Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Management Act Provisions; Atlantic Coast Weakfish Fishery; Exempted Fishing Permits (EFPs)
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: December 3, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 232)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 67636-67638]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03de03-19]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 600 and 697
[I.D. 110102A]
Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Management Act Provisions;
Atlantic Coast Weakfish Fishery; Exempted Fishing Permits (EFPs)
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
[[Page 67637]]
ACTION: Notice of intent to issue EFPs to conduct experimental fishing;
request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, NMFS (Director) has received EFP applications from the State
of North Carolina to continue work on the first year of a 2-year EFP
issued in 2003. The State of North Carolina originally proposed
conducting an experimental characterization study using flynets to fish
for weakfish in a closed area of the exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
south of Cape Hatteras, during 2003 and 2004. Study goals, however,
were not met in that first year in 2003 due to poor weather conditions
and insufficient availability of fish. Accordingly, the State of North
Carolina has requested that they again be given 2 years to complete the
study and that the study period be revised to cover the years 2004 and
2005.
DATES: Written comments on the applications must be received on or
before December 18, 2003.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to John H. Dunnigan, Director, Office of
Sustainable Fisheries (F/SF), NOAA Fisheries, 1315 East-West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910. The applications, related documents, including
the draft EA, and copies of the regulations under which EFPs are issued
may also be requested from this address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Lange 301-713-2334; FAX: 301-713-
0596.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Director has made a preliminary
determination that the EFP applications contain all the required
information; that the activities to be authorized under the EFP would
be consistent with the goals and objectives of the Atlantic weakfish
fishery under the Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Management Act
(Atlantic Coastal Act); and that the applications warrant further
consideration. This document requests public input in the form of
written comments to NMFS relative to the issuance of EFPs to the State
of North Carolina. If granted, these EFPs would authorize a flynet
characterization study to be conducted by the North Carolina Division
of Marine Fisheries (NCDMF) in a closed area south of Cape Hatteras.
Two participating flynet vessels, each with its own EFP and observer
aboard, would conduct up to a total of 18 trips per year over each of
two seasons, from 15 January through 1 April, in 2004 and 2005, south
of Cape Hatteras, for a maximum of 36 trips.
The NCDMF has presently applied for two EFPs in 2004 to conduct the
first year of a 2-year characterization study in the closed area in the
EEZ south of Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. The NCDMF previously
applied, and was granted by NOAA Fisheries, two identical EFPs for 2003
to perform an identical study, but due to inclement weather and
insufficient availability of fish, NCDMF was unable to conduct year one
of their study in 2003. Hence, NCDMF is reapplying to again begin their
study, but in 2004. The previous NCDMF application also sought, and was
granted by NOAA Fisheries, a third EFP to test turtle excluder devices
(TEDs) in the closed area. Unlike the work involved in the
characterization study, NCDMF was able to conclude its testing of TEDs,
and is presently analyzing the data gained. Accordingly NCDMF does not
presently seek a third EFP, as it did last year, for TED testing.
NOAA Fisheries has authority to grant the requested EFPs under the
Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative Management Act (Atlantic Coastal
Act), 16 U.S.C. 5101 et seq., and regulations at 50 CFR 697.22
concerning the conduct of activities that are otherwise prohibited by
the regulations in this part. The prohibited activities for which NCDMF
seeks exemption involve weakfish regulations at 50 CFR 697.7(a)(5) that
prohibit any person from fishing with a flynet in the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) off North Carolina in a closed area south of Cape
Hatteras, as defined by this regulation. This area was closed to
flynetters in order to reduce the harvest of the recovering weakfish
stock, especially the harvest of juvenile weakfish known to congregate
in the closed area. In addition, other prohibitions for which exemption
is sought are at 50 CFR 697.7(a)(1) and (2), which prohibits fishing
for, harvesting, possessing, or retaining weakfish less than 12 inches
(30.5 cm), in the EEZ and at 50 CFR 697.7(a)(3), which prohibits
fishing for weakfish coastwide in the EEZ with a minimum mesh size less
than 3 1/4-inch (8.3 cm) square stretched mesh (as measured between the
centers of opposite knots when stretched taut) or 3 3/4-inch (9.5 cm)
diamond stretched mesh for trawls.
