Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: August 23, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 164)]
[Notices]
[Page 54650-54651]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23au02-46]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6632-4]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at (202) 564-7167. An explanation of the ratings
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published
in the Federal Register dated April 12, 2002 (67 FR 17992).
Draft EISs
ERP No. D-AFS-J65013-MT Rating EC2, Moose Post-Fire Project,
Proposal to Decrease Potential Mortality from Bark Beetles to Remaining
Live Douglas-fir and Spruce Trees, Recover Merchantable Wood Fiber,
Reduce Future Fire Risk and Modify Existing Road Access, Glacier View
Ranger District, Flathead National Forest, Flathead County, MT.
Summary: While EPA supports road decommissioning, EPA expressed
environmental concerns about potential effects on roadless
characteristics from timber harvests in roadless areas, and about
potential water quality impacts to a 303(d) listed stream. EPA
recommended additional seeding and planting in severely burned areas.
ERP No. D-AFS-L65401-ID Rating EC2, Sixshooter Project, Reduction
of Threats from Insect Infestation and Wildfire, Sixmile and West Fork
Creek, Boise National Forest, Emmett Ranger District, Gem County, ID.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with potential
adverse environmental impacts to old growth forest habitat and water
quality. The final EIS should fully disclose these impacts and any
appropriate mitigation measures.
ERP No. D-FHW-H40174-IA Rating LO, Avenue G Viaduct and Connecting
Corridor, Access Improvement for Local Emergency Services and Safety
Through Expanded Capacity across the Trail Corridor, Funding and NPDES
Permit, Pottawattamie County, IA.
Summary: EPA has no objection to the proposed action. However,
applicability and compliance with the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (asbestos) should be clarified in the FEIS.
ERP No. D-NRC-E06021-NC Rating EC1, Generic EIS--McGuire Nuclear
Power Station Units 1 and 2, Supplement 8 to NUREG-1437, Located on the
Shore of Lake Norman, Mecklenburg County, NC.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about and requested
clarification on anticipated waste quantities and the status of
groundwater wells.
ERP No. DR-AFS-K65203-CA Rating LO, Sirretta Peak Trail Project to
Explore Locations for the Construction of Trail Routes Open to Off-
Highway Vehicles and New Information Relating to the Sierra Nevada
Forest Plan Amendment, Cannell Meadow Ranger District, Sequoia National
Forest, Tulare County, CA.
Summary: EPA has no objections to the proposed action.
ERP No. D1-DOE-A09824-00 Rating EO2, Hanford Site Solid
(Radioactive and Hazardous) Waste Program, Waste Management Practices
Enhancement for Low-Level Radioactive Waste, Mixed Low-Level
Radioactive Waste and Transuranic Waste, Richland, Benton County, WA.
Summary: EPA has environmental objections to both action
alternatives because they are predicted to exceed MCLs of Iodine-129
and contribute to exceedances of MCLs for other radionuclides, thereby
worsening contamination in the groundwater and vadose zone. EPA also
notes that the draft provides insufficient information to fully
describe existing and predicted impacts. EPA recommends that the EIS
expand its alternative discussion to include changes in design or waste
acceptance criteria to meet environmental standards and that it include
additional information about the affected environment and environmental
impacts.
Final EISs
ERP No. F-AFS-G65062-NM Agua/Caballos Timber Sale, Harvesting
Timber and Managing Existing Vegetation, Implementation, Carson
National Forest, El Rito Ranger District, Taos County, NM.
Summary: EPA expressed lack of objections.
ERP No. F-AFS-L65389-OR Shore 'Nuf Timber Sale, Timber Harvesting
on the Detroit Ranger District, Willamette National Forest, Linn and
Marion Counties, OR.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
ERP No. F-APH-A65169-00 Programmatic--EIS Rangeland Grasshopper and
Mormon Cricket Suppression Program, Authorization, Funding and
Implementation in 17 Western States, AZ, CA, CO, ID, KS, MT, NE, NV,
NM, ND, OK, OR, SD, TX, UT, WA and WY.
Summary: EPA expressed lingering concerns with the FEIS with
respect to mitigation measures for human exposure, water quality and
pesticide drift mitigation. EPA suggested that APHIS consider these
concerns as it proceeds to develop a Record of Decision for the Cricket
Suppression Program.
ERP No. F-FHW-E40790-00 Corridor 18/I-69 Proposed Improvements from
the US 412/US 51 Interchange to the US 51 Fulton Bypass/Purchase
Parkway Interchange, Funding, Dyer and Obion Counties, TN and Fulton
County, KY.
Summary: EPA expressed no objections to this project, provided that
mitigation measures and monitoring programs, as described in the Final
EIS, are implemented as applicable.
[[Page 54651]]
Dated: August 20, 2002.
B. Katherine Biggs,
Associate Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal
Activities.
[FR Doc. 02-21563 Filed 8-22-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)