Outer Continental Shelf Facility Security

Note: EPA no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.

[Federal Register: July 1, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 126)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 39338-39353]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01jy03-18]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 106
[USCG-2003-14759]
RIN 1625-AA68

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary interim rule with request for comments and notice of
meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This interim rule provides security measures for mobile
offshore drilling units (MODUs) not subject to the International
Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, (SOLAS) and certain
fixed and floating facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)
other than deepwater ports. For the purpose of this part, non-SOLAS
MODUs and certain fixed and floating facilities on the OCS are
collectively referred to as OCS facilities. This rule requires the
owners or operators of OCS facilities to designate security officers,
develop security plans based on security assessments, implement
security measures specific to the OCS facility's operation and comply
with Maritime Security Levels. This interim rule is one of six interim
rules in today's Federal Register that comprise a new subchapter on the
requirements for maritime security mandated by the Maritime
Transportation Security Act of 2002. These six interim rules implement
national maritime security initiatives concerning General Provisions,
Area Maritime Security (ports), Vessels, Facilities, OCS Facilities,
and the Automatic Identification System. Where appropriate, they align
these domestic maritime security requirements with those of the
International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code and recent
amendments to SOLAS. This interim rule will benefit persons and
property by requiring security plans and procedures to prevent, deter,
detect, and respond to incidents that threaten the security of OCS
facilities. To best understand these rules, first read the one titled
``Implementation of National Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-
2003-14792).

DATES: Effective date. This interim rule is effective from July 1, 2003
until November 25, 2003.
Comments. Comments and related material must reach the Docket
Management Facility on or before July 31, 2003. Comments on collection
of information sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) must
reach OMB on or before July 31, 2003.
Meeting. A public meeting will be held on July 23, 2003, from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m., in Washington, DC.

ADDRESSES: Comments. To make sure that your comments and related
material are not entered more than once in the docket, please submit
them by only one of the following means:
(1) Electronically to the Docket Management System Web site at
http://dms.dot.gov;
(2) By mail to the Docket Management Facility (USCG-2003-14759),
U.S. Department of Transportation, room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001;
(3) By fax to the Docket Management Facility at 202-493-2251; or
(4) By delivery to room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif
Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
You must also mail comments on collection of information to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, ATTN: Desk Officer,
U.S. Coast Guard.
Meeting. A public meeting will be held on July 23, 2003, in
Washington, DC, at the Grand Hyatt Washington, DC 1000 H Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20001.
Availability. Electronic forms of all comments received into any of
our dockets can be searched by the name of the individual submitting
the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor unit, etc.) and is open to the public
without restriction. You may also review the Department of
Transportation's complete Privacy Act Statement published in the
Federal Register on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you may visit
http://dms.dot.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call Lieutenant Greg Versaw by telephone 202-267-1103, toll-free
telephone 1-800-842-8740 ext. 7-1103, or electronic mail
msregs@comdt.uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Ms. Dorothy Beard, Chief, Dockets,
Department of Transportation, telephone 202-366-5149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Due to the short timeframe given to
implement these National Maritime Transportation Security initiatives,
as directed by the Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) of 2002
(MTSA, Pub. L. 107-295, 116 STAT. 2064), and to ensure all comments are
in the public venue for these important rulemakings, we are not
accepting comments containing protected information for these interim
rules. We request you submit comments, as explained in the Request for
Comments section below, and discuss your concerns or support in a
manner that is not security sensitive. We also request that you not
submit proprietary information as part of your comment.
The Docket Management Facility maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
will be available for inspection or copying at room PL-401 on the Plaza
level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. You may also find this docket on the Internet at
http://dms.dot.gov.

Request for Comments

We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. Your comments will be considered for the
final rule we plan to issue before November 25, 2003, to replace this
interim rule. If you choose to comment on this rule, please include
your name and address, identify the specific docket number for this
interim rule (USCG-2003-14759), indicate the specific heading of this
document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each
comment. You may submit your comments and material by mail, hand
delivery, fax, or electronic means to the Docket Management Facility at
the address under ADDRESSES. Please submit your comments and material
by only one means. If you submit them by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period. We may change this interim
rule in view of them.

Public Meeting

We will hold a public meeting on July 23, 2003, in Washington, DC
at the

[[Page 39339]]

Grand Hyatt Hotel, at the address listed under ADDRESSES. The meeting
will be from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. to discuss all of the maritime security
interim rules, and the Automatic Identification System (AIS) interim
rule found in today's Federal Register. In addition, you may submit a
request for other public meetings to the Docket Management Facility at
the address under ADDRESSES explaining why another one would be
beneficial. If we determine that other meetings would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold them at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.

Regulatory Information

We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
rulemaking and are making this interim rule effective upon publication.
Section 102(d)(1) of the MTSA requires the publication of an interim
rule as soon as practicable without regard to the provisions of chapter
5 of title 5, U.S. Code (Administrative Procedure Act). The Coast Guard
finds that harmonization of U.S. regulations with maritime security
measures adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in
December 2002, and the need to institute measures for the protection of
U.S. maritime security as soon as practicable, furnish good cause for
this interim rule to take effect immediately under both the
Administrative Procedure Act and section 808 of the Congressional
Review Act.

Background and Purpose

A summary of the Coast Guard's regulatory initiatives for maritime
security can be found under the Background and Purpose section in the
preamble to the interim rule titled ``Implementation of National
Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-2003-14792) published elsewhere
in today's Federal Register.

Discussion of Comments Addressing OCS Facility Issues in the Notice of
Meeting

For a discussion of comments on OCS facilities at the public
meetings and in the docket, see the interim rule titled
``Implementation of National Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-
2003-14792) published elsewhere in today's Federal Register.

Discussion of Interim Rule

This interim rule regulates the owners and operators of OCS
facilities to provide security to these OCS facilities and to other
vessels with which an OCS facility interfaces. The interim rule adds
new 33 CFR part 106, OCS Facility Security, as part of 33 CFR, Chapter
I, subchapter H, Maritime Security. A general description of the
process used in developing subchapter H and its component parts appears
in the interim rule titled ``Implementation of National Maritime
Security Initiatives'' (USCG-2003-14792).
This interim rule applies to Certificated Mobile Offshore Drilling
Units (MODUs) that are not subject to International Convention for
Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, (SOLAS) and fixed or floating platforms
operating on the Outer Continental Shelf that host more than 150
persons for 12 hours or more during each 24-hour period continuously
for 30 days or more, or produce more than 100,000 barrels of oil per
day, and/or produce more than 200 million cubic feet of natural gas per
day. OCS facilities that do not meet these characteristics may still be
required to conduct a Facility Security Assessment, develop a Facility
Security Plan, and implement certain security measures if the cognizant
Coast Guard District Commander makes that determination. That
determination is made on a case-by-case basis, based upon unique local
conditions, specific intelligence information, or other identifiable
and articulable risk factors that confirm such actions are necessary
and appropriate to ensure an adequate level of security. This
requirement would be issued in a Maritime Security Directive. This
interim rule does not apply to deepwater ports.
The MTSA and the International Ship and Port Facility Security
(ISPS) Code use different terms to define similar, if not identical,
persons or things. These differing terms sometimes match up with the
terms used in subchapter H, but sometimes they do not. For a table of
the terms used in subchapter H and their related terms in the MTSA and
the ISPS Code, see the Discussion of Interim Rule section in the
preamble for the interim rule titled ``Implementation of National
Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-2003-14792), published elsewhere
in today's Federal Register.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to require certain OCS facilities
to perform security assessments, develop security plans, and implement
security measures and procedures to reduce the risk of and to mitigate
the results of an act that threatens the security of the OCS facility,
the crew, or the public. This rulemaking combines international
requirements and existing domestic policy, and is published as a part
of a new subchapter on maritime security. The MTSA mandates that OCS
facilities conduct security assessments and develop security plans,
submit these plans within 6 months of publication of this interim rule.
It also mandates that each OCS facility shall be in compliance with its
approved security plans within 12 months of the publication of this
interim rule.
Part 106 consists of four subparts: subpart A (General), subpart B
(Security Requirements), subpart C (OCS Facility Security Assessment),
and subpart D (OCS Facility Security Plan). The requirements discussed
in part 106 are consistent with similar requirements in parts 104 and
105 of this subchapter. These interim rules include requirements
discussed below.

Waivers

The waiver section of this interim rule establishes procedures for
OCS facility owners or operators who wish to be relieved of complying
with specific requirements of the interim rule on the grounds that
those requirements are unreasonable or unnecessary.

Equivalents

The equivalents section of this interim rule establishes procedures
for requesting an equivalency to the requirements of this interim rule.
Equivalencies are intended to allow an OCS facility owner or operator
to provide an alternative provision or arrangement that provides the
same level of security as a specific requirement contained within this
part.

Alternatives

The alternatives section of this interim rule allows OCS facility
owners or operators to implement an Alternative Security Program that
has been reviewed and accepted by the Commandant (G-MP) to meet the
requirements of this part. An Alternative Security Program must be
comprehensive and must be demonstrated to meet the intent of each
section of this part. Owners or operators are required to implement an
Alternative Security Program in its entirety to be deemed in compliance
with this part.

Appeals

The appeals section of this interim rule establishes the procedures
for OCS facility owners or operators who are aggrieved by, and wish to
contest, a Coast Guard decision regarding a matter covered by this
interim rule.

