![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Cayuga Project, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Ashland County, WI
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: April 23, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 78)]
[Notices]
[Page 20421-20423]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23ap01-29]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Cayuga Project, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Ashland
County, WI
AGENCY: USDA, Forest Service.
ACTION: Notice; intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to document the analysis and disclose the environmental
impacts of proposed land management activities, and corresponding
alternatives, within the Cayuga project area.
The purpose of the Cayuga project is to implement a variety of land
management activities that addresses resource management and public
safety concerns while moving the area towards the desired future
condition as directed in the Chequamegon Land and Resource Management
Plan. These activities include vegetation management, wildlife and
fisheries habitat protection and enhancement, watershed restoration,
and recreation facilities and trail improvement. The existing condition
does not meet the desired future condition described in the Chequamegon
Land and Resource Management Plan.
A legal description for the area is as follows: Township 43 North,
Range 2 West, Sections 6-7, 16-20, and 29; Township 43 North, Range 3
West, Sections 1-18, and 23-24; Township 43 North, Range 4 West,
Sections 1-3, 10-23, and 27-33; Township 43 North, Range 5 West,
Section 24; Township 44 North, Range 3 West, Sections 19-23 and 26-35;
and Township 44 North, Range 4 West, Sections 23-27 and 34-36, Fourth
Principle Meridian.
DATES: Initial comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be
received on or before May 23, 2001 to receive timely consideration in
the preparation of the draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments concerning the proposed land
management activities or requests to be placed on the project mailing
list to: Barry Paulson, District Ranger, Great Divide Ranger District,
P.O. Box 126, Hwy. 13, Glidden, Wisconsin 54527.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Maday, Project Leader/
Integrated Resource Analyst, or Richard Strauss,
[[Page 20422]]
Assistant Ranger-Timber, Great Divide Ranger District, P.O. Box 126,
Hwy. 13, Glidden, Wisconsin, or phone at (715) 264-2511.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information presented in this notice is
included to help the reviewer determine if they are interested in or
potentially affected by the proposed land management activities. The
information presented in this notice is summarized. Those who wish to
provide comments, or are otherwise interested in or affected by the
project, are encouraged to obtain additional information from the
contact identified in the For Further Information Contact section.
Proposed Actions--The proposed land management activities (proposed
actions) include the following with approximate acreage and mileage
values: (1) Forest Age and Composition--selection harvest 2,101 acres,
thin 1,744 acres, clearcut harvest 732 acres, shelterwood seedcut
harvest 339 acres, overstory shelterwood removal harvest 64 acres, and
underplant 38 acres (other needs include 14 miles of temporary road
construction, which will be obliterated following harvest activities,
and reconstruction of 16.8 miles); (2) Visual Quality Objectives--
underplant 53 acres with white pine in stands adjacent to Day Lake and
Spillerberg Lake and within Day Lake Campground and shelterwood seedcut
harvest 279 acres along County Highway GG north; (3) Recreation
Facilities--thin 113 acres of jack and red pine within Day Lake
Campground; (4) Fish and Wildlife Habitat Improvement--restore 75 acres
of upland openings through a combination of hand cutting, mowing, and
prescribed burning, remove fine debris and alder along 1.5 miles of
McCarthy Creek, and place brush bundles along 1,000 feet of McCarthy
Creek; (5) Watershed Improvement--replace culverts and improve road
crossings at seven sites along unnamed tributaries to Dead Horse
Slough, East Twin Lake, Brush Creek, Bad River, Squaw Creek and along
County Highway GG north, and thin 52 acres and underplant within 300
feet of McCarthy Creek; (6) Noxious Weeds--biologically treat less than
1 acre of noxious weed infestation along County Highway GG north; (7)
Trail Management--construct a 1 acre snowmobile trailhead and reroute
4.8 miles and abandon 2.5 miles of Snowmobile Trail 8; and (8) Road
Closures--close .5 miles of road in the McCarthy Lake and Cedars
Research Natural Area.
