Proposed Plan Amendments and Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report for the North Baja Pipeline Project, California, in Accordance With 43 CFR 1610.5-5
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: June 5, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 108)]
[Notices]
[Page 30223-30224]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05jn01-101]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[CA-670-5101-ER-B140/CACA-42662]
Proposed Plan Amendments and Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report for the North Baja Pipeline Project,
California, in Accordance With 43 CFR 1610.5-5
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to consider proposed amendments to the
California Desert Conservation Area Plan and the Yuma District Resource
Management Plan in conjunction with the North Baja Pipeline project.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice supplements the notice published by the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in the Federal Register in the
issue of May 22, 2001 at page 28160 (66 FR 28160). That notice
requested comments on environmental issues related to the Bureau of
Land Management's (BLM) consideration of amendments to the Yuma
Resource Management Plan (RMP) and the California Desert Conservation
Area (CDCA) Plan. The proposed North Baja Pipeline project extends from
Ehrenberg, Arizona through Riverside and Imperial Counties south to the
Mexican border. All federal lands affected by the proposed plan
amendments are located in eastern Imperial County, California. FERC and
the California State Lands Commission are jointly preparing an
Environmental Impact Statement and an Environmental Impact Report (EIS/
EIR) that will analyze the environmental impacts of the proposed
project. An amendment to the CDCA Plan is required because part of the
proposed project is not within a CDCA designated Utility Corridor. An
amendment to the Yuma RMP is required because the proposed project
would cross portions of the Milpitas Wash Natural Area, and that plan
does not allow for new utilities within this area. BLM will attempt to
use the EIS/EIR to consider the plan amendments. If the Plan(s) are not
amended, BLM may authorize installation of the project within existing
corridors only, or BLM may deny the project if the existing corridor
option does not prove feasible. The currently identified environmental
issues are listed in the notice previously published by FERC in the
Federal Register in the issue dated December 18, 2000 at page 79097 (65
FR 79097).
DATES: Submit comments, concerning the scope of the proposed
amendments, on or before July 5, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed by Lynda Kastoll,
Project Manager, Bureau of Land Management, El Centro Field Office,
1661 So. 4th Street, El Centro, CA 92243.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynda Kastoll at the above address or
at (760) 337-4421.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: North Baja Pipeline Project's proposed
action consists of the construction and operation of about 79.8 miles
of pipeline, including 11.5 miles of 36-inch-diameter and 68.3 miles of
30-inch-diameter pipe, extending from an interconnection with El Paso
Natural Gas Company in La Paz County, Arizona, through Riverside and
Imperial Counties, California, to an interconnection at the
international border between the United States and Mexico. It includes
the construction of a new compressor station (with associated metering
facilities) in Ehrenberg, Arizona, a meter station near the Ogilby
Road-Interstate 8 interchange in Imperial County, CA and a pig launcher
and receiver facility near Rannel's Drain and 18th Avenue in Riverside
County, California. A pig is an internal tool used to inspect the
pipeline for potential leaks or damage.
The nominal construction right-of-way (construction corridor) for
the pipeline would be 80 feet wide, with 50 feed retained as permanent
right-of-way. About 63 percent of the pipeline route would abut or
overlap existing road or powerline rights-of-way.
The first 11.5 miles of the project are in or adjacent to
agricultural lands in the Blythe and Palo Verde Valley areas. The
alignment then parallels an electric transmission line and Stallard
Road on the Palo Verde Mesa from Mile Post (MP) 11.5 to MP 28. From MP
28 to MP 39 it parallels Highway 78, then from MP 39 to MP 75 it
parallels either an electric transmission line or public roadways for
all but about 5.4 miles, across desert habitats. It crosses Interstate
8 at MP 75, then parallels the edge of sand dunes to its crossing of
the All American Canal at MP 79.5 and its termination in Mexico at MP
79.6.
The combined United States and Mexico pipeline system is initially
designed to carry 500 million cubic feet per day of natural gas. As
designed, the new pipeline system will serve existing
[[Page 30224]]
and planned power plants in Mexico and in the United States that in
turn serve electric power demand in northern Baja California, Mexico
and western United States' markets.
The total project configuration, as proposed and including measures
to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts on the environment, is being
considered along with several alternatives, including building the
pipeline entirely within existing corridors as designated in the
California Desert Conservation Area Plan, and a ``No Action''
alternative.
Dated: May 22, 2001.
MarLynn Spears,
Acting Chief, Branch of Lands (CA-931).
[FR Doc. 01-14078 Filed 6-4-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)