Owner or Operator Responsibilities

The owner or operator of a facility is generally responsible for
all requirements imposed by this part. The owner or operator must:

[[Page 39340]]

? Ensure the performance of all OCS facility security duties;
? Define the security organizational structure for each OCS
facility and provide each person exercising security duties or
responsibilities within that structure with the support needed to
fulfill those obligations;
? Designate, by name or title, a Company Security Officer and
a Facility Security Officer for each OCS facility;
? Ensure that a Facility Security Assessment is conducted;
? Ensure the development and submission for approval of a
Facility Security Plan.
? Ensure that the OCS facility operates in compliance with
the approved Facility Security Plan;
? Ensure that adequate coordination of security issues takes
place between the OCS facility and vessels, including the execution of
a Declaration of Security;
? Ensure that security communication is readily available;
? Ensure coordination with and implementation of changes in
MARSEC Level; and
? Ensure all breaches of security and security incidents are
reported.

Company Security Officer (CSO)

This interim rule requires that each OCS facility owner or operator
appoint a Company Security Officer, designated in writing, for each OCS
facility. The Company Security Officer may be a full-time or collateral
position. A Company Security Officer may perform other duties within
the owner or operator's organization provided he or she is able to
perform the duties and responsibilities required of the Company
Security Officer.
The Company Security Officer must have a general knowledge in
matters of a range of issues, such as company security administration
and organization, relevant laws and regulations, current security
threats and patterns, risk assessment methodology, and conducting
audits, inspections, and control procedures. The Company Security
Officer may delegate his or her duties, but remains responsible for the
performance of those duties. The duties of the Company Security Officer
include:
? Ensuring that a Facility Security Assessment is carried
out;
? Ensuring that a Facility Security Plan is developed,
approved, maintained, and implemented;
? Ensuring that the Facility Security Plan is modified when
necessary;
? Ensuring that OCS facility security activities are audited
and reviewed;
? Ensuring the timely correction of problems identified by
audits, reviews, or inspections;
? Ensuring adequate security training; and
? Ensuring communication and cooperation between the OCS
facility and vessels.

Facility Security Officer (FSO)

This interim rule requires that the owner or operator of OCS
facilities appoint, and designate in writing, a Facility Security
Officer. The Facility Security Officer may be a full-time or collateral
position. The Facility Security Officer must have a general knowledge
in a range of issues such as security administration and organization,
relevant laws and regulations, current security threats and patterns,
risk assessment methodology, and conducting audits, inspections, and
control procedures. The most important duties a Facility Security
Officer must perform include implementing a Facility Security Plan,
ensuring that adequate training is provided to OCS facility personnel;
ensuring that the OCS facility operates in accordance with the plan and
in continuous compliance with part 106; and periodically auditing and
updating the Facility Security Assessment and Facility Security Plan.
The Facility Security Officer may assign security duties to other OCS
facility personnel; however, the Facility Security Officer remains
responsible for these duties.

Training

Required training for OCS facility personnel must be specified in
the Facility Security Plan. The Coast Guard will not require specific
security training courses for the Facility Security Officer and OCS
facility personnel. While formal training may be appropriate, we are
not mandating specifics. OCS facility owners or operators must certify
that security personnel are, in fact, properly trained to perform their
duties. The types of training required must also be consistent with the
training requirements described in this part. The Facility Security
Officer is also required to ensure that OCS facility security persons
possess necessary training to maintain the overall security of the OCS
facility.

Drill and Exercise Requirements

Exercises are required to ensure the adequacy of the Facility
Security Plan and are required to be conducted at least once each
calendar year, with no more than 18 months between exercises. Drills,
which are smaller in scope than exercises, must be conducted at least
every 3 months. Exercises may be OCS facility specific, or as part of a
cooperative exercise program. Exercises for security may be combined
with other required exercises, as appropriate.

Security Systems and Equipment Maintenance

Procedures and/or policies must be developed and implemented to
ensure security systems and equipment are tested and operated in
accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer and ready for use.

Security Measures

Security measures for specific activities must be scalable in order
to provide increasing levels of security at increasing MARSEC levels.
An effective security program relies on detailed procedures that
clearly indicate the preparation and prevention activities that will
occur at each threat level and the organizations, or personnel, who are
responsible for carrying out those activities. Security Measures must
be developed for the following activities:
? Security measures for access control;
? Security measures for restricted areas;
? Security measures for delivery of stores and industrial
supplies; and
? Security measures for monitoring.

Declaration of Security (DoS)

This interim rule requires the execution of a Declaration of
Security under certain security conditions. A Declaration of Security
provides a means for ensuring that critical security concerns are
properly addressed prior to a vessel-to-facility interface. Security
must be properly addressed by delineating responsibilities for security
arrangements and procedures between a vessel and the OCS facility. This
obligation is similar to the existing U.S. practice for vessel-to-
facility oil transfer procedures.
Only certain vessels carrying Certain Dangerous Cargoes, in bulk,
will complete a Declaration of Security for every evolution regardless
of the MARSEC Level. At MARSEC Levels 2 and 3, all vessels and OCS
facilities would need to complete the Declaration of Security.
OCS facilities that frequently receive the same vessel may execute
a continuing Declaration of Security--a single Declaration of Security
for multiple visits.
Each Declaration of Security must state the security activities for
which the OCS facility and vessel are responsible during the vessel-to-
facility interface.

[[Page 39341]]

Declarations of Security must be kept as part of the OCS facility's
recordkeeping.

Security Incident Procedures

Each OCS facility must develop security incident procedures for
responding to security incidents. The security incident procedures must
explain the OCS facility's reaction to an emergency, including the
notification and coordination with local, State, and federal
authorities. The security incident procedures must also explain actions
for securing the OCS facility as well as actions for evacuating
passengers and crew.

Facility Security Assessment (FSA)

This interim rule requires all appropriate OCS facilities to
complete a Facility Security Assessment, which is an essential part of
the process of developing and updating the required Facility Security
Plan. The Facility Security Assessment is based in part on an on-scene
security survey, which details the overall assessment of the OCS
facility including any existing security measures, and includes a
written report documenting the vulnerabilities and mitigation
strategies of the OCS facility. As discussed in the interim rule
``Implementation of National Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-
2003-14792), 33 CFR 101.510, lists the various assessment tools that
may be used to meet the risk assessment requirements in the parts 104
through 106 of this subchapter. The assessment tools listed are
sufficient to enable the development of the Facility Security Plan.
This list is also provided to ensure that the Facility Security
Assessment is consistent with other modal assessments. We are working
with other agencies to develop assessment tools that are sensitive to
the diversity of the national Marine Transportation System to ensure
consistent levels of security throughout the entire system. The
designated Company Security Officer must conduct the on-scene survey by
examining and evaluating existing OCS facility protective measures,
procedures, and operations. Using the information obtained in the on-
scene survey, the Company Security Officer must ensure the completion
of the Facility Security Assessment. The Facility Security Assessment
identifies and evaluates, in writing, existing security measures; key
OCS facility operations; the likelihood of possible threats to key OCS
facility operations; and weaknesses, including human factors in the
infrastructure, policies, and procedures of the OCS facility.
The Facility Security Assessment includes, among other things, a
written summary of how the assessment was conducted, each vulnerability
found during the assessment, and countermeasures that could be used to
address each vulnerability. The Facility Security Assessment must be
reviewed and updated each time the Facility Security Plan is revised
and when the Facility Security Plan is submitted for re-approval every
five years

Facility Security Plan

This interim rule requires each OCS facility owner or operator to
develop an effective security plan that incorporates detailed
preparedness, prevention, and response activities for each MARSEC
Level, along with the organizations or personnel responsible for
carrying out those activities. The requirements discussed in this part
are consistent with the requirements covered in parts 104 and 105 of
this subchapter.
The Facility Security Plan is a document, written in English that
is prepared in response to the Facility Security Assessment and
approved by the Coast Guard. A single Facility Security Plan may cover
more than one OCS facility to the extent that they share physical
characteristics and operations, if authorized and approved by the
cognizant District Commander.
In addition to other things, the Facility Security Plan must
respond specifically to any recommendations made by the Facility
Security Assessment; must describe, for each MARSEC Level, how the OCS
facility will apply the security measures required in these
regulations; must detail the organizational structure of security for
the OCS facility; must detail the responsibilities of all OCS facility
personnel with a security duty; must detail the OCS facility's
relationships with the Company, vessels that conduct operations with
the OCS facility, and relevant authorities with a security
responsibility; must provide for regular audit of the FSP and for its
amendment in response to experience or changing circumstances; and must
establish the procedures needed to assess the continuing effectiveness
of security procedures and all security-related equipment and systems,
including procedures for identifying and responding to equipment or
systems failure or malfunction.

Submission and Approval of Security Plan

The Facility Security Plan, including the Facility Security
Assessment report must, be submitted to and reviewed by the cognizant
District Commander. Once the cognizant District Commander finds that
the plan meets the security requirements in part 106, the submitter
will receive confirmation via an approval letter.
If the cognizant District Commander requires more time than is
indicated in the requirements of the interim rule to review a submitted
Facility Security Plan, the cognizant District Commander may return to
the submitter a written acknowledgement stating that the Coast Guard is
currently reviewing the Facility Security Plan submitted for approval,
and that the OCS facility may continue to operate so long as the OCS
facility remains in compliance with the submitted Facility Security
Plan.
If the cognizant District Commander finds that the FSP does not
meet the security requirements, the plan would be returned to the OCS
facility with either an approval letter stating conditions of the
approval, or a disapproval letter along with an explanation of why the
plan does not meet the part 106 requirements.
Security plans must be reviewed by the Coast Guard every time:
? The Facility Security Assessment is altered;
? Failures are identified during an exercise of the Facility
Security Plan; and
? There is a change in ownership or operational control of
the OCS facility or there are amendments to the Facility Security Plan.

