Jump to main content.

The Presidio of San Francisco, California; Notice of Availability of the Presidio Trust Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

 
[Federal Register: May 13, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 92)]
[Notices]
[Page 32070-32071]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr13my02-118]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDIO TRUST
 
The Presidio of San Francisco, California; Notice of Availability 
of the Presidio Trust Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact 
Statement

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the Presidio Trust Management Plan 
(PTMP): Land Use Policies for Area B of The Presidio of San Francisco 
and associated Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The PTMP 
(formerly known as the Presidio Trust Implementation Plan or PTIP) is 
an update to the July 1994 Final General Management Plan Amendment 
(GMPA) for the portion of The Presidio of San Francisco (Presidio) now 
under the Presidio Trust's (Trust's) jurisdiction (Area B). The PTMP 
EIS supplements the GMPA Environmental Impact Statement adopted by the 
National Park Service (NPS) for the Presidio in 1994.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Contents of Final EIS: Volume I of the Final EIS contains the text 
of the Final EIS with a summary of changes made in response to comments 
on the Draft EIS. Major impact topics assessed in Volume I include 
historic resources, cultural landscape, archaeology, biological 
resources, water resources, visual resources, air quality, noise, land 
use, socioeconomic issues, visitor experience, recreation, public 
safety, transportation, water supply, utilities and Trust operations. 
Volume II contains a summary of the public and agency comments received 
on the Draft EIS, along with written responses to those comments. 
Volume III contains technical appendices related to the EIS analyses.
    Background: The Trust has prepared a Final EIS in compliance with 
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on 
Environmental Quality's implementing regulations at 40 CFR Parts 1500-
1508, and the Trust's supplemental implementing regulations in 36 CFR 
Part 1010. The Final EIS describes and analyzes a proposed action 
(Final Plan), a variant of the Final Plan alternative, and five 
additional alternatives to address Presidio Trust Act (Trust Act) 
requirements, changed conditions since the GMPA was adopted, new 
policies and management approaches of the Trust, and public comment on 
the Draft Plan and Draft EIS. The Draft Plan and EIS were circulated 
for public and agency review from July 25, 2001 to October 25, 2001, a 
period of about 90 days. During this period, the Trust received over 
3,000 comment letters, as well as oral comments provided at two public 
hearings and at a public meeting of the Golden Gate National Recreation 
Area and Point Reyes National Seashore Citizens' Advisory Commission. 
The Trust carefully considered public comments, and made modifications 
to the text of the Draft Plan and EIS. Modifications included re-naming 
and substantially revising the text of the Draft Plan, along with 
inclusion of the Final Plan variant in the EIS and other modest 
adjustments to the text and analysis of the EIS. Original comment 
letters and transcripts are available for review in the Trust library, 
34 Graham Street, in the Presidio.

[[Page 32071]]

    Under the Trust Act, as amended, Congress created the Trust to 
manage Area B so as to make it financially self-sufficient by year 2013 
and to protect Area B's resources by ensuring long-term financial 
sustainability. Each of the alternatives summarized below and presented 
in the Final EIS achieves Trust Act goals to varying degrees and has a 
different emphasis. Principal differences among alternatives include 
the proposed total building square footage, the proposed amount of non-
residential and residential uses, the amount of open space, the 
proposed plan vision and method of delivery of public programs. The 
maximum overall square footage of 5,960,000 allowed under the Trust Act 
would not be exceeded under any alternative.
    GMPA 2000 Alternative--The GMPA 2000 or ``no action'' alternative 
would implement the 1994 GMPA assuming current (year 2000) conditions. 
Buildings would be removed to increase open space and enhance natural 
resources, and available housing would decrease substantially. Tenants 
with a mission related to environmental, social or cultural concerns 
would offer public programs related to their business mission.
    Final Plan Alternative--Under the Final Plan or the Trust's 
``preferred'' alternative, the Trust would preserve and enhance the 
park resources for public use. Housing units would be removed to 
increase open space and would be replaced through a combination of 
subdivision, conversion and possible new construction. The Trust would 
collaborate with partners, including the NPS, tenants and residents, to 
provide park programs. A broader mix of tenants would be permitted than 
under the GMPA 2000 alternative to meet the policy goals of the Plan.
    Final Plan Variant--The Final Plan variant is consistent with a 
detailed Sierra Club proposal. Its land use proposals are similar to 
the Final Plan alternative, except for greater building demolition and 
therefore less total built space as well as a prohibition on replacing 
demolished structures through new construction. The Final Plan variant 
emphasizes the replacement of removed housing units by converting 
existing buildings.
    Resource Consolidation Alternative--Under the Resource 
Consolidation alternative, the Presidio would become an enhanced open 
space haven in the center of urban surroundings by maximizing open 
space in the southern part of the park through the removal of historic 
and non-historic structures, and concentrating built space in the 
northern part of the park. Open space and natural resource enhancements 
would be maximized.
    Sustainable Community Alternative--Under the Sustainable Community 
alternative, the Presidio would become a sustainable live/work 
community in a park setting with a small decrease in housing units, 
would retain its present dispersed pattern of development, and would 
emphasize building reuse and rehabilitation.
    Cultural Destination Alternative--Under the Cultural Destination 
alternative, the Presidio would become a national and international 
destination park by providing robust public programming delivered 
through the Trust. A substantial level of building demolition in the 
southern part of the park would be replaced in the northern part of the 
park to provide an increase in and improved mix of housing, and to 
cluster housing near work and transit.
    Minimum Management Alternative--Under the Minimum Management 
alternative, there would be no significant physical change beyond that 
already underway, and the Presidio would be minimally managed to meet 
legal requirements.
    Materials Available to the Public: Copies of the PTMP and Final EIS 
will be available at the public meeting of the Trust Board of Directors 
on May 21, 2002, and will be available thereafter by calling or writing 
the Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, Post Office Box 29052, San 
Francisco, CA 94129-0052. Telephone: 415/561-5414. The complete PTMP 
and Final EIS will be available electronically on the Trust's website 
(www.presidiotrust.gov) Exit Disclaimer and on CD-ROM after May 21, 2002. The PTMP and 
Final EIS may also be reviewed after May 21, 2002, in the Trust's 
library at the above address or in local libraries.
    Public Meeting: As previously announced on April 26, 2002 (67 FR 
20846), information on the PTMP and Final EIS will be presented at the 
public meeting of the Trust Board of Directors on May 21, 2002, at the 
Officers' Club, 50 Moraga Avenue at Arguello Boulevard (Main Post), 
Presidio of San Francisco, California, from 6 p.m. to 9 p.m.
    Limitation on Action: Following distribution of the Final EIS, and 
following the 30-day ``no action'' period required under the NEPA, the 
Trust Board of Directors will consider adoption of the Final Plan. The 
Board's action could include, but is not limited to, adoption of the 
preferred alternative (the Final Plan), rejection of all alternatives, 
and/or partial or conditional approval of a particular alternative. The 
Board's action, through a Record of Decision, will describe the scope 
and basis of the decision, the mitigations or conditions upon which it 
is contingent, and how the Final EIS will be used in subsequent 
decision-making.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Pelka, NEPA Compliance Manager, 
the Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, CA 
94129-0052. Telephone: 415/561-5414.

    Dated: May 7, 2002.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 02-11831 Filed 5-10-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P

 
 

Local Navigation

Jump to main content.