Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Statement, Portland District, Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Federal Navigation Channel Improvements, Oregon and Washington
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: March 19, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 53)]
[Notices]
[Page 12546-12547]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr19mr02-72]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplemental Final Environmental Impact
Statement, Portland District, Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers
Federal Navigation Channel Improvements, Oregon and Washington
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Portland District,
intends to prepare a supplement to the Final Integrated Feasibility
Report/Environmental Impact Statement (IFR/EIS Supplement) for the
Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Federal Navigation Channel, Oregon
and Washington. The final IFR/EIS, which was published in 1999,
identified a plan of action to deepen the Columbia and Lower Willamette
Federal navigation project by 3 feet, and construct ecosystem
restoration features. This supplement will address new information that
has been developed since the 1999 report, including information that
resulted from the Endangered Species Act consultation with National
Marine Fisheries Service and US Fish and Wildlife Service and for water
quality certification.
The IFR/EIS is being supplemented to add new information that has
been generated since the final report in 1999. It will include
information from the recently transmitted biological assessment
prepared by the Corps for the National Marine Fisheries Service and US
Fish and Wildlife Service. Several additional ecosystem restoration
features are proposed to be implemented to benefit the recovery of
listed threatened and endangered fish. As a result of these actions the
lower river disposal plan will be re-evaluated to shift from ocean
disposal at the Deep Water disposal site to creation of ecosystem
restoration features in the estuary. The construction volumes will also
be updated utilizing December 2001 and January 2002 hydrographic
surveys. Other items will be updated from a cost perspective due to new
information collected since 1999, including a reduction in rock
excavation and utility relocations. Project economics will be re-
examined to evaluate the sensitivity of the fleet and commodity
forecasts in the EIS When the costs and benefits are re-examined the
benefit-to-cost ratio will be reevaluated.
The alternatives under consideration are the same as those measures
evaluated in the 1999 IFR/EIs. Elements of the plan of action may
include dredging of sands, rock removal by mechanical means as well as
blasting, disposal of material at in-water, shoreline and upland
disposal sites, and ecosystem restoration features. Information updates
will include the disposal plan in the lower river, and new ecosystem
restoration proposals. This plan will shift disposal material from
ocean disposal at the Deep Water disposal site to creation of the
restoration features in the estuary.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Mr. Robert E. Willis,
Chief, Environmental Resources Branch, US Army Corps of Engineers,
Portland District, CENWP-PM-E, PO Box 2946, Portland, OR 92708-2946,
phone (503) 808-4760.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed action is being considered
under the authority of resolution of the House of Representatives,
Committee on Public Works and Transportation, adopted August 3, 1989.
The action ultimately may involve some measures similar to those
selected in 1999. The Supplement will identify a plan of action which
(1) evaluates the specific engineering, environmental, and economic
effects of proposed alternatives for improving the authorized channel
as compared to the without-project condition (no action alternative);
(2) identifies a plan which maximizes National Economic Development
(NED) benefits while protecting environmental resources in accordance
with Federal laws and statutes; (3) recommends a plan for construction
if economic, environmental, and engineering justification is met and
the plan is supported by the sponsor. Alternatives being considered to
the proposed action are the same as those analyzed in the 1999 report.
The Supplement will consider information gained from the expert panel
held during the consultation process and data collection for smelt and
sturgeon conducted in conjunction with the Federal and State resource
agencies. Based on preliminary consideration to date, the following
have been some of the significant issues requiring analysis in the
Supplement: smelt, sturgeon, Dungeness crab concerns, wetlands and
mitigation required due to wetland losses. The Corps welcomes input to
the Supplement from affected Federal, State and local agencies, Indian
tribes, and other interested organizations and parties. The
Environmental Protection
[[Page 12547]]
Agency, Region 10, was a cooperating agency to the IFR/EIs, and will
also act as a cooperating agency in the Supplement.
The normal range of environmental review and consultation shall
apply to the proposed action.
Scoping was completed in 1994. The Corps plans to conduct a series
of public meetings after release of the draft Supplement. Meeting times
will be announced later. The draft IFR/EIS Supplement is tentatively
scheduled for release to the public and agencies for review in May
2002.
Randall J. Butler,
Colonel, EN, Commanding.
[FR Doc. 02-6583 Filed 3-18-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-AR-M
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)