Jump to main content.

Commonwealth Edison Company; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

 [Federal Register: September 19, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 182)]
[Notices]
[Page 56604]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19se00-95]

[[Page 56604]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249]


Commonwealth Edison Company; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units
2 and 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating Licenses Nos. DPR-19 and
DPR-25, issued to Commonwealth Edison Company (ComEd, or the licensee)
for operation of the Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3,
located in Grundy County, Illinois.

Environmental Assessment

Identification of the Proposed Action

    The proposed action would add the Siemens Power Corporation RODEX2A
methodology to the Dresden, Units 2 and 3, Technical Specifications
(TSs) list of approved methodologies that may be used to determine core
operating limits. The proposed action also adds a condition to the
Dresden, Units 2 and 3, licenses to limit the maximum rod average
burnup to 60 gigawatt-days per metric ton of uranium (GWD/MTU). Adding
the RODEX2A methodology to the TSs will permit the use of extended fuel
burnup limits. RODEX2A supports maximum rod average burnups to 62 GWD/
MTU and uranium-235 (U-235) enrichments up to 5 percent by weight.
However, the license condition will limit burnup to 60 GWD/MTU until
the completion of an NRC Environmental Assessment supporting increased
limits.
    The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's
application for amendment dated August 3, 1999, as supplemented by
letter dated February 25, 2000.

The Need for the Proposed Action

    The proposed action is needed in order for the licensee to have the
flexibility to use fuel with increased burnup. The changes in operating
parameters and limits will allow longer operating cycles and result in
fewer fuel assemblies being needed.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and
concludes that, although the extended burnup may slightly change the
mix of radionuclides that might be released in the event of an
accident, there are no significant adverse environmental impacts
associated with the proposed action.
    The staff published ``Extended Burnup Fuel Use in Commercial LWR's;
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact'' on
February 29, 1988 (53 FR 6040). This generic environmental assessment
of extended fuel burnup in light water reactors found that ``no
significant adverse effects will be generated by increasing the present
batch-average burnup level of 33 GWD/MTU to 50 GWD/MTU or above as long
as the maximum rod average burnup level of any fuel rod is no greater
than 60 GWD/MTU.'' In addition, the environmental impacts of
transportation resulting from the use of higher enrichment fuel and
extended irradiation were published and discussed in the staff
assessment entitled, ``NRC Assessment of the Environmental Effects of
Transportation Resulting from Extended Fuel Enrichment and
Irradiation,'' dated July 7, 1988. That assessment was published in
connection with an Environmental Assessment related to the Sheron
Harris Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, which was published in the Federal
Register on August 11, 1988 (53 FR 30355), as corrected on August 24,
1988 (53 FR 32322). In these assessments, collectively, the staff
concluded that the environmental impacts summarized in Table S-3 of 10
CFR 51.51 and in Table S-4 of 10 CFR 51.52 for a burnup level of 33
GWD/MTU and enrichments up to 4 weight percent U-235 are conservative
and bound the corresponding impacts for burnup levels up to 60 GWD/MTU
and enrichments up to 5 weight percent U-235. These findings are
applicable to the proposed action at Dresden which will limit burnup to
60 GWD/MTU and allow enrichments up to 5 weight percent U-235.
    The proposed action will not significantly increase the probability
or consequences of accidents, no significant changes are being made in
the types of any effluents that may be released offsite, and there is
no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure.
Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts
associated with the proposed action.
    With regard to potential nonradiological environmental impacts, the
proposed action does not involve any historic sites. It does not affect
nonradiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact.
Therefore, there are no significant nonradiological impacts associated
with the proposed action.
    Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.

Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
Denial of the application would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action
and the alternative action are similar.

Alternative Use of Resources

    This action does not involve the use of any resources not
previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the
Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3, dated November 1973.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    In accordance with its stated policy, on May 12, 2000, the staff
consulted with the Illinois State official, Frank Niziolek of the
Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety, regarding the environmental
impact of the proposed action. The State official had no comments.

Finding of No Significant Impact

    On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes
that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has
determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
    For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the
licensee's letters dated August 3, 1999, as supplemented on February
25, 2000, which are available for public inspection at the NRC Public
Document Room, The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC.
Publicly available records will be accessible electronically from the
ADAMS Public Library component on the NRC Web site, http:\\www.nrc.gov
(the Electronic Reading Room).

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of September 2000.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Anthony J. Mendiola,
Chief, Section 2, Project Directorate III, Division of Licensing
Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 00-24058 Filed 9-18-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P

 
 

Local Navigation

Jump to main content.