Regulatory Assessment

This interim rule is a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under that
Order. It requires an assessment of potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. It is significant under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland Security. A
Regulatory Assessment is available in the docket as indicated under
ADDRESSES. A summary of the Assessment follows:

Cost Assessment

For the purposes of good business practice or regulations
promulgated by other Federal and State agencies, many companies already
have spent a substantial amount of money and resources to upgrade and
improve security. The costs shown in this assessment do not include
security measures these companies have already taken to enhance
security.
The Coast Guard realizes that every company engaged in maritime
commerce will not implement this interim rule exactly as presented in
the

[[Page 39342]]

assessment. Depending on each company's choices, some companies could
spend much less than what is estimated herein while others could spend
significantly more. In general, the Coast Guard assume that each
company will implement this interim rule differently based on the types
of OCS facilities it owns or operates and whether it engages in
international or domestic trade.
This interim rule will affect about 40 OCS facilities under U.S.
jurisdiction, (current and future facilities). These OCS facilities
engage in exploring for, developing, or producing oil, natural gas, or
mineral resources. To determine the number of OCS facilities, we used
data that the Mineral Management Service (MMS) has identified as
nationally critical OCS oil and gas infrastructure. These OCS
facilities meet or exceed any of the following operational threshold
characteristics:
(1) OCS facility hosts more than 150 persons for 12 hours or more
in each 24-hour period continuously for 30 days or more;
(2) Production greater than 100,000 (one hundred thousand) barrels
of oil per day; or
(3) Production greater than 200,000,000 (two hundred million) cubic
feet of natural gas per day.
The estimated cost of complying with the interim rule is Present
Value (PV) $37 million (2003-2012, 7 percent discount rate). In the
first year of compliance, the cost of security assessments and plans,
training, personnel, and paperwork is an estimated $3 million (non-
discounted). Following initial implementation, the annual cost of
compliance is an estimated $5 million (non-discounted).
Approximately 80 percent of the initial cost of the interim rule is
for assigning and establishing Company Security Officers and Facility
Security Officers, 12 percent is associated with paperwork creating
Facility Security Assessments and Facility Security Plans, and 8
percent of the cost is associated with initial training (not including
quarterly drills). Following the first year, approximately 58 percent
of the cost is training (including quarterly drills), 42 percent is for
Company Security Officers and Facility Security Officers, and less than
1 percent is associated with paperwork. Annual training (including
quarterly drills) is the primary cost driver of OCS facility security.
We estimated approximately 3,200 burden hours for paperwork during
the first year of compliance (40 hours for each Facility Security
Assessment and each Facility Security Plan). We estimated approximately
160 burden hours annually following full implementation of the interim
rule to update Facility Security Assessments and Facility Security
Plans.
We estimated the cost of this interim rule to be minimal in
comparison to vessel and non-OCS facility security implementation. This
interim rule includes only personnel, training, and paperwork costs for
the affected OCS facility population. We assume the industry is
adequately prepared with equipment suited to be used for security
purposes (lights, radios, communications), therefore no security
equipment installation, upgrades, or maintenance will be required for
this interim rule.

Benefit Assessment

This interim rule is one of six interim rules that implement
national maritime security initiatives concerning General Provisions,
Area Maritime Security (ports), Vessels, Facilities, OCS Facilities,
and AIS. The Coast Guard used the National Risk Assessment Tool (N-RAT)
to assess benefits that would result from increased security for
vessels, facilities, OCS facilities, and ports. The N-RAT considers
threat, vulnerability, and consequences for several maritime entities
in various security-related scenarios. For a more detailed discussion
on the N-RAT and how we employed this tool, refer to Applicability of
National Maritime Security Initiatives in the interim rule titled
``Implementation of National Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-
2003-14792) published elsewhere in today's Federal Register. For this
benefit assessment, the Coast Guard used a team of experts to calculate
a risk score for each entity and scenario before and after the
implementation of required security measures. The difference in before
and after scores indicates the benefit of the proposed action.
The Coast Guard recognized that the interim rules are a ``family''
of rules that will reinforce and support one another in their
implementation. The Coast Guard has ensured, however, that risk
reduction that is credited in one rulemaking is not also credited in
another. For a more detailed discussion on the benefit assessment and
how the Coast Guard addressed the potential to double-count the risk
reduced, refer to Benefit Assessment in the interim rule titled
``Implementation of National Maritime Security Initiatives'' (USCG-
2003-14792) published elsewhere in today's Federal Register.
The Coast Guard determined annual risk points reduced for each of
the six interim rules using the N-RAT. The benefits are apportioned
among the Vessel, Facility, OCS Facility, AMS, and AIS requirements. As
shown in Table 1, the implementation of OCS Facility Security Plans for
the affected population reduces 13,288 risk points annually through
2012. The benefits attributable for part 101, General Provisions, were
not considered separately since it is an overarching section for all
the parts.

Table 1.--Annual Risk Points Reduced by the Interim Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual risk points reduced by rulemaking
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maritime entity Vessel Facility OCS facility
security plans security plans security plans AMS plans AIS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vessels......................... 778,633 3,385 3,385 3,385 1,448
Facilities...................... 2,025 469,686 .............. 2,025 ..............
OCS Facilities.................. 41 .............. 9,903 .............. ..............
Port Areas...................... 587 587 .............. 129,792 105
-----------------
Total....................... 781,285 473,659 13,288 135,202 1,553
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Once we determined the annual risk points reduced, we discounted
these estimates to their present value (7 percent discount rate, 2003-
2012) so that they could be compared to the costs. We presented the
cost effectiveness, or dollars per risk point reduced, in two ways:
First, we compared the first-year cost and first-

[[Page 39343]]

year benefit because first-year cost is the highest in our assessment
as companies develop security plans and purchase equipment. Second, we
compared the 10-year PV cost and the 10-year PV benefit. The results of
our assessment are presented in Table 2.

Table 2.--First-Year and 10-Year PV Cost and Benefit of the Interim Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim rule
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item Vessel Facility OCS facility
security plans security plans security plans AMS plans AIS \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First-Year Cost (millions)...... $218 $1,125 $3 $120 $41
First-Year Benefit.............. 781,285 473,659 13,288 135,202 1,553
First-Year Cost Effectiveness ($/ $279 $2,375 $205 $890 $26,391
Risk Point Reduced)............
10-Year PV Cost (millions)...... $1,368 $5,399 $37 $477 $42
10-Year PV Benefit.............. 5,871,540 3,559,655 99,863 1,016,074 11,671
10-Year PV Cost Effectiveness ($/ $233 $1,517 $368 $469 $3,624
Risk Point Reduced)............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Cost less monetized safety benefit.

Small Entities

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Coast
Guard has considered whether this interim rule would have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term
``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000. This interim rule does not require a
general notice of proposed rulemaking and, therefore, is exempt from
the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Although this
interim rule is exempt, the Coast Guard has reviewed it for potential
economic impacts on small entities. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis discussing the impact of this interim rule on small entities
is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
There are approximately 40 total current and future OCS facilities
owned by 5 large companies that will be affected by this interim rule.
Depending on how the corporate headquarters' operation is classified
and whether it is oil or gas specific, these companies are generally
classified under the North American Industry Classification System
(NAICS) code 211111 or 221210. According to the Small Business
Administration guidelines for these industries, a company with less
than 500 total corporate employees is considered a small entity. The
entities affected by this interim rule do not qualify as small entities
because all of them have more than 500 employees.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this interim rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this interim rule will have a significant economic impact on
it, please submit a comment to the Docket Management Facility at the
address under ADDRESSES. In your comment, explain why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree this interim rule would
economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this interim rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
interim rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please consult Lieutenant Greg
Versaw, Coast Guard by telephone 202-267-1103, toll-free telephone 1-
800-842-8740 ext. 7-1103, or electronic mail msregs@comdt.uscg.mil.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).

Collection of Information

This interim rule calls for a collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). As defined in 5
CFR 1320.3(c), ``collection of information'' comprises reporting,
recordkeeping, monitoring, posting, labeling, and other, similar
actions. The title and description of the information collections, a
description of those who must collect the information, and an estimate
of the total annual burden follow. The estimate covers the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing sources of data, gathering
and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection. This interim rule modifies an existing OMB-approved
collection--1625-0077 (formerly 2115-0551). A summary of the revised
collection follows.
Title: Security Plans for Ports, Vessels, Facilities, and Outer
Continental Shelf Facilities and Other Security-Related Requirements.
OMB Control Number: 1625-0077.
Summary of the Collection of Information: The Coast Guard requires
security standards for certain non-SOLAS Certificated MODUs and fixed
and floating OCS platforms engaged in the exploration, production and
development of oil and mineral resources on the OCS. This interim rule
provides a framework to ensure adequate security planning, drilling,
and communication procedures by requiring OCS facilities to develop and
submit for approval Facility Security Assessments and Facility Security
Plans. It also requires the use of a Declaration of Security between
OCS facilities and certain vessels.
Need for Information: The primary need for information is to
identify the adequate security mitigating measures that will be
implemented when needed.
Proposed Use of Information: The information will be used to
identify and communicate the security mitigating measures to the Coast
Guard and necessary personnel. Declarations of Security will be used to
identify and

[[Page 39344]]

delineate the security responsibilities between an OCS facility and a
vessel.
Description of the Respondents: OCS facilities that produce 100,000
(one hundred thousand) barrels of oil per day or 200,000,000 (two
hundred million) cubic feet of natural gas per day or host more than
150 persons for 12 hours or more during a 24-hour period continuously
for 30 days or more.
Number of Respondents: 40.
Frequency of Response: Varies.
Initial OCS Facility Security Assessments and OCS Facility Security
Plans occur the first year the OCS facility is online with updates
during each following year.
Depending on the OCS facility there may be additional requirements
and reporting frequencies.
Burden of Response: Development burden for the Facility Security
Assessments and Facility Security Plans are estimated to be 80 hours
for each OCS facility. Updating the assessments and plans is estimated
to be 4 hours for some facilities and 2 hours for others. The
Declaration of Security is expected to be 15 minutes each.
Estimate of Total Annual Burden: During the initial year the burden
will be 3,200 hours. The average annual reporting burden to industry is
160 hours. For a summary of all revisions to this existing OMB-approved
collection, refer to Collection of Information in the interim rule
titled ``Implementation of National Maritime Security Initiatives''
(USCG-2003-14792) published elsewhere in today's Federal Register.
As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)), we have submitted a copy of this interim rule to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for its review of the collection of
information. Due to the circumstances surrounding this temporary rule,
we asked for ``emergency processing'' of our request. We received OMB
approval for the collection of information on June 16, 2003. It is
valid until December 31, 2003.
We ask for public comment on the collection of information to help
us determine how useful the information is; whether it can help us
perform our functions better; whether it is readily available
elsewhere; how accurate our estimate of the burden of collection is;
how valid our methods for determining burden are; how we can improve
the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the information; and how we can
minimize the burden of collection.
If you submit comments on the collection of information, submit
them both to OMB and to the Docket Management Facility where indicated
under ADDRESSES, by the date under DATES.
You need not respond to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control number from OMB. We received OMB
approval for the collection of information on June 16, 2003. It is
valid until December 31, 2003.

