Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: July 14, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 136)]
[Notices]
[Page 43748-43749]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14jy00-61]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6609-2]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at (202) 260-5076. An explanation of the ratings
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published
in Federal Register dated April 14, 2000 (65 FR 20157).
Draft EISs
ERP No. D-FAA-E51047-NC Rating EO2, Piedmont Triad International
Airport, Construction and Operation, Runway 5L/23R and New Overnight
Express Air Cargo Sorting and Distribution Facility, and Associated
Developments, Funding, NPDES and COE Section 404 Permit, City of
Greensboro, Guilford County, NC.
[[Page 43749]]
Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections since the EIS did
not fully describe the proposed air cargo operations and the associated
potential noise impacts. EPA requested that there be specific
commitments to both avoid or reduce air cargo operational noise.
ERP No. D-GSA-B80007-MA Rating LO, U.S. Courthouse Springfield,
Construction, Hampden County, MA.
Summary: EPA had no objections to the project.
ERP No. D-IBW-G29002-00 Rating EC2, El Paso--Las Cruces Regional
Sustainable Water Project, To Secure Future Drinking Water Supplies,
United States and New Mexico.
Summary: EPA expressed concern regarding potential impacts to
water/terrestrial resources, habitats, air quality, cultural resources
and socioeconomics. EPA requested the final document include additional
information and mitigation measures on these issues.
Final EISs
ERP No. F-AFS-J65288-CO Uncompahgre National Forest Travel Plans
Revision, Implementation, Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National
Forests, Garrison, Hinsdale Mesa, Montrose, Ouray and San Juan
Counties, CO.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-FAA-B51018-CT Tweed-New Haven Airport Runway Safety Area
and Taxiway Improvements, Safety Improvements to Runway 2/20 and
Taxiways `B' and `E', Funding, COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, New
Haven County, CT.
Summary: EPA has no objections to the project.
ERP No. F-HUD-K80040-CA City of Monterey Park Project, Construction
and Operation of the Monterey Park Towne Plaza, North of the Pomona
Freeway and west of Paramount Boulevard, Los Angeles County, CA.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-USA-K26001-HI Schofield Barracks Wastewater Treatment
Plant (WWTP), Effluent Treatment and Disposal, NPDES Permit and COE
Section 404 Permit, City of County of Honolulu, Oahu, HI.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
Dated: July 11, 2000.
Joseph C. Montgomery,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 00-17924 Filed 7-13-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)