Notice of Consideration of Amendment Request for the Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI and Opportunity for Providing Comments and Requesting a Hearing
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: December 16, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 241)]
[Notices]
[Page 77083-77084]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16de02-77]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 040-00017]
Notice of Consideration of Amendment Request for the Dow Chemical
Company, Midland, MI and Opportunity for Providing Comments and
Requesting a Hearing
I. Introduction
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of a license amendment to Material License No. STB-527 issued
to The Dow Chemical Company (Dow), to authorize decommissioning of its
Bay City Site Decommissioning Management Plan (SDMP) site in Bay City,
Michigan.
Dow began using thorium metal and compounds in 1956 for the
production of magnesium-thorium alloys at a Dow-owned site in Bay City,
Michigan. The waste slag from the alloying process was disposed of on
Dow property in Bay City. Magnesium-thorium material returned by Dow
customers was received at Dow's Midland, MI, site for storage. The
decommissioning plan (DP) submitted by Dow to decommission the two
(Midland and Bay City) sites was approved by a license amendment on
July 19, 1996 (Amendment 6). The Midland site was remediated and
removed from the license on March 3, 2000 (Amendment 8). After
remediating about 31 acres of the 40 acre contaminated area at the Bay
City site, Dow proposed, in March 2001, a different approach and
conceptual plan for remediating the remaining nine acres. According to
Dow, the reason for the change in the approach is that the
decommissioning cost is expected to be too high under the previously
approved DP. In August 2001, Dow submitted a Supplement to the
previously (1996) approved DP. This Supplement was rejected in
September 2001 because it was found to be administratively deficient
for a detailed technical review. Dow submitted a revised Supplement on
January 31, 2002. On July 19, 2002, Dow submitted Attachment 1 to the
January 31, 2002, revised Supplement. An NRC administrative review,
documented in a letter to Dow dated August 5, 2002, found the revised
Supplement acceptable to begin a technical review.
If the NRC approves the revised Supplement, the approval will be
documented in an amendment to NRC License No. STB-527. However, before
approving the proposed amendment, the NRC will need to make the
findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and
NRC's regulations. These findings will be documented in a Safety
Evaluation Report and either an Environmental Assessment or an
Environmental Impact Statement.
II. Opportunity To Provide Comments
The NRC is providing notice to individuals in the vicinity of the
site that the NRC is in receipt of a revised Supplement to the DP, and
will accept comments concerning this decommissioning proposal and its
associated environmental impacts. Comments with respect to this action
should be provided in writing within 30 days of this notice and
addressed to M. (Sam) Nalluswami, Project Manager, Decommissioning
Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001. Telephone: (301) 415-6694, fax number (301) 415-5398, e-
mail: smn@nrc.gov. Comments received after 30 days will be considered
if practicable to do so, but only those comments received on or before
the due date can be assured consideration.
III. Opportunity To Request a Hearing
NRC also provides notice that this is a proceeding on an
application for an amendment of a license falling within the scope of
Subpart L, ``Informal Hearing Procedures for Adjudication in Materials
Licensing Proceedings,'' of NRC's rules and practice for domestic
licensing proceedings in 10 CFR Part 2. Whether or not a person has or
intends to provide comments as set out in section II above, pursuant to
Sec. 2.1205(a), any person whose interest may be affected by this
proceeding may file a request for a hearing in accordance with Sec.
2.1205(d). A request for a hearing must be filed within thirty (30)
days of the date of publication of this Federal Register notice.
The request for a hearing must be filed with the Office of the
Secretary either:
1. By delivery to the Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff of the
Office of the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White
Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-2738, between
7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m., Federal workdays; or
2. By mail or telegram, addressed to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Attention:
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Because of continuing disruptions
in the delivery of mail to United States Government offices, it is
requested that requests for hearing be also transmitted to the
[[Page 77084]]
Secretary of the Commission either by means of facsimile transmission
to 301-415-1101, or by e-mail to hearingdocket@nrc.gov.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.1205(f), each request for a hearing
must also be served, by delivering it personally or by mail, to:
1. The applicant, The Dow Chemical Company, Ashman Center, 4520
East Ashman, Midland, MI 48674, Attention: Mr. Ben Baker, Project
Manager, and;
2. The NRC staff, by delivery to the Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-2738, between 7:45 a.m. and 4:15
p.m., Federal workdays, or by mail, addressed to the Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001. Because of continuing disruptions in the delivery of mail
to United States Government offices, it is requested that requests for
hearing be transmitted to the Office of the General Counsel either by
means of facsimile transmission to 301-415-3725, or by e-mail to
OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov.
In addition to meeting other applicable requirements of 10 CFR Part
2 of NRC's regulations, a request for a hearing filed by a person other
than an applicant must describe in detail:
1. The interest of the requester in the proceeding;
2. How that interest may be affected by the results of the
proceeding, including the reasons why the requester should be permitted
a hearing, with particular reference to the factors set out in Sec.
2.1205(h);
3. The requester's areas of concern about the licensing activity
that is the subject matter of the proceeding; and
4. The circumstances establishing that the request for a hearing is
timely in accordance with Sec. 2.1205(d).
IV. Further Information
The application for the license amendment and supporting
documentation are available for inspection at NRC's Public Electronic
Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html. (ADAMS Access
Numbers: January 31, 2002, Revised Supplement--ML023170462; July 19,
2002, Attachment 1--ML023170508; August 5, 2002, Acceptance Letter--
ML022280370) Any questions with respect to this action should be
referred to M. (Sam) Nalluswami, Project Manager, Decommissioning
Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001. Telephone: (301) 415-6694. Fax: (301) 415-5398.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of December, 2002.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Larry Camper,
Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 02-31611 Filed 12-13-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)