Federalism

An interim rule has implications for federalism under Executive
Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State
or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a
substantial direct cost of compliance on them. This part applies to
facilities that are on the OCS, outside the jurisdiction of State
waters or submerged lands. Nothing in this part will have a substantial
direct effect on State or local governments, nor will a substantial
direct cost of compliance be imposed on them. We have analyzed this
interim rule under Executive Order 13132 and have determined that it
therefore does not have implications for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. This interim rule is exempted from assessing the effects of
the regulatory action as required by the Act because it is necessary
for the national security of the United States (2 U.S.C. 1503(5)).

Taking of Private Property

This interim rule will not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

This interim rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

We have analyzed this interim rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. While this interim rule is an economically significant rule, it
does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
may disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

This interim rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

We have analyzed this interim rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order. Although it is a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, it is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
This interim rule has a positive effect on the supply,
distribution, and use of energy. The interim rule provides for security
assessments, plans, procedures, and standards, which will prove
beneficial for the supply, distribution, and use of energy at increased
levels of maritime security.

Trade Impact Assessment

The Trade Agreement Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2501-2582) prohibits
Federal agencies from engaging in any standards or related activities
that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States. Legitimate domestic objectives, such as safety and security,
are not considered unnecessary obstacles. The Act also requires
consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, that
they be the basis for U.S. standards. We have assessed the potential
effect of this interim rule and have determined that it would likely
create obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. However,
because these regulations are being put in place in order to further a
legitimate domestic objective, to increase the security of the United
States, any obstacles created by the

[[Page 39345]]

regulation are not considered unnecessary obstacles.

Environment

We have considered the environmental impact of this interim rule
and concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(a) and (34)(c), of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, this interim rule is categorically
excluded from further environmental documentation. This interim rule
concerns security assessments, plans, training for personnel, and the
establishment of security positions that will contribute to a higher
level of marine safety and security for OCS facilities extracting oil
or gas. A ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' is available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
This rulemaking will not significantly impact the coastal zone.
Further, the rulemaking and the execution of this interim rule will be
done in conjunction with appropriate State coastal authorities. The
Coast Guard will therefore, comply with the requirements of the Coastal
Zone Management Act while furthering its intent to protect the coastal
zone.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 106

Facilities, Maritime security, Outer Continental Shelf, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures.

? For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is adding
part 106 to subchapter H of chapter I of title 33 of the CFR.

PART 106--OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF (OCS) FACILITY SECURITY

Subpart A--General
Sec.
106.100 Definitions.
106.105 Applicability.
106.110 Compliance dates.
106.115 Compliance documentation.
106.120 Noncompliance.
106.125 Waivers.
106.130 Equivalents.
106.135 Alternative Security Program.
106.140 Maritime Security (MARSEC) Directive.
106.145 Right to appeal.
Subpart B--Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Facility Security Requirements
106.200 Owner or operator.
106.205 Company Security Officer (CSO).
106.210 Facility Security Officer (FSO).
106.215 Company or OCS facility personnel with security duties.
106.220 Security training for all other OCS facility personnel.
106.225 Drill and exercise requirements.
106.230 OCS facility recordkeeping requirements.
106.235 Maritime Security (MARSEC) Level coordination and
implementation.
106.240 Communications.
106.245 Procedures for interfacing with vessels.
106.250 Declaration of Security (DoS).
106.255 Security systems and equipment maintenance.
106.260 Security measures for access control.
106.265 Security measures for restricted areas.
106.270 Security measures for delivery of stores and industrial
supplies.
106.275 Security measures for monitoring.
106.280 Security incident procedures.
Subpart C--Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Facility Security Assessment
(FSA)
106.300 General.
106.305 Facility Security Assessment (FSA) requirements.
106.310 Submission requirements.
Subpart D--Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Facility Security Plan (FSP)
106.400 General.
106.405 Format and Content of the Facility Security Plan (FSP).
106.410 Submission and approval.
106.415 Amendment and audit.

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-11, 6.14, 6.16, and 6.19; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.

Subpart A--General

Sec. 106.100 Definitions.

Except as specifically stated in this subpart, the definitions in
part 101 of this subchapter apply to this part.

Sec. 106.105 Applicability.

The requirements in this part apply to owners and operators of any
fixed or floating facility, including MODUs not subject to part 104 of
this subchapter, operating on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) of the
United States for the purposes of engaging in the exploration,
development, or production of oil, natural gas, or mineral resources
that are regulated by 33 CFR subchapter N, that meet the following
operating conditions:
(a) Hosts more than 150 persons for 12 hours or more in each 24-
hour period continuously for 30 days or more;
(b) Produces greater than 100,000 barrels of oil per day; or
(c) Produces greater than 200 million cubic feet of natural gas per
day.

Sec. 106.110 Compliance dates.

(a) On or before December 29, 2003, each Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS) facility owner or operator must submit for each OCS facility a
Facility Security Plan (FSP) described in subpart D of this part for
review and approval to the cognizant District Commander.
(b) On or before June 25, 2004, each OCS facility owner or operator
must be operating in compliance with this part.
(c) OCS facilities built on or after July 1, 2004, must submit for
approval an FSP 60 days prior to beginning operations.

Sec. 106.115 Compliance documentation.

Each OCS facility owner or operator subject to this part must
ensure that no later than July 1, 2004, that copies of the following
documentation are available at the OCS facility and are made available
to the Coast Guard upon request:
(a) The approved Facility Security Plan (FSP) and any approved
revisions or amendments thereto, and a letter of approval from the
cognizant District Commander dated within the last 5 years;
(b) The FSP submitted for approval and current written
acknowledgment from the cognizant District Commander, stating that the
Coast Guard is currently reviewing the FSP submitted for approval and
that the OCS facility may continue to operate so long as the OCS
facility remains in compliance with the submitted FSP; or
(c) For OCS facilities operating under a Coast Guard-approved
Alternative Security Program as provided in Sec. 106.135, a copy of
the Alternative Security Program the OCS facility is using and a letter
signed by the OCS facility owner or operator, stating which Alternative
Security Program the OCS facility is using and certifying that the OCS
facility is in full compliance with that program.

Sec. 106.120 Noncompliance.

When an OCS facility is not in compliance with the requirements of
this part, the OCS facility owner or operator must notify the cognizant
District Commander and request a waiver to continue operations.

Sec. 106.125 Waivers.

Any OCS facility owner or operator may apply for a waiver of any
requirement of this part that the OCS facility owner or operator
considers unnecessary in light of the nature or operating conditions of
the OCS facility. A request for a waiver must be submitted in writing
with justification to the cognizant District Commander. The cognizant
District Commander may require the OCS facility owner or operator to
provide additional data for use in determining the validity of the
requested waiver. The cognizant District Commander may grant a waiver,
in writing, with or without conditions only if the waiver will not
reduce the overall

[[Page 39346]]

security of the OCS facility, its personnel, or visiting vessels.

Sec. 106.130 Equivalents.

For any measure required by this part, the OCS facility owner or
operator may propose an equivalent, as provided in Sec. 101.130 of
this subchapter.

Sec. 106.135 Alternative Security Program.

An OCS facility owner or operator may use an Alternative Security
Program approved under Sec. 101.120 of this subchapter if:
(a) The Alternative Security Program is appropriate to that OCS
facility;
(b) The OCS facility does not serve vessels on international
voyages; and
(c) The Alternative Security Program is implemented in its
entirety.

Sec. 106.140 Maritime Security (MARSEC) Directive.

All OCS facility owners or operators subject to this part must
comply with any instructions contained in a MARSEC Directive issued
under Sec. 101.405 of this subchapter.

Sec. 106.145 Right to appeal.

Any person directly affected by a decision or action taken under
this part, by or on behalf of the Coast Guard, may appeal as described
in Sec. 101.420 of this subchapter.

Subpart B--Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Facility Security
Requirements

Sec. 106.200 Owner or operator.

(a) Each OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that the OCS
facility operates in compliance with the requirements of this part.
(b) For each OCS facility, the OCS facility owner or operator must:
(1) Define the security organizational structure for each OCS
Facility and provide each person exercising security duties or
responsibilities within that structure the support needed to fulfill
those obligations;
(2) Designate in writing, by name or title, a Company Security
Officer (CSO) and a Facility Security Officer (FSO) for each OCS
Facility and identify how those officers can be contacted at any time;
(3) Ensure that a Facility Security Assessment (FSA) is conducted;
(4) Ensure the development and submission for approval of a
Facility Security Plan (FSP);
(5) Ensure that the OCS facility operates in compliance with the
approved FSP;
(6) Ensure that adequate coordination of security issues takes
place between OCS facilities and vessels, including the execution of a
Declaration of Security (DoS) as required by this part;
(7) Ensure, within 12 hours of notification of an increase in
MARSEC Level, implementation of the additional security measures
required by the FSP for the new MARSEC Level; and
(8) Ensure all breaches of security and security incidents are
reported in accordance with part 101 of this subchapter.

