Jump to main content.

Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

 [Federal Register: April 13, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 72)]
[Notices]
[Page 19164]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13ap01-52]

[[Page 19164]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6617-2]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at (202) 564-7167. An explanation of the ratings
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published
in FR dated April 14, 2000 (65 FR 20157).

Draft EISs

ERP No. D-AFS-L65375-00 Rating EC2, Lookout Pass Ski and Recreation
Area (LPSRA) Expansion Project, Implementation, Amendment to the
Existing Special Use Permit, NPDES Permit and COE Section 404 Permit,
Idaho Panhandles National Forests, Coeur d'Alene River Range District,
ID and MT.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns over the lack of
mitigation for aquatic habitat impacts; consistency with TMDL
development for 303(d) listed waters; and the indirect effects to off
site land uses.
ERP No. D-IBR-L65374-WA Rating EC2, Potholes Reservoir Resource
Management Plan, Implementation, COE Section 404 and NPDES Permits,
Moses Lake, Grant County, WA.
    Summary: EPA expressed concerns regarding the loss of shrub-steppe
and water quality. EPA requested that the Bureau of Reclamation
estimate the direct, indirect and cumulative effects on shrub-steppe
from project implementation, and contact the state Ecology Department
for information on load limits for the Potholes Reservoir and East
Potholes Canal.
ERP No. D-NPS-K65229-CA Rating EC2, Santa Cruz Island Primary
Restoration Plan, Implementation, Channel Islands National Park, Santa
Cruz Island, Santa Barbara County, CA.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with the adequacy of
the proposed mitigation measures concerning soil erosion and noxious
weeds and from potential impacts to air and water quality from aerially
applied herbicides. While EPA agrees with the need for the project EPA
favors the selection of Alternative 2 which appears more cost effective
and efficient in the long term.

Final EISs

ERP No. F-AFS-J65316-MT Clearwater Ecosystem Management and Timber Sale
Project, Timber Harvesting, Burning, Weed Spraying and Road Management,
Lola National Forest, Seeley Lake Ranger District, Missoula County, MT.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns regarding short-term
increases in sediments levels from temporary road construction and
reconstruction, road obliteration and timber harvest. EPA supports the
long term objectives of the proposed project which will reduce road
densities; protect the grizzly bear; reduce sources of sediment to
protect water quality and bull trout habitat; improve forest health and
reduce risk of insect infestation and wildfire; improve wildlife
habitat; treat noxious weeds; and enhance scenic views.
ERP No. F-AFS-L65346-OR Triangle Land Exchange Project, Between
Clearwater Land Exchange Oregon (Clearwater) an Oregon Partnership,
Implementation, Malheur, Umatilla and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests,
Baker, Grant, Harney and Wallowa Counties, OR.
    Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-BLM-K61148-NV Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area
(RRCNCA), General Management Plan (GMP), Amendment to the Las Vegas
Resource Management Plan, Las Vegas, NV.
    Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-DOE-K22004-CA National Ignition Facility Project Specific
Analysis, Construction and Operation at the Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory, Livermore, CA.
    Summary: EPA noted that the FSEIS satisfactorily responds to EPA
comments on the DSEIS.
ERP No. F-FHW-G40152-LA North-South Expressway Const. I-220 in
Shreveport, LA to the Arkansas State Line, Funding and COE Section 404
Permit Issuance, Caddo Parish, LA.
    Summary: The Final EIS adequately responded to comments offered on
the DEIS. EPA has no objection to the section of the preferred
alternative. EPA has no further comments to offer.
ERP No. F-NPS-J65319-UT Zion National Park, General Management Plan,
Implementation, Washington, Iron and Kane Counties, UT.
    Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.

ERP No. F-NPS-K65221-AZ Chiricahua National Monument, General
Management Plan, To Protect Certain National Formations, Known as ``The
Pinnacles,'' AZ.
    Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-NPS-K65222-AZ Fort Bowie National Historic Site General
Management Plan, Implementation, Cochise County, AZ.
    Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-TVA-E06020-MS Kemper County Combustion Turbine Plant,
Construction and Operation, Addition of Electric General Peaking
Capacity at Greenfield Sites, NPDES Permit, Kemper County, MS.
    Summary: Although overall impacts do not appear to be major, EPA
has some concerns with the proposed new peaking power facility. These
include air quality and compensation for the proposed conversion of
forested wetlands. EPA also suggest that substantive issues be included
in the TVA ROD. EPA will continue to review this project through the
State of Mississippi's PSD process.
ERP No. F-TVA-E39053-TN Future Water Supply Needs in the Upper Duck
River Basin, NPDES Permit and COE Section 404 Permit, Bedford,
Marshall, Maury and Williamson Counties, TN.

    Summary: EPA notes that no preferred alternative was identified in
the FEIS and believes that the No-Action Alternative should be
continued with water conservation measures implemented before any
additional source water action alternative is initiated when water
shortfalls become acute. EPA prefers action alternatives C and E, and
has environmental objections to alternatives B and D, as proposed.

    Dated: April 10, 2001.
Joseph C. Montgomery,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 01-9242 Filed 4-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

 
 

Local Navigation

Jump to main content.