![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Record of Decision for Ford Island Development, Pearl Harbor, HI
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: April 15, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 72)]
[Notices]
[Page 18180-18182]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15ap02-40]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Record of Decision for Ford Island Development, Pearl Harbor, HI
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DON) announces its decision to
consolidate selected operations on and to pursue limited private
development of Ford Island. The decision includes construction of new
facilities and the adaptive reuse of existing facilities on Ford Island
as well as the sale or lease of selected DON properties on Oahu,
Hawaii, with the proceeds of such sale or lease to be used to develop
DON facilities at Ford Island.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Stanley Uehara (PLN231), Pacific
Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 258 Makalapa Drive,
Suite 100, Pearl Harbor, HI 96860-3134, telephone (808) 471-9338,
facsimile (808) 474-5909.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Record of Decision (ROD) in its entirety
is provided as follows:
Pursuant to Section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, 42 U.S.C. Section 4332(2)(C), and regulations of
the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) that implement NEPA, 40 CFR
Parts 1500-1508, the Department of the Navy (DON) announces its
decision to consolidate selected operations at Pearl Harbor onto Ford
Island by constructing new facilities and adaptively reusing existing
structures. This decision will include the sale or lease of selected
DON properties on Oahu, Hawaii with the use of proceeds to develop DON
facilities at Ford Island. This action will improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of its operations, make greater use of its properties,
and improve the quality of life of sailors and their families. This
will be accomplished as set out in Alternative B (Medium Intensity),
described in the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
(PEIS) as the preferred alternative.
DON development on Ford Island may include new construction for up
to 420 housing units, Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQ) for up to 1,000
personnel, and infrastructure improvements such as roads and utilities.
The development may also include a combination of new construction and
adaptive reuse of existing structures for administrative space to
accommodate 1,500 additional employees, and a consolidated training
complex. Additionally, the action includes private development of up to
75 acres on Ford Island, which could include a historic visitor
attraction, and allows for the lease of Halawa Landing and Iroquois
Point/Pu`uloa Housing, and sale of Waikele Branch, Naval Magazine
(NAVMAG) Pearl Harbor and property at the former Naval Air Station
(NAS) Barbers Point.
The action will be implemented through the Ford Island legislation
(10 U.S.C. Section 2814), and other legislative authorities such as the
annual Military Construction (MILCON) program, use of Non-Appropriated
Funds (NAF), and the Military Housing Privatization Initiative (10
U.S.C. Sections 2871-2885).
Alternatives Considered: The PEIS evaluated four alternatives,
including ``no action,'' that represent varying intensities of
development on Ford Island. With the exception of ``no action''
(Alternative D), the alternatives provide for the conveyance and
reuse--by either sale or lease--of selected DON properties on Oahu to
support the Ford Island development.
Alternative A provides for both DON and private development on Ford
Island. DON development would consist of new construction for up to 420
family housing units, Bachelor Enlisted Quarters (BEQ) for up to 1,000
personnel, and infrastructure improvements such as roads and utilities.
Development would also include a combination of new construction and
adaptive reuse of existing structures for administrative space to
accommodate 1,500 additional employees, and a consolidated training
complex. Private development envisioned includes an historic visitor
attraction, commercial, and light industrial uses that could employ up
to 5,600 workers and attract up to 15,000 daily visitors. The outlying
properties will be conveyed or reused in the following ways in this
alternative: The Halawa Landing property will be available for lease in
support of an historic visitor attraction on Ford Island. The Iroquois
Point/Pu`uloa Housing will be available for lease for residential and
directly related uses (e.g. playgrounds). Waikele Branch NAVMAG Pearl
Harbor and the property at the former NAS Barbers Point will be offered
for sale. Based on DON's marketing analysis, it is anticipated that
these properties will be reused for residential and related land uses.
Alternative B, Medium Intensity, is similar to Alternative A and
provides for both DON and private development on Ford Island. DON
development would be the same as that in Alternative
[[Page 18181]]
A. Private development includes an historic visitor attraction but
assumes a lower intensity development for commercial and light
industrial uses. Private development could have a population of 2,800
employees and 6,700 daily visitors. Halawa Landing will be leased in
support of an historic visitor attraction on Ford Island. Other
selected properties identified under Alternative A will be either
leased or sold as noted to support the Ford Island Development Program.
Alternative C does not provide for private development on Ford
Island. DON population could total 3,000 employees and 3,000 residents.
In this alternative, the Halawa Landing property will not be leased.
Selected properties identified under Alternative A will be either sold
or leased as noted to support the Ford Island Development Program.
Alternative C is the environmentally preferred action alternative due
to limited private development.
Alternative D is the no action alternative.
