Security Zone; Saint Lawrence River, Massena, NY
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: September 27, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 188)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 49288-49290]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27se01-13]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09-01-128]
RIN 2115-AA97
Security Zone; Saint Lawrence River, Massena, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone
encompassing United States navigable waters of the St. Lawrence River
in the vicinity of the Moses-Saunders Power Dam. The security zone is
necessary to prevent damage to the dam. Unauthorized entry into this
security zone is prohibited.
DATES: This rule is effective from September 12, 2001, through June 15,
2002.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket [CGD09-01-128]
and are available for inspection or
copying at the U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Buffalo, 1
Furhmann Blvd., Buffalo, New York 14203, between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant David Flaherty, U. S. Coast
Guard Marine Safety Office Buffalo, (716) 843-9574.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. The Coast Guard for good cause finds that, under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B) and (d)(3), notice and public comment on the rule before the
effective date of the rule and advance publication are impracticable
and contrary to public interest. Immediate action is necessary to
ensure the safety of life, property, the environment, as well as safe
passage for vessels transiting this area. The conduct of notice and
comment rulemaking proceedings and compliance with advance notice
requirements present significant public safety concerns that outweigh
the public interest in compliance with these provisions. Public
rulemaking proceedings and advance publication could provoke
consequences that would pose a risk of harm to the public, military
personnel, and law enforcement personnel charged with enforcement of
the security zone. This regulation is geographically limited and in
effect for such limited duration that it meets the needs of national
security with a minimal burden on the public.
Background and Purpose
This security zone is required to ensure the security of the Moses-
Saunders Power Dam as a result of the terrorist attacks on the United
States on September 11, 2001. Pursuant to this regulation, no vessel or
person will be allowed to enter, transit through, or anchor in the
security zone unless specifically authorized by the District Commander,
the Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP), or one of the Captain of the
Port's designated representatives. The Captain of the Port or one of
his
[[Page 49289]]
designated representatives can be reached on Marine Channel 16.
This security zone is established pursuant to the authority of
Subpart D of part 165 of Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations
and the Magnuson Act regulations promulgated by the President under 50
U.S.C. 191, including subparts 6.01 and 6.04 or part 6 Title 33 of the
Code of Federal Regulations. See Executive Order 10173, as amended. The
security zone is needed to protect the Moses-Saunders Power Dam on the
St. Lawrence River. This zone in Massena, New York, encompasses United
States navigable waters of the St. Lawrence River from the point
45 deg.00.3' N, 74 deg.48.2' W; east to the international border at
45 deg.00.5' N, 74 deg.47.9' W; then southeast along the international
border to 45 deg.00.3' N, 74 deg.47.6' W; along the international
border to 45 deg.00.3' N, 74 deg.47.4' W; southwest to 44 deg.00.0' N,
74 deg.47.8' W; northwest to 45 deg.00.2' N, 74 deg.48.0' W; back to
starting point 45 deg.00.3' N, 74 deg.48.2' W. (NAD 83).
Vessels or persons violating this section are subject to the
penalties set forth in 50 U.S.C. 192: seizure and forfeiture of the
vessel, a monetary penalty of not more than $250,000, and imprisonment
for not more than 10 years.
Regulatory Evaluation
This temporary rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that order. It has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget under that order. It is not significant under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44
FR 11040; February 26, 1979).
The security zone covers a vital portion of the St. Lawrence River
transited by commercial vessels and is being created to protect the
Moses-Saunders Power Dam. In addition, the security zone is necessary
to ensure the safety of land and adjacent waterfront facilities. The
Coast Guard does not foresee any interruption to the passage of vessels
through this area. While the vessels will need authorization to transit
the zone, the Coast Guard expects this not to interfere with or delay
their passage.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) the
Coast Guard considered whether this rule will have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small businesses and not-for-profit
organizations that are not dominant in their respective fields, and
government jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under section 605 (b) that this temporary
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
the St. Lawrence River in the vicinity of the Moses-Saunders Power Dam.
This security zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Vessel
traffic will be allowed to pass through the zone with the permission of
the COTP or his designated on scene representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effectiveness and participate in the rulemaking process. If your
small business or organization is affected by this rule, and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the office listed in ADDRESSES in this preamble.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule contains no information collection requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Federalism
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132, Federalism,
and have determined that this rule does not have implications for
Federalism under that order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
governs the issuance of Federal regulations that require unfunded
mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that requires a State,
local, or tribal government or the private sector to incur direct costs
without the Federal Government's having first provided the funds to pay
those unfunded mandate costs. This rule will not impose an unfunded
mandate.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
[[Page 49290]]
Environment
The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this
regulation and concluded that, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g) of
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, it is categorically excluded from
further environmental documentation. A ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' is available in the docket for inspection or copying
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1(g),
6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; 49 CFR 1.46.
2. A new temporary Sec. 165.T09-103 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-103 Security Zone: St. Lawrence River, Massena, New York.
(a) Location. The following area is designated a security zone: all
waters of the St. Lawrence River encompassed by the points from
45 deg.00.3' N, 74 deg.48.2' W; east to the international border at
45 deg.00.5' N, 74 deg.47.9' W; then southeast along the international
border to 45 deg.00.3' N, 74 deg.47.6' W; along the international
border to 45 deg.00.3' N, 74 deg.47.4' W; southwest to 44 deg.00.0' N,
74 deg.47.8' W; northwest to 45 deg.00.2' N, 74 deg.48.0' W; back to
starting point 45 deg.00.3' N, 74 deg.48.2' W. (NAD 83).
(b) Effective dates. This section is effective from September 12,
2001, through June 15, 2002.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.33 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Buffalo, or the
designated Patrol Commander. The designated Patrol Commander on scene
may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16.
Dated: September 12, 2001.
S.D. Hardy,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo, NY.
[FR Doc. 01-24239 Filed 9-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)