Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: October 19, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 203)]
[Notices]
[Page 53269-53270]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19oc01-138]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-271]
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp; Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Station; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No. DPR-28,
issued to Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (VYNPC, the
licensee), for operation of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station
(Vermont Yankee) located in Windham County, Vermont. Therefore, as
required by 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC is issuing this environmental
assessment and finding of no significant impact.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would amend the Facility Operating License
(FOL) by deleting obsolete information, correcting errors, and make
administrative changes to enhance the context and provide consistency.
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's
application for amendment dated April 23, 2001.
[[Page 53270]]
The Need for the Proposed Action
When FOL DPR-28 was issued to the licensee and in subsequent
amendments, the NRC staff deemed certain issues essential to safety
and/or essential to meeting certain regulatory interests. These issues
were imposed as license conditions in the FOL. Since the unit was
licensed to operate in the 1970s, most of these license conditions have
been fulfilled or changed. For the license conditions that have been
fulfilled, the licensee proposed to have them deleted from the FOL. The
license conditions that are incorrect or need to be updated are being
changed.
The licensee also proposed to make changes to correct
administrative errors such as words misspelled and deleted documents
being referenced and to provide clarifying information such as
identifying deleted license conditions with the applicable amendment
number and date and providing consistent paragraph identification.
The fire protection license condition will also be changed to
reflect an updated list of applicable NRC safety evaluation reports.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and
concludes that there is no significant environmental impact if the
amendment is granted. No changes will be made to the design and
licensing basis, and the applicable procedures at Vermont Yankee will
remain the same. Other than the administrative changes, no other
changes will be made to the FOL, including the Technical
Specifications.
The proposed action will not significantly increase the probability
or consequences of accidents, no changes are being made in the types of
any effluents that may be released off site, and there is no
significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure.
Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts
associated with the proposed action.
With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed
action does not have a potential to affect any historic sites. It does
not affect nonradiological plant effluents and has no other
environmental impact. Therefore, there are no significant
nonradiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed
action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
Denial of the application would result in no change in current
environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of the proposed action
and the alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
This action does not involve the use of any different resources
than those previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement
for Vermont Yankee dated July 1972.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
On August 6, 2001, the staff consulted with the Vermont State
official, William Sherman of the Department of Public Service,
regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The State
official had no comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes
that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined
not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed
action.
For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the
licensee's letter dated April 23, 2001. Documents may be examined, and/
or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located
at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available records will be accessible
electronically from the ADAMS Public Library Component on the NRC web
site,
http://www.nrc.gov
(Public Electronic Reading Room). If you do not have
access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents
located in ADAMS, contact the NRC PDR Reference staff at 1-800-397-
4209, 301-415-4737 or by e-mail at pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of October 2001.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Robert M. Pulsifer,
Project Manager, Section 2, Project Directorate I, Division of
Licensing Project Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 01-26443 Filed 10-18-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)