Environmental Impacts: DON analyzed the direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts of each alternative on the environment. Potential
significant impacts that could result from Alternative B are discussed
below: There is potential for significant impacts on the wastewater
collection system at Pearl Harbor. The main side sewage lift station,
SY-001, which is currently at capacity, will be unable to accommodate
additional sewage discharge flows. DON will initiate a utility study to
determine what wastewater collection system improvements are necessary,
including the additional capacity needed at lift station SY-001. DON
will upgrade the SY-001 lift station to meet the additional capacity
requirements.
There is potential for significant impacts on traffic. Projected
traffic volumes at Kamehameha Highway and Ford Island Boulevard would
exceed the intersection capacity during morning and afternoon peak
hours. A combination of intersection improvements and travel demand
management measures, such as mass transit and staggered work hours
could mitigate the intersection impacts. For all areas leased by
private developers, DON will require the developer to submit a Traffic
Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) to identify what mitigation would be
required so that traffic volumes would not exceed intersection
capacities. DON will prepare follow-on NEPA documentation for future
development projects on leased property that have adverse impacts on
traffic in order to identify mitigation requirements.
There is a potential for impacts to marine species listed as
endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act from project
specific construction activities. The National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) chose to reserve comment until individual project specific
actions are available for review. DON will review known data concerning
marine species as specific projects are proposed and will consult with
the NMFS as appropriate.
There is potential for significant impacts on cultural resources.
The Section 106 process of the National Historic Preservation Act has
been concluded with the execution of a Programmatic Agreement (PA)
between DON, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the
State Historic Preservation Officer. Other consulting parties,
including the National Trust for Historic Preservation (NTHP),
participated in development of the PA and signed the PA as interested
parties. DON will carry out the Ford Island Development Program in
accordance with the stipulations of the PA. The PA provides for the
review of individual projects at Ford Island and contains provisions
addressing potential effects of the lease and sale of lands with
historic properties.
Response to Comments Received Regarding the PEIS: DON received
comments from ten organizations and individuals on the Final PEIS. Most
comments had been responded to in the Final PEIS. The following are new
and substantive comments.
EPA commented that DON is responsible for oversight of
environmental protection efforts on leased properties, especially
related to the protection of water quality and implementation of
pollution prevention measures. DON acknowledges that it will fulfill
its responsibility as owner of leased properties pursuant to the
specific environmental compliance requirements.
National Trust for Historic Preservation (NTHP) notified DoN that
NTHP's written comments prepared for submittal at the August 2, 2001
public hearing on the Draft PEIS were not included in the Final PEIS.
This omission was unintentional. However, DON has carefully considered
Mr. David Scott's summary of NTHP's written comments, presented at the
August 2, 2001 public hearing. NTHP also commented about the lack of an
Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) for the Pearl
Harbor Naval Complex. DON has resolved this issue by releasing the
Final ICRMP for Pearl Harbor Naval Complex dated March 2002. Issues
addressing impacts to historic properties were resolved with the
signing of the PA.
The Commander Navy Region Hawaii determined that the discussion of
jurisdiction for provision of police and security functions contained
in the PEIS was incorrect. Jurisdiction is concurrent rather than
exclusively federal as discussed in the PEIS. The issue of jurisdiction
has no effect on the environmental analysis.
Conclusion: In determining whether or not to develop Ford Island
and if so, to what level of intensity, I considered the following: DON
operational and readiness requirements; anti-terrorism/force protection
requirements; benefits to DoN; appropriate uses of historic resources;
environmental impacts; costs associated with construction, operation,
and maintenance; and comments received from the public on the Draft and
Final PEIS. After carefully weighing all of these factors and analyzing
the information presented in the Final PEIS, I have determined that the
preferred alternative, Alternative B, best meets DON's needs.
Alternative B meets DON's operational and readiness requirements with
implementation of mitigation to minimize significant impacts on the
environment. Alternative A was rejected because the additional private
development intensity provided is not needed to satisfy DoN's Ford
Island Development Program. Alternative C was rejected because there is
limited economic return, which is needed to attract prospective
developers to meet DoN's development needs on Ford Island. Alternative
D was rejected as it would not enable DoN to improve the efficiency and
effectiveness of its operations, make greater use of its properties,
and improve the quality of life of sailors and their families.
As specific projects are proposed during the development of Ford
Island, additional project-specific environmental analyses will be
prepared where necessary and, if appropriate, may be tiered from the
Programmatic EIS. DoN will continue to coordinate with other Federal,
State, and local entities as necessary to determine if any additional
mitigation measures are appropriate.
[[Page 18182]]
Dated: April 9, 2002.
Duncan Holaday,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Installations and Facilities).
Dated: April 10, 2002.
T.J. Welsh,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corp, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 02-9082 Filed 4-12-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P