Sec. 106.205 Company Security Officer (CSO).

(a) General. (1) An OCS facility owner or operator may designate a
single CSO for all its OCS facilities to which this part applies, or
may designate more than one CSO, in which case the owner or operator
must clearly identify the OCS facilities for which each CSO is
responsible.
(2) A CSO may perform other duties within the owner's or operator's
organization, provided he or she is able to perform the duties and
responsibilities required of the CSO.
(3) The CSO may delegate duties required by this part, but remains
responsible for the performance of those duties.
(b) Qualifications. The CSO must have general knowledge, through
training or equivalent job experience, in the following:
(1) Security administration and organization of the OCS facility;
(2) OCS facility and vessel operations and conditions;
(3) OCS facility and vessel security measures including the meaning
and consequential requirements of the different MARSEC Levels;
(4) Emergency preparedness and response and contingency planning;
(5) Security equipment and systems and their operational
limitations;
(6) Methods of conducting audits, inspection, control, and
monitoring; and
(7) Techniques for security training and education, including
security measures and procedures.
(c) In addition to the knowledge and training in paragraph (b) of
this section, the CSO must have general knowledge, through training or
equivalent job experience, in the following, as appropriate:
(1) Relevant international conventions, codes, and recommendations;
(2) Relevant government legislation and regulations;
(3) Responsibilities and functions of other security organizations;
(4) Methodology of Facility Assessment;
(5) Methods of OCS facility security surveys and inspections.
(6) Handling sensitive security information (SSI) and security
related communications;
(7) Knowledge of current security threats and patterns;
(8) Recognition and detection of dangerous substances and devices;
(9) Recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of
persons who are likely to threaten security;
(10) Techniques used to circumvent security measures;
(11) Methods of physical screening and non-intrusive inspections;
and
(12) Conducting and assessing security drills and exercises.
(d) Responsibilities. In addition to any other duties required by
this part, for each OCS facility for which the CSO is responsible, the
CSO must:
(1) Keep the OCS facility apprised of potential threats or other
information relevant to its security;
(2) Ensure that a Facility Security Assessment (FSA) is carried out
in compliance with this part;
(3) Ensure that a Facility Security Plan (FSP) is developed,
approved, maintained, and implemented in compliance with this part;
(4) Ensure that the FSP is modified when necessary to comply with
this part;
(5) Ensure that OCS facility security activities are audited in
compliance with this part;
(6) Ensure the timely correction of problems identified by audits
or inspections;
(7) Enhance security awareness and vigilance within the owner's or
operator's organization;
(8) Ensure relevant personnel receive adequate security training in
compliance with this part;
(9) Ensure communication and cooperation between the OCS facility
and vessels that interface with it, in compliance with this part;
(10) Ensure consistency between security requirements and safety
requirements in compliance with this part;
(11) Ensure that if a common FSP is prepared for more than one
similar OCS facility, the FSP reflects any OCS facility specific
characteristics; and
(12) Ensure compliance with an Alternative Security Program or
equivalents approved under this subchapter, if appropriate.

Sec. 106.210 OCS Facility Security Officer (FSO).

(a) General. (1) The FSO may perform other duties within the
owner's or operator's organization, provided he or she is able to
perform the duties and responsibilities required of the FSO of each
such OCS facility.
(2) The same person may serve as the FSO for more than one OCS
facility,

[[Page 39347]]

provided the facilities are within a reasonable proximity to each
other. If a person serves as the FSO for more than one OCS facility,
the name of each OCS facility for which he or she is the FSO must be
listed in the Facility Security Plan (FSP) of each OCS facility for
which he or she is the FSO.
(3) The FSO may assign security duties to other OCS facility
personnel; however, the FSO remains responsible for these duties.
(b) Qualifications. The FSO must have general knowledge, through
training or equivalent job experience, in the following:
(1) Those items listed in Sec. 106.205(b), and as appropriate
Sec. 106.205(c), of this part;
(2) OCS facility layout;
(3) The FSP and related procedures; and
(4) Operation, testing and maintenance of security equipment and
systems.
(c) Responsibilities. In addition to any other responsibilities
specified elsewhere in this part, the FSO must, for each OCS facility
for which he or she has been designated:
(1) Regularly inspect the OCS facility to ensure that security
measures are maintained in compliance with this part;
(2) Ensure the maintenance of and supervision of the implementation
of the FSP, and any amendments to the FSP, in compliance with this
part;
(3) Ensure the coordination and handling of stores and industrial
supplies in compliance with this part;
(4) Where applicable, propose modifications to the FSP to the
Company Security Officer (CSO);
(5) Ensure that any problems identified during audits or
inspections are reported to the CSO, and promptly implement any
corrective actions;
(6) Ensure security awareness and vigilance on board the OCS
facility;
(7) Ensure adequate security training for OCS facility personnel in
compliance with this part;
(8) Ensure the reporting and recording of all security incidents in
compliance with this part;
(9) Ensure the coordinated implementation of the FSP with the CSO;
(10) Ensure that security equipment is properly operated, tested,
calibrated and maintained in compliance with this part;
(11) Ensure consistency between security requirements and the
proper treatment of OCS facility personnel affected by those
requirements;
(12) Ensure that occurrences that threaten the security of the OCS
facility are recorded and reported to the CSO;
(13) Ensure that when changes in the MARSEC Level are attained they
are recorded and reported to the CSO, OCS facility owner or operator,
and the cognizant District Commander; and
(14) Have prompt access to a copy of the FSA, along with an
approved copy of the FSP.

Sec. 106.215 Company or OCS facility personnel with security duties.

Company or OCS facility personnel responsible for security duties
must have knowledge, through training or equivalent job experience, in
the following, as appropriate:
(a) Knowledge of current security threats and patterns;
(b) Recognition and detection of dangerous substances and devices;
(c) Recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of
persons who are likely to threaten security;
(d) Recognition of techniques used to circumvent security measures;
(e) Security related communications;
(f) Knowledge of emergency procedures and contingency plans;
(g) Operation of security equipment and systems;
(h) Testing, calibration, and maintenance of security equipment and
systems;
(i) Inspection, control, and monitoring techniques;
(j) Methods of physical screenings of persons, personal effects,
stores and industrial supplies;
(k) Relevant provisions of the Facility Security Plan (FSP); and
(l) The meaning and the consequential requirements of the different
MARSEC Levels.

Sec. 106.220 Security training for all other OCS facility personnel.

All other OCS facility personnel, including contractors, whether
part-time, full-time, temporary, or permanent, must have knowledge,
through training or equivalent job experience, of the following:
(a) Relevant provisions of the Facility Security Plan (FSP);
(b) The meaning and the consequential requirements of the different
MARSEC Levels including emergency procedures and contingency plans;
(c) Recognition and detection of dangerous substances and devices;
(d) Recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of
persons who are likely to threaten security; and
(e) Recognition of techniques used to circumvent security measures.

Sec. 106.225 Drill and exercise requirements.

(a) General. Drills and exercises must test the proficiency of OCS
facility personnel in assigned security duties at all MARSEC Levels and
the effective implementation of the Facility Security Plan (FSP). They
must enable the Facility Security Officer (FSO) to identify any related
security deficiencies that need to be addressed.
(b) Drills. (1) From the date of the FSP approval, the FSO must
ensure that at least one security drill is conducted every 3 months.
Security drills may be held in conjunction with non-security drills,
where appropriate.
(2) Drills must test individual elements of the FSP, including
response to security threats and incidents. Drills should take into
account the types of operations of the OCS facility, OCS facility
personnel changes, the types of vessels calling at the OCS facility,
and other relevant circumstances. Examples of drills include
unauthorized entry to a restricted area, response to alarms, and
notification of appropriate authorities.
(3) If a vessel is conducting operations with the OCS facility on
the date the OCS facility has planned to conduct any drills, the OCS
facility may include, but cannot require, the vessel or vessel
personnel to participate in the OCS facility's scheduled drill.
(c) Exercises. (1) From the date of the FSP approval, exercises
must be conducted at least once each calendar year, with no more than
18 months between exercises.
(2) Exercises may be:
(i) Full scale or live;
(ii) Tabletop simulation;
(iii) Combined with other appropriate exercises held; or
(iv) A combination of the elements in paragraphs (c)(2)(i) through
(iii) of this section.
(3) Exercises may be facility-specific or part of a cooperative
exercise program.
(4) Each exercise must test communication and notification
procedures, and elements of coordination, resource availability, and
response.
(5) Exercises are a full test of the Facility Security Plan and
must include substantial and active participation of relevant company
and OCS facility personnel, and may include governmental authorities
and vessels depending on the scope and the nature of the exercise.

Sec. 106.230 OCS facility recordkeeping requirements.

(a) Unless otherwise specified in this section, the Facility
Security Officer (FSO) must keep records of the activities as set out
in paragraph (b) of this section for at least 2 years and make them
available to the Coast Guard upon request.

