49 Degrees North Mountain Resort Revised Master Plan, Colville National Forest, Stevens County, Washington
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: April 11, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 70)]
[Notices]
[Page 17671-17672]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11ap02-28]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
49 Degrees North Mountain Resort Revised Master Plan, Colville
National Forest, Stevens County, Washington
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service, USDA, will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to analyze and disclose the environmental impacts of a
site-specific proposal to revise the master plan and the present
special use permit of the Chewelah Basin Ski Corporation, current
operator of the 49 Degrees North Mountain Resort. The proposed master
plan would replace the existing 1977 master plan. This master plan
would expand the ski area from it's current size of about 900 acres to
2,100 acres, utilizing the entire area the 1988 Colville National
Forest Land and Resources Management Plan designated for downhill
skiing (Management Area 3C). Chewelah Basin Ski Corporation owns about
320 acres adjacent to the current permit area. All or portions of the
proposed activities would occur on this private land. The proposal
revises the master plan and includes projects that expand downhill
skiing capacity and improve the downhill skiing experience, expands the
Nordic skiing capacity, develops the associated infrastructure, and
includes summer use of the permit area. The proposal may require a
minor Forest Plan amendment because the Forest Plan Management Area 3C
boundaries do not precisely coincide with the ridge tops. Connected
action on adjacent private land, which will be evaluated as part of
this proposal, include: (1) Constructing a mid-way lodge; (2) plating
and preparing for the development of 120 residential housing units
clustered on 32 acres; and (3) transferring one mile of Forest Road
4300473 to Stevens County. Portions of the proposal ski trails, water
pipeline, electrical cable would be located on private land. 49 Degrees
North Mountain Resort is located approximately 10 miles east of the
city of Chewelah, Washington and approximately 50 miles north of the
city of Spokane, Washington. The purpose of the EIS will be to develop
and evaluate a range of alternatives, including a No Action alternative
and possible additional alternatives, to respond to issues identified
during the scoping process. Except as described above, the proposed
action is in compliance with the direction in the Colville National
Forest Land and Resources Management Plan, which provides the overall
guidance for the management area. The Agency invites written comments
on the scope of this project. In addition, the agency gives notice of
this analysis so that interested and affected people are aware of how
they may participate and contribute to the final decision.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and suggestions to Nora B. Rasure,
Forest Supervisor, Colville National Forest, 765 South Main, Colville,
Washington 99114. Attn: 49 Degrees North Revised Master Plan.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions and comments about this EIS
should be directed to Dan Dallas, District Ranger, Newport Ranger
District, 315 North Warren, Newport, Washington 99156; phone 509-447-
3129.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chewelah Basin Ski Corporation, owner of 49
Degrees North Mountain Resort, has been working to revise their master
plan since they purchased the ski area in 1996. The Colville National
Forest is initiating this action in response to a proposed revision of
the master plan submitted by the corporation.
The proposal would expand downhill skiing capacity and improve the
downhill skiing experience by--(1) expanding ski runs from about 540 to
860 acres, (2) expanding tree skiing from about 200 acres to 470 acres,
(3) constructing one chair lift, and (4) installing three culverts and
extending two culverts on existing ski runs. Develop new Nordic skiing
facilities by--(1) developing about 12 miles of cross-country ski
trails, and (2) constructing a Nordic ski center with an ice rink.
Develop the necessary infrastructure by--(1) expanding the current
lodge, (2) expanding the wastewater treatment facility, (3) installing
additional water supply pipeline, (4) installing a larger water storage
tank, (5) installing more underground electrical cable, (6) expanding
the parking and including a small RV park, (7) constructing about 0.75
miles of new primitive road to access work areas, (8) constructing a
new maintenance shop, and (9) re-aligning the entrance road. The
proposal further includes summer use of the area by--(1) allowing
biking and hiking on the Nordic ski trails, and (2) developing a small
tent camping area near the Nordic center.
[[Page 17672]]
A range of alternatives will be considered, including a No Action
alternative. Other alternatives will be developed in response to issues
received during scoping. Preliminary issues that have been identified
include the potential effects of structures and developments on--
streams and riparian areas, wildlife habitats., and heritage resources.
Comments received in response to this notice, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public
record on this proposed revised master plan will be available for
public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not have
standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR part 215.
Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may request the
agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing how
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality.
Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that under the
FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very limited
circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service
will inform the requester of the agency's decision regarding the
request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied, the
agency will return the submission and notify the requester that the
comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address within a
specified number of days.
The draft EIS is expected to be filed with the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and to be available for review in July 2002.
The EPA will publish a notice of availability of the draft EIS in the
Federal Register. The comment period of the draft EIS will be 45 days
from the date the EPA notice appears in the Federal Register. At that
time, copies of the draft EIS will be distributed to interested and
affected agencies, organizations, Tribes, and members of the public for
their review and comment. It is very important that those interested in
the management of the Colville National Forest participate at that
time.
The Forest Service believes it is important, at this early stage,
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
a draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to
the reviewer's position and connections. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,553 (1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft EIS stage, but that are not raised
until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or dismissed by
the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F. 2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F Supp. 1334, 1338
(E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close
of the comment period so that substantive comments and objections are
made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully
consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
The final EIS is scheduled to be completed October 2002. In the
final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to comments and
responses received during the comment period that pertain to the
environmental consequences discussed in the draft EIS and applicable
laws, regulations and policies considered in making the decision
regarding this proposal.
Nora B. Rasure, Forest Supervisor, Colville National Forest is the
responsible official. As the responsible official, she will document
the decision and reasons for the decision in the record of decision.
That decision will be subject to Forest Service Appeal Regulation (36
CFR Part 215).
Dated: March 25, 2002.
Nora B. Rasure,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 02-8771 Filed 4-10-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)