Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River, LMR mile 531.3 to 537, Vaucluse Trenchfill
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: July 26, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 144)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 38935-38936]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26jy01-11]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[COTP Memphis 01-007]
RIN 2115-AA97
Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River, LMR mile 531.3 to 537,
Vaucluse Trenchfill
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone for the
Mississippi River from mile 531.3 to 537.0. This zone is needed to
allow the Army Corps of Engineers' contractors to strengthen the
integrity of the Vaucluse Trenchfill. Navigation within this zone will
be prohibited from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. (CDT) unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port Memphis.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. (CDT) on June 11, 2001,
through 6 p.m. (CDT) on September 2, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket COTP Memphis 01-007 and are available for inspection
or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office, 200 Jefferson
Ave., Memphis, TN 38103-2300, between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: COTP Memphis representative, LT Brian
Meier, at (901) 544-3941 ext. 226.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM, and, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3),
good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days
after publication in the Federal Register. This type of construction
project requires specific river conditions that are difficult to
predict. Publishing a NPRM and delaying its effective date would be
contrary to public interest since immediate action is needed to ensure
that the project can be completed under optimal conditions.
Reinforcement of the Vaucluse Trenchfill is also immediately needed to
maintain the integrity of the right descending bank of the Mississippi
River at the project site.
Background and Purpose
Due to bendway weir construction in the vicinity of the Vaucluse
Trenchfill, LMR mile 533, the Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone
for the Mississippi River from mile 531.3 to 537.0. Beginning on June
11, 2001, navigation will be closed every day from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.
(CDT) within the aforementioned zone. No vessels may enter or remain
within this safety zone unless specifically authorized by the Captain
of the Port Memphis. Vessels shall contact the M/V PATRICK on channel
13 or 16 for closure information and passing instructions. This safety
zone will remain in effect until the construction project is completed.
The contract construction time is approximately 83 days. This zone is
needed to allow the Army Corps of Engineers' contractors to strengthen
the integrity of the Vaucluse Trenchfill.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
It is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures
of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040, February 26,
1979). The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this rule to be
so minimal that a full regulatory evaluation is unnecessary. The
regulation will be in effect for a long period of time, but each day
during night hours river traffic will be unrestricted, minimizing the
impacts on routine navigation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
[[Page 38936]]
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The impacts on small entities are expected to be minimal.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and have
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism
under that Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
governs the issuance of Federal regulations that require unfunded
mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that requires a State,
local, or tribal government or the private sector to incur direct costs
without the Federal Government's having first provided the funds to pay
those unfunded mandate costs. This rule will not impose an unfunded
mandate.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Environment
The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this rule
and concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph (34) g, of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lC, this rule is categorically excluded from further
environmental documentation.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
List of Subjects
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1(g),
6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; 49 CFR 1.46.
2. A new Sec. 165.T08-038 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-038 Safety Zone; Lower Mississippi River, LMR mile 531.3
to 537, Vaucluse Trenchfill.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: the waters of
the Mississippi River from mile LMR mile 531.3 to 537.0.
(b) Effective date. This section is effective daily from 6 a.m. to
6 p.m. (CDT) from June 11, 2001, through September 2, 2001.
(c) Regulations.
(1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec. 165.23 of
this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Memphis.
(2) No vessels may enter or remain within this safety zone unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Memphis. Vessels
shall contact the M/V PATRICK on channel 13 or 16 for closure
information and passing instructions. The Captain of the Port will
notify the public of changes in the status of this zone by Marine Radio
Safety Broadcast on VHF Marine Band Radio, Channel 22 (157.1 MHz).
Dated: June 8, 2001.
R.R. O'Brien, Jr.,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port.
[FR Doc. 01-18677 Filed 7-25-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)