Regulated Navigation Area; Chesapeake Bay Entrance and Hampton Roads, VA and Adjacent Waters
Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
[Federal Register: January 16, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 11)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2201-2203]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16ja03-11]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05-02-103]
RIN 2115-AE84
Regulated Navigation Area; Chesapeake Bay Entrance and Hampton
Roads, VA and Adjacent Waters
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District is adding vessel
speed limits, for certain vessels operating in the vicinity of Naval
Station Norfolk, to the existing regulated navigation area found at 33
CFR 165.501. This temporary rule is necessary to ensure the safety and
security of naval vessels that are moored at Naval Station Norfolk. The
temporary rule will require all vessels of 300 gross tons and greater
to reduce speed to eight knots in the vicinity of Naval Station
Norfolk, in order to improve security measures and reduce the potential
threat to Naval Station Norfolk security that may be posed by these
vessels.
DATES: This temporary final rule is effective from December 20, 2002 to
June 15, 2003.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket CGD05-02-103 and are available for inspection or
copying at USCG Marine Safety Office Hampton Roads, 200 Granby Street,
Norfolk, Virginia, 23510 between 9:30 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Monica Acosta, USCG,
project officer, USCG Marine Safety Office Hampton Roads, telephone
number (757) 441-3453.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
temporary regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for not publishing a NPRM. Upon request by the
Navy, immediate action is necessary to ensure the safety and security
of naval vessels moored at Naval Station Norfolk during large merchant
vessel transits of the Elizabeth River. Due to their large size and
substantial momentum while underway, these merchant vessels pose
[[Page 2202]]
a potential threat to Naval Station Norfolk's security. Imposing this
speed limit will improve security alongside Naval Station Norfolk as
well as reduce the potential threat. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying
the effective date of the rule would be contrary to the public
interest, as immediate action is necessary to ensure the safety and
security of naval vessels during large merchant vessel transits of the
Elizabeth River.
Background and Purpose
The Commander Naval Station Norfolk requested this rule to reduce
the potential threat to national security that may be posed by vessels
of 300 gross tons or greater as they pass the naval station. This
temporary modification of the regulated navigation area (RNA) is
necessary to ensure the safety and security of naval vessels in the
vicinity of Naval Station Norfolk. The U.S. Navy or other federal
agencies may assist the U.S. Coast Guard in the enforcement of this
rule.
No vessel of 300 gross tons or greater may proceed at a speed over
eight knots between Elizabeth River Channel Lighted Gong Buoy 5 (LL
9470) of Norfolk Harbor Reach and gated Elizabeth River Channel Lighted
Buoys 17 (LL 9595) and 18 (LL 9600) of Craney Island Reach. All vessels
less than 300 gross tons are exempt from this rule, as well as all
Public vessels as defined in 33 U.S.C. 1321, which states that a public
vessel means a vessel owned or bareboat chartered and operated by the
United States, or by a State or political subdivision thereof, or by a
foreign nation, except when such vessel is engaged in commerce.
Regulatory Evaluation
This temporary rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040; February 26, 1979). This temporary
final rule will be in effect for less than nine months. During this
period, it is estimated to affect 3988 vessel transits. However, the
speed limit restrictions are only in effect for less than four miles,
and typical vessel speed is 10 knots. Therefore, any delay caused by
the two knot reduction in speed will be minimal.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this temporary
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This rule will affect the following entities,
some of which may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
300 gross tons or greater intending to transit Norfolk Harbor Reach at
speeds greater than eight knots. This regulated navigation area will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities for the following reasons. This rule will only affect a
limited portion of a vessel's total transit, and for only a length of
less than four miles. Deep-draft vessels typically transit this area at
approximately 10 knots, and therefore the eight-knot speed limit will
not cause significant delays. Further, the rule is only in effect for
nine months.
If, however, you think that your business or organization qualifies
as a small entity and that this rule will have a significant economic
impact on your business or organization, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and in what way and to
what degree this rule will economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian
[[Page 2203]]
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that Order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Environment
We have considered the environmental impact of this temporary rule
and concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g) of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lC, this temporary rule is categorically excluded
from further environmental documentation. This temporary rule seeks to
modify a well established Regulated Navigation Area, and will be in
effect for less than nine months. A ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' is available in the docket for inspection or copying
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Vessels, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 50 U.S.C 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; 49 CFR 1.46.
2. From December 20, 2002 until June 15, 2003 add new paragraph
(d)(14) to Sec. 165.501 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.501 Chesapeake Bay entrance and Hampton Roads, Va. and
adjacent waters--regulated navigation area.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(14) Speed restrictions on Norfolk Harbor Reach. Vessels of 300
gross tons or more may not proceed at a speed over eight knots between
the Elizabeth River Channel Lighted Gong Buoy 5 (LL 9470) of Norfolk
Harbor Reach (northwest of Sewells Point) at approximately
36[deg]58'00'' N, 76[deg]20'00'' W and gated Elizabeth River Channel
Lighted Buoys 17 (LL 9595) and 18 (LL 9600) of Craney Island Reach
(southwest of Norfolk International Terminal) at approximately
36[deg]54'17'' N, 76[deg]20'11'' W. All vessels less than 300 gross
tons are exempt from this rule. All coordinates reference Datum NAD
1983. This speed restriction does not apply to Public Vessels as
defined in 33 U.S.C. 1321(a)(4). The U.S. Navy or other federal
agencies may assist the U.S. Coast Guard in the enforcement of this
rule.
* * * * *
Dated: December 20, 2002.
J.D. Hull,
Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 03-1006 Filed 1-15-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)