Jump to main content.


Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Columbia River, Astoria, Oregon

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.


 [Federal Register: June 28, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 125)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34370-34372]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28jn01-9]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD13-00-011]
RIN 2115-AA97
 
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Columbia River, Astoria, Oregon

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
waters of Columbia River in the vicinity of Astoria, Oregon. This 
safety zone is being created in response to a July 4, 2001, evening 
fireworks display. The Coast Guard is taking this action to safeguard 
watercraft and their occupants from safety hazards associated with the 
fireworks display.

DATES: This regulation is effective from 9 p.m. (PDT) to 11 p.m. (PDT) 
on July 4, 2001.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as 
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, 
will be available for inspection or copying at the U.S. Coast Guard 
Group/MSO Portland, 6767 N. Basin Ave, Portland, Oregon 97217, between 
7 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Commander William Clark, 
(503) 240-9317.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 34371]]

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this 
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM and for 
making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the 
Federal Register. Publishing a NPRM would be contrary to public 
interest since immediate action is necessary to ensure the safety of 
vessels and spectators gathering in the vicinity of the fireworks 
launching area. Due to the complex planning and coordination, the event 
sponsor, the Astoria Fireworks Committee, was unable to provide the 
Coast Guard with notice of the final details until less than 30 days 
prior to the date of the event. If normal notice and comment procedures 
were followed, this rule would not become effective until after the 
date of the event. For this reason, following normal rulemaking 
procedures in this case would be impracticable and contrary to the 
public interest.

Background and Purpose

    The Coast Guard is promulgating a temporary safety zone regulation 
to allow a safe fireworks display. The fireworks display is scheduled 
to start at 10 p.m. (PDT) on July 4, 2001. This event may result in a 
number of vessels congregating near the fireworks launching area. The 
zone is needed to protect watercraft and their occupants from safety 
hazards associated with fireworks display. This safety zone will be 
enforced by representatives of the Captain of the Port, Portland, 
Oregon. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by other federal 
agencies and local agencies.
    The safety zone will encompass all waters of the Columbia River at 
Astoria, Oregon enclosed by the following points: North from the Oregon 
shoreline at 123 degrees 12 minutes north latitude, thence east to 123 
degrees 49.3 minutes west longitude, thence south to the Oregon 
shoreline, thence westerly along the Oregon shoreline to the point of 
origin. (Datum NAD 1983). Entry into this safety zone is prohibited 
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The 
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this rule under that 
Order. This rule is not ``significant'' under the regulatory policies 
and procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040; 
February 26, 1979). The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this 
proposal to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under 
paragraph 10e of the regulatory policies and procedures act of DOT is 
unnecessary. This expectation is based on the fact that the regulated 
area established by the proposed regulation would encompass less than 
one mile of the Columbia River for a period of only two hours.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), we 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
include small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. 
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be 
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit 
a portion of the Columbia River from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on July 4, 2001. 
This safety zone will not have significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This 
rule will be in effect for only 2 hours in the evening when vessel 
traffic is low. The safety zone will not apply to the entire width of 
the river, and traffic will be allowed to pass through the zone with 
the permission of the Coast Guard patrol commander. Because the impacts 
of this proposal are expected to be so minimal, the Coast Guard 
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) that this final rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and have 
determined that this final rule does not have implications for 
federalism under that Order.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
governs the issuance of Federal regulations that require unfunded 
mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that requires a State, 
local, or tribal government or the private sector to incur direct costs 
without the Federal Government's having first provided the funds to pay 
those unfunded mandate costs. This rule will not impose an unfunded 
mandate.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Environment

    The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this rule 
and concluded that, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g) of Commandant 
Instruction M16475.1C, this rule is categorically excluded from further 
environmental documentation. A Categorical Exclusion is provided for 
temporary safety zones of less than one week in duration. This rule 
establishes a safety zone with a duration of two hours.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

[[Page 34372]]

PART 165--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 
6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; 49 CFR 1.46.

    2. A temporary Sec. 165.T13-005 is added to read as follows:

Sec. 165.T13-005  Safety Zone; Columbia River Astoria, Oregon.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of 
the Columbia River at Astoria, Oregon encompassed by a line drawn north 
from the Oregon shoreline at 123 degrees 12 minutes north latitude, 
thence east to 123 degrees 49.3 minutes west longitude, thence south to 
the Oregon shoreline, thence westerly along the Oregon shoreline to the 
point of origin. (Datum NAD 1983).
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec. 165.23 of this part, no person or vessel may enter or remain in 
this zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his 
designated representatives.
    (c) Effective date and time. This section is effective on July 4, 
2001, from 9 p.m. (PDT) to 11 p.m. (PDT).

    Dated: June 15, 2001.
James D. Spitzer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port.
[FR Doc. 01-16317 Filed 6-27-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P 

 
 


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.