General Management Plan, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Devils Tower National Monument, Crook County, Wyoming
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: March 21, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 55)]
[Notices]
[Page 13193-13194]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21mr02-78]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
General Management Plan, Final Environmental Impact Statement,
Devils Tower National Monument, Crook County, Wyoming
AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Availability of Final Environmental Impact Statement and
General Management Plan for Devils Tower National Monument.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102 (2) (c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, the National Park Service announces the
availability of a final Environmental Impact Statement and General
Management Plan (FEIS/GMP) for Devils Tower National Monument, Wyoming.
DATES: The Draft EIS/GMP was on public review from July 2, through
September 30, 2001. Responses to public comment are addressed in the
FEIS/GMP. A 30-day no-action period will follow the Environmental
Protection Agency's Notice of Availability of the FEIS/GMP.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the FEIS/GMP are available from the
Superintendent, Devils Tower National Monument, P.O. Box 10, Devils
Tower, WY 82714. Public reading copies of the FEIS/GMP will be
available for review at the following locations:
Office of the Superintendent, Devils Tower National Monument, P.O. Box
10, Devils Tower, WY 82714, Telephone: (307) 467-5283 x 14.
Planning and Environmental Quality, Intermountain Support Office--
Denver, National Park Service, P.O. Box 25287, Denver, CO 80225-0287,
Telephone: (303) 969-2851 or (303)969-2377.
Office of Public Affairs, National Park Service, Department of the
Interior, 18th and C Streets NW, Washington, DC 20240, Telephone: (202)
208-6843.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Superintendent, Devils Tower National
Monument, (307) 467-5282 x 14.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FEIS/GMP analyzes five alternatives to
manage natural and cultural resources, visitor use and access, general
development and park operations. The alternatives address issues
including the following. The national monument is subject to visitor
congestion, including vehicular circulation and parking, and crowded
visitor facilities. None of the four buildings where park staff works
has adequate space for office requirements, storage, meetings, or
breaks. The space available for the cooperating association's offices
and bookstore is inadequate. Congestion and inadequate facilities limit
the staff's ability to offer orientation and interpretation that would
ensure visitor understanding of the monument's significance and allow
visitors to make the best use of their time. Flood control structures
on the Belle Fourche River inside and outside the monument have
severely damaged the riparian woodland system. Modern recreational use,
developments, and climbing on the Tower are sometimes in conflict with
American Indian traditional cultural values. High levels of
development, visitor use, and crowding at the base of the Tower are not
consistent with the spiritual nature of the area. Alternative 1, the no
action alternative represents the continuation of existing conditions
and management at the monument. Alternative 2 would reduce overall
development to improve the monument's natural setting, institute a
reservation system during periods of peak visitation, and convert the
parking area at the base of the Tower to a pedestrian plaza.
Alternative 3, the NPS preferred alternative, would institute a shuttle
system for use during peak
[[Page 13194]]
visitation periods, construct a shuttle staging area and visitor
orientation facilities within the monument, and convert the parking
area at the base of the Tower to a pedestrian plaza. Alternative 4
would also institute a shuttle system, but would construct/relocate
staging and visitor orientation facilities, along with headquarters and
maintenance facilities, outside the monument boundaries. Alternative 5
would continue to offer visitor experiences similar to those presently
available, but would expand, pave, and upgrade parking areas and roads,
and/or add facilities to reduce visitor congestion.
The FEIS/GMP in particular evaluates the environmental consequences
of the proposed action and the other alternatives on the prairie dog (a
candidate for listing as threatened by the Fish and Wildlife Service),
wetlands, floodplains, ethnographic and historic resources, visitors'
experience of monument resources, visitor access and freedom to go at
one's own pace, access to orientation and interpretation, visitor
safety, businesses and neighbors, and local and regional economy.
Dated: December 7, 2001.
R. Everhart,
Acting Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 02-6610 Filed 3-20-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)