Previous Year's EFP
The present application by NCDMF for two EFPs to begin a
characterization study is identical to the application for EFPs sought
last year by NCDMF to perform this same study. Last year, on December
18, 2002, NMFS issued two EFPs to NCDMF to conduct a flynet
characterization study, in cooperation with NMFS, with two flynet
vessels using mesh at least as large as defined in the Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission's (Commission) Weakfish Fishery Management
Plan Amendment 3 (Amendment 3), and at 50 CFR 697.7(a)(3), to collect
information on the size and species composition of finfish caught in
modified flynets in the closed area. Under last year's EFPs, the NCDMF
was to assess the effects, including the species and size composition
of the catch, of using larger mesh size nets in the North Carolina
flynet fishery if it were to be allowed to resume operations south of
Cape Hatteras. The mesh size used in the flynet fishery, prior to the
1997 closure of this area, was significantly smaller than is currently
required. This information would have permitted NCDMF, the Commission,
and NMFS to properly assess the potential impacts of reopening the
closed area to flynets with larger minimum-mesh sizes after management
goals have been met and the stock is declared to be restored.
Additional terms of the study proposal related to sample design or
address concerns raised by the Commission's Weakfish Fishery Management
Board and its Technical Committee. The study was to terminate if any
cumulative, monthly sample yields juvenile or undersized fish in excess
of 10 percent of the total catch for that month. If an annual cap of
175,000 lbs (79,380 kg) on landings of weakfish taken south of Cape
Hatteras is reached, the study would end for that year. Multiple tows
made on a single trip were to be spatially separated by at least one
(1) nautical mile to insure maximum geographic coverage and prevent
directing effort on one specific school of fish. The entire contents of
each tow on an individual trip were to be kept separate and processed
separately at the dock. NMFS observers were to be required on each trip
to monitor fishing activity and to record global positioning system
coordinates for each tow, interactions with any threatened or
endangered species, tow time, depth, water temperature, air
temperature, date, and time. NMFS observers were to also record net
dimensions and design specifications to document successful designs, if
a net was found to effectively avoid catches of undersized fish. In
order to determine the ability of these flynets to minimize bycatch of
undersized fish, unculled catches were to be sorted by tow for species
composition and weight by market category, and sub-samples would be
[[Page 67638]]
measured for length frequency. Regulatory discards, including sub-legal
weakfish, and non-marketable species, were to be sorted, weighed and a
sub-sample would be taken for length frequency. These fish were to be
properly disposed of, and would not be sold. ESA and other protected
species would have been handled as required by law; observers would
have recorded and reported all discarded red drum and striped bass. The
flynet characterization was to be terminated if takes (lethal or non-
lethal) of loggerhead or Kemp's ridley sea turtles exceeded one half of
the numbers (20 and 2) allowed in the Incidental Take Statement of the
1997 BO (that is, 10 or 1, in any one year). Further, analysis of the
study data was to be coordinated by NCDMF and NMFS staff and the
Commission was to be briefed through annual and final reports that
would provide maps of the sample areas overlaid with the location of
each tow, species encountered, total weights, numbers, and length
frequency distributions of selected species. The final report was also
to summarize the findings from each year and attempt to relate
variability in catches and species composition with environmental
variables. The report was also to summarize all interactions with sea
turtles and include a discussion on the use of TEDs in the flynet
fishery .
Newly Proposed EFP
Unfortunately, due to poor weather and insufficient availablity of
fish, NCDMF was unable to complete its year one experiments in the 2-
year study. Accordingly, NCDMF seeks to reapply for EFPs to conduct an
identical two year characterization study under identical terms, this
time for the 2004 and 2005 years. Specifically, the NCDMF proposes to
complete the first year of the 2-year flynet characterization study
using the same means and methods as described above for last year's
EFP. The flynet characterization study would be conducted in a closed
area south of Cape Hatteras by two participating flynet vessels, each
with its own EFP and observer aboard, conducting up to a total of 18
trips per year over each of two seasons, from 15 January through 1
April, in 2004 and 2005, for a maximum of 36 trips.
The EFP would exempt up to three vessels from the requirements of
the Atlantic weakfish regulations according to the provisions at 50 CFR
600.745 and 697.22, as follows: (1) prohibiting of the use of flynets
in the closed area of the EEZ off North Carolina as defined at Sec.
697.7(a)(5); and (2) fishing for, harvesting, possession or retention
of any weakfish less than 12 inches (30.5 cm) in total length from the
EEZ as specified at Sec. 697.7(a)(1) and (2) for data collection
purposes.
The environmental assessment prepared for the proposed flynet
characterization study in 2003 found that no significant environmental
impacts would result from the proposed action.
Dated: November 26, 2003.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 03-30136 Filed 12-2-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)