[[Page 39348]]

(b) Records required by this section may be kept in electronic
format. If kept in an electronic format, they must be protected against
unauthorized access, deletion, destruction, amendment, and disclosure.
The following records must be kept:
(1) Training. For each security training session, the date of each
session, duration of session, a description of the training, and a list
of attendees;
(2) Drills and exercises. For each drill or exercise, the date
held, a description of the drill or exercise, a list of participants,
and any best practices or lessons learned which may improve the FSP;
(3) Incidents and breaches of security. Date and time of
occurrence, location within the OCS facility, a description of the
incident or breach, the identity of the individual to whom it was
reported, and a description of the response;
(4) Changes in MARSEC Levels. Date and time of the notification
received, and the time of compliance with additional requirements;
(5) Maintenance, calibration, and testing of security equipment.
For each occurrence of maintenance, calibration, and testing, record
the date and time, and the specific security equipment involved;
(6) Security threats. Date and time of occurrence, how the threat
was communicated, who received or identified the threat, a description
of the threat, to whom it was reported, and a description of the
response;
(7) Declaration of Security (DoS). A copy of each DoS for at least
90 days after the end of its effective period; and
(8) Annual audit of the Facility Security Plan (FSP). For each
annual audit, a letter certified by the FSO stating the date the audit
was conducted.

Sec. 106.235 Maritime Security (MARSEC) Level coordination and
implementation.

(a) The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure the OCS facility
operates in compliance with the security requirements in this part for
the MARSEC Level in effect for the OCS facility.
(b) When notified of an increase in the MARSEC Level, the OCS
facility owner and operator must ensure:
(1) Vessels conducting operations with the OCS facility and vessels
scheduled to arrive at the OCS facility within 96 hours of the MARSEC
Level change are notified of the new MARSEC Level and the Declaration
of Security (DoS), if applicable, is revised as necessary;
(2) The OCS facility complies with the required additional security
measures within 12 hours; and
(3) The OCS facility reports compliance or noncompliance to the
cognizant District Commander.
(c) For MARSEC Levels 2 and 3, the Facility Security Officer (FSO)
must inform all OCS facility personnel about identified threats,
emphasize reporting procedures, and stress the need for increased
vigilance.
(d) An OCS facility owner or operator whose facility is not in
compliance with the requirements of this section must so inform the
cognizant District Commander and obtain approval prior to interfacing
with another vessel or prior to continuing operations.

Sec. 106.240 Communications.

(a) The Facility Security Officer (FSO) must have a means to
effectively notify OCS facility personnel of changes in security
conditions at the OCS facility.
(b) Communication systems and procedures must allow effective and
continuous communications between the OCS facility security personnel,
vessels interfacing with the OCS facility, with the cognizant District
Commander, and national and local authorities with security
responsibilities.
(c) Facility communications systems must have a backup means for
both internal and external communications.

Sec. 106.245 Procedures for interfacing with vessels.

The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that there are
measures for interfacing with vessels at all MARSEC Levels.

Sec. 106.250 Declaration of Security (DoS).

(a) Each OCS facility owner or operator must ensure procedures are
established for requesting a DoS and for handling DoS requests from
vessels.
(b) At MARSEC Level 1, owners or operators of OCS facilities
interfacing with a manned vessel carrying Certain Dangerous Cargoes, in
bulk, must:
(1) Prior to the arrival of a vessel to the OCS facility, ensure
the Facility Security Officer (FSO) and Master, Vessel Security Officer
(VSO), or their designated representatives coordinate security needs
and procedures, and agree upon the contents of a DoS for the period of
time the vessel is at the OCS facility; and
(2) Upon the arrival of the vessel at the OCS facility, the FSO and
Master, VSO, or their designated representatives, must sign the written
DoS.
(c) Neither the OCS facility nor the vessel may embark or disembark
personnel, or transfer stores or industrial supplies until the DoS has
been signed.
(d) At MARSEC Levels 2 and 3, the FSOs of OCS facilities
interfacing with manned vessels subject to part 104 must sign and
implement DOSs.
(e) At MARSEC Levels 1 and 2, FSOs of OCS facilities that
frequently interface with the same vessel may implement a continuing
DoS for multiple visits, provided that:
(1) The DoS is valid for a specific MARSEC Level;
(2) The effective period at MARSEC Level 1 does not exceed 90 days;
and
(3) The effective period at MARSEC Level 2 does not exceed 30 days.
(f) When the MARSEC Level increases beyond that contained in the
DoS, the continuing DoS is void and a new DoS must be executed in
accordance with this section.

Sec. 106.255 Security systems and equipment maintenance.

(a) Security systems and equipment must be in good working order
and inspected, tested, calibrated, and maintained according to
manufacturers' recommendations.
(b) Security systems must be regularly tested in accordance with
the manufacturers' recommendations; noted deficiencies corrected
promptly; and the results recorded as required in Sec. 106.230(b)(5)
of this part.
(c) The Facility Security Plan (FSP) must include procedures for
identifying and responding to security system and equipment failures or
malfunctions.

Sec. 106.260 Security measures for access control.

(a) General. The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure the
implementation of security measures to:
(1) Deter the unauthorized introduction or dangerous substances and
devices, including any device intended to damage or destroy persons,
vessels, or the OCS facility;
(2) Secure dangerous substances and devices that are authorized by
the OCS facility owner or operator to be on board; and
(3) Control access to the OCS facility.
(b) The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that:
(1) All locations providing means of access to the OCS facility
where access restrictions or prohibitions are applied for each security
level to prevent unauthorized access;
(2) The identification of the types of restriction or prohibition
to be applied and the means of enforcing them; and
(3) The means of identification required to allow individuals to
access

[[Page 39349]]

the OCS facility and remain on the OCS facility without challenge are
established.
(c) The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that an
identification system is established for checking the identification of
OCS facility personnel or other persons seeking access to the OCS
facility that:
(1) Provides for identification of authorized and unauthorized
persons at any MARSEC Level;
(2) Is coordinated, when practicable, with identification systems
used by vessels conducting operations with the OCS facility;
(3) Is updated regularly; and
(4) Allows temporary or continuing access for OCS facility
personnel and visitors through the use of a badge or other system to
verify their identity.
(d) The OCS facility owner or operator must establish in the
approved Facility Security Plan (FSP) the frequency of application of
any access controls, particularly if they are to be applied on a random
or occasional basis.
(e) MARSEC Level 1. The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure
the following security measures are implemented at the facility:
(1) Screen persons and personal effects going aboard the OCS
facility for dangerous substances and devices at the rate specified in
the approved FSP;
(2) Conspicuously post signs that describe security measures
currently in effect and clearly stating that:
(i) Boarding an OCS facility is deemed valid consent to screening
or inspection; and
(ii) Failure to consent or submit to screening or inspection will
result in denial or revocation of authorization to be on board;
(3) Check the identification of any person seeking to board the OCS
facility, including OCS facility employees, passengers and crews of
vessels interfacing with the OCS facility, vendors, and visitors;
(4) Deny or revoke a person's authorization to be on board if the
person is unable or unwilling, upon the request of OCS facility
personnel, to establish his or her identity or to account for his or
her presence on board. Any such incident must be reported in compliance
with this part;
(5) Deter unauthorized access to the OCS facility;
(6) Identify access points that must be secured or attended to
deter unauthorized access;
(7) Lock or otherwise prevent access to unattended spaces that
adjoin areas to which passengers and visitors have access;
(8) Ensure OCS facility personnel are not required to engage in or
be subjected to screening, of the person or of personal effects, by
other OCS facility personnel, unless security clearly requires it;
(9) Provide a designated secure area on board, or in liaison with a
vessel interfacing with the OCS facility, for conducting inspections
and screening of people and their personal effects; and
(10) Respond to the presence of unauthorized persons on board.
(f) MARSEC Level 2. In addition to the security measures required
for MARSEC Level 1 in this section, at MARSEC Level 2, the OCS facility
owner or operator must also ensure the implementation of additional
security measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 2 in the approved FSP.
These additional security measures may include:
(1) Increasing the frequency and detail of screening of people and
personal effects embarking onto the OCS facility as specified for
MARSEC Level 2 in the approved FSP;
(2) Assigning additional personnel to patrol deck areas during
periods of reduced OCS facility operations to deter unauthorized
access;
(3) Limiting the number of access points to the OCS facility by
closing and securing some access points; or
(4) Deterring waterside access to the OCS facility, which may
include, providing boat patrols.
(g) MARSEC Level 3. In addition to the security measures required
for MARSEC Level 1 and MARSEC Level 2, the OCS facility owner or
operator must ensure the implementation of additional security
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 3 in the approved FSP. The
additional security measures may include:
(1) Screening all persons and personal effects for dangerous
substances and devices;
(2) Being prepared to cooperate with responders;
(3) Limiting access to the OCS facility to a single, controlled
access point;
(4) Granting access to only those responding to the security
incident or threat thereof;
(5) Suspending embarkation and/or disembarkation of personnel;
(6) Suspending the onloading of stores or industrial supplies;
(7) Evacuating the OCS facility; or
(8) Preparing for a full or partial search of the OCS facility.

Sec. 106.265 Security measures for restricted areas.

