldorado Jeep Trail, Arizona, would be areas where burros may remain, managed to NPS standards and prescriptions, in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management. The alternatives under consideration, in addition to the proposed action, include ``No-Action or Status Quo'' (which is the continuance of the level of management that currently exists within the NRA), ``No Management of Burros'', ``Managing a Population of Burros for Perpetuity'', and ``Total Removal of All Burros''. Major impact topics assessed for the proposed action and alternatives include natural resources, socioeconomic resources, cultural resources, and burros.SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The no-action period on this final environmental impact statement for burro management will extend for 30 days after a notice of its availability is published by the Environmental Protection Agency in the Federal Register. Inquiries about the document should be addressed to: Superintendent, Lake Mead National Recreation Area, 601 Nevada Highway, Boulder City, Nevada, 89005; or by calling the park at (702) 293-8949. For copies of the FEIS, or for further information, please contact the Superintendent at the above address or telephone number. Copies of the document are available at park headquarters and at area libraries.
Dated: February 22, 1995.
Stanley T. Albright,
Regional Director, Western Region.
[FR Doc. 95-5195 Filed 3-2-95; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)