Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: May 19, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 98)]
[Notices]
[Page 31899-31900]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19my00-54]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6607-4]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared May 01, 2000 Through May 05,
2000 pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under Section
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National
Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA
comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at (202)
564-7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 14, 2000 (65
FR 20157).
Draft EISs
ERP No. D-FAA-B51019-RI Rating EC2, T. F. Green Airport Project, To
Implement the Part 150 Noise Abatement Procedures in a Safe and
Efficient Manner, Warwick County, RI.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns regarding the analysis of community
noise impacts and mitigation measures described in the DEIS.
ERP No. D-FHW-E40308-TN Rating EC2, TN-374 (North Parkway) Project,
Construction from TN13 to TN 76 in Clarksville, Funding, US Coast Guard
and COE Section 404 Permits, Montgomery County, TN.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding purpose and
need and potential wetland impacts. EPA requested clarification of
these issues.
ERP No. D-FHW-F40388-WI Rating EC2, US-14/61 Westby--Virogua Bypass
Corridor Study, Transportation Improvements, Funding and COE Section
404 Permit, Cities of Virogua and Westby, Vernon County, WI.
Summary: EPA expressed concern that the document did not provide
information on how this project relates to plans for the Highway 14 and
61 corridors.
ERP No. D-FHW-H40167-MO Rating EC2, US 65 Improvements, from County
Road 65-122 South to Route EE Intersection south of Buffalo, COE
Section 404 Permit, Dallas County, MO.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns regarding possible detrimental
impacts to drinking water supplies; lack of cumulative and indirect
impacts analysis; and a lack of maps detailing information addressed in
the various sections of the DEIS.
ERP No. D-FRC-K03023-00 Rating EC2, Southern Trails Pipeline
Project (CP99-163-000), Conversion of an Existing Crude Oil Pipeline
(known as the ARCO Four Corners Pipeline Line 90 System), Construction
and Operation, CA, AZ, UT and NM.
Summary: EPA identified some concerns and additional analysis
needs, particularly in the area of socioeconomics and the treatment of
environmental justice.
ERP No. D-FTA-F54012-OH Rating EC2, Bera/I-X Center Red Line
Extension Project, Southwest Corridor Major Investment, Transit
Improvements, Funding, Cuyahoga County, OH.
Summary: EPA expressed concerns because of the lack of discussion
pertaining to avoidance, minimization and mitigation of wetlands and
the insufficiency of the content and format of noise and vibration
analysis.
ERP No. D-USN-K11033-CA Rating EC2, El Toro Marine Corps Air
Station Disposal and Reuse, Implementation, Orange County, CA.
Summary: EPA expressed concern that re-use activities could lead to
exceedences of applicable air quality standards, could result in
increased water pollution, or could harm wildlife. EPA recommended that
the Navy identify mitigation to protect wetlands, develop a restoration
alternative, and consider an environmental management system (EMS) to
mitigate risks.
ERP No. DA-IBR-J35005-00 Rating EC2, Animas-La Plata Project (ALP
Project), Municipal and Industrial Water Supply, Reservoir Construction
in Ridges Basin, Implementation and Water Acquisition Funding,
Additional Information concerning Project Alternatives Developed in
1996 through 1997, CO NM.
Summary: EPA requested that additional information be provided on
how the various environmental impacts of the alternatives are being
compared and details of the proposed wetland and habitat mitigation
plan.
ERP No. DS-DOD-A11075-00 Rating LO, National Missile Defense
Deployment (NMD) System, Upgraded Early Warning Radar Supplement
(UEWR), To Addresses Interior Replacement of Electronic Hardware and
Computer Software, Affected Areas Clear Air Force Station (AFS), Denali
Borough, AK; Beale Air Force Base (AFB), Yuba County, CA; and Cape Cod
AFS, Barnstable County, MA.
Summary: EPA had no objection to this project.
Final EISs
ERP No. F-BOP-E80002-SC South Carolina--Federal Correctional
Institution, Construct and Operate, Possible Sites: Andrew,
Bennettsville, Oliver and Salters, SC.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding potential
wetlands impacts.
ERP No. F-FAA-B51021-MA Provincetown Municipal Airport Safety and
Operational Enhancement Project, Improvements (1) Firefighter Equipment
Garage; (2) General Aviation Parking Apron Expansion; (3) Runaway
Safety Areas, and (4) a Runaway Extension, COE Section 404 Permit, Cape
Cod National Seashore, Barnstable County, MA.
Summary: EPA has no objections to the recommended actions in the
FEIS but asked to be actively involved in any NEPA reevaluation
associated with any future runway extension project at the airport.
ERP No. F-FHW-H50001-MO MO-19 Missouri River Replacement Bridge
Project, Construction and Operation, US Coast Guard and COE Section 404
Permits, Gasconade and Montgomery Counties, MO.
Summary: EPA urged FHWA/MoDOT to condition the Record of Decision
for the selection of the 5-W1 alternative pending completion of Fish
and Wildlife Service surveys for three endangered species.
ERP No. F-FHW-K40225-CA Marin US-101 High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)
Gap Closure Project, Construction from US 101 I-580 on US-101 from
Lucky Drive to North San Pedro Road and I-580 from Irene Street to US-
101, Funding, COE Section 404 and Bridge Permits, Marin County, CA.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-FTA-K40238-CA Downtown Sacramento--Folsom Corridor,
Improvement of Transit Services, US 50/Folsom Boulevard,
[[Page 31900]]
Funding and COE Section 404 Permit, Transportation Systems Management
(TSM) and Light Rail Transit (LRT), City and County of Sacramento, CA.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-FTA-K54023-CA Vasona Corridor Light Rail Transit Project,
Extension of existing Light Rail Transit (LRT), in portion of the
Cities of San Jose, Campbell and Los Gatos, Santa Clara County, CA.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-IBR-K39054-CA Groundwater Replenishment System,
Implementation to Repurifying Water from Orange County Water District
(OCWD) Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), Funding and COE
Section 404 Permit, Orange County, CA.
Summary: EPA continues to express concern regarding (1) potential
emergency response procedures and contingency plans, (2) how the
injection process would improve the effectiveness of the saltwater
intrusion barrier, and (3) a preliminary monitoring plan to be
implemented by the project operators.
ERP No. F-SFW-L64046-WA Little Pend Oreille National Wildlife
Refuge, Implementation, Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Stevens and
Pend Oreille Counties, WA.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-TVA-E09805-TN Addition of Electric Generation Peaking and
Baseload Capacity at Greenfield Sites, Construction and Operation of
Combustion Turbines (CTs), Haywood County, TN.
Summary: EPA expressed concern with the proposal to develop new
power plants proposed for greenfields as opposed to brownfields or the
expansion/repowering of existing plants. EPA also expressed concern
that the project would likely induce growth with associated impacts.
EPA recommended that TVA continue to coordinate with local community
leaders regarding environmental justice issues.
ERP No. F-USN-K11083-CA Hunters Point (Former) Naval Shipyard
Disposal and Reuse, Implementation, City of San Francisco, San
Francisco County, CA.
Summary: EPA continues to object to the FEIS based upon inadequate
mitigation on potential impacts to the environmental justice community
at Hunters Point.
ERP No. FS-UAF-A11074-00 Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV)
Program, Development, Operation and Deployment, Proposed Launch
Locations are Cape Canaveral Air Station (AS), Florida and Vandenberg
Air Force Base (AFB), California, Federal Permits and Licenses, FL and
CA.
Summary: EPA had no objection to the Final document.
Dated: May 16, 2000.
Joseph C. Montgomery,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 00-12681 Filed 5-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)