(a) General. The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure the
designation of restricted areas in order to:
(1) Prevent or deter unauthorized access;
(2) Protect persons authorized to be in the OCS facility;
(3) Protect the OCS facility;
(4) Protect vessels using and serving the OCS facility;
(5) Protect sensitive security areas within the OCS facility;
(6) Protect security and surveillance equipment and systems; and
(7) Protect stores and industrial supplies from tampering.
(b) Designation of restricted areas. The OCS facility owner or
operator must ensure restricted areas are designated within the OCS
facility. They must also ensure that all restricted areas are clearly
marked and indicate that access to the area is restricted and that
unauthorized presence within the area constitutes a breach of security.
The OCS facility owner or operator may designate the entire OCS
facility as a restricted area. Restricted areas must include, as
appropriate:
(1) Areas containing sensitive security information;
(2) Areas containing security and surveillance equipment and
systems and their controls, and lighting system controls; and
(3) Areas containing critical OCS facility infrastructure
equipment, including:
(i) Water supplies;
(ii) Telecommunications;
(iii) Power distribution system;
(iv) Access points for ventilation and air-conditioning systems;
(v) Manufacturing areas and control rooms;
(vi) Areas designated for loading, unloading or storage of stores
and industrial supplies; and
(vii) Areas containing hazardous materials.
(c) The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that the
Facility Security Plan (FSP) should include measures for restricted
areas to:
(1) Identify which OCS facility personnel are authorized to have
access;
(2) Determine which persons other than OCS facility personnel are
authorized to have access;
(3) Determine the conditions under which that access may take
place;
(4) Define the extent of any restricted area; and
(5) Define the times when access restrictions apply.
(d) MARSEC Level 1. At MARSEC Level 1, the OCS facility owner or
operator must ensure the implementation of security measures to prevent
unauthorized access or activities within the area. These security
measures may include:
(1) Restricting access to only authorized personnel;

[[Page 39350]]

(2) Securing all access points not actively used and providing
physical barriers to impede movement through the remaining access
points;
(3) Verifying the identification and authorization of all persons
seeking entry;
(4) Using security personnel, automatic intrusion detection
devices, surveillance equipment, or surveillance systems to detect
unauthorized entry to or movement within restricted areas; or
(5) Designating temporary restricted areas to accommodate OCS
facility operations. If temporary restricted areas are designated, the
FSP must include security requirements to conduct a security sweep of
the designated temporary restricted areas both before and after the
area has been established.
(e) MARSEC Level 2. In addition to the security measures required
for MARSEC Level 1 in this section, at MARSEC Level 2, the OCS facility
owner or operator must also ensure the implementation of additional
security measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 2 in their approved
FSP. These additional security measures may include:
(1) Enhancing the effectiveness of the barriers surrounding
restricted areas, for example, by the use of patrols or automatic
intrusion detection devices;
(2) Reducing the number of access points to restricted areas, and
enhancing the controls applied at the remaining accesses;
(3) Further restricting access to the restricted areas and
movements and storage within them;
(4) Using continuously monitored and recorded surveillance
equipment;
(5) Increasing the number and frequency of patrols, including the
use of waterborne patrols; or
(6) Restricting access to areas adjacent to the restricted areas.
(f) MARSEC Level 3. In addition to the security measures required
for MARSEC Level 1 and MARSEC Level 2, at MARSEC Level 3, the OCS
facility owner or operator must ensure the implementation of additional
security measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 3 in their approved
FSP. These additional security measures may include:
(1) Restricting access to additional areas;
(2) Prohibiting access to restricted areas; or
(3) Searching restricted areas as part of a security sweep of all
or part of the OCS facility.

Sec. 106.270 Security measures for delivery of stores and industrial
supplies.

(a) General. The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that
security measures relating to the delivery of stores or industrial
supplies to the OCS facility are implemented to:
(1) Check stores or industrial supplies for package integrity;
(2) Prevent stores or industrial supplies from being accepted
without inspection;
(3) Deter tampering; and
(4) Prevent stores and industrial supplies from being accepted
unless ordered. For any vessels that routinely use an OCS facility, an
OCS facility owner or operator may establish and implement standing
arrangements between the OCS facility, its suppliers, and any vessel
delivering stores or industrial supplies regarding notification and the
timing of deliveries and their documentation.
(b) MARSEC Level 1. At MARSEC Level 1, the OCS facility owner or
operator must ensure the implementation of measures to:
(1) Inspect stores or industrial supplies before being accepted;
and
(2) Check that stores or industrial supplies match the order prior
to being brought on board.
(c) MARSEC Level 2. In addition to the security measures required
for MARSEC Level 1 in this section, at MARSEC Level 2, the OCS facility
owner or operator must also ensure the implementation of additional
security measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 2 in the approved
Facility Security Plan (FSP). These additional security measures may
include:
(1) Intensifying inspection of the stores or industrial supplies
during delivery; or
(2) Checking stores or industrial supplies prior to receiving them
on board.
(d) MARSEC Level 3. In addition to the security measures for MARSEC
Level 1 and MARSEC Level 2, at MARSEC Level 3, the OCS facility owner
or operator must ensure the implementation of additional security
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 3 in the approved FSP. These
additional security measures may include:
(1) Checking all OCS facility stores or industrial supplies more
extensively;
(2) Restricting or suspending delivery of stores or industrial
supplies; or
(3) Refusing to accept stores or industrial supplies on board.

Sec. 106.275 Security measures for monitoring.

(a) General. (1) The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure the
implementation of security measures in this section and have the
capability to continuously monitor, through a combination of lighting,
watchkeepers, security guards, deck watches, waterborne patrols and
automatic intrusion-detection devices, or surveillance equipment as
specified in their approved Facility Security Plan (FSP), the:
(i) OCS facility;
(ii) Restricted areas on board the OCS facility; and
(iii) The area surrounding the OCS facility.
(2) The following must be considered when establishing the
appropriate level and location of lighting:
(i) OCS facility personnel should be able to detect activities on
and around OCS facility;
(ii) Coverage should facilitate personnel identification at access
points; and
(iii) Lighting effects, such as glare, and their impact on safety,
navigation, and other security activities.
(b) MARSEC Level 1. At MARSEC Level 1, the OCS facility owner or
operator must ensure the implementation of security measures, which may
be implemented in coordination with a vessel interfacing with the OCS
facility, to:
(1) Monitor the OCS facility, particularly OCS facility access
points and restricted areas;
(2) Be able to conduct emergency searches of the OCS facility;
(3) Ensure that equipment or system failures or malfunctions are
identified and corrected;
(4) Ensure that any automatic intrusion detection device, sets off
an audible or visual alarm, or both, at a location that is continually
attended or monitored; and
(5) Light deck and OCS facility access points during the period
between sunset and sunrise and periods of limited visibility
sufficiently to allow visual identification of persons seeking access
to the OCS facility.
(c) MARSEC Level 2. In addition to the security measures required
for MARSEC Level 1 in this section, at MARSEC Level 2, the OCS facility
owner or operator must also ensure the implementation of additional
security measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 2 in the approved FSP.
These additional security measures may include:
(1) Increasing the frequency and detail of security patrols;
(2) Using (if not already in use) or increasing the use of security
and surveillance equipment;
(3) Assigning additional personnel as security lookouts; or
(4) Coordinating with boat patrols, when provided.

[[Page 39351]]

(d) MARSEC Level 3. In addition to the security measures for MARSEC
Level 1 and MARSEC Level 2, at MARSEC Level 3, the OCS facility owner
or operator must ensure the implementation of additional security
measures, as specified for MARSEC Level 3 in the approved FSP. These
additional security measures may include:
(1) Cooperating with responders;
(2) Switching on all lights;
(3) Switching on all surveillance equipment capable of recording
activities on, or in the vicinity of, the OCS facility;
(4) Maximizing the length of time such surveillance equipment (if
not already in use) can continue to record; or
(5) Preparing for underwater inspection of the OCS facility.

Sec. 106.280 Security incident procedures.

For each MARSEC Level, the OCS facility owner or operator must
ensure the Facility Security Officer (FSO) and OCS facility security
personnel are able to:
(a) Respond to security threats or breaches of security and
maintain critical OCS facility and OCS facility-to-vessel interface
operations;
(b) Deny access to the OCS facility, except to those responding to
an emergency;
(c) Evacuate the OCS facility in case of security threats or
breaches of security; and
(d) Report security incidents as required in Sec. 101.305 of this
subchapter;
(e) Brief all OSC facility personnel on possible threats and the
need for vigilance, soliciting their assistance in reporting suspicious
persons, objects, or activities; and
(f) Secure non-critical operations in order to focus response on
critical operations.

Subpart C--Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Facility Security
Assessment (FSA)

Sec. 106.300 General.

(a) The Facility Security Assessment (FSA) is a written document
that is based on the collection of background information, the
completion of an on-scene survey and an analysis of that information.
(b) A single FSA may be performed and applied to more than one OCS
facility to the extent they share physical characteristics, location,
and operations.
(c) Third parties may be used in any aspect of the FSA if they have
the appropriate skills and if the Company Security Officer (CSO)
reviews and accepts their work.
(d) Those involved in a FSA must be able to draw upon expert
assistance in the following areas, as appropriate:
(1) Knowledge of current and anticipated security threats and
patterns;
(2) Recognition and detection of dangerous substances and devices;
(3) Recognition of characteristics and behavioral patterns of
persons who are likely to threaten security;
(4) Recognition of techniques used to circumvent security measures;
(5) Methods used to cause a security incident;
(6) Effects of dangerous substances and devices on structures and
essential services;
(7) OCS facility security requirements;
(8) OCS facility and vessel interface business practices;
(9) Contingency planning, emergency preparedness and response;
(10) Physical security requirements;
(11) Radio and telecommunications systems, including computer
systems and networks;
(12) Marine or civil engineering; and
(13) OCS facility and vessel operations.

Sec. 106.305 Facility Security Assessment (FSA) requirements.