The scope of this analysis is limited to activities related to the
purpose and need and measures necessary to mitigate the effects these
activities may have on the environment. The decision will include if,
when, how, and where to schedule: Vegetation management activities,
recreation site and trail improvement projects, road improvement,
construction, and management activities, watershed and fisheries
improvement activities, planting and reforestation activities, wildlife
habitat enhancement projects, visual quality enhancement activities,
resource protection measures, monitoring, and other follow-up
activities.
Responsible Official--The District Ranger of the Great Divide
Ranger District, Barry Paulson, is the Responsible Official for making
project-level decisions from the project.
Decision Space--Decision making will be limited to specific
activities relating to the proposed actions. The primary decision to be
made will be whether or not to implement the proposed actions or
another action alternative that responds to the project's purpose and
needs.
Project History--This project was originally presented to the
public for review and comment in October 2000 prior to undertaking
preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA). Many years of
experience implementing similar types of activities in the same
vicinity have shown us that the effects are not significant. We
therefore do not feel that an EIS is required. However, due to the
increase in appeals and litigation over the last few years and for wise
fiscal efficiency, we have decided to prepare an EIS. This Notice of
Intent serves as notice of the intent to prepare an EIS for the Cayuga
Project. The comments received as a result of the public participation
for the Cayuga analysis will be brought forward for this EIS.
Preliminary Issues--Comments from American Indian tribes, the
public, and other agencies were considered in the development of the
tentative or preliminary issues. These are as follows: effects on
Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive (TES) and Management Indicator
Species (MIS); concern over new road construction and road closures;
safety concerns on a section of a motorized trail, direct, and indirect
and cumulative effects.
Public Participation--The Forest Service is seeking comments from
Federal, State, and local agencies, as well as local Native American
tribes and other individuals or organizations that may be interested in
or affected by the proposed actions. Comments received in response to
this notice will become a matter of public record. While public
participation is welcome at any time, comments on the proposed actions
received within 30 days of this notice will be especially useful in the
preparation of the draft EIS. Timely comments will be used to identify:
potential issues with the proposed actions, alternatives to the
proposed actions that respond to the identified needs and significant
issues, and potential environmental effects of the proposed actions and
alternatives considered in detail. In addition, the public is
encouraged to contact and/or visit Forest Service officials at any time
during the planning process.
Relation to Forest Plan Revision--The Chequamegon-Nicolet National
Forest is in the process of revising and combining the existing Land
and Resource Management Plans (Forest Plans) for the Chequamegon
National Forest and the Nicolet National Forest, which were
administratively separate at the time the Forest Plans were developed.
A Notice of Intent to revise and combine the Forest Plans was issued in
1996. As part of this process, various inventories and evaluations are
occurring. Additionally, the Forest is in the process of developing
alternative land management scenarios that could change the desired
future conditions and management direction for the Forest. A Draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) will be published in the near
future that will disclose the consequences of the different land
management direction scenarios considered in detail. As a result of the
Forest Plan revision effort, the Forest has new and additional
information beyond that used to develop the existing Forest Plans. This
information will be used where appropriate in the analysis of this
project to disclose the effects of the proposed activities and any
alternatives developed in detail.
The decisions associated with the analysis of this project will be
consistent with the existing Forest Plan, unless amended, for the
Chequamegon. Under regulations of the National Environmental Policy Act
(40 CFR 1506.1), the Forest Service can take actions while work on a
Forest Plan revision is in progress because a programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement--the existing Forest Plan Final EIS,
already covers the actions. The relationship of this project to the
proposed FP revision will be considered as appropriate as part of this
planning effort.
The Forest Service believes it is important at this early stage to
give
[[Page 20423]]
reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
the draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal in such a way that it is meaningful and alerts
an agency to the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee
Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 513 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage
but that are not raised until after completion of the final EIS may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir, 1986), and Wisconsin Heritages Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis., 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45 day comment period of the draft EIS
in order that substantive comments and objections are available to the
Forest Service at time when it can meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final EIS. To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action,
comments should be as specific as possible. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
The responsible official for this EIS is Barry Paulson, District
Ranger, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest.
Dated: April 17, 2001.
Lynn Roberts,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 01-9951 Filed 4-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3401-11-U