Security Zone; Snell and Eisenhower Locks, St. Lawrence Seaway, Massena, New York
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: September 27, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 188)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 49290-49292]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27se01-14]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR PART 165
[CGD09-01-127]
RIN 2115-AA97
Security Zone; Snell and Eisenhower Locks, St. Lawrence Seaway,
Massena, New York
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a security zone covering a
portion of the St. Lawrence Seaway and adjacent land, including
waterfront facilities, from a line approximately one-half mile east of
the Snell Lock to a line approximately one mile west of the Eisenhower
Lock, including all waters of the Wiley-Dondero Canal between the
locks, in Massena, New York. No portion of the Grasse River is included
in the zone. The security zone is necessary to prevent damage to the
Snell and Eisenhower locks. Unauthorized entry into this security zone
is prohibited.
DATES: This rule is effective from September 12, 2001, through June 15,
2002.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket [CGD09-01-127]
and are available for inspection or
copying at the U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Office Buffalo, 1
Furhmann Blvd, Buffalo, New York 14203, between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant David Flaherty, U.S. Coast
Guard Marine Safety Office Buffalo, (716) 843-9574.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. The Coast Guard for good cause finds that, under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B) and (d)(3), notice and public comment on the rule before the
effective date of the rule and advance publication are impracticable
and contrary to public interest. Immediate action is necessary to
ensure the safety of life, property, the environment, as well as safe
passage for vessels transiting this area. The conduct of notice and
comment rulemaking proceedings and compliance with advance notice
requirements present significant public safety concerns that outweigh
the public interest in compliance with these provisions. Public
rulemaking proceedings and advance publication could provoke
consequences that would pose a risk of harm to the public, military
personnel, and law enforcement personnel charged with enforcement of
the security zone. This regulation is geographically limited and is in
effect for such a limited duration so as to meet the needs of national
security while presenting a minimal burden on the public.
Background and Purpose
This security zone is required to ensure the security of the Snell
and Eisenhower locks as a result of the terrorist attacks on the United
States on September 11, 2001. Use of these locks is vital to national
security. Pursuant to this regulation, no vessel or person will be
allowed to enter, transit through, or anchor in the security zone
unless specifically authorized by the District Commander, the Captain
of the Port Buffalo (COTP), or one of the Captain of the Port's
designated representatives. The Captain of the Port or one of his
designated representatives can be reached on Marine Channel 16.
The security zone encompasses the area beginning at a line drawn
from 44 deg.59.17' N, 74 deg.46.01' W; to 44 deg.59.49' N,
74 deg.46.01' W. These coordinates are on opposite sides of the Wiley-
Dondero Canal 100 yards inland from the shoreline. The security zone
then proceeds in a westerly direction, encompassing all waters in the
canal and land 100 yards inland from the shoreline, along the Wiley-
Dondero Canal past the Snell and Eisenhower Locks, to a line drawn from
44 deg.58.75' N, 74 deg.52.35' W; to 44 deg.58.14' N, 74 deg.52.28' W
(NAD 83). These coordinates are on opposite sides of the Wiley-Dondero
Canal 100 yards inland from the shoreline. The security zone does not
include any portion of the Grasse River.
This security zone is established pursuant to the authority of
Subpart D of part 165 of Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations
and the Magnuson Act regulations promulgated by the President under 50
U.S.C. 191, including subparts 6.01 and 6.04 or part 6 Title 33 of the
Code of Federal Regulations. See Executive Order 10173, as amended. The
security zone is needed to protect persons, transiting vessels,
adjacent waterfront facilities, and the adjacent land of the St.
Lawrence River from a line approximately one-half mile east of the
Snell Lock to a line approximately one mile west of the Eisenhower
Lock, including all waters of the Wiley-
[[Page 49291]]
Dondero Canal between the locks, in Massena, New York.
Vessels or persons violating this section are subject to the
penalties set forth in 50 U.S.C. 192: seizure and forfeiture of the
vessel, a monetary penalty of not more than $250,000, and imprisonment
for not more than 10 years.
Regulatory Evaluation
This temporary rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that order. It has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget under that order. It is not significant under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44
FR 11040; February 26, 1979).
The security zone covers a vital portion of the St. Lawrence River
transited by commercial vessels and is being created to protect the
Snell and Eisenhower locks. In addition, the security zone is necessary
to ensure the safety of land and adjacent waterfront facilities. The
Coast Guard does foresee minor interruption to the passage of vessels
through this area. While vessels will need authorization to transit the
zone, the Coast Guard expects minimal interference with or delay in
their passage.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) the
Coast Guard considered whether this rule will have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small businesses and not-for-profit
organizations that are not dominant in their respective fields, and
government jurisdictions with populations less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under section 605(b) that this temporary
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
the St. Lawrence River up-river, between, and down-river of the Snell
and Eisenhower Locks immediately until terminated by COTP Buffalo.
This security zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Vessel
traffic will be allowed to pass through the zone after obtaining
permission of the COTP or his designated on scene representative.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effectiveness and participate in the rulemaking process. If your
small business or organization is affected by this rule, and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the office listed in ADDRESSES in this preamble.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule contains no information collection requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Federalism
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132, Federalism,
and have determined that this rule does not have implications for
Federalism under that order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
governs the issuance of Federal regulations that require unfunded
mandates. An unfunded mandate is a regulation that requires a State,
local, or tribal government or the private sector to incur direct costs
without the Federal Government's having first provided the funds to pay
those unfunded mandate costs. This rule will not impose an unfunded
mandate.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Environment
The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this
regulation and concluded that, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g) of
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, it is categorically excluded from
further environmental documentation. A ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' is available in the docket for inspection or copying
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Vessels, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1(g),
6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; 49 CFR 1.46.
2. A new temporary Sec. 165.T09-102 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-102 Security Zone: St. Lawrence Seaway, Massena, New
York.
(a) Location. The following area is designated as a security zone:
beginning at a line drawn from 44 deg. 59.17' N, 74 deg. 46.01' W to
44 deg. 59.49' N, 74 deg. 46.01' W. These coordinates are on opposite
sides of the Wiley-Dondero Canal of the St. Lawrence Seaway, 100 yards
inland from the shoreline. The security zone then proceeds in a
westerly direction, encompassing all waters in the canal and land 100
yards inland from the shoreline, along the Wiley-Dondero Canal past the
Snell and Eisenhower locks, to a line drawn from 44 deg. 58.75' N,
74 deg. 52.35' W; to 44 deg. 58.14' N, 74 deg. 52.28' W (NAD 83). These
coordinates are on opposite sides of the Wiley-Dondero Canal 100 yards
inland from the shoreline. The security zone does not include any
portion of the Grasse River.
(b) Effective dates. This section is effective from September 12,
2001, through June 15, 2002.
[[Page 49292]]
(c) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.33 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Buffalo, or the
designated Patrol Commander. The designated Patrol Commander on scene
may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16.
Dated: September 12, 2001.
S.D. Hardy,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Buffalo, NY.
[FR Doc. 01-24240 Filed 9-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)