(a) Background. The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that
the following background information, if applicable, is provided to the
person or persons who will conduct the assessment:
(1) The general layout of the OCS facility, including:
(i) The location of each access point to the OCS facility;
(ii) The number, reliability, and security duties of OCS facility
personnel;
(iii) Security doors, barriers, and lighting;
(iv) The location of restricted areas;
(v) The emergency and stand-by equipment available to maintain
essential services;
(vi) The essential maintenance equipment and storage areas;
(vii) Location of escape and evacuation routes and assembly
stations; and
(viii) Existing security and safety equipment for protection of
personnel;
(2) Response procedures for fire or other emergency conditions;
(3) Procedures for monitoring OCS facility and vessel personnel;
(4) Procedures for controlling keys and other access prevention
systems;
(5) Response capability for security incidents;
(6) Threat assessments, including the purpose and methodology of
the assessment, for the OCS facility's location;
(7) Previous reports on security needs; and
(8) Any other existing security procedures and systems, equipment,
communications, and OCS facility personnel.
(b) On-scene survey. The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure
that an on-scene survey of each OCS facility is conducted. The on-scene
survey examines and evaluates existing OCS facility protective
measures, procedures, and operations to verify or collect the
information required in paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Analysis and recommendations. In conducting the FSA, the OCS
owner or operator must ensure that the Company Security Officer (CSO)
analyzes the OCS facility background information and the on-scene
survey, and considering the requirements of this part, provides
recommendations to establish and prioritize the security measures that
should be included in the FSP. The analysis must consider:
(1) Each vulnerability found during the on-scene survey, including
but not limited to:
(i) Access to the OCS facility;
(ii) Structural integrity of the OCS facility;
(iii) Existing security measures and procedures, including
identification systems;
(iv) Existing security measures and procedures relating to
essential services;
(v) Measures to protect radio and telecommunication equipment,
including computer systems and networks;
(vi) Existing agreements with private security companies;
(vii) Any conflicting policies between safety and security measures
and procedures;
(viii) Any conflicting OCS facility operations and security duty
assignments;
(ix) Any deficiencies identified during daily operations or
training and drills; and
(x) Any deficiencies identified following security incidents or
alerts, the report of security concerns, the exercise of control
measures, or audits.
(2) Possible security threats, including but not limited to:
(i) Damage to or destruction of the OCS facility or of a vessel
adjacent to the OCS facility;
(ii) Smuggling dangerous substances and devices;
(iii) Use of a vessel interfacing with the OCS facility to carry
those intending to cause a security incident and their equipment;

[[Page 39352]]

(iv) Use of a vessel interfacing with the OCS facility as a weapon
or as a means to cause damage or destruction; and
(v) Nuclear, radiological, explosive, biological, and chemical
attack;
(3) Threat assessments by Government agencies;
(4) Vulnerabilities, including human factors, in the OCS facility's
infrastructure, policies and procedures;
(5) Any particular aspects of the OCS facility, including the
vessels that interface with the OCS facility, which make it likely to
be the target of an attack;
(6) Likely consequences, in terms of loss of life, damage to
property, or economic disruption, of an attack on or at the OCS
facility; and
(7) Locations where access restrictions or prohibitions will be
applied for each MARSEC Level.
(d) FSA Report. (1) The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure
that a written FSA report is prepared and included as a part of the
FSP. The report must contain:
(i) A summary of how the on-scene survey was conducted;
(ii) A description of existing security measures, including
inspection, control and monitoring equipment, personnel identification
documents and communication, alarm, lighting, access control, and
similar systems;
(iii) A description of each vulnerability found during the on-scene
survey;
(iv) A description of security measures that could be used to
address each vulnerability.
(v) A list of the key OCS facility operations that are important to
protect; and
(vi) A list of identified weaknesses, including human factors, in
the infrastructure, policies, and procedures of the OCS facility.
(2) A FSA report must describe the following elements within the
OCS facility:
(i) Physical security;
(ii) Structural integrity;
(iii) Personnel protection systems;
(iv) Procedural policies;
(v) Radio and telecommunication systems, including computer systems
and networks; and
(vi) Essential services.

Sec. 106.310 Submission requirements.

(a) A completed FSA report must be submitted with the Facility
Security Plan (FSP) required in Sec. 106.405 of this part.
(b) An OCS facility owner or operator may generate and submit a
report that contains the FSA for more than one OCS facility subject to
this part, to the extent that they share similarities in physical
characteristics, location and operations.

Subpart D--Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Facility Security Plan
(FSP)

Sec. 106.400 General.

(a) The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure the FSO develops
and implements a Facility Security Plan (FSP) for each OCS facility for
which he or she is designated as FSO. The FSP:
(1) Must identify the FSO by name or position and provide 24-hour
contact information;
(2) Must be written in English;
(3) Must address each vulnerability identified in the Facility
Security Assessment (FSA);
(4) Must describe security measures for each MARSEC Level; and
(5) May cover more than one OCS facility to the extent that they
share similarities in physical characteristics and operations, if
authorized and approved by the cognizant District Commander.
(b) The FSP must be submitted for approval to the cognizant
District Commander in a written or electronic format in a manner
prescribed by the cognizant District Commander.
(c) The FSP is sensitive security information and must be protected
in accordance with 49 CFR part 1520.
(d) If the FSP is kept in an electronic format, procedures must be
in place to prevent its unauthorized deletion, destruction, or
amendment.

Sec. 106.405 Format and content of the Facility Security Plan (FSP).

(a) An OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that the FSP
consists of the individual sections listed in this paragraph (a). If
the FSP does not follow the order as it appears in the list, the OCS
facility owner or operator must ensure that the FSP contains an index
identifying the location of each of the following sections:

(1) Security organization of the OC facility;
(2) Personnel training;
(3) Drills and exercises;
(4) Records and documentation;
(5) Response to change in MARSEC Level;
(6) Procedures for interfacing with vessels;
(7) Declaration of Security (DoS);
(8) Communications;
(9) Security systems and equipment maintenance;
(10) Security measures for access control;
(11) Security measures for restricted areas;
(12) Security measures for delivery of stores and industrial
supplies;
(13) Security measures for monitoring;
(14) Security incident procedures;
(15) Audits and FSP amendments; and
(16) Facility Security Assessment (FSA) report.
(b) The OCS facility owner or operator must ensure that the FSP
describes in detail how each of the requirements of subpart B of this
part will be met.

Sec. 106.410 Submission and approval.

(a) On or before December 29, 2003, each OCS facility owner or
operator must either:
(1) Submit one copy of the Facility Security Plan (FSP) for review
and approval to the cognizant District Commander and a letter
certifying that the FSP meets the applicable requirements of this part;
or
(2) If implementing a Coast Guard approved Alternative Security
Program, meet the requirements in Sec. 101.120(b) of this subchapter.
(b) OCS facilities built on or after July 1, 2004, must comply with
the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section 60 days prior to
beginning operations.
(c) The cognizant District Commander will examine each submission
for compliance with this part, and return to the submitter either:
(1) A letter of approval, stating acceptance of the FSP and
specifying any conditions of approval;
(2) An acknowledgement letter stating that the Coast Guard is
currently reviewing the FSP submitted for approval, and that the OCS
facility may continue to operate so long as the OCS facility remains in
compliance with the submitted FSP; or
(3) A disapproval letter specifying the reasons for disapproval and
the submitted FSP.
(d) An FSP may be submitted and approved to cover more than one OCS
facility where they share similarities in physical characteristics,
location, and operations.
(e) Each OCS facility owner or operator that submits one FSP to
cover two or more OCS facilities of similar design, location, and
operation must address OCS facility-specific information that includes
the physical and operational characteristics of each OCS facility.
(f) An FSP that is approved by the cognizant District Commander is
valid for 5 years from the date of its approval. The cognizant District
Commander will issue an approval letter, as indicated in Sec. 106.115
of this part.

[[Page 39353]]

Sec. 106.415 Amendment and audit.

(a) Amendments. (1) Amendments to a Facility Security Plan (FSP)
that are approved by the cognizant District Commander may be initiated
by:
(i) The OCS facility owner or operator; or
(ii) The cognizant District Commander, upon a determination that an
amendment is needed to maintain the OCS facility's security. The
cognizant District Commander will give the OCS facility owner or
operator written notice and request that the OCS facility owner or
operator propose amendments addressing any matters specified in the
notice. The OCS facility owner or operator will have at least 60 days
to submit its proposed amendments. Until amendments are approved, the
OCS facility owner or operator shall ensure temporary security measures
are implemented to the satisfaction of the cognizant District
Commander.
(2) Proposed amendments must be sent to the cognizant District
Commander. If initiated by the OCS facility owner or operator, the
proposed amendment must be submitted at least 30 days before the
amendment is to take effect unless the cognizant District Commander
allows a shorter period. The cognizant District Commander will approve
or disapprove the proposed amendment in accordance with Sec. 106.410
of this subpart.
(3) If the owner or operator has changed, the Facility Security
Officer (FSO) must amend the Facility Security Plan (FSP) to include
the name and contact information of the new OCS facility owner(s) or
operator(s) and submit the affected portion of the FSP for review and
approval in accordance with Sec. 106.410 of this subpart.
(b) Audits. (1) The FSO must ensure an audit of the FSP is
performed annually, beginning no later than one year from the initial
date of approval and attach a letter to the FSP certifying that the FSP
meets the applicable requirements of this part.
(2) If there is a change in ownership or operations of the OCS
facility, or if there have been modifications to the OCS facility, the
FSP must be audited including but not limited to physical structure,
emergency response procedures, security measures, or operations.
(3) Auditing the FSP as a result of modifications to the OCS
facility may be limited to those sections of the FSP affected by the
OCS facility modifications.
(4) Unless impracticable due to the size and nature of the company
or the OCS facility, personnel conducting internal audits of the
security measures specified in the FSP or evaluating its implementation
must:
(i) Have knowledge of methods of conducting audits and inspections,
and control and monitoring techniques;
(ii) Not have regularly assigned security duties; and
(iii) Be independent of any security measures being audited.
(5) If the results of an audit require an amendment of either the
Facility Security Assessment (FSA) or FSP, the FSO must submit, in
accordance with Sec. 106.410 of this subpart, the amendments to the
cognizant District Commander for review and approval no later than 30
days after completion of the audit and a letter certifying that the
amended FSP meets the applicable requirements of this part.

Dated: June 23, 2003.
Thomas H. Collins,
Admiral, Coast Guard Commandant.
[FR Doc. 03-16190 Filed 6-27-03; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P

Notices For
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994

Outer Continental Shelf Facility